{"id":24693,"date":"2026-09-29T12:01:48","date_gmt":"2026-09-29T12:01:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24693"},"modified":"2026-09-29T12:01:48","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T12:01:48","slug":"comptia-securityx-ca1-005-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/comptia-securityx-ca1-005-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400\/","title":{"rendered":"CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Test Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part20 Q381-400"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/ca1-005-exam-dumps\"><b>CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 381.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security architect wants to reduce the risk that a compromised privileged account can immediately alter enterprise-wide authentication policies. Which control is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Require just-in-time privilege elevation, independent approval, and strong MFA for authentication-policy changes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give all identity administrators permanent unrestricted access<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one shared privileged account for all identity operations<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable audit logging for authentication changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Just-in-time privilege reduces standing administrative access, while independent approval adds separation of duties for high-impact identity changes. Strong MFA provides additional assurance that a stolen password alone cannot authorize sensitive actions. Permanent broad privileges and shared accounts increase blast radius and weaken accountability. Authentication-policy changes should also be centrally logged and monitored because attackers who gain access to identity controls may attempt to weaken MFA, federation, or recovery settings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 382.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which architecture best protects enterprise applications from direct internet exposure while still allowing approved external users to access them securely?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Publish every application directly to the internet<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication for remote users<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow access based solely on source IP addresses<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use identity-aware application access through a zero-trust broker or secure proxy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An identity-aware access broker can authenticate and authorize users before establishing access to private applications. Access decisions can consider user identity, device posture, risk, authentication strength, and application sensitivity. This avoids exposing backend systems directly to the internet and reduces broad network access. IP address alone is not a sufficient trust signal, and authentication should never be removed merely because access is remote or proxied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 383.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security capability is most useful for identifying unexpected or excessive permissions assigned to machine identities in a cloud environment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> RAID monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS caching<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cloud entitlement and permission usage analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disk compression<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cloud entitlement analysis can reveal excessive, inherited, unused, or risky permissions assigned to service accounts, workload identities, and other machine identities. Comparing granted permissions with observed usage helps identify privileges that can safely be removed. Machine identities often accumulate access over time and may be overlooked during ordinary user access reviews. Least privilege should apply equally to both human and nonhuman identities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 384.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control best reduces the risk of a compromised API client abusing a sensitive transaction endpoint?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Trust the client completely after authentication.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Enforce scoped authorization, transaction limits, rate controls, and contextual validation.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable API logging.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give every client administrator-level access.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authentication alone does not prevent a compromised client from abusing an API. Scoped authorization limits the actions and resources available to the client, while transaction limits and rate controls constrain abuse. Contextual validation can identify anomalous patterns such as unusual device, location, or transaction behavior. Detailed auditing is also important for detection and investigation. Broad administrator access significantly increases potential impact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 385.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security operations team wants to detect malicious use of legitimate remote administration tools. Which approach provides the strongest visibility?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Correlate endpoint process activity, command lines, identity context, and network connections<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely only on malware file hashes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable endpoint telemetry<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Block all administrative tools permanently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Legitimate administration tools are frequently abused by attackers, so behavioral context is critical. Process execution, command-line arguments, parent-child relationships, remote-session data, identity events, and network connections can reveal suspicious activity even when the executable itself is trusted. File hashes alone are insufficient. Blanket blocking of all administrative tools is usually impractical and may interfere with legitimate operations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 386.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which design best protects critical cryptographic keys if the general-purpose operating system hosting an application is compromised?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store keys in plaintext configuration files.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep keys in application source code.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store keys in user home directories.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use an HSM or hardware-backed secure key service.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An HSM or hardware-backed key service isolates key material from the general-purpose operating system and can perform cryptographic operations without exposing private keys directly. Plaintext files, source code, and user directories remain vulnerable if the host is compromised. High-value key systems should also enforce least privilege, separation of duties, key rotation, secure backup, and detailed auditing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 387.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security practice best reduces the risk that outdated third-party dependencies remain unnoticed in production software?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable dependency inventories.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow arbitrary package versions.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain SBOMs and continuously scan dependencies for vulnerabilities and outdated components.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove automated build checks.