{"id":24894,"date":"2026-09-30T09:15:46","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:15:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24894"},"modified":"2026-09-30T09:15:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:15:46","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-710-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-710-test-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Test Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part20 Q381-400"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 381.<\/b><\/p>\n

An administrator wants to verify whether a specific flow is being bypassed by a prefilter Fastpath rule before it reaches normal access control inspection. What should be checked first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> The prefilter policy rule order, match conditions, and action<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The file policy only<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The URL category only<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The device serial number<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Prefilter policies are processed before the normal access control policy, so they are the logical first place to investigate when traffic appears to bypass deeper inspection. A Fastpath action can allow selected traffic to skip later application identification, intrusion inspection, and file analysis. The administrator should verify the rule order, source and destination criteria, security zones, protocols, tunnel conditions, and any other configured match fields. If the rule is too broad, traffic that should receive full security inspection may be unintentionally exempted. File policy and URL filtering are later-stage security controls and may never evaluate a session that has already been fastpathed. Device serial numbers have no role in traffic matching. If the rule is incorrect, it should be narrowed, the updated policy should be deployed, and connection behavior should then be revalidated.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 382.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A Secure Firewall administrator modifies an object used by several active policies, but the managed Threat Defense device continues using the old object value. What is the most likely reason?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> The device must be rebooted after every object change<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The object must be recreated under a different name<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The managed device must be registered again<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The updated configuration has not yet been deployed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Secure Firewall Management Center separates configuration editing from device enforcement. An administrator can modify a reusable object in Management Center, and all references to that object remain intact, but the managed Threat Defense device continues using its currently deployed configuration until a new deployment occurs. The correct response is to review pending changes, deploy them to the affected device, and confirm that the deployment completes successfully. Rebooting the firewall is not normally required for routine object modifications. Recreating the object is unnecessary because the existing policy references can continue using it. Re-registration is also unrelated unless there is a management-association problem. This workflow is especially important with shared objects because one object modification can affect many rules at once, making deployment validation and change review essential before the new value becomes active in production.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 383.<\/b><\/p>\n

      Which Secure Firewall construct should be used when several interfaces need to share a logical trust boundary for policy matching?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Network object group<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> URL category<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Security zone<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Malware disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Security zones provide a logical abstraction for grouping interfaces that share a common security role. For example, several internal interfaces can be assigned to an Inside zone, while Internet-facing interfaces can belong to an Outside zone. Access control rules can then reference these zones rather than individual physical or logical interfaces. This simplifies rule design, improves readability, and makes future interface changes easier to manage. A network object group combines IP addresses or networks rather than interfaces. URL categories classify web destinations, while malware dispositions describe the security status of analyzed files. Incorrect zone assignment can cause unexpected rule matching even when the source and destination IP addresses are correct. Therefore, zone membership should always be verified when troubleshooting traffic that appears to enter or leave through an unexpected security context.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 384.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A connection reaches the bottom of the access control rule set without matching any explicit rule. What determines how the traffic is handled?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> The first NAT rule<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The access control policy default action<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The health policy<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The interface MTU<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          The default action of the access control policy determines what happens when traffic does not match any explicit rule. This behavior is a critical part of the policy design because unmatched traffic may otherwise be allowed or denied in ways administrators do not expect. A restrictive default is often used to prevent unapproved communication, while some environments may choose a default that allows traffic with specified inspection. NAT rules determine address translation but do not define the final access-control disposition. Health policies monitor system status, while MTU affects packet transmission characteristics rather than rule matching. When troubleshooting a session that does not appear in any explicit rule match, administrators should review the default action and confirm whether that behavior aligns with the intended security posture. Logging on the default action can also help identify traffic that lacks a dedicated rule.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 385.<\/b><\/p>\n

          An organization needs traffic between two internal private networks to remain untranslated, while those same networks should use PAT when accessing the Internet. Which configuration is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Identity NAT for internal-to-internal traffic and Dynamic PAT for Internet-bound traffic<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Dynamic PAT for all traffic<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Static NAT for both internal networks<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> No NAT rules anywhere<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Identity NAT is appropriate when specific traffic must preserve its original source and destination addresses. This is common for internal communication, site-to-site connectivity, or applications that depend on original endpoint addressing. The administrator can configure identity NAT for communication between the two private networks while retaining Dynamic PAT for sessions that leave toward the Internet. Dynamic PAT for every flow would unnecessarily translate internal traffic. Static NAT would create fixed translated addresses rather than preserving the originals, while removing all NAT would also eliminate the required Internet translation. NAT rule scope and order are important because a broad PAT rule could match before the intended exemption if the configuration is not designed correctly. The administrator should therefore verify both the identity NAT criteria and the order in which translation rules are evaluated.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 386.<\/b><\/p>\n

