{"id":24069,"date":"2026-09-28T12:23:34","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:23:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24069"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:23:34","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:23:34","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part12 Q221-240"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/300-725-exam-dumps\"><b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 221.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance capability is most appropriate for preventing users from reaching domains that have recently been associated with malware campaigns?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Web reputation filtering<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP root guard<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP relay<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Web reputation filtering evaluates the trustworthiness of destinations using threat intelligence and observed behavior. A domain that was previously benign can become compromised or begin participating in malware campaigns, and reputation data can reflect that change more quickly than static allowlists. This makes reputation a valuable control alongside URL categorization. HSRP, STP, and DHCP relay are infrastructure technologies and do not assess the security reputation of web destinations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 222.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance policy would be most useful for allowing access to social media while blocking file uploads to those services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Routing policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application visibility and control<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> NTP policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application visibility and control can distinguish between different functions within supported web applications. Instead of blocking an entire social media platform, administrators may allow browsing while restricting uploads, posting, or other actions. This provides more granular policy than simple URL filtering. Routing, DHCP, and NTP configuration do not inspect application behavior. This approach is useful when organizations want to support legitimate business use while limiting data-loss or malware risks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 223.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance feature is best suited to identifying whether a specific request matched a custom URL category?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switch interface counters<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Power status page<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy trace or transaction logs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ARP table<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy trace and transaction logs provide direct visibility into how a request was evaluated. They can show the user, destination, category, reputation, matched policy, and resulting action. This makes them the best tools for confirming whether a custom URL category matched as expected. Interface counters and hardware status may help diagnose network or appliance health but do not explain application-layer policy decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 224.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which condition most strongly indicates that a custom URL category definition is too broad?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only the intended domain matches<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The proxy responds quickly<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authentication succeeds<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Unrelated domains are matching the same category<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If unrelated domains are being classified into the same custom category, the match expression is probably too broad. Common causes include incorrect wildcard usage, overly general domain strings, or pattern logic that matches more than intended. The category should be narrowed and retested. Because custom categories can influence access and decryption policies simultaneously, inaccurate matching can create widespread unexpected behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 225.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security policy should be reviewed first when users can access a site but cannot download files from it?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File-type or malware-related policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Spanning Tree policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP configuration<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface duplex<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If browsing works but downloads fail, the issue is likely related to a file control, malware verdict, content policy, or application-specific restriction rather than general site access. Administrators should review the transaction log to determine whether a file-type rule, reputation verdict, or malware action blocked the download. Network-layer technologies such as HSRP and STP do not normally distinguish web browsing from file transfer behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 226.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which action is most appropriate when a file is unknown but originates from a high-risk destination?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Automatically trust the file<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Apply additional analysis such as sandboxing according to policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable malware inspection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore destination reputation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An unknown file from a high-risk destination deserves additional scrutiny. Sandboxing or advanced malware analysis can examine behavior before the file is considered trustworthy. Destination reputation and file reputation should be used together rather than independently. Automatically allowing unknown content can increase risk, especially when the source already has suspicious characteristics. Security policy should define how unknown verdicts are handled for different risk levels.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 227.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which benefit does retrospective malware analysis provide after a file verdict changes?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It helps identify previously exposed users or systems<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically reimages endpoints<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It removes all network routes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It disables DNS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retrospective analysis helps defenders determine where a file was previously observed after its security verdict changes. This is valuable when a file was initially classified as unknown or clean and later becomes known as malicious. Security teams can identify affected users or endpoints and prioritize investigation. It does not automatically rebuild devices or alter network routing. Its primary value is historical visibility and improved incident response.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 228.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which feature is most appropriate for preventing users from sending regulated data through web forms?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Static routing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN pruning<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP preemption<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data loss prevention<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP can inspect outbound web content and identify sensitive information such as regulated records, personal information, payment data, or intellectual property. It can then block or alert on unauthorized transmission through web forms, uploads, or other supported channels. Routing and redundancy technologies cannot inspect application payloads for sensitive content. DLP policies should be tuned carefully to reduce false positives while preserving protection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 229.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which identity information is most useful when an administrator wants to apply different web policies to employees and guests?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Directory group or user identity<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switch serial number<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface MTU<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Router hostname only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Directory group or user identity provides the context needed to distinguish employees, guests, contractors, and other user classes. The Secure Web Appliance can then apply different access or decryption rules based on organizational role. Network hardware characteristics such as serial numbers or MTU values do not identify the person generating the request. Identity-aware policy is especially important in shared or dynamically addressed environments.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 230.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which condition may cause a user to receive the wrong access policy even though authentication succeeds?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> High interface bandwidth<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incorrect directory group mapping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Correct NTP time<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Healthy power supplies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authentication success proves the user&#8217;s identity was accepted, but the wrong group mapping can still cause an incorrect access policy to be selected. Administrators should verify group membership returned by the directory service and confirm which policy references those groups. Transaction logs and policy trace tools can help identify the mismatch. Interface bandwidth and hardware status do not normally determine identity-based policy selection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 231.