{"id":24083,"date":"2026-09-28T12:25:19","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24083"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:25:19","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:25:19","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part19 Q361-380"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 361.<\/b><\/p>\n

Which Cisco Secure Web Appliance feature is most appropriate for determining why a specific user was allowed to access a URL that another user was denied?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Policy trace and identity-based policy review<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> STP topology analysis<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> HSRP state verification<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Interface duplex checking<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Policy trace and identity-based policy review provide the most relevant information when different users receive different results for the same destination. The administrator should compare the identities, directory groups, source information, URL category, web reputation, and policy rules that matched each request. This often reveals that the two users belong to different groups or that one request matches a more specific policy. Transaction logs can then confirm what actually happened during the real requests. STP, HSRP, and interface duplex settings may affect network connectivity, but they do not explain user-specific web access decisions. When troubleshooting policy differences, administrators should avoid disabling broad security controls. Instead, they should identify the precise policy condition that caused the different results and modify only that condition if a change is justified.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 362.<\/b><\/p>\n

    Which condition should an administrator investigate first if users are repeatedly prompted to enter credentials while using an explicit proxy?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Incorrect VLAN pruning<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Authentication method or browser integration problem<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> HSRP priority mismatch<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> STP root bridge change<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Repeated credential prompts usually indicate that the authentication exchange between the browser, proxy, and identity service is not operating as expected. The administrator should verify the configured authentication mechanism, browser support, directory connectivity, user credentials, and identification profile. Integrated authentication problems can also arise when applications do not support the selected mechanism or when requests are sent through inconsistent proxy paths. Authentication logs are especially useful because they show whether credentials are rejected, whether group information is returned, and whether the user is being identified repeatedly. VLAN pruning, HSRP, and Spanning Tree issues may affect general connectivity, but they do not normally cause repeated proxy authentication prompts. The safest troubleshooting method is to review identity and authentication evidence before creating bypasses or weakening authentication policy.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 363.<\/b><\/p>\n

      Which Secure Web Appliance capability is best suited to allowing a web application for all employees while restricting uploads for contractors?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Route redistribution<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> DNS forwarding<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Identity-based application control<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> HSRP tracking<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Identity-based application control combines user or group identity with granular application actions. This allows the organization to create different behavior for employees and contractors even when both groups access the same web application. Employees may be allowed to use all required functions, while contractors could be restricted from uploads or other higher-risk actions. This is more flexible than simply blocking the entire domain. Directory integration provides the group information, while application visibility and control identifies supported actions inside the service. Route redistribution, DNS forwarding, and HSRP do not provide this combination of user-aware and application-aware enforcement. Policies should be tested carefully because a broad rule could unintentionally restrict legitimate users or allow a sensitive action for the wrong group.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 364.<\/b><\/p>\n

        Which action is most appropriate if a custom URL category intended for one partner domain unexpectedly matches several unrelated domains?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Disable all web filtering<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Allow all matched domains temporarily<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove directory authentication<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Review and narrow the URL match pattern<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Unexpected matches strongly suggest that the custom category contains an overly broad wildcard, suffix, or pattern. The administrator should examine the exact matching expression and narrow it so that only the intended partner domain and required subdomains are included. Policy trace or equivalent testing should be used with both expected and unexpected URLs before the corrected category is broadly relied upon. Because a custom URL category may be referenced by access, decryption, malware, or reporting rules, one inaccurate definition can influence several layers of policy simultaneously. Disabling all filtering or authentication would not solve the underlying match problem and would unnecessarily weaken security. Precise category design, limited scope, and validation are the correct operational response.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 365.<\/b><\/p>\n

          Which web security signal provides the best indication that a normally legitimate site has recently become risky because it was compromised?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Web reputation<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Interface MTU<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> VLAN ID<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Route metric<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Web reputation provides dynamic risk information about a destination and can reflect changes in observed threat activity. A site may continue to belong to a legitimate category such as Business, Education, or News while its reputation deteriorates after it becomes compromised or begins distributing malicious content. This is why category and reputation should be evaluated together rather than treating a legitimate category as proof of safety. Reputation can be used to block high-risk sites or trigger stronger inspection for destinations with uncertain trust. Interface MTU, VLAN IDs, and route metrics are network configuration values and do not indicate web threat activity. Dynamic reputation is especially valuable against compromised legitimate infrastructure because users may otherwise assume the website is safe based only on its familiar name or category.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 366.<\/b><\/p>\n

