{"id":24683,"date":"2026-09-29T11:59:30","date_gmt":"2026-09-29T11:59:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24683"},"modified":"2026-09-29T11:59:30","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T11:59:30","slug":"comptia-securityx-ca1-005-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/comptia-securityx-ca1-005-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300\/","title":{"rendered":"CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Test Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part15 Q281-300"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/ca1-005-exam-dumps\"><b>CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 281.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security architect wants to reduce the risk that a compromised cloud administrator account can modify sensitive network controls without oversight. Which control is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Require just-in-time privilege elevation with independent approval for high-impact network changes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give all administrators permanent network administrator privileges<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one shared cloud administrator account<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable audit logging for infrastructure changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Just-in-time privilege limits how long elevated access exists, while independent approval adds separation of duties for sensitive network modifications. This reduces the chance that one compromised account can silently change security controls. Shared accounts and permanent administrative access increase blast radius and weaken accountability. High-impact changes should also be centrally logged, monitored, and ideally deployed through controlled infrastructure-as-code pipelines with rollback capability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 282.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control best ensures that a workload can access only the specific cloud API permissions it requires?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Grant the workload a global administrator role.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one shared role for every application.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable workload authentication.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assign a dedicated workload identity with narrowly scoped permissions.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A dedicated workload identity with narrowly scoped permissions supports least privilege and limits the blast radius if the workload is compromised. Shared broad roles make it difficult to distinguish legitimate activity and can expose unrelated resources. Disabling authentication creates even greater risk. Machine identities should also use short-lived credentials where possible and have their permissions reviewed periodically.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 283.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security capability is most useful for detecting risky cloud configuration changes that occur outside approved deployment workflows?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> RAID monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File compression<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Configuration drift detection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Static routing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Configuration drift detection compares the actual deployed environment against an approved baseline or infrastructure-as-code definition. Unexpected differences may indicate unauthorized console changes, compromised credentials, or configuration errors. RAID, compression, and routing do not provide governance over configuration state. Drift alerts should be investigated and reconciled so the approved code remains the authoritative source of infrastructure configuration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 284.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach best protects an enterprise API from authorization bypass when multiple user roles access the same endpoint?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Trust all authenticated users equally.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Enforce server-side authorization for every requested resource and operation.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely only on client-side interface restrictions.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authorization checks for internal users.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authentication establishes identity, but authorization must still be enforced on the server for every sensitive action and resource. Client-side restrictions can be bypassed, and internal users should not be automatically trusted. Fine-grained authorization should consider role, resource ownership, requested action, and other policy attributes. Strong API design also uses scoped tokens, input validation, logging, and consistent access-control testing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 285.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security team suspects attackers are using valid service-account credentials for reconnaissance. Which telemetry provides the strongest evidence?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cloud API audit logs correlated with normal service-account behavior<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Printer activity records<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Monitor resolution settings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disk fragmentation statistics<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cloud API audit logs can show enumeration of resources, privilege queries, unusual role assumptions, and other reconnaissance activity. Because service accounts often behave predictably, comparing current behavior with a normal baseline can reveal suspicious deviations. Printer and display information provide no relevant context. Analysts should also review source systems, authentication methods, session timing, and follow-on privilege changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 286.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which architecture best protects sensitive application secrets from compromise of the host operating system?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store secrets in plaintext local files.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Embed secrets in application source code.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Place credentials in shell history.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use hardware-backed or isolated secrets services with tightly controlled retrieval.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hardware-backed or isolated secret-management services reduce exposure of sensitive credentials to the general-purpose host. Applications can retrieve secrets dynamically under tightly scoped identity policies rather than storing them in source code or files. Plaintext local storage and shell history are easily exposed after host compromise. Strong secret management also includes rotation, auditing, expiration, and separation between application and administrative identities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 287.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security practice best reduces the chance that a malicious dependency is introduced during software development?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow any package from any public repository.