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which design is most appropriate when a web security appliance depends on an external directory service for authentication?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Provide redundant directory services<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one directory server with no backup<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove all fallback policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Redundant directory services improve availability for identity-based web security. If the appliance cannot reach its identity source, authentication and group-based policy enforcement may be disrupted. Redundancy, monitoring, and clearly defined fallback behavior reduce the impact of a single server failure. Depending on one directory server creates an unnecessary single point of failure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 232.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which behavior is associated with a fail-open authentication design?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> All access is always denied<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Users may receive broader access when identity services are unavailable<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS is disabled<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> TLS inspection stops permanently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fail-open behavior prioritizes availability by allowing access when authentication or identity services cannot be reached. The security trade-off is that users may receive less restrictive or anonymous policy during the outage. Organizations should decide explicitly whether this is acceptable. A fail-closed design would instead deny or restrict access when identity cannot be verified. The chosen behavior should be documented and tested.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 233.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control allows the Secure Web Appliance to inspect malware hidden inside HTTPS traffic?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> TLS decryption<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route summarization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> LACP<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP snooping<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">TLS decryption makes encrypted application payloads visible to the web security appliance so malware scanning, file analysis, and content policies can be applied. Without decryption, the gateway may still see metadata such as destination information, but it cannot inspect the full encrypted payload. TLS inspection should be used according to privacy, regulatory, performance, and compatibility requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 234.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which condition most strongly suggests that HTTPS inspection is failing because clients do not trust the appliance&#8217;s signing CA?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only one URL category is blocked<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Widespread browser certificate warnings appear<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS lookups become faster<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface counters increase<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Widespread certificate warnings after TLS inspection is enabled strongly suggest that the inspection CA is not trusted by client systems. The CA certificate should be distributed securely to managed endpoints and installed in the appropriate trust store. Administrators should not solve this problem by globally bypassing HTTPS inspection. The private key associated with the inspection CA must also be protected carefully.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 235.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which TLS-related behavior is most likely if only one mobile application fails while normal browser traffic works through HTTPS inspection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Certificate pinning<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP loop<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP exhaustion<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP failure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When normal browser traffic works but one application fails only during TLS interception, certificate pinning or another application-specific certificate validation method is a likely cause. Pinned applications may reject the dynamically generated certificates presented by the inspection gateway. The issue should be confirmed through logs and testing before creating a narrow decryption exception.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 236.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which action is most appropriate after confirming that a critical application cannot operate through TLS inspection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all web security<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Create a narrowly scoped bypass for that application<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication globally<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow all HTTPS destinations without policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A narrowly scoped decryption bypass preserves security inspection for the rest of the environment while restoring access to the application that cannot tolerate interception. The exception should be limited to specific destinations or other precise match criteria and should be reviewed periodically. Broadly disabling TLS inspection would unnecessarily reduce visibility and increase risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 237.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco service is most appropriate for enforcing domain-based threat policy for roaming users?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Umbrella<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco APIC<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco UCS Manager<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Unified Communications Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco Umbrella provides cloud-delivered DNS-layer security that can protect roaming users when properly deployed. It can block malicious, phishing, or policy-restricted domains before a full connection is established. APIC, UCS Manager, and Unified Communications Manager serve unrelated infrastructure or collaboration functions. Umbrella is particularly valuable because it can extend security beyond the enterprise perimeter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 238.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which limitation should be considered when relying on DNS-layer security alone?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It may not see connections that use direct IP addresses<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically decrypts all HTTPS traffic<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It provides full endpoint remediation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for firewalls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DNS-layer security depends on DNS resolution being part of the connection process. Traffic sent directly to an IP address may bypass DNS-based controls. Attackers may also abuse trusted platforms or other mechanisms that reduce the effectiveness of simple domain blocking. Therefore, DNS security should be combined with secure web gateways, endpoint protection, firewalls, identity controls, and monitoring.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 239.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach is best before enabling a major URL filtering change for all employees?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Pilot the policy with a representative group and review the logs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Deploy globally without validation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable rollback capability<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the old configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A pilot deployment limits blast radius and allows administrators to identify false positives, unexpected category matches, authentication issues, and application dependencies before broad rollout. Logs and user feedback provide evidence for tuning. A known-good configuration and rollback plan should also be maintained. Global untested policy changes can disrupt critical business access for a large user population.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 240.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>After a new policy is deployed, only users in one directory group lose access to a required web service. What should the administrator investigate first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace the network hardware<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable URL filtering globally<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Verify group mapping and the policy rule matched by that group<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Turn off DNS security<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When only one directory group is affected, the problem is most likely related to identity mapping or a group-specific policy. The administrator should verify which group memberships the appliance sees and which rule is applied to those users. Comparing affected users with working users can quickly expose a policy or directory mismatch. Broadly disabling unrelated security controls would weaken protection without addressing the likely root cause.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 221. Which Secure Web Appliance capability is most appropriate for preventing users from reaching domains that have recently been associated with malware campaigns? Web reputation filtering 2. HSRP tracking 3. STP root guard 4. DHCP relay Correct Answer: 1 Explanation: Web [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24069"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24070,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24069\/revisions\/24070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}