{"id":24908,"date":"2026-09-30T09:25:55","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:25:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24908"},"modified":"2026-09-30T09:25:55","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:25:55","slug":"isc-sscp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isc-sscp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140\/","title":{"rendered":"ISC SSCP Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part7 Q121-140"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/sscp-exam-dumps\"><b>ISC SSCP Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 121<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator wants to prevent unauthorized users from changing the configuration of a network device. Which control is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Restrict management access and require administrative authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allow configuration access from any network<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Share one administrator account with all employees<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable configuration logging<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Restricting management access and requiring administrative authentication helps prevent unauthorized configuration changes to network devices. Management interfaces should generally be accessible only from approved administrative networks or systems and should use strong authentication and appropriate authorization. Organizations should also maintain individual administrator accounts, log configuration activity, and review significant changes. Sharing a single account reduces accountability, while allowing management access from unrestricted networks increases exposure. Disabling configuration logging removes valuable evidence that could help identify unauthorized changes. Administrative interfaces should be protected as critical components because changes to network devices can affect the security of many systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 122<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization needs to determine whether a newly discovered vulnerability affects its environment before prioritizing remediation. What should the security team perform first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Replace every workstation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Determine affected assets and exposure<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable all vulnerability scanning<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Publish the vulnerability internally without analysis<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Determining affected assets and exposure helps the security team understand whether the vulnerability exists in the organization&#8217;s environment and how accessible affected systems are. Analysts should identify vulnerable software or configurations, exposed interfaces, asset criticality, and relevant compensating controls. This information supports informed prioritization and prevents resources from being spent on systems that are not actually affected. The assessment should also consider whether the vulnerability is being actively exploited or has reliable mitigation options. Replacing every workstation is unnecessary without evidence, while disabling scanning reduces visibility and publishing unverified information can create confusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 123<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to protect administrator sessions from interception while managing servers remotely. Which practice provides appropriate protection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use an encrypted and authenticated remote administration channel<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Send administrative commands through plain text<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Share administrator passwords through public chat<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Permit anonymous remote management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An encrypted and authenticated remote administration channel protects administrative communications from interception and unauthorized use. Secure management protocols help protect credentials, commands, and session data while also providing mechanisms for authenticating the remote endpoint or administrator. Administrative access should be limited to authorized personnel and preferably restricted through dedicated management networks or gateways. Plain-text administration can expose sensitive information, while anonymous access removes accountability and authorization controls. Passwords should never be shared through public communication channels. Organizations should also monitor privileged sessions and maintain records of significant administrative activity.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 124<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team wants to identify whether a user account has accumulated permissions that are no longer necessary. Which activity is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Increase password length for every account<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Review the account&#8217;s effective permissions against current responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable all user accounts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove access review records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reviewing an account&#8217;s effective permissions against current responsibilities helps identify excessive or outdated access. Effective permissions should include direct assignments as well as access inherited through groups, roles, applications, and delegated permissions. This review is particularly important after job changes, project completion, organizational restructuring, or changes to sensitive resources. Unnecessary permissions should be removed through an authorized process, and completed reviews should be documented. Increasing password length addresses authentication strength rather than authorization. Disabling every account is impractical, while removing review records weakens accountability and makes future verification more difficult.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 125<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization is concerned that a compromised workstation could be used to reach critical database servers. Which network architecture can reduce this risk?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Place all systems on one unrestricted network<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Segment critical database systems into a restricted network zone<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove firewall controls between all systems<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allow direct workstation-to-database communication<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Segmenting critical database systems into a restricted network zone can limit which systems and users are able to communicate with those resources. Access between zones can be controlled through firewalls, access-control lists, application gateways, or other enforcement points. Segmentation can reduce lateral movement opportunities if an endpoint is compromised and can also make monitoring and incident containment more manageable. Placing all systems on one unrestricted network increases connectivity and potential attack paths. Removing firewall controls or allowing direct workstation-to-database communication similarly reduces opportunities to enforce restrictions between less-trusted endpoints and critical systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 126<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator is reviewing a firewall change and wants to confirm that the requested rule is justified by a documented business need. Which record should be examined?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Approved change request<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employee attendance sheet<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Office equipment inventory<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Marketing campaign plan<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An approved change request can document the business justification, requested configuration, affected systems, risk considerations, testing requirements, and authorization for a firewall change. Reviewing this record helps administrators determine whether the rule was properly requested and approved before implementation. It also provides useful information for later audits and troubleshooting. Firewall changes should be reviewed carefully because overly broad rules can expose internal services or create unintended access paths. Attendance sheets, equipment inventories, and marketing plans do not establish technical authorization for a network security change or demonstrate that the requested rule has been appropriately evaluated.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 127<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to protect a web server from receiving unexpectedly large numbers of malicious requests that could exhaust resources. Which control can help mitigate this condition?