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable dependency version tracking.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use approved repositories, dependency scanning, integrity verification, and version pinning.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove all build-system logging.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Approved repositories and version pinning reduce reliance on unknown packages, while dependency scanning identifies known vulnerable or risky components. Integrity verification helps ensure packages have not been modified unexpectedly. Disabling version tracking or allowing unrestricted repositories increases software-supply-chain risk. SBOM generation and controlled package publishing provide additional visibility and governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 288.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes the purpose of continuous authentication?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It means authenticating only once when an account is created.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It reevaluates trust during a session using changing risk and contextual signals.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for authorization.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It permanently trusts a device after initial enrollment.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Continuous authentication or continuous access evaluation reassesses session trust based on factors such as device posture, location, behavior, identity risk, and security events. If risk increases, access can be restricted, revoked, or subjected to additional verification. This supports zero-trust principles by avoiding permanent trust after initial login. Authorization remains necessary because authenticated users still need appropriate permissions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 289.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security operations team detects an unusual spike in DNS queries containing long encoded subdomains. Which threat should be investigated first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS tunneling or data exfiltration<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ARP spoofing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disk corruption<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Printer malfunction<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Long, high-entropy, or encoded subdomains generated at unusual volume can indicate DNS tunneling, where attackers encode data or command-and-control traffic into DNS queries. Analysts should correlate DNS logs with endpoint processes, destination domains, data volume, and host behavior. Not every unusual DNS pattern is malicious, so contextual validation is important. ARP spoofing and hardware issues do not best match the observed behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 290.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control provides the strongest assurance that production firmware has not been replaced with an unauthorized version?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNSSEC<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data masking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File compression<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Secure boot with signed firmware verification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure boot verifies cryptographic signatures on firmware and boot components before allowing them to execute. This helps prevent unauthorized or tampered firmware from becoming part of the trusted boot chain. DNSSEC, data masking, and compression address different security goals. Measured boot and remote attestation can provide additional evidence about the state of the system after startup.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 291.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control best reduces the risk that a compromised endpoint can use valid user credentials to access a high-value SaaS application?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow access from any device after password authentication.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Trust all internal IP addresses.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Require compliant device posture and phishing-resistant MFA.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable session monitoring.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Requiring a compliant device and phishing-resistant MFA adds assurance beyond the password itself. A stolen password may still be insufficient if the attacker lacks an approved device and cryptographic authenticator. Internal IP addresses alone do not establish trust. Sensitive SaaS applications may also use risk-based session controls, step-up authentication, and continuous evaluation to reduce account-takeover risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 292.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes a security exception process?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It permanently bypasses security policy without review.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It documents a justified deviation, associated risk, compensating controls, approval, and expiration or review date.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for governance.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It should never identify an owner.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A security exception process allows a documented and time-bounded deviation when a standard control cannot be met. It should identify the business justification, risk owner, compensating safeguards, approval authority, and review or expiration date. Exceptions should not become permanent unmanaged gaps. Periodic reassessment ensures the organization either restores compliance or consciously accepts residual risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 293.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which response is most appropriate after discovering that a production database credential was exposed in a CI\/CD log?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Revoke or rotate the credential, restrict the log, and investigate any use of the exposed secret.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Leave the credential unchanged because the log is internal.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete all incident records.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increase the credential&#8217;s privileges for easier troubleshooting.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An exposed production credential should be treated as compromised even if disclosure occurred in an internal system. The secret should be rotated promptly, access to the log restricted, and audit records reviewed for suspicious use. The pipeline should also be corrected so secrets are masked or never written to logs. Internal environments can still be accessed by compromised users, systems, or third parties.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 294.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which architecture best protects high-value recovery data from attackers who compromise normal production administration?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use the same identities for backup and production administration.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep all backup repositories continuously writable.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give production administrators unrestricted deletion rights.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use isolated backup administration, separate identities, and immutable recovery copies.