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SBOMs provide visibility into the components and dependencies included in applications. Continuous dependency scanning can identify vulnerable or obsolete versions and support timely remediation. Without inventory, organizations may not know which applications are affected when a vulnerability is disclosed. Strong dependency management also includes trusted repositories, version pinning, integrity verification, and controlled update processes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 388.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes the purpose of data classification in enterprise security?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically encrypts all information.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It categorizes data based on sensitivity and handling requirements so appropriate controls can be applied.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It removes the need for access control.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It applies only to printed documents.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data classification helps organizations distinguish between public, internal, confidential, regulated, and highly sensitive information. Different classifications can drive different requirements for encryption, access, retention, monitoring, sharing, and disposal. Classification does not automatically implement controls, but it provides the basis for consistent handling decisions. It should apply across structured data, documents, cloud storage, collaboration platforms, and other information repositories.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 389.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security team detects that a normally dormant service account has begun making repeated privilege-management API calls. What should be done first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Investigate the identity, revoke suspicious sessions or credentials if needed, and review recent activity.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore the behavior because the account exists legitimately.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increase the service account&#8217;s privileges.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable audit logging for the account.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A dormant service account suddenly performing privilege-management operations is a significant anomaly and may indicate credential compromise. The security team should validate whether the activity is expected, inspect the source workload or host, review related API calls, and contain suspicious sessions or credentials. Dormant identities should generally have been disabled if no longer required. Successful authentication does not guarantee that the behavior is legitimate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 390.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control provides the strongest protection against unauthorized modification of enterprise audit records?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store logs only on local production systems.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow privileged users to delete logs freely.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable centralized collection.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Send logs to a separate immutable or tamper-resistant platform.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A separate immutable logging platform provides stronger integrity because attackers or administrators with access to production systems cannot easily alter historical records. Local-only storage creates a common failure domain. Security teams should also monitor for gaps in log collection, unexpected retention changes, and attempts to disable telemetry. Protected audit records are essential for investigation, compliance, and accountability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 391.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which architecture best limits lateral movement if an internet-facing application is compromised?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Place all internal systems on one flat network.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give the application broad administrative rights.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Segment the application and allow only required connections to downstream services.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable east-west monitoring.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Segmentation limits the systems a compromised application can reach after exploitation. Explicit allow rules should permit only necessary communication to required services and deny access to unrelated management, identity, and data systems. Broad privileges and flat networking significantly increase blast radius. Segmentation is most effective when paired with service identity, application authorization, and monitoring of unexpected internal traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 392.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes the purpose of a business impact analysis?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It identifies every software vulnerability in the enterprise.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It determines how disruption of business processes affects the organization and helps establish recovery priorities.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It replaces incident response planning.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It is used only to measure network performance.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A business impact analysis identifies critical processes, dependencies, acceptable downtime, data-loss tolerance, and consequences of disruption. These findings help determine recovery priorities and support RTO and RPO decisions. A BIA is focused on business consequences rather than technical vulnerability discovery. It informs continuity and disaster-recovery planning but does not replace incident response or technical resilience testing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 393.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which action is most appropriate after discovering that a privileged API key was exposed in a public repository?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Revoke or rotate the key immediately, review its usage, and investigate the exposure.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete only the current file and keep the key active.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Wait until the key expires naturally.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increase the key&#8217;s permissions.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A credential exposed publicly should be considered compromised because it may already have been copied or indexed. Revocation or rotation limits further misuse, while usage logs help determine whether the key was abused. Repository history should also be reviewed because deleting the latest version may not remove older copies. Preventive controls such as secret scanning and managed credential retrieval should be implemented to reduce recurrence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 394.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which architecture best protects recovery capability when ransomware compromises production systems and normal administrator credentials?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use the same credentials for production and backups.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep every backup permanently writable.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow production administrators unrestricted backup deletion.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain isolated recovery identities, immutable backups, and independent administrative access.