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rate limiting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabling server monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing network controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Publishing administrator credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rate limiting restricts the number of requests accepted from a source or toward a particular service within a defined period. It can help reduce the impact of excessive requests, automated abuse, credential attacks, and certain denial-of-service conditions. Rate limits should be designed carefully because legitimate users may generate high request volumes, and distributed attacks can originate from many sources. Additional controls such as traffic filtering, load balancing, and upstream protection may also be appropriate. Disabling monitoring or removing network controls reduces defensive capability, while publishing administrative credentials creates an unrelated but serious security exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 128<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to ensure that sensitive files stored in a cloud service remain protected even if unauthorized individuals gain access to the storage location. Which control provides direct confidentiality protection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File renaming<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Increased storage capacity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Public sharing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data encryption provides direct confidentiality protection by transforming readable information into ciphertext that requires an appropriate key to recover. For cloud storage, organizations should consider encryption at rest, secure key management, access controls, and provider responsibilities. Encryption does not eliminate the need for authorization because an attacker who obtains legitimate decryption access may still be able to read the information. Keys should be protected separately and managed throughout their lifecycle. Renaming files or increasing storage capacity does not protect their contents, while public sharing can expose sensitive information to unauthorized users.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 129<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team wants to ensure that a critical application is protected from unauthorized administrative changes made through its management interface. Which control is most effective?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Require strong administrator authentication and role-based authorization<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allow every employee administrative access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable management logging<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use an anonymous administrator account<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Strong administrator authentication combined with role-based authorization can ensure that only approved administrators receive access to sensitive management functions. Authentication establishes the administrator&#8217;s identity, while authorization limits the actions available to that identity according to assigned responsibilities. Administrative interfaces should also be protected with secure communication, logging, monitoring, and appropriate network restrictions. Giving every employee administrative privileges creates unnecessary exposure and weakens separation of responsibilities. Anonymous administrative accounts eliminate accountability, while disabling management logs makes unauthorized configuration changes harder to detect and investigate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 130<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to ensure that sensitive information cannot be recovered from a retired solid-state drive after disposal. Which consideration is important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use a sanitization method appropriate for the storage technology<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rename the drive<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Delete only the desktop shortcuts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Move the drive to another office<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Storage technologies require disposal methods appropriate to how data is physically and logically stored. Solid-state drives may use techniques such as wear leveling that make ordinary file deletion or simple overwriting insufficient in some circumstances. Organizations should select an approved sanitization or destruction method suitable for the specific media and sensitivity of the information. Cryptographic erasure may also be appropriate when encryption and key management were properly implemented. Renaming the drive or deleting shortcuts does not remove underlying data. Moving the device to another office also leaves the information exposed unless an approved disposal process is followed.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 131<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator discovers that a system is using an expired digital certificate. What is the most appropriate action?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Replace or renew the certificate through the approved certificate management process<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ignore the expiration permanently<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Publish the private key<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable all certificate validation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An expired digital certificate should be replaced or renewed through the organization&#8217;s approved certificate management process. Expired certificates can interrupt secure communications, cause applications to reject connections, or create trust problems for users and systems. Administrators should verify the correct certificate identity, validity period, subject information, and associated private key before deployment. Certificate inventories and expiration monitoring can help prevent unexpected service disruptions. Publishing private keys would compromise the security of the certificate, while disabling certificate validation removes important trust protections. Organizations should also investigate repeated expiration failures because they may indicate weaknesses in lifecycle management.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 132<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to identify unauthorized changes to important system files. Which capability can provide useful detection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File integrity monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Screen capture resolution<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer queue management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Email mailbox expansion<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File integrity monitoring can detect changes to selected files, directories, configurations, or system components by comparing their current state against an established trusted state. Depending on the implementation, it may detect modifications, additions, or deletions and generate alerts for investigation. This capability is particularly useful for sensitive configuration files and other assets where unauthorized changes may indicate compromise or misuse. Baselines should be updated through an authorized change process so legitimate modifications are not repeatedly treated as suspicious. Printer management, mailbox expansion, and display settings do not provide equivalent visibility into unauthorized file changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 133<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization is creating a secure baseline for employee laptops. Which configuration should be included?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable unnecessary services and enforce approved security settings<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Enable every available service<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Permit unrestricted administrative access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable endpoint protection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A secure laptop baseline should define approved security settings that reduce unnecessary exposure while supporting required business functions. Typical settings may include disabling unnecessary services, enabling host-based firewalls, enforcing secure authentication, configuring endpoint protection, restricting administrative privileges, and enabling appropriate logging. The baseline should be documented, tested, version-controlled, and reviewed when technology or organizational requirements change. Enabling every service increases the attack surface, while unrestricted administrative access can make compromise more damaging. Disabling endpoint protection removes an important defensive layer. Baselines provide a consistent standard against which endpoint configurations can be assessed.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 134<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team receives a report that confidential customer information may have been disclosed externally. Which activity should occur before the organization concludes that a breach definitely occurred?