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separate administrative identities and isolated backup infrastructure reduce the chance that attackers can use compromised production privileges to destroy recovery capabilities. Immutable copies further protect data from modification or deletion during the retention period. Using the same identities creates a common failure domain. Backup security should be validated through routine restoration exercises and monitoring for suspicious deletion or policy changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 295.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which technique best helps an organization identify exploitable privilege-escalation paths across enterprise identity systems?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Network load balancing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data deduplication<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Identity attack-path analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disk compression<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity attack-path analysis examines relationships among users, groups, service accounts, roles, trusts, permissions, and resources to reveal indirect privilege-escalation opportunities. Attackers often exploit combinations of seemingly minor permissions to reach high-value identities or systems. Graph-based analysis can make these paths visible and help security teams prioritize remediation. Storage and network-performance technologies do not provide this identity insight.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 296.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes the purpose of purple teaming?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It replaces all defensive operations.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It brings offensive and defensive teams together to test and improve detections and controls.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It guarantees that all attacks will be prevented.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It is only a compliance documentation exercise.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purple teaming combines attacker-style testing with defensive observation and improvement. Offensive participants emulate realistic techniques while defenders verify whether controls detect, prevent, and respond effectively. The exercise produces actionable improvements to telemetry, rules, procedures, and architecture. Purple teaming complements red teaming, threat hunting, and vulnerability management rather than replacing them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 297.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best reduces the risk of secret sprawl across an enterprise?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Centralize secret management, inventory credentials, rotate them, and eliminate unnecessary static secrets.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow every team to store passwords wherever convenient.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reuse one password across applications.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable secret-access auditing.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secret sprawl occurs when credentials are copied across source code, scripts, documents, configuration files, and user systems. Centralized secret management improves visibility, rotation, access control, and auditing. Inventorying existing secrets helps identify unnecessary or abandoned credentials. Reusing secrets increases blast radius, while decentralized storage makes exposure and remediation much harder.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 298.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which activity most strongly indicates possible malicious modification of cloud security controls?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A scheduled report executes normally.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A user reads a dashboard.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A standard application health check succeeds.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A privileged account unexpectedly disables multiple security policies after an anomalous login.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unexpected disabling of multiple security controls following anomalous privileged authentication is a strong sign of potential compromise. Attackers often weaken defenses before establishing persistence, escalating privilege, or accessing data. Responders should validate the session, preserve evidence, restore protections, revoke suspicious access where appropriate, and examine other changes made during the same period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 299.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security design best reduces the risk that one compromised third-party integration can access unrelated enterprise data?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give every integration tenant-wide administrator privileges.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one shared integration account.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assign each integration its own identity with narrowly scoped permissions and monitored access.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable consent and access logging.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separate integration identities and narrowly scoped permissions reduce the blast radius of compromise and provide clearer accountability. Each integration should access only the data and APIs required for its business purpose. Broad shared access can expose unrelated information. Third-party applications should also undergo periodic permission reviews, vendor risk assessment, credential rotation, and monitoring for abnormal behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 300.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach best supports resilient security architecture in an environment that changes frequently?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Freeze all security designs permanently after approval.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Continuously reassess architecture, validate controls, monitor drift, exercise recovery, and update protections as risks evolve.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review architecture only after successful attacks.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable telemetry to reduce complexity.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fast-changing environments create new identities, workloads, dependencies, and attack paths. Continuous architecture review, control validation, configuration monitoring, recovery testing, and threat reassessment help security teams identify gaps before attackers exploit them. Security design should therefore evolve alongside technology and business change rather than remaining fixed after initial deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 281. A security architect wants to reduce the risk that a compromised cloud administrator account can modify sensitive network controls without oversight. Which control is most appropriate? Require just-in-time privilege elevation with independent approval for high-impact network changes 2. Give all administrators [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24683"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24683"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24684,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24683\/revisions\/24684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}