{"id":24892,"date":"2026-09-30T09:15:22","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24892"},"modified":"2026-09-30T09:15:22","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:15:22","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-710-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-710-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Test Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part19 Q361-380"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 361.<\/b><\/p>\n

An administrator wants to verify whether traffic is being handled by a prefilter rule before it reaches the access control policy. Which action should be taken first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Review the prefilter policy, rule order, match conditions, and configured action for the traffic<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Delete the file policy<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable all NAT rules<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Restart Secure Firewall Management Center<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Prefilter processing occurs before the standard access control policy, so it should be examined first when traffic appears to bypass later security inspection. The administrator should verify the source and destination networks, security zones, protocols, tunnel criteria, and rule order to determine whether the connection is matching a prefilter rule. A Fastpath action, for example, can cause selected traffic to bypass deeper application, intrusion, and file inspection. If the rule is broader than intended, sensitive traffic may be excluded from security controls. Deleting file policies or NAT rules would alter unrelated behavior without identifying the real cause. Restarting Management Center is also unnecessary unless there is evidence of a management-system problem. Reviewing prefilter logic provides the most direct way to determine whether an early processing decision is responsible for the unexpected traffic handling.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 362.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A Threat Defense device is not enforcing a recently modified security policy even though the changes are visible in Secure Firewall Management Center. What is the most likely reason?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> The firewall requires a factory reset after every policy modification<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The policy must be recreated as a new object<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The device must be re-registered after each policy edit<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The pending configuration changes have not been deployed successfully<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Changes made in Secure Firewall Management Center are stored centrally until they are deployed to the managed Threat Defense device. Saving a rule or object does not automatically change the active configuration on the enforcement device. The administrator should check for pending changes, initiate deployment to the correct device, and then verify the deployment task for success or errors. Routine policy modifications do not require device re-registration, factory resets, or recreation of the policy. If deployment fails, the task details should be examined before any further action is taken. Understanding the distinction between saved configuration and deployed configuration is essential because many apparent policy failures are simply cases where the correct configuration exists in Management Center but has not yet been applied to the firewall that is processing production traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 363.<\/b><\/p>\n

      Which feature allows multiple network hosts or subnets to be combined into one reusable object for use across access control and NAT policies?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Security zone<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> URL category<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Network object group<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Malware disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        A network object group lets administrators combine multiple host, subnet, or network objects into a single reusable configuration element. This simplifies policy management when the same collection of networks must appear repeatedly in access control, NAT, or other supported policies. Instead of manually entering each network into every rule, the administrator can reference the object group. If a network changes later, the object group can be updated once and the revised configuration deployed to all affected policies. Security zones group interfaces rather than IP addresses, URL categories classify web destinations, and malware dispositions describe file-analysis results. Object groups improve consistency and reduce configuration errors, particularly in large environments where the same server farms, branch networks, or partner address ranges are referenced many times across the firewall rule base.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 364.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A connection does not match any explicit access control rule. Which configuration determines the action that Secure Firewall ultimately takes?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> The first NAT rule in the policy<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The access control policy default action<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The device health policy<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The interface description<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          The access control policy default action determines what happens to traffic that reaches the end of the rule set without matching an explicit rule. This behavior is an important part of the firewall’s overall security posture. A restrictive default can deny unmatched traffic, while a more permissive default may allow it under specified inspection conditions. Administrators should understand this setting because incomplete or overly narrow rules can cause unexpected traffic to fall through to the default action. NAT rules perform address translation and do not define the final access-control disposition. Health policies monitor device condition, while interface descriptions are informational. When troubleshooting a session that does not appear to match any access control rule, reviewing the policy’s default action is therefore essential to understanding why the firewall allowed or denied the connection.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 365.<\/b><\/p>\n

          An organization needs traffic between two private internal networks to retain its original addresses, while Internet-bound traffic from the same networks should use translation. Which NAT configuration is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Configure identity NAT for the internal traffic and Dynamic PAT for Internet-bound sessions<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Use Dynamic PAT for all flows<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Configure static NAT for all internal communication<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable access control<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Identity NAT is used when selected traffic should pass through the firewall without changing its original source or destination addresses. This is useful for internal communication, VPN-related traffic, or applications that depend on real endpoint addressing. The administrator can configure identity NAT specifically for traffic between the two private networks while keeping Dynamic PAT for Internet-bound connections. Dynamic PAT for every flow would unnecessarily translate internal communication, while static NAT would create fixed translated addresses rather than preserving the originals. Disabling access control would not solve a translation requirement because NAT and access-control functions are separate. Rule ordering is also important: the identity NAT condition must be specific enough to match the intended traffic before a broader translation rule applies. Proper design preserves internal addressing while still providing scalable Internet translation.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 366.<\/b><\/p>\n