            Which Secure Web Appliance control can block a downloaded script file even when no malware engine has yet identified it as malicious?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> HSRP policy<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> File-type filtering<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Route summarization<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> STP root guard<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              File-type filtering allows policy decisions based on the type or format of downloaded content rather than only on a malware verdict. This is useful for preventing high-risk file types such as executables, scripts, archives, or macro-enabled content from reaching users in situations where business requirements do not justify those formats. A file can be dangerous before reputation or signatures exist, so file-type restrictions provide preventive security against unknown threats. Administrators can often apply the control selectively by user group, destination category, or risk level. HSRP, routing, and Spanning Tree features operate at the network layer and do not inspect downloaded content. File-type controls work best as part of layered protection with reputation, malware scanning, sandboxing, and identity-aware policy.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 367.<\/b><\/p>\n

              Which capability provides the strongest additional analysis for a suspicious file whose reputation is unknown?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Static routing<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> DHCP snooping<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Sandbox analysis<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Port-channel monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Sandbox analysis provides behavioral examination of an unknown or suspicious file in an isolated environment. Instead of relying only on signatures or previously known reputation, the sandbox can observe actions such as creating processes, changing files, establishing outbound network connections, attempting persistence, or performing other suspicious activity. This is particularly useful against previously unseen malware and rapidly changing threats. Depending on the security architecture, the result may influence whether the file is permitted, blocked, or escalated for additional investigation. Static routing, DHCP snooping, and port-channel monitoring do not analyze file behavior. Unknown status should not automatically be interpreted as safe, especially when the destination itself has a poor reputation or the file type presents elevated risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 368.<\/b><\/p>\n

