{"id":24723,"date":"2026-09-29T12:26:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-29T12:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24723"},"modified":"2026-09-29T12:26:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T12:26:00","slug":"salesforce-certified-integration-architect-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/salesforce-certified-integration-architect-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300\/","title":{"rendered":"Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part15 Q281-300"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certified-integration-architect-exam-dumps\"><b>Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><br \/>\n<\/b><b>Q281. Which design best protects an integration when the target system rejects requests above a fixed rate<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Unlimited parallel calls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rate aware throttling<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable retries<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Rate aware throttling<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rate aware throttling controls how quickly requests are sent so the receiving system defined capacity is not exceeded. Unlimited parallel calls can overwhelm the target application. Disabling retries removes a useful recovery mechanism for temporary failures. Shared administrator access does not solve traffic capacity problems. Rate aware throttling is therefore the correct answer because integrations should respect limits imposed by downstream services. Architects can combine throttling with queues controlled retries and monitoring. This allows traffic bursts to be absorbed without repeatedly triggering rate limit errors or causing unnecessary failures across dependent business processes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q282. Which approach best preserves business processing when a temporary external outage lasts several hours<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Fail every Salesforce transaction<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep synchronous calls open<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete pending requests<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Durable message queue<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Durable message queue<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A durable message queue stores accepted work safely while an external dependency remains unavailable. Failing every Salesforce transaction creates unnecessary business disruption. Keeping synchronous calls open for hours is impractical and will lead to timeouts. Deleting pending requests causes data loss. Durable message queue is therefore the correct answer because work can remain available until the external service recovers. Architects should define retention retry behavior message age monitoring and exception handling so queued transactions eventually reach a final state rather than remaining hidden in the backlog indefinitely.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q283. Which integration principle reduces the impact of changing an external provider implementation<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Encapsulation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Direct field dependency<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser automation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Encapsulation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Encapsulation hides provider specific implementation details behind a controlled interface or integration layer. Shared credentials are a security concern. Direct field dependencies increase coupling. Browser automation is fragile and unsuitable for enterprise integration. Encapsulation is therefore the correct answer because Salesforce business processes should depend on stable contracts rather than the internal details of external providers. When the provider changes protocols mappings or endpoints the integration layer can absorb those differences. This reduces the number of Salesforce components requiring modification and supports safer long term maintenance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q284. Which Salesforce API is designed for operations related to development tools and selected setup objects<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Bulk API<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Streaming API<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Tooling API<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Analytics API<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Tooling API<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tooling API provides access to objects and operations useful for development tooling configuration inspection and related Salesforce development activities. Bulk API is optimized for high volume business data processing. Streaming capabilities focus on event based communication. Analytics API supports analytical use cases. Tooling API is therefore the correct answer because development tools may need access to components such as Apex related metadata or other setup information without using the ordinary business record interfaces. Architects should select APIs according to their intended purpose rather than using one interface for every integration requirement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q285. Which strategy best prevents conflicting updates when Salesforce owns a customer email field<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reject external updates to that field<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Let every system overwrite it<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use the latest timestamp only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Select values randomly<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Reject external updates to that field<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rejecting external updates to a Salesforce owned field enforces the agreed data ownership model and prevents nonauthoritative systems from overwriting the trusted value. Allowing every system to update creates conflicts. Choosing only the newest timestamp ignores ownership rules. Random selection is obviously unreliable. Reject external updates to that field is therefore the correct answer because system of record responsibilities should be enforced technically where possible. Architects should document ownership at the attribute level and ensure integrations distribute authoritative values without allowing uncontrolled updates from consumer systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q286. Which design is best when an outbound request must be retried only for temporary failures<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Retry every response<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore error codes<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Retry based on error classification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Retry based on error classification<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retry based on error classification distinguishes temporary failures from permanent business errors before deciding whether another attempt is appropriate. Retrying every response can repeatedly submit invalid data. Ignoring error codes removes valuable recovery information. Disabling monitoring makes failures harder to diagnose. Retry based on error classification is therefore the correct answer because timeout and temporary server failures may recover while validation or authorization failures usually require correction. Architects should define maximum attempts delay rules escalation paths and final exception handling for transactions that remain unsuccessful.