            An HTTPS application stops working after TLS decryption is enabled because it uses certificate pinning. What is the best solution?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Disable intrusion inspection for all users<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Trust every HTTPS connection<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove all URL filtering<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Create a narrowly scoped do-not-decrypt exception for the affected application or destination<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Certificate pinning can cause applications to reject TLS sessions when a firewall performs decryption and presents a substitute certificate instead of the exact certificate or public key the application expects. The correct response is to create a narrowly scoped decryption bypass for the affected application or destination rather than disabling inspection globally. This preserves TLS visibility for other traffic while allowing the incompatible application to function. Trusting all HTTPS traffic would create an unnecessarily large security blind spot, and disabling intrusion or URL filtering would not resolve the certificate-pinning issue. Decryption exclusions should be documented and reviewed periodically because traffic that is not decrypted cannot receive the same level of file, malware, or application-layer inspection. The administrator should keep the exception as limited as possible to reduce security exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 367.<\/b><\/p>\n

              Which pair of attributes can be used to distinguish a website’s content type from its perceived level of risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Interface state and security zone<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> NAT rule and route metric<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> URL category and URL reputation<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> File hash and VLAN ID<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                URL category describes the type or purpose of a website, such as business, news, social networking, gambling, or malware-related content. URL reputation provides a separate assessment of how trustworthy or risky the destination is considered. These two attributes can be combined to create more precise web-access policies. For example, an organization could allow websites in a business category only if their reputation is acceptable, while blocking similar sites that have a poor or suspicious reputation. Security zones and interface state describe network topology, NAT rules and route metrics affect forwarding, and file hashes are related to content analysis rather than web classification. Understanding the distinction between category and reputation is especially useful when a destination seems to belong to an acceptable category but is still blocked because its assessed risk level is unfavorable.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 368.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A rule contains the correct source and destination networks, but traffic continues to match another access control rule. Which additional condition should be verified first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Firewall serial number<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Source and destination security zones<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Hardware model<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Management Center system name<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Security zones are common access control match criteria and can cause a rule to fail even when the source and destination IP addresses are correct. The administrator should verify which interface the packet enters, which interface the firewall selects for egress, and which security zones are assigned to those interfaces. If the actual zones differ from the zones specified in the intended access control rule, the rule will not match. Serial numbers, hardware models, and the Management Center hostname do not influence normal access control rule selection. If the zones are correct, other conditions such as application, user identity, port, URL category, or network objects should then be reviewed. Effective troubleshooting requires evaluating the entire rule rather than focusing only on address-based criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 369.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Which Secure Firewall feature can passively identify information about hosts and applications to improve contextual awareness during security analysis?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Network discovery<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Dynamic PAT<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> High availability<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Interactive Block<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Network discovery helps Secure Firewall build contextual awareness by observing network activity and learning information about hosts, applications, and other characteristics of the environment. This information can help analysts understand which systems exist, what applications they appear to use, and how intrusion events relate to actual assets. For example, an intrusion alert targeting a particular service may be more meaningful if discovery indicates that the destination host actually runs that service. Dynamic PAT performs address translation, high availability provides redundancy, and Interactive Block presents warning pages to web users. None of those features builds environmental context. Discovery should be scoped appropriately so useful information is collected without unnecessary overhead. Accurate context improves investigation quality and can support more informed intrusion-policy tuning and event prioritization.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 370.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A Snort signature repeatedly triggers against a host that has been verified as not vulnerable to the detected condition. Which response is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Disable every intrusion rule<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Remove all logging<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Turn off Snort inspection globally<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Apply targeted tuning or suppression for the specific signature and host context<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Targeted intrusion tuning is the preferred way to reduce false-positive noise without weakening protection across the network. If the destination host has been verified as not vulnerable to the condition described by the signature, the administrator can suppress, threshold, or otherwise tune that specific event for the relevant host or traffic pattern. Disabling all Snort rules or global intrusion inspection would remove valuable protection against unrelated attacks. Removing logging would only hide the alert and reduce visibility without improving the policy. Tuning decisions should be based on verified application, operating system, and vulnerability information and should be documented for later review. Because systems and software versions change, exceptions should also be reassessed periodically to make sure the original justification remains valid.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 371.