            An HTTPS application stops working after TLS decryption is enabled because it validates a pinned certificate. What is the best corrective action?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Disable all intrusion inspection<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Trust all HTTPS traffic<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove the access control policy<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Create a narrowly scoped do-not-decrypt exception for the affected application or destination<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Certificate pinning can cause an application to reject TLS sessions when a firewall decrypts the traffic and presents a substitute certificate. The correct response is usually to create a targeted decryption bypass for the specific application or destination rather than disabling decryption across the network. This preserves visibility into other encrypted traffic while allowing the incompatible application to function. Trusting all HTTPS traffic would create a broad security blind spot, while disabling intrusion inspection would not solve the certificate-validation problem. Removing the access control policy would be both unrelated and highly disruptive. The exception should be carefully documented and limited to the smallest practical scope because traffic that bypasses decryption cannot receive the same level of file, malware, URL, and application-layer inspection. Administrators should periodically review such exemptions to ensure they remain necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 387.<\/b><\/p>\n

              Which pair of attributes helps an administrator distinguish a website’s content classification from its assessed level of trust or risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Security zone and interface type<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> NAT rule and route metric<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> URL category and URL reputation<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> File type and VLAN tag<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                URL category and URL reputation serve different but complementary purposes. Category describes what type of content or function a website represents, such as business, social networking, gambling, or malware-related content. Reputation reflects the perceived trustworthiness or risk associated with that destination. An organization can combine both values in policy to create more precise controls. For example, a business-related site may be allowed if its reputation is acceptable but blocked if its reputation is poor or suspicious. Security zones and interface types describe network topology, NAT and route metrics affect traffic forwarding, and file types and VLAN tags apply to other areas of inspection. Understanding the difference between category and reputation is useful when a site appears to belong to an allowed category but is still denied because its risk assessment does not meet policy requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 388.<\/b><\/p>\n

                An access control rule contains the correct network objects, but traffic still does not match the intended rule. Which additional criterion should be verified early in troubleshooting?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> The firewall chassis serial number<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Source and destination security zones<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The Management Center appliance model<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The backup schedule<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Security zones are frequently used as access control rule conditions, and a zone mismatch can prevent the intended rule from matching even when source and destination addresses are correct. The administrator should verify the actual ingress interface, the route-selected egress interface, and the security zones associated with both. A rule expecting Inside-to-Outside traffic will not match if the packet actually enters through an interface assigned to a different zone. Chassis serial numbers, management appliance models, and backup schedules do not affect normal access-control rule evaluation. If the zones are correct, the administrator should continue reviewing other rule criteria such as applications, ports, users, URL categories, and object values. Effective troubleshooting requires examining all match conditions rather than assuming that network addresses alone determine which rule processes the traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 389.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Which Secure Firewall capability can provide contextual information about hosts and applications that are observed on the network?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Network discovery<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Dynamic PAT<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> High availability<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Interactive Block<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Network discovery helps Secure Firewall learn contextual information about hosts, applications, and activity observed on the network. This context can improve security analysis because administrators gain a clearer understanding of what systems exist and what types of services or applications they appear to use. During an intrusion investigation, for example, the value of an alert can be interpreted more accurately when the destination host’s characteristics are known. Dynamic PAT performs address and port translation, high availability provides device redundancy, and Interactive Block creates a warning page for web users. None of those features builds environmental context. Discovery should be scoped appropriately to gather useful information while minimizing unnecessary processing. Accurate host and application context can also help security teams tune intrusion rules and prioritize alerts according to actual risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 390.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A Snort rule repeatedly generates alerts against a server that has been verified as not vulnerable to the corresponding exploit. What is the best administrative response?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Disable all intrusion rules<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Turn off all event logging<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove the access control policy<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Apply targeted tuning or suppression based on the verified host context<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Targeted tuning is the preferred response when a specific intrusion rule creates known false-positive or irrelevant events for a verified host. The administrator can suppress or adjust the rule for the affected system or traffic pattern while preserving the same detection capability for other hosts where the vulnerability may exist. Disabling every intrusion rule would remove broad security coverage, while turning off event logging would only hide the alerts and reduce visibility. Removing the access control policy would not solve the root issue and would create major security exposure. Tuning decisions should be documented and periodically reviewed because host software, services, and vulnerability status can change over time. Context-aware rule tuning helps balance detection effectiveness, system performance, and analyst workload without creating unnecessary blind spots.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 391.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Which Secure Firewall configuration area is most appropriate for device-level settings such as supported syslog destinations and time synchronization?