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recovery systems should not depend entirely on the same identities and administrative paths used in production. Separate recovery identities and isolated administration reduce the chance that compromised production credentials can destroy backups. Immutable copies further prevent unauthorized modification or deletion. Recovery procedures should be exercised regularly so the organization knows that protected data can actually be restored under adverse conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 395.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which control most directly reduces exposure of sensitive data used for application testing?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Copy full production databases into every test environment.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable nonproduction access controls.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use masked, anonymized, or synthetic data where real identifiers are unnecessary.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give developers unrestricted access to production systems.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Masked, anonymized, or synthetic data enables realistic testing while reducing exposure of customer, regulated, or confidential information. Development and testing environments often have broader access and different operational controls than production, making unnecessary production data particularly risky. Data minimization should be applied wherever possible. Test systems should still use strong authentication, encryption, monitoring, and appropriate retention controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 396.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which statement best describes the purpose of security metrics and key performance indicators?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They guarantee that controls cannot fail.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They provide measurable evidence about security performance, trends, and control effectiveness.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They eliminate the need for qualitative risk analysis.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They are useful only for compliance reporting.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security metrics help organizations measure whether controls and processes are improving outcomes over time. Examples can include remediation time, detection coverage, incident response speed, privileged-access reduction, or recovery performance. Metrics do not eliminate the need for judgment and risk analysis, but they provide evidence that can support better decisions. Effective metrics should be tied to meaningful security objectives rather than collected solely for reporting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 397.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best reduces risk from unmanaged machine identities in a large cloud environment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Inventory machine identities, assign owners, review permissions, and rotate or eliminate unnecessary credentials.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Exempt service identities from governance.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give every machine identity administrator privileges.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable machine-identity logging.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Machine identities can greatly outnumber human users and often hold significant permissions. Inventory, ownership, access review, and credential lifecycle management are therefore essential. Unused credentials should be revoked, and active identities should use narrow permissions and short-lived credentials where possible. Exempting service identities from governance creates hidden attack paths and increases the chance of unmanaged privilege accumulation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 398.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which activity most strongly suggests an attacker is attempting to weaken cloud defenses before performing additional actions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A scheduled application health check succeeds.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A routine report is generated.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A standard backup completes.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A privileged identity disables threat detection and reduces audit-log retention immediately after an unusual login.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attackers often attempt to reduce visibility after gaining privileged access. Unexpectedly disabling detection services and shortening audit retention after suspicious authentication is a high-priority indicator. Security teams should validate the session, preserve available logs, restore monitoring, revoke suspicious access if warranted, and review other administrative changes made during the same period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 399.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security design best protects internal service-to-service communication in a zero-trust architecture?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Trust all traffic originating from internal IP addresses.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use a single shared API key for every service.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use workload identities, mutual authentication, scoped authorization, and short-lived credentials.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable service communication logging.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Zero-trust service communication requires explicit identity and authorization for every connection rather than implicit trust based on network location. Workload identities provide accountability, mutual authentication establishes both endpoints, scoped authorization limits permitted operations, and short-lived credentials reduce the impact of theft. Shared keys and IP-based trust create broad security boundaries and make compromise more damaging.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 400.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach best supports continuous improvement of an enterprise SecurityX-level security architecture?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Treat compliance approval as proof that the architecture will remain secure indefinitely.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Continuously reassess threats, test controls, review identities and dependencies, exercise recovery, and update architecture based on measured gaps.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review security design only after major incidents.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid changing controls once they have passed an audit.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Enterprise security architecture must evolve as technologies, identities, dependencies, threats, and business requirements change. Threat-model reviews, control testing, access analysis, detection validation, resilience exercises, and incident lessons provide evidence of where improvements are needed. Continuous reassessment helps prevent outdated assumptions and configuration drift from becoming persistent weaknesses. A mature program treats architecture as an ongoing risk-management discipline rather than a one-time compliance exercise.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full CompTIA SecurityX CA1-005 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 381. A security architect wants to reduce the risk that a compromised privileged account can immediately alter enterprise-wide authentication policies. Which control is most appropriate? Require just-in-time privilege elevation, independent approval, and strong MFA for authentication-policy changes 2. Give all identity administrators [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24693"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24693"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24693\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24694,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24693\/revisions\/24694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}