{"id":24406,"date":"2026-09-29T07:32:27","date_gmt":"2026-09-29T07:32:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24406"},"modified":"2026-09-29T07:32:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T07:32:27","slug":"isaca-cgeit-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-cgeit-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CGEIT Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part20 Q381-400"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CGEIT Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 381<\/b><\/h3>\n

An enterprise is reviewing its IT governance framework after a significant change in its business operating model. What should governance evaluate FIRST?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whether the current governance structure, decision rights, and responsibilities still support the new operating model.<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Whether all existing IT projects should be canceled.<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Whether the IT budget should immediately be increased.<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Whether every technology decision should be centralized.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    A major change in the operating model can affect accountability, decision rights, organizational responsibilities, technology priorities, and risk management. Governance should first evaluate whether the current framework remains appropriate for the new environment. This assessment identifies specific gaps before structural changes are made. Automatically canceling projects or increasing the budget may create unnecessary disruption without addressing the actual governance requirements. Centralizing every decision can also reduce efficiency and may not reflect the organization’s revised operating model. A structured governance assessment provides the basis for targeted changes to responsibilities, authorities, reporting, policies, and oversight while maintaining alignment with enterprise objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 382<\/b><\/h3>\n

    A governance committee is reviewing an IT investment with several possible implementation approaches. Which analysis would BEST support the decision?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Comparing only the technical features of each approach.<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Comparing expected value, costs, risks, dependencies, feasibility, and strategic alignment of each alternative.<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Selecting the approach recommended by the vendor.<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Choosing the approach requiring the largest budget.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Investment governance should evaluate alternatives using a balanced set of business and technology criteria. Comparing expected value, total costs, risks, dependencies, feasibility, resource requirements, and strategic alignment allows decision-makers to understand the trade-offs among implementation options. Technical features are important but do not provide a complete business perspective. Vendor recommendations may be useful input but should not replace independent enterprise analysis. A larger budget does not necessarily indicate greater value. Structured alternative analysis helps governance select an approach that supports business objectives while managing risk and resources appropriately. It also improves transparency by documenting why one alternative was selected over others.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 383<\/b><\/h3>\n

      An enterprise has introduced a new technology governance standard, but several business units claim that the standard prevents legitimate business requirements from being met. What should governance do?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Enforce the standard without considering business requirements.<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Remove the standard entirely.<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Evaluate the standard, review justified exceptions, and determine whether the standard needs refinement.<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Allow every business unit to ignore the standard.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Technology standards are intended to promote consistency, interoperability, security, and sustainable architecture, but they should also support legitimate business requirements. Governance should investigate the concerns, determine whether the standard is appropriate, and use a controlled exception process for justified deviations. Recurring exceptions may indicate that the standard itself requires refinement. Enforcing it without assessment can create unnecessary business constraints, while removing it entirely eliminates useful governance controls. Allowing unrestricted noncompliance creates inconsistency and increases risk. A balanced approach preserves enterprise standards while providing a formal mechanism to address legitimate circumstances and improve standards based on evidence and changing business needs.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 384<\/b><\/h3>\n

        A critical IT service has experienced rising costs while its business value remains unchanged. What should governance assess?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Whether the service should continue in its current form without review.<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Whether additional funding should be provided automatically.<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Whether performance reporting should be reduced.<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Whether the service model, costs, alternatives, and expected value remain appropriate.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Rising costs without corresponding increases in business value may indicate that a service model requires review. Governance should assess total costs, service performance, business criticality, alternatives, risks, dependencies, and future requirements. Additional funding should not be granted automatically because it may increase an existing inefficiency. Reducing reporting would also reduce visibility into the problem. Continuing without review may result in unnecessary expenditure. Governance should determine whether optimization, modernization, sourcing changes, consolidation, or other actions could improve the balance between cost and value. The assessment should consider both financial and nonfinancial outcomes while ensuring that critical business requirements remain adequately supported.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 385<\/b><\/h3>\n

          An organization wants to ensure that its IT strategy reflects current enterprise priorities. Which governance activity should occur regularly?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Review IT objectives and initiatives against changes in enterprise strategy and business priorities.<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Review only infrastructure performance.<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Replace the IT strategy every month.<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Allow technology teams to define priorities independently.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            Strategic alignment is not a one-time activity because enterprise objectives, market conditions, regulations, and operating requirements can change. Governance should periodically review IT objectives, investments, capabilities, and initiatives against current enterprise priorities. This helps identify initiatives that require modification, reprioritization, or additional resources. Reviewing only infrastructure performance does not establish strategic alignment. Replacing the strategy too frequently can create instability, while allowing technology teams to establish priorities independently may result in misalignment with business needs. Regular alignment reviews provide governance with a structured mechanism to ensure that technology resources and investments continue to support the organization’s current strategic direction.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 386<\/b><\/h3>\n