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> File policy<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Access control rule<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Platform settings policy<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> URL filtering condition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Platform settings policies are designed for supported device-level parameters that are separate from ordinary access-control decisions. Depending on the platform and software release, these settings can include external logging, time synchronization, and other operational behavior. Centralizing such settings through Management Center helps administrators maintain consistency across multiple managed devices. File policies control transferred content, access control rules determine how network sessions are handled, and URL filtering conditions classify or restrict web destinations. Accurate time synchronization is especially important because connection, intrusion, deployment, and audit events must have consistent timestamps for reliable investigation and correlation. Likewise, external syslog configuration can provide centralized event retention and SIEM integration. Platform settings therefore play an important role in operational consistency and security monitoring across the managed firewall environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 392.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A deployment fails after an administrator adds a new advanced configuration object. What is the best first action?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Factory-reset the managed firewall<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Review the deployment task details and validate the reported configuration error<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Delete every NAT rule<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable all intrusion policies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Deployment task details provide the most useful initial evidence when a configuration push fails. They may identify unsupported commands, invalid object references, configuration conflicts, syntax problems, or communication failures. The administrator should review the exact error messages and determine which change caused the deployment to stop. If the failure followed an advanced configuration modification such as FlexConfig, supportability and syntax should be verified carefully. Factory-resetting the firewall would be unnecessarily disruptive and could extend downtime. Deleting NAT rules or disabling intrusion policies would change unrelated security behavior without addressing the specific problem. The best troubleshooting process is to use the information already provided by the failed deployment, correct the offending configuration, and then retry the deployment. This preserves stability and avoids speculative changes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 393.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Which practice provides the strongest foundation for recovering Secure Firewall Management Center after a catastrophic failure?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Maintain current, tested backups with documented restoration procedures<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Depend only on connection event logs<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Rely on the configuration of one managed sensor<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Assume an HA firewall peer contains the entire management database<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Current and tested Management Center backups are essential for recovering centralized configuration after a major failure. An organization should maintain a documented backup schedule, secure the backup files, understand version compatibility requirements, and periodically validate that restoration procedures work. Connection-event logs may be useful for incident analysis but do not replace management configuration data. A managed sensor does not serve as a complete Management Center backup, and an HA pair of Threat Defense appliances protects data-plane availability rather than preserving the full management database. A robust recovery plan should also include required software images, credentials, licensing information, system documentation, and clear responsibilities. Backup files are valuable only if they are current, accessible, protected from corruption or loss, and actually usable when a real recovery is necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 394.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            What is the primary operational purpose of configuring high availability between compatible Threat Defense appliances?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Improve URL categorization accuracy<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Automatically tune every intrusion rule<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Replace the access control policy<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Maintain firewall service when one peer fails<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              High availability is designed to maintain firewall service if one compatible peer becomes unavailable. Depending on the supported platform and deployment, configuration and relevant connection state may be synchronized between the active and standby devices so that failover causes minimal disruption. High availability does not improve URL classification, automatically tune Snort rules, or eliminate the need for access control policies. Those functions remain independent. Administrators should monitor peer communication, failover interfaces, synchronization, and monitored data interfaces so the standby firewall is genuinely ready to assume service. Periodic failover testing is also important because it verifies not only appliance behavior but also surrounding routing and network dependencies. HA therefore improves resiliency and service continuity rather than changing the underlying security-inspection logic.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 395.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              An administrator wants connection records that include final statistics such as total session duration and byte counts whenever available. Which logging choice is generally most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Disable connection logging<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Record only health events<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Enable connection-end logging on the relevant access control rule<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Record only system startup events<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Connection-end logging often provides the most complete session information because the firewall has observed the connection through its full lifetime. Depending on the session and available fields, the event can include final byte and packet counts, duration, application identification, user information, security zones, and the rule that handled the traffic. Connection-start logging can still be useful when immediate awareness is important, but many values are not yet known at session establishment. Health events and startup events relate to device operation rather than individual network sessions. Disabling logging would remove important troubleshooting and forensic evidence. Administrators should balance the need for detailed event data against storage and event-volume considerations. In busy environments, selective end-of-connection logging can provide strong visibility without generating unnecessary duplicate records.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 396.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A specific Allow exception must override a broader Block rule for the same network range. How should the access control rules be ordered?