                Which security capability is most useful when a file originally classified as clean is later identified as malicious?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> VLAN pruning<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> HSRP preemption<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> STP monitoring<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Retrospective file tracking<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Retrospective file tracking allows security teams to revisit earlier file activity when new threat intelligence changes a file’s verdict. A file might appear clean or unknown at the time it is first downloaded and only later be confirmed as malicious. Retrospective visibility can identify which users, endpoints, or transactions involved the file so the incident response team can investigate affected systems. This is especially valuable because modern threats can evade initial detection and threat intelligence evolves continuously. Network technologies such as VLAN pruning, HSRP, and Spanning Tree do not provide historical file-level security context. Retrospective tracking turns updated intelligence into actionable response information rather than protecting only future downloads.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 369.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Which security control should be used when users are allowed to access a cloud storage service but must not upload customer financial records?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Data loss prevention<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> HSRP tracking<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Route-map<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> VLAN access policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Data loss prevention is designed to inspect outbound content and identify sensitive information such as customer financial records, payment data, personally identifiable information, regulated records, or intellectual property. DLP can block, alert on, or monitor transfers based on organizational policy. This allows the cloud storage service itself to remain available while controlling what data users are permitted to send to it. DLP is therefore more precise than simply blocking the service. Identity and application control can also be combined with DLP to create different restrictions for different user groups. HSRP, route-maps, and VLAN access mechanisms do not inspect web payloads for sensitive content. DLP rules should be carefully tuned and piloted to reduce false positives that could interfere with legitimate business activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 370.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Which design best improves the availability of user authentication for Secure Web Appliance policy enforcement?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Use one directory server and no monitoring<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Deploy redundant authentication and directory services<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Use one shared user account for all employees<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable identity integration entirely<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Redundant authentication and directory services reduce the chance that one server failure will interrupt identity-based web policy. If the Secure Web Appliance cannot identify users or retrieve group membership, access may be denied, broadened, or handled by fallback policy depending on the design. Redundancy should be combined with monitoring so administrators can detect partial outages, high latency, or authentication errors before they affect large numbers of users. A single directory server creates an avoidable point of failure. Shared user accounts eliminate meaningful attribution, and disabling identity integration removes group-specific control. Organizations should also test both fail-open and fail-closed scenarios so they understand how web access behaves when all identity services are unavailable.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 371.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Which behavior is associated with a fail-open authentication design?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Users may receive access with reduced identity enforcement if authentication services fail<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> All Internet access is always denied during authentication failure<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> TLS inspection automatically becomes stricter<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> DNS filtering is permanently disabled<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Fail-open behavior prioritizes service availability when authentication or identity infrastructure becomes unavailable. Instead of blocking all access, the environment may permit users to continue with anonymous, default, or less restrictive policy. This reduces business interruption but creates a security trade-off because identity-based controls may no longer be enforced precisely. A fail-closed design takes the opposite approach by denying or restricting access when identity cannot be verified. The correct choice depends on risk tolerance, compliance requirements, and operational needs. Organizations should document the decision, monitor authentication services, deploy redundancy, and test failure scenarios. Fail-open should never be accidental; administrators should understand exactly which fallback policy users receive when the identity system cannot be reached.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 372.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Which condition should an administrator check first if users receive certificate warnings on nearly every HTTPS site immediately after TLS inspection is enabled?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Route summarization<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Whether clients trust the inspection CA<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> HSRP priority<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> VLAN pruning<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          TLS inspection requires the Secure Web Appliance to present dynamically generated certificates signed by an inspection certificate authority. If client devices do not trust that CA, browsers will warn users that the certificate cannot be validated. When warnings appear across many unrelated HTTPS sites immediately after inspection is enabled, missing CA trust is the most likely cause. Administrators should confirm that the inspection CA certificate is installed in the correct trusted certificate store and that the certificate chain is valid. The CA private key must also be protected carefully because it has significant trust authority. Routing, HSRP, and VLAN issues would not normally cause widespread certificate trust warnings specific to HTTPS inspection.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 373.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Which symptom most strongly suggests certificate pinning rather than a general inspection CA trust issue?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> One particular application fails while normal browser HTTPS access works<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Every browser shows certificate warnings<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> DNS fails for all destinations<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> All client devices lose network connectivity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Certificate pinning usually affects specific applications that expect a particular server certificate, public key, or certificate chain. A browser may trust the inspection CA and work normally, while a pinned mobile or desktop application rejects the substitute certificate created by the Secure Web Appliance. This creates an application-specific failure rather than a widespread trust problem. If every HTTPS site generates certificate warnings, the inspection CA is more likely missing or untrusted. Administrators should verify the application behavior through logs and controlled tests before creating an exemption. If pinning is confirmed and the application is business-critical, a narrowly scoped decryption bypass may be appropriate rather than disabling TLS inspection broadly.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 374.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Which action is most appropriate when a critical application is confirmed to use certificate pinning and cannot function through HTTPS inspection?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Disable TLS inspection for the entire enterprise<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Create a narrowly scoped decryption bypass<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove authentication for all users<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Permit unrestricted Internet access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A narrowly scoped decryption bypass limits the reduction in visibility to only the application that cannot tolerate interception. The exception should use specific destinations, application identifiers, or other precise match criteria and should be documented and reviewed periodically. Broadly disabling TLS inspection would unnecessarily reduce security for all other HTTPS traffic. Other controls such as URL category, web reputation, DNS-layer security, identity policy, and logging can continue to protect the bypassed traffic where applicable. Administrators should confirm that certificate pinning is actually the cause before creating the bypass. The objective is to restore required business functionality while preserving as much security inspection as possible.