            A governance committee discovers that a project has exceeded its approved risk tolerance but remains within its budget and schedule. What should happen?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Continue the project because budget and schedule are acceptable.<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Escalate and reassess the risk in accordance with defined governance thresholds.<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Remove the risk from project reporting.<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Increase the project budget automatically.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Budget and schedule performance do not override risk governance requirements. If a project exceeds approved risk tolerance, the exposure should be assessed and escalated according to established thresholds and decision rights. Governance may require additional controls, scope changes, risk acceptance by an authorized party, or reconsideration of the investment. Continuing solely because the project is on schedule and budget could expose the enterprise to unacceptable risk. Removing the risk from reporting would reduce transparency, while increasing the budget does not necessarily address the underlying exposure. Effective governance balances investment value, delivery performance, and risk rather than allowing one performance dimension to override another.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 387<\/b><\/h3>\n

              An enterprise is implementing a new governance reporting framework. What should be defined for each key governance metric?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Only the report’s visual design.<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. The number of pages allowed in the report.<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Definition, data source, owner, target, frequency, and interpretation requirements.<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. The name of the executive receiving the report.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Reliable governance metrics require consistent definitions and clear accountability. Each important measure should have a documented definition, data source, owner, target or threshold, reporting frequency, and appropriate interpretation. These elements help ensure that metrics are calculated consistently and that decision-makers understand what the information represents. Visual design and report length can affect usability but do not establish measurement quality. Knowing the report recipient is useful but insufficient for reliable governance information. A well-defined measurement framework improves comparability, accountability, trend analysis, and decision quality and reduces the likelihood of conflicting interpretations across departments or reporting periods.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 388<\/b><\/h3>\n