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Validate the evidence and determine the scope of the event<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Delete all related records<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Announce a confirmed breach without investigation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable every customer account<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The organization should validate available evidence and determine the scope of the suspected disclosure before concluding that a confirmed breach occurred. Investigators may need to review data-access records, outbound transfers, user activity, system configurations, and other relevant evidence. The investigation should establish what information may have been affected, whether unauthorized access occurred, and which systems or individuals were involved. Premature conclusions can create unnecessary operational, legal, and communication problems. Evidence should be preserved appropriately throughout the investigation. Deleting records destroys potentially important evidence, while disabling every customer account may cause unnecessary disruption without establishing the facts.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 135<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to reduce the risk of unauthorized access when employees leave their workstations unattended. Which endpoint control is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automatic screen locking after inactivity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable authentication prompts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Keep sessions permanently unlocked<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Share workstation passwords<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automatic screen locking after a defined period of inactivity reduces the opportunity for unauthorized individuals to use an unattended workstation. The locked session should require appropriate authentication before access is restored. Timeout settings should balance security requirements with legitimate operational needs, and highly sensitive environments may require shorter periods or additional controls. Disabling authentication prompts or keeping sessions permanently unlocked removes important protection. Sharing passwords also undermines accountability and makes it difficult to determine who performed actions on the system. Screen locking is one layer within a broader endpoint security strategy that should include authentication and authorization controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 136<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security manager needs to determine whether employees are completing required security training within the organization&#8217;s defined period. Which metric is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Training completion rate<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Number of network switches<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amount of disk space<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer utilization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Training completion rate measures the proportion of required personnel who have completed assigned security training within the defined period. Organizations can use this metric to identify departments or groups with outstanding requirements and determine whether awareness programs are reaching their intended population. Completion alone does not prove that employees understood the material, so additional measures such as assessments, exercises, or incident trends may provide further insight. Network switches, disk capacity, and printer utilization do not measure training compliance. Metrics should be defined consistently so results can be compared across reporting periods and used to support appropriate follow-up actions.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 137<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company is planning access for a third-party maintenance technician who needs temporary access to a server. Which approach best limits exposure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Provide permanent unrestricted administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Grant time-limited access for the approved maintenance task<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Share a permanent administrator password<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allow access without authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Time-limited access restricts a third-party technician&#8217;s permissions to the period and activities required for the approved maintenance task. Temporary access can be combined with strong authentication, specific authorization, session monitoring, and approval workflows. After the maintenance activity is completed, access should expire automatically or be explicitly revoked. Permanent unrestricted privileges create unnecessary exposure and may remain active after the business need ends. Shared administrator passwords reduce accountability, while unauthenticated access removes basic identity verification. Third-party access should also be documented and reviewed according to contractual and organizational security requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 138<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator wants to ensure that critical security alerts are not lost when a monitoring platform becomes unavailable. Which capability is useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alert redundancy and reliable notification channels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removal of alert records<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Single-channel notification with no backup<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabled monitoring during maintenance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alert redundancy and reliable notification channels can help ensure that important security events reach responsible personnel even when one monitoring component becomes unavailable. Organizations may use replicated monitoring infrastructure, multiple notification mechanisms, durable event queues, or alternate communication paths depending on the environment. Critical alerts should have defined escalation procedures and ownership so that notifications do not remain unattended. Single-channel designs can create a point of failure, while deleting records or disabling monitoring reduces visibility. Monitoring systems themselves should be tested periodically to confirm that alerts are generated, delivered, acknowledged, and escalated as intended.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 139<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to verify that a security configuration applied to multiple servers is consistent with the approved standard. Which method is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automated configuration comparison against the approved baseline<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manual guessing based on server names<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabling configuration management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Comparing only physical server sizes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automated configuration comparison can efficiently identify deviations between multiple servers and an approved security baseline. Configuration management or compliance tools can evaluate settings such as services, permissions, firewall rules, authentication parameters, and security policies. Automated comparison improves consistency and reduces the likelihood of overlooking differences across large environments. Findings should be reviewed because some deviations may have approved business justifications. Manual guessing does not provide reliable assurance, while disabling configuration management reduces control over system consistency. Physical server characteristics do not establish whether security configurations match organizational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 140<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team wants to ensure that employees understand how to protect confidential information when working remotely. Which training topic is most directly relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure remote data handling and communication practices<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Office furniture maintenance<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer color calibration<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Desktop wallpaper selection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure remote data handling and communication practices help employees understand how to protect organizational information outside controlled office environments. Training can address approved devices, secure connections, phishing awareness, physical privacy, appropriate cloud storage, document handling, screen protection, and procedures for reporting lost equipment or suspected exposure. Remote workers may face risks from shared spaces, untrusted networks, and unauthorized access to devices or information. Security awareness should provide practical instructions that match organizational policies and technologies. Furniture maintenance, printer calibration, and wallpaper selection do not directly address the protection of confidential information during remote work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ISC SSCP Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 121 A security administrator wants to prevent unauthorized users from changing the configuration of a network device. Which control is most appropriate? Restrict management access and require administrative authentication Allow configuration access from any network Share one administrator account with all employees Disable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24908"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24908"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24908\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24909,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24908\/revisions\/24909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}