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 375.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Which Cisco service can protect roaming users by blocking known malicious domains during DNS resolution?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Cisco Umbrella<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Cisco UCS Manager<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Cisco APIC<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Cisco Unified Communications Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Cisco Umbrella provides cloud-delivered DNS-layer security that can enforce policy before a full connection to a destination is established. It can block domains associated with malware, phishing, command-and-control activity, or other restricted categories. With appropriate roaming-user integration, protection can continue when devices are away from the corporate network. This makes DNS-layer security valuable for remote and mobile workforces. Cisco UCS Manager handles server infrastructure, APIC manages ACI policy, and Unified Communications Manager provides collaboration services. Umbrella is specifically relevant when the security requirement involves cloud-based DNS filtering and early threat blocking.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 376.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Which limitation is important to remember when relying on DNS-layer security?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> It decrypts all HTTPS traffic automatically<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Direct-IP connections may bypass DNS-based enforcement<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> It completely replaces endpoint security<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> It guarantees that every malicious connection will be blocked<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  DNS-layer security is effective when a client performs a DNS lookup before connecting. If malware or an application connects directly to an IP address, the DNS security service may never see the request. Attackers may also use compromised legitimate services or other communication methods that reduce the usefulness of simple domain blocking. This is why DNS protection should be part of a layered strategy that also includes secure web gateways, endpoint security, network firewalls, identity controls, and monitoring. DNS security does not automatically decrypt HTTPS traffic and cannot guarantee prevention of every attack. Understanding these limitations helps administrators design multiple complementary controls rather than depending on one security layer.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 377.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Which Secure Web Appliance log source provides the best evidence for determining whether a download was blocked because of URL policy, file type, or malware verdict?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Web access or transaction logs<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Power supply logs<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> STP logs<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> HSRP logs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Web access or transaction logs contain the application-layer details needed to understand how a particular request was processed. Depending on logging configuration, records may include username, source IP, URL, category, web reputation, file information, malware verdict, matched policy, and final action. These fields allow an administrator to determine whether a download failed because of URL category policy, file-type restriction, malware detection, DLP, or another rule. Hardware and network redundancy logs cannot provide this level of web transaction detail. During troubleshooting, administrators should preserve logs and compare affected requests with successful ones rather than temporarily disabling all security controls.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 378.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Which practice is most important when exporting Secure Web Appliance logs to a centralized SIEM for incident analysis?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Disable time synchronization on the appliance<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Maintain accurate NTP synchronization across systems<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Use different time zones without documentation<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Delete logs immediately after export<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Accurate NTP synchronization ensures that timestamps from the Secure Web Appliance, firewall, DNS security service, endpoint systems, and SIEM can be correlated correctly. Incident investigations often depend on understanding the sequence of events across several platforms. Even small clock differences can make a timeline confusing, while large differences may cause analysts to associate unrelated events. Time synchronization also supports auditing and some certificate-related functions. Logs should be retained according to organizational requirements rather than immediately deleted. If systems use different displayed time zones, the configuration should be understood and normalized in the SIEM. Consistent and reliable time is one of the simplest but most important prerequisites for effective centralized security analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 379.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Which deployment approach is safest when enabling a new DLP policy that could potentially block legitimate uploads for thousands of users?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Pilot the rule with a representative group and review false positives before broad enforcement<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Enable it globally without testing<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable transaction logging during deployment<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Remove all rollback options<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        DLP policies can have significant business impact because sensitive-data patterns may also appear in legitimate transactions. A representative pilot group allows administrators to observe which uploads match, identify false positives, adjust classifiers or thresholds, and verify that important workflows remain functional. Logging should remain enabled so every decision can be reviewed. A known-good configuration and rollback plan should also be available. After the pilot is successful, enforcement can be expanded in controlled stages. Global untested deployment can disrupt large numbers of users and generate unnecessary support incidents. Staged deployment is therefore a core operational practice for high-impact controls such as DLP, authentication changes, TLS decryption, and application restrictions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 380.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        After a policy update, only contractors are unable to use the file-upload feature of an approved cloud application, while employees can use it normally. What should the administrator investigate first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Replace the Secure Web Appliance<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Disable all application controls<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Verify contractor identity mapping and the application-control or DLP policy that matches their requests<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable Cisco Umbrella for all users<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Because the difference follows user type rather than device or destination, identity-based policy is the most likely cause. The administrator should verify that contractor users are mapped to the correct directory group and then determine which application-control, DLP, or access policy applies to that group. Policy trace and transaction logs can show whether the upload is blocked intentionally or because of an incorrect rule. Comparing a contractor transaction with a successful employee transaction can quickly expose the difference. Replacing hardware or disabling broad security controls would not address the likely root cause. The goal is to identify the specific user-group condition and modify only that rule if the restriction is not intended.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 361. Which Cisco Secure Web Appliance feature is most appropriate for determining why a specific user was allowed to access a URL that another user was denied? Policy trace and identity-based policy review 2. STP topology analysis 3. HSRP state verification […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24083"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24083"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24084,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24083\/revisions\/24084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}