                A company is evaluating whether to continue using an aging application that supports a critical business process. Which consideration is MOST important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Whether employees have used the application for many years.<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Whether the application has a familiar user interface.<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Whether replacing it would require a large project team.<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Whether its business value, risks, supportability, cost, and lifecycle position justify continued use.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  An aging application should be evaluated based on its overall business and technology position rather than familiarity alone. Governance should consider business criticality, ongoing value, security risks, vendor support, maintenance costs, technical debt, integration dependencies, regulatory requirements, and available modernization or replacement alternatives. User familiarity may reduce change resistance but does not establish that continued use is appropriate. Project team size is also not a sufficient decision criterion. A lifecycle assessment helps governance determine whether the application should be retained, modernized, replaced, or retired. This supports sustainable technology management and helps prevent increasing operational and security risks associated with unsupported or difficult-to-maintain systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 389<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  A governance committee finds that business benefits for a completed IT investment are below expectations. What should be examined FIRST?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The assumptions, adoption levels, process changes, and ownership associated with the expected benefits.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Whether the project team should receive additional funding.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. Whether all investment reporting should stop.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Whether the system should automatically be retired.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    When benefits fall below expectations, governance should first understand the underlying causes. The review should examine the assumptions in the original business case, user adoption, business process changes, benefit ownership, external conditions, and implementation outcomes. Additional funding may be appropriate in some circumstances, but it should follow an evidence-based assessment. Stopping reporting would reduce transparency, while automatic retirement could eliminate a capability without understanding why benefits were missed. A structured benefits review enables governance to identify corrective actions and capture lessons for future investments. It also helps determine whether the original assumptions or benefit measures need improvement.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 390<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    An enterprise is establishing governance requirements for a new critical technology service. Which responsibility should remain clearly assigned to the business?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Configuration of every technical component.<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Definition of business outcomes, priorities, and acceptable risk requirements.<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Maintenance of all infrastructure hardware.<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Administration of technical monitoring tools.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Business ownership is essential for defining the outcomes and priorities that technology services are expected to support. Business stakeholders should establish requirements such as desired business outcomes, service importance, priorities, acceptable risk, and expected value. Technical teams or providers may be responsible for infrastructure, configuration, monitoring, and operational activities. Assigning every technical responsibility to business users would be impractical, while transferring business decisions to technical teams could weaken alignment and accountability. Governance should clearly distinguish business accountability from technical service management responsibilities. This ensures that service design and performance remain connected to actual business requirements and enterprise objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 391<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      A governance body is reviewing an IT portfolio and discovers several initiatives have similar objectives but different sponsors. What should it do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Approve all initiatives to avoid stakeholder conflict.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Compare the initiatives for duplication, consolidation opportunities, dependencies, and enterprise value.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Give automatic priority to the initiative with the highest budget.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Transfer all initiatives to operational teams.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Different sponsorship does not necessarily mean that initiatives provide distinct enterprise value. Governance should compare initiatives with similar objectives to identify duplicated capabilities, overlapping scope, conflicting architectures, shared dependencies, and opportunities for consolidation. Approving everything can waste resources and increase complexity. Budget size is not a reliable measure of strategic importance, and transferring projects to operations does not resolve portfolio duplication. An enterprise-wide review allows governance to determine whether initiatives should be combined, sequenced, modified, or separately justified. This improves resource optimization and ensures investments are evaluated according to enterprise priorities rather than individual sponsorship interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 392<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        A regulatory authority introduces new requirements affecting an organization’s information management practices. What should governance ensure?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. The requirements are assessed and incorporated into relevant policies, controls, processes, and technology plans.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Only the legal department reviews the requirements.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. Existing information policies remain unchanged.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. All technology investments are suspended permanently.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Regulatory requirements affecting information management can influence policies, controls, processes, systems, data handling, retention, access, and reporting. Governance should ensure that the requirements are assessed and translated into appropriate organizational and technology actions. Legal teams may interpret regulatory obligations, but implementation requires coordination across business, security, compliance, information management, and IT functions. Leaving policies unchanged can create compliance gaps, while permanently suspending technology investments is disproportionate. A structured impact assessment allows governance to determine required changes, assign accountability, prioritize investments, and monitor compliance. This ensures that regulatory obligations are incorporated into the enterprise governance framework rather than treated as an isolated legal activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 393<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          An enterprise wants to improve its governance decision-making process. Which practice would MOST directly support this objective?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Increase the number of people attending governance meetings.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Require longer written reports for every decision.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Define decision criteria, authority levels, required information, and escalation paths.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Schedule governance meetings more frequently.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Decision quality improves when decision-makers understand what information is required, what criteria should be applied, who has authority, and when issues must be escalated. Clearly defined decision criteria promote consistency and transparency, while authority levels prevent unnecessary delays and unauthorized decisions. Longer reports or more meeting participants may increase administrative effort without improving decision quality. Meeting frequency also does not address unclear decision rights or inconsistent criteria. Governance should establish a structured decision framework that is proportionate to the significance and risk of the decision. This supports accountability, timely decisions, effective escalation, and alignment with enterprise objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 394<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            A critical technology supplier announces that it may discontinue support for a product used by the enterprise. What should governance evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. The supplier’s advertising strategy.<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. The impact on business continuity, security, costs, lifecycle, and available alternatives.<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Whether employees prefer the existing product.<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Whether the supplier can increase its marketing budget.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Potential product discontinuation can create significant lifecycle, operational, security, financial, and continuity risks. Governance should assess the criticality of the affected capability, remaining support period, migration complexity, contractual obligations, costs, dependencies, alternative technologies, and business continuity implications. Employee preference may influence change management but should not be the primary governance criterion. Supplier marketing activity is unrelated to the core risk. Early assessment allows the organization to develop a transition, modernization, replacement, or risk-mitigation strategy before support ends. This reduces the likelihood of rushed decisions and helps ensure that critical business capabilities remain sustainable and appropriately protected.