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Place the broad Block rule first<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Place the specific Allow exception before the broader Block rule<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Change both rules to Trust<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Remove all network criteria<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Access control rules are evaluated in sequence, so the more specific exception should normally appear before the broader rule that would otherwise match the same traffic. If the broad Block rule is evaluated first, the exception traffic will be denied and the later Allow rule will never be reached. Placing the specific Allow rule first permits only the approved subnet, host, application, or other narrowly defined traffic while the broader Block rule still denies the rest. Changing both rules to Trust would bypass additional inspection and undermine the intended restriction. Removing network criteria would make the policy less precise. After reordering the rules, the administrator should deploy the policy and review connection events to confirm that the expected traffic matches the exception while all remaining traffic is handled by the broader deny rule.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 397.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A session is permitted and translated correctly, but return traffic follows another path that bypasses the original firewall. Which problem is most likely?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Asymmetric routing<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> URL categorization error<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> File-policy mismatch<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Malware disposition problem<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Asymmetric routing occurs when the forward and return directions of a session take different network paths. Stateful firewalls track connections and expect return traffic to correspond to an existing session. If the return packets bypass the original firewall and traverse another device, the original connection may never complete properly, or the alternate firewall may reject the traffic because it has no matching state. Administrators should examine routing tables, upstream and downstream routers, load balancers, equal-cost routes, redundant links, and policy-based routing to understand why the return path differs. URL categories, file policies, and malware dispositions do not determine the physical return path of packets. Correcting routing symmetry is therefore one of the first actions when a session is allowed and translated correctly but still fails because replies are not returning through the expected device.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 398.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Before upgrading Secure Firewall Management Center and several managed Threat Defense devices, what should be verified first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> That all historical events are deleted<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> That all NAT rules are removed<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> That every interface is in the same security zone<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Software compatibility, the supported upgrade path, system readiness, backups, and recovery options<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Upgrade planning should begin with a full compatibility and readiness assessment. Administrators should verify that the intended Management Center and Threat Defense versions are supported together, identify the required upgrade sequence, confirm hardware and storage prerequisites, check device health, and ensure that current backups and recovery procedures are available. This reduces the risk of failed upgrades, management incompatibility, prolonged outages, or difficult rollback situations. Historical events, NAT rules, and security-zone design do not need to be removed simply because an upgrade is being performed. Because upgrade requirements can vary across platforms and software releases, the administrator should follow the supported path for the specific environment rather than assuming a direct jump between versions is valid. Preparation and recovery planning are central to minimizing maintenance risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 399.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Which intrusion-policy concept provides an initial set of Snort rule states that administrators can use as a starting point before local tuning?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Dynamic PAT pool<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Security zone<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Base intrusion policy<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> URL category<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A base intrusion policy provides a predefined starting configuration for Snort rule states and behavior. Administrators can choose a baseline that aligns with their general security and performance objectives and then tune it according to the actual applications, assets, vulnerabilities, false positives, and traffic patterns in the environment. This approach is more manageable than manually configuring every rule from the beginning. Dynamic PAT pools relate to address translation, security zones group interfaces, and URL categories classify web content. No base intrusion policy can perfectly match every network, so continued tuning is necessary. Administrators should use real event data and verified host context to adjust rules carefully while preserving protection against threats that remain relevant. Effective intrusion management balances coverage, performance, and manageable event volume.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 400.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        After a Secure Firewall software upgrade, users report that traffic is unexpectedly matching different access control rules. What is the best first troubleshooting approach?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Factory-reset every managed device<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Verify the active deployed policy, rule order, object values, zone assignments, upgrade status, device health, and relevant connection events<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable intrusion inspection permanently<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Delete all reusable objects from Management Center<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Unexpected post-upgrade behavior should be investigated systematically rather than with broad configuration changes. The administrator should confirm that the intended access control policy is actually deployed, verify rule order and object values, check interface-to-zone assignments, review software upgrade status and compatibility, and examine connection events to identify which rule is processing the traffic. Device health and deployment history can also reveal whether an incomplete or failed update contributed to the problem. Factory-resetting devices or deleting objects would be highly disruptive and could make recovery more difficult. Permanently disabling intrusion inspection would reduce security without identifying the underlying issue. Evidence from the active configuration and event data provides the safest way to determine whether the cause is policy logic, deployment state, software behavior, or another post-upgrade condition.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-710 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 381. An administrator wants to verify whether a specific flow is being bypassed by a prefilter Fastpath rule before it reaches normal access control inspection. What should be checked first? The prefilter policy rule order, match conditions, and action 2. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24894"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24894"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24895,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24894\/revisions\/24895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}