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q287. Which integration capability helps transform one source message into several target messages<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Dashboard refresh<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Message splitting<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser redirect<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Report scheduling<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Message splitting<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message splitting divides one source payload into several smaller target messages according to defined business or technical rules. Dashboard refresh and report scheduling are analytics functions. Browser redirects concern user navigation. Message splitting is therefore the correct answer because downstream systems may require separate transactions for individual records or may enforce payload size limits. Architects should preserve correlation identifiers and define ordering recovery and reconciliation behavior so all pieces of the original business message can be tracked and handled correctly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q288. Which practice best verifies that an external API still meets agreed performance expectations<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increase user permissions<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable timeouts<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service level monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Share credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Service level monitoring<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Service level monitoring measures operational behavior such as latency availability and error rates against agreed expectations. Increasing permissions does not improve service performance. Disabling timeouts can make failures last longer. Sharing credentials creates security problems. Service level monitoring is therefore the correct answer because external services can degrade even when requests still succeed technically. Architects should monitor both averages and higher percentile response times along with error rates so partial degradation becomes visible before it causes widespread user or business impact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q289. Which design is best when one producer sends messages to several consumers with different business purposes<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared database lock<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> One synchronous service chain<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Direct browser calls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Event distribution layer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Event distribution layer<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An event distribution layer allows one producer to publish information while multiple consumers subscribe independently according to their business needs. A shared database lock and synchronous chain create unnecessary coupling. Browser calls do not provide reliable backend distribution. Event distribution layer is therefore the correct answer because billing analytics fulfillment and notification systems can react to the same event without depending directly on each other. Architects should define stable event contracts consumer recovery and replay behavior while allowing each subscriber to scale independently.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q290. Which integration practice best helps avoid sending unchanged records during a recurring synchronization<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Change based filtering<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Full export every cycle<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable timestamps<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate all records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Change based filtering<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Change based filtering selects only records created or modified since the previous successful synchronization point. Full exports repeatedly transfer unchanged data. Disabling timestamps removes useful selection information. Duplicating records increases processing volume unnecessarily. Change based filtering is therefore the correct answer because recurring integrations should minimize unnecessary data movement whenever the business requirement allows incremental synchronization. Architects should preserve reliable checkpoints and account for timing boundaries so records are not skipped when a prior job fails or completes partially.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q291. Which Salesforce capability allows external applications to access external data represented through external objects<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Static Resources<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Approval Processes<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Salesforce Connect<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Report subscriptions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Salesforce Connect<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Salesforce Connect supports external objects that represent data stored outside Salesforce without requiring full replication into Salesforce storage. Static Resources store files. Approval Processes manage approvals. Report subscriptions distribute report information. Salesforce Connect is therefore the correct answer because it supports data virtualization scenarios where the external application remains the authoritative source. Architects should evaluate external system performance security and supported operations because user interactions with external objects can depend directly on the remote system availability and response time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q292. Which approach best limits the effect of repeated transient failures on a downstream service<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Unlimited retries<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Exponential backoff<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared administrator account<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable error logging<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Exponential backoff<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Exponential backoff increases the delay between repeated retry attempts so a temporarily failing service receives time to recover. Unlimited rapid retries can worsen overload or prolong an outage. Shared administrator accounts do not address reliability. Disabling error logs reduces visibility. Exponential backoff is therefore the correct answer because distributed integrations should avoid repeatedly sending traffic to a dependency that is already struggling. Architects should also define retry limits and use error classification so permanent failures are not retried unnecessarily.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q293. Which design helps ensure a message cannot be processed using an unknown contract version<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Version validation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore version information<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable schema checks<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one mapping for all formats<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Version validation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Version validation checks the message contract version before processing and confirms that the integration supports it. Ignoring version information or disabling schema checks can cause messages to be interpreted incorrectly. Using one mapping for incompatible formats can corrupt business data. Version validation is therefore the correct answer because message contracts evolve over time and consumers must know which structure and semantics they are receiving. Unsupported versions should be rejected clearly or routed to an appropriate compatibility process rather than processed using assumptions from another version.