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 395<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              A governance committee is evaluating whether an IT service should be redesigned to reduce operating costs. What should be considered before approving the redesign?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Only the expected cost reduction.<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Whether the redesign maintains required business outcomes, service levels, controls, and acceptable risk.<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Whether the technical team prefers the redesign.<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Whether the redesign uses newer technology.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Cost reduction should not compromise essential business outcomes, service quality, security, compliance, resilience, or acceptable risk. Governance should evaluate whether the proposed redesign continues to meet business requirements while delivering sustainable savings. Technical team preference and technology novelty may provide useful input but should not determine the decision. Focusing only on immediate savings can create hidden costs or increased risk later. A comprehensive assessment should consider lifecycle costs, service performance, dependencies, transition risks, controls, and expected benefits. Governance can then determine whether the redesign provides an appropriate balance between efficiency and business value while maintaining the level of oversight required for a critical service.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 396<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                An organization has implemented a new IT governance process, but adoption varies significantly across business units. What should governance do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Ignore the differences because the process is already approved.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Investigate adoption barriers and address communication, training, process design, and accountability gaps.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Require every business unit to create its own governance process.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Eliminate monitoring of adoption.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Variation in governance-process adoption can indicate problems with communication, training, process usability, accountability, or alignment with business needs. Governance should investigate the causes and determine appropriate corrective actions. This may involve clearer guidance, stakeholder engagement, training, process simplification, or revised responsibilities. Ignoring adoption problems can create inconsistent decision-making and control gaps. Allowing every business unit to establish separate governance processes can increase fragmentation, while eliminating monitoring removes visibility into whether the framework is working. Governance should promote consistent enterprise requirements while allowing justified differences where necessary. Adoption monitoring and stakeholder feedback support continual improvement and help ensure that governance practices are practical and effective.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 397<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  An enterprise has limited capacity to implement several regulatory technology changes within the required timeframe. What should governance prioritize?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Changes based on business and regulatory risk, mandatory deadlines, criticality, and available resources.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Changes requested by the largest department.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Changes requiring the newest technology.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Changes proposed earliest.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    When capacity is constrained and regulatory deadlines exist, governance should prioritize work using objective criteria. Regulatory obligations, compliance deadlines, business impact, risk exposure, service criticality, dependencies, and available resources should inform sequencing. Department size, technology novelty, or submission order does not necessarily reflect urgency or risk. Governance should also consider whether temporary controls, alternative solutions, or resource reallocation can address immediate requirements. A structured prioritization process supports compliance while minimizing disruption and ensuring scarce implementation capacity is directed toward the most significant obligations and risks. This also provides transparency when difficult trade-offs are necessary across competing initiatives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 398<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    A governance committee wants to verify that risk acceptance decisions are being made at the appropriate organizational level. What should it review?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. The number of risk reports produced.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Whether accepted risks were approved by individuals with authority consistent with defined risk thresholds and decision rights.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Whether all risks were accepted by IT management.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Whether risk documentation is longer than previous years.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Risk acceptance should be performed by individuals with appropriate authority based on the significance of the exposure and established governance thresholds. Reviewing approval records against defined decision rights can determine whether risks are being accepted at the proper organizational level. The number or length of reports does not demonstrate appropriate authority. IT management should not automatically accept all enterprise risks because some exposures may require business, executive, or board-level authorization. Clear risk thresholds and decision rights help ensure accountability and prevent unauthorized acceptance of significant exposures. Periodic reviews can also identify recurring issues and strengthen the organization’s risk governance framework.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 399<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      An enterprise wants to improve the relationship between IT governance and enterprise performance. Which approach is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Measure governance activities only.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Focus exclusively on reducing IT costs.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Connect governance objectives and measures to strategic outcomes, value, risk, and organizational performance.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Increase the number of governance policies.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        IT governance contributes to enterprise performance when its objectives and measures are connected to meaningful organizational outcomes. Governance should evaluate strategic alignment, value realization, risk management, resource optimization, decision effectiveness, and relevant performance outcomes. Measuring only governance activities, such as meetings or policies, does not demonstrate enterprise impact. Cost reduction can be valuable but may undermine other objectives if pursued without considering value and risk. Increasing the number of policies also does not prove governance effectiveness. Connecting governance measures to enterprise outcomes provides stronger evidence of contribution and enables leadership to identify areas where governance practices should be adjusted to improve decision quality and value delivery.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 400<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        An enterprise is conducting a comprehensive review of its IT governance framework. Which outcome BEST indicates that the framework is effective?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. All technology decisions are approved by senior executives.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. The organization has a large number of governance policies.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Governance meetings occur according to schedule.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. IT decisions consistently support enterprise objectives while delivering value and managing risk within approved boundaries.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Effective IT governance is demonstrated through outcomes rather than the volume of governance activity. A strong framework enables technology decisions to support enterprise objectives, deliver expected value, manage resources effectively, and keep risks within approved boundaries. Requiring senior executives to approve every decision can create bottlenecks and does not necessarily improve decision quality. A large number of policies may increase complexity without improving governance, and regularly scheduled meetings measure activity rather than effectiveness. Governance should therefore be assessed through strategic alignment, accountability, value realization, risk management, decision quality, and stakeholder outcomes. These measures provide meaningful evidence that governance is functioning as intended across the enterprise.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CGEIT Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 381 An enterprise is reviewing its IT governance framework after a significant change in its business operating model. What should governance evaluate FIRST? Whether the current governance structure, decision rights, and responsibilities still support the new operating model. Whether all existing IT projects […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24406"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24406"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24407,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24406\/revisions\/24407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}