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Which policy type is most appropriate for configuring supported device-level settings such as syslog destinations and time synchronization?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> File policy<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Access control rule<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Platform settings policy<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> URL filtering rule<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Platform settings policies are intended for supported device-level configuration that is separate from ordinary traffic access decisions. Depending on platform and software release, these settings can include logging destinations, time synchronization, management-related parameters, and other operational behavior. Centralizing such settings helps administrators maintain consistency across multiple managed devices. File policies control transferred content, access control rules determine whether traffic is permitted or denied, and URL filtering handles web-category and reputation decisions. None of those serves the same device-configuration role. Accurate time synchronization is particularly important because connection, intrusion, and audit events must contain reliable timestamps for incident correlation. Proper external logging configuration also helps preserve events outside the firewall and integrate Secure Firewall activity with centralized monitoring and SIEM platforms.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 372.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A deployment fails immediately after a configuration change. What should the administrator do first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Factory-reset the device<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Review the deployment task details and specific error messages<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Delete the access control policy<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable all health monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Deployment task details usually provide the most direct evidence about why a configuration push failed. They can identify invalid references, unsupported features, conflicting settings, communication problems, or syntax-related issues. The administrator should review these details before taking broader action because the error often points directly to the component that needs correction. A factory reset would be unnecessarily disruptive and could create significant downtime. Deleting the access control policy would also be excessive unless the error specifically identifies a problem that cannot be corrected normally. Health monitoring should remain active because it can provide additional information about device status and communication. Troubleshooting should begin with the existing evidence, correct the identified configuration issue, and then retry deployment rather than making unrelated or destructive changes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 373.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Which practice best supports recovery after a catastrophic Secure Firewall Management Center failure?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Maintain current, tested Management Center backups and documented recovery procedures<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Depend only on connection event history<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Rely on Dynamic PAT configuration<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Assume that an HA firewall peer contains the complete management database<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Current and tested backups provide the strongest foundation for restoring Secure Firewall Management Center after a major failure. The organization should define a backup schedule, protect backup files, understand software-version compatibility, and periodically verify that restoration procedures work as expected. Connection-event history can support investigations but does not replace a configuration backup. Dynamic PAT is unrelated to management recovery, while a high-availability pair of Threat Defense appliances protects data-plane forwarding rather than storing a full replacement for the Management Center system. A good recovery plan should also include software images, administrative documentation, licensing information, credentials, and clear responsibility for restoration. Backup creation alone is not enough; the organization must also know that the files are current, accessible, and usable when a real outage occurs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 374.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            What is the primary purpose of high availability between compatible Threat Defense appliances?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Improve Snort signature quality<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Automatically update URL categories<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Replace access control policy<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Provide firewall service redundancy when one peer becomes unavailable<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              High availability is a resiliency mechanism that allows a compatible peer firewall to assume the active role when the currently active appliance fails or meets configured failover conditions. Depending on the platform and design, configuration and relevant connection state can be synchronized to reduce disruption. High availability does not make Snort signatures more accurate, automatically update URL categories, or replace access control policies. These functions remain separate. Administrators should monitor failover links, peer health, synchronization, and monitored interfaces to ensure that the standby device is genuinely capable of assuming service. Periodic failover testing is also useful because it verifies the complete operational path, including routing and interface behavior, rather than merely confirming that the configuration exists on both devices.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 375.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              An administrator wants connection records that contain final session information such as total bytes and duration whenever available. Which logging choice is generally most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Disable connection logging<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Record only health events<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Enable appropriate connection-end logging<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Record only device startup events<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Connection-end logging often provides the most complete session information because the firewall has observed the flow throughout its lifetime. The resulting record can contain final byte counts, packet totals, duration, application identification, user context, security zones, and the policy rule that handled the connection. Connection-start logging can still be useful when immediate visibility is required, but many values are not known when a session first begins. Health events and startup records provide operational information rather than detailed connection statistics. Disabling logging would eliminate important evidence for troubleshooting and security investigations. Administrators should still balance logging requirements against event volume and storage capacity. In high-traffic environments, carefully selecting which rules log at start, end, or both can provide useful visibility without generating unnecessary data.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 376.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A specific Allow rule must provide an exception to a broader Block rule covering the same network range. How should the rules be ordered?