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q294. Which monitoring approach provides one view of logs from Salesforce middleware and external applications<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Local files only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable tracing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Separate manual reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Centralized logging<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Centralized logging<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Centralized logging collects relevant operational records from several integration components into one searchable location. Local files only and separate manual reviews make cross system troubleshooting slower. Disabling tracing removes valuable context. Centralized logging is therefore the correct answer because distributed integrations may fail in Salesforce middleware network services or external applications. A central view combined with correlation identifiers helps support teams reconstruct transaction paths and identify the source of failures. Sensitive values should be masked and log access should remain controlled.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q295. Which security practice ensures an integration can perform only approved actions after authentication<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transport encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authorization<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data compression<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Caching<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Authorization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authorization determines which operations an authenticated integration client is allowed to perform. Transport encryption protects information during transmission. Data compression reduces payload size. Caching improves performance. Authorization is therefore the correct answer because establishing caller identity does not automatically justify access to every Salesforce object field or business operation. Architects should use scopes permissions service policies and least privilege controls so each integration receives only the access required for its defined responsibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q296. Which architecture pattern is best when Salesforce and external systems react independently to each other business events<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Direct database sharing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Long synchronous calls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Event choreography<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared browser sessions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Event choreography<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Event choreography allows systems to publish and react to business events without requiring one central component to direct every step. Direct database sharing creates tight coupling. Long synchronous calls create availability dependencies. Shared browser sessions are not suitable for backend integration. Event choreography is therefore the correct answer because systems can participate in a distributed process by responding to events that matter to them. Architects should document responsibilities event meanings compensation behavior and monitoring because distributed flows can become difficult to understand without clear governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q297. Which operational control is most useful when malformed messages repeatedly reach a consumer<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increase concurrency<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete all events<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable validation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Quarantine invalid messages<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Quarantine invalid messages<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quarantining invalid messages separates malformed transactions from normal processing so they do not repeatedly fail and consume resources. Increasing concurrency does not correct bad data. Deleting all events risks losing valid work. Disabling validation allows incorrect messages to enter downstream systems. Quarantine invalid messages is therefore the correct answer because persistent format or business rule failures often require investigation or source correction. Architects should preserve enough context to identify the sender reason for failure and safe replay procedure after correction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q298. Which design helps ensure the correct external record is updated when Salesforce IDs differ across environments<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use a stable business key<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Hard code Salesforce IDs<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Match on display name only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use record creation order<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Use a stable business key<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A stable business key provides an identifier that remains meaningful across Salesforce environments and connected systems. Hard coded Salesforce IDs may differ between environments. Display names may not be unique. Record creation order is not a reliable identity method. Use a stable business key is therefore the correct answer because integrations should match records using durable identifiers that survive deployments migrations and environment changes. External IDs or governed enterprise identifiers can support reliable upsert and reconciliation behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q299. Which testing practice verifies the complete integration path from Salesforce through all dependent systems<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Unit testing only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> End to end testing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Report validation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser theme testing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. End to end testing<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">End to end testing verifies that a complete business transaction moves successfully through Salesforce middleware and all required external systems. Unit testing validates individual components but does not confirm the entire integration path. Report validation and browser theme testing are unrelated. End to end testing is therefore the correct answer because interface mappings authentication routing and downstream behavior may work individually yet fail when combined. Tests should include successful transactions important error scenarios retries and representative data so the complete flow is validated before production deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Q300. Which governance practice best ensures integration interfaces have clearly assigned technical owners<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove documentation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface ownership registry<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use informal agreements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Interface ownership registry<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An interface ownership registry records who is responsible for each integration endpoint message contract service or interface. Shared administrator access does not establish ownership. Removing documentation creates uncertainty. Informal agreements can become outdated as teams change. Interface ownership registry is therefore the correct answer because operational issues security changes and contract updates require a clearly identified responsible team. Architects should keep ownership information current and connect it with escalation paths documentation lifecycle status and dependency information.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. Q281. Which design best protects an integration when the target system rejects requests above a fixed rate Unlimited parallel calls Rate aware throttling Disable retries Shared administrator access Correct Answer: 2. Rate aware throttling Explanation Rate aware throttling controls how quickly requests are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24723"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24723"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24724,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24723\/revisions\/24724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}