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Put the broad Block rule first<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Place the specific Allow exception before the broader Block rule<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Change both rules to Trust<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Remove source and destination conditions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Access control rules are evaluated sequentially, so a specific exception must generally appear before a broader rule that would otherwise match the same traffic. If the broad Block rule comes first, the firewall will deny the session before it ever reaches the more specific Allow rule. Placing the narrowly defined exception first permits the intended traffic while the subsequent broad Block rule continues to deny the rest of the network range. Changing both rules to Trust would allow traffic while bypassing deeper inspection and would defeat the intended restriction. Removing address conditions would make the policy less precise. After reordering and deploying the rules, administrators should review connection events to verify that exception traffic matches the Allow rule and all other matching traffic is processed by the Block rule.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 377.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A connection is permitted by policy and NAT appears correct, but responses return through a different firewall. Which issue is most likely causing the session failure?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Asymmetric routing<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> URL reputation<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> File policy mismatch<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Incorrect malware disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Asymmetric routing occurs when the forward and return directions of a session use different network paths. Stateful firewalls maintain connection information and expect return traffic to correspond to an existing session. If replies bypass the original firewall and instead traverse another device, the first firewall may never see the return traffic, while the alternate device may not possess the necessary connection state. This can cause intermittent or complete application failure. Administrators should examine upstream and downstream routing, equal-cost paths, load balancers, redundant routers, and policy-based routing to identify why the return path differs. URL reputation, file policies, and malware dispositions do not determine the return network path. Correcting routing symmetry is therefore the most relevant response when session state is split across different firewalls.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 378.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Before performing a major Secure Firewall software upgrade, which preparation step is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Delete all historical events<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Remove every NAT rule<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable all access control policies<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Validate compatibility, supported upgrade paths, system readiness, backups, and recovery procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Upgrade preparation should begin with validation of the complete environment. Administrators should confirm that the target Management Center and Threat Defense versions are mutually supported, verify the correct upgrade sequence, check hardware and storage requirements, review system health, and ensure that current backups and recovery plans are available. This reduces the risk of failed upgrades, version mismatches, or extended outages. Deleting historical events, removing NAT, or disabling access control is not generally required and could create operational or security problems. Because supported upgrade paths can differ among platforms and software releases, administrators should not assume that any direct version jump is valid. Proper preparation includes both technical compatibility and the ability to recover if the maintenance does not proceed as expected.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 379.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Which intrusion-policy concept provides a predefined collection of Snort rule settings that administrators can use as a starting point and then customize?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> NAT pool<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Security zone<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Base intrusion policy<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> URL category<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A base intrusion policy provides an initial set of Snort rule states and behaviors that can serve as the foundation for an organization’s intrusion prevention configuration. Administrators can select a baseline appropriate to their security and performance objectives and then tune individual rules according to actual applications, vulnerabilities, assets, and event data. This is more manageable than configuring every rule manually from the beginning. NAT pools are used for address translation, security zones group interfaces, and URL categories classify website content. No generic intrusion baseline perfectly matches every environment, so ongoing tuning remains important. Administrators should use verified network context and observed events to adjust the policy without unnecessarily disabling protections that may still be valuable against other systems or traffic patterns.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 380.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        After a software upgrade, traffic begins matching unexpected access control rules. What is the best first troubleshooting approach?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Factory-reset all managed devices<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Verify the active deployed policy, rule order, object values, security zones, device health, and relevant connection events<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable intrusion inspection permanently<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Delete all reusable objects from Management Center<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Unexpected post-upgrade policy behavior should be investigated systematically. The administrator should confirm that the expected access control policy is actually deployed, verify rule order and object values, check interface and security-zone assignments, review device health, and analyze connection events to identify which rule is processing the traffic. An upgrade may expose an existing configuration issue, leave a deployment incomplete, or introduce changed behavior that requires adjustment. Factory-resetting devices or deleting all objects would be highly disruptive and could make recovery more difficult. Permanently disabling intrusion inspection would reduce security without identifying the cause. A structured review of the active configuration and available event evidence is the safest and most efficient way to determine whether the issue involves policy logic, deployment status, compatibility, or another post-upgrade condition.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 361. An administrator wants to verify whether traffic is being handled by a prefilter rule before it reaches the access control policy. Which action should be taken first? Review the prefilter policy, rule order, match conditions, and configured action for the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24892"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24892"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24893,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24892\/revisions\/24893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}