{"id":24922,"date":"2026-09-30T09:27:49","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:27:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24922"},"modified":"2026-09-30T09:27:49","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T09:27:49","slug":"isc-sscp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part14-q261-280","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isc-sscp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part14-q261-280\/","title":{"rendered":"ISC SSCP Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part14 Q261-280"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/sscp-exam-dumps\"><b>ISC SSCP Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 261<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which security principle requires two different individuals to complete sensitive activities?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data masking<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separation of duties<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network redundancy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data aggregation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separation of duties divides sensitive responsibilities among multiple individuals so that one person cannot independently complete an entire high-risk process. For example, one employee may request access while another approves it. This reduces opportunities for fraud, unauthorized changes, and abuse of authority. The control is particularly useful for financial systems, privileged administration, security exceptions, and other sensitive operations. Data masking protects sensitive values, network redundancy supports availability, and data aggregation combines information. Separation of duties should be documented clearly and reviewed periodically to ensure responsibilities remain appropriately divided.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 262<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator discovers that a server is running an obsolete application that is no longer required. What should be done first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Increase its privileges<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Expose it to the internet<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove the unnecessary application<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable security logging<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing an unnecessary obsolete application reduces the server&#8217;s attack surface and eliminates potential vulnerabilities associated with software that no longer serves a business purpose. Before removal, administrators should confirm that the application is not required by another service or business process. Approved change procedures should be followed when production systems are affected. Increasing privileges or exposing the server to the internet would increase risk, while disabling logging reduces visibility. Secure system maintenance involves regularly reviewing installed software, removing unnecessary components, applying appropriate updates, and maintaining configurations that reflect current operational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 263<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which security control helps prevent an unauthorized person from following an authorized employee through a controlled entrance?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anti-tailgating control<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Password expiration<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File integrity monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anti-tailgating controls help prevent unauthorized individuals from entering a restricted area by following an authorized person through a secured entrance. Examples can include security personnel, turnstiles, mantraps, access-control vestibules, or procedures requiring each person to authenticate independently. These measures strengthen physical access controls and reduce the risk that possession of an authorized person&#8217;s access credentials indirectly provides entry to another individual. Data encryption protects information, password expiration addresses authentication credentials, and file integrity monitoring detects changes to files. Physical security controls should be selected according to facility risk and operational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 264<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to ensure that an employee&#8217;s access changes promptly after moving to a different department. Which process is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network bandwidth management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data backup scheduling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity lifecycle management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity lifecycle management handles changes to user access throughout employment, including onboarding, transfers, role changes, and termination. When an employee moves to another department, previous permissions may no longer be appropriate and new permissions may be required. A documented lifecycle process helps ensure that access changes are authorized, timely, and traceable. Network bandwidth, backup scheduling, and printer configuration do not directly manage user authorization. Organizations should integrate identity lifecycle processes with human resources notifications, role definitions, access approval workflows, and periodic reviews to reduce the risk of excessive or outdated privileges.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 265<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security analyst receives an alert showing repeated failed authentication attempts followed by a successful login from the same source. What should the analyst examine next?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The building&#8217;s lighting system<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authentication and source activity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer toner levels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employee vacation balances<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Authentication and source activity can help determine whether repeated failures followed by a successful login represent legitimate behavior or a potential account compromise. The analyst should review timestamps, source addresses, affected accounts, authentication methods, device information, and subsequent activity. Additional evidence may reveal password guessing, credential stuffing, or a legitimate user who initially entered incorrect credentials. Unrelated operational information does not help establish the security context of the event. Investigation should preserve relevant logs and correlate authentication records with endpoint, network, and identity information before drawing conclusions about the incident.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 266<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which control provides assurance that a backup has not been altered since it was created?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compression<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hash verification<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File renaming<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disk defragmentation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hash verification can help determine whether backup content has changed by comparing a newly calculated cryptographic hash with a trusted reference value. If the values match, the data is consistent with the content used to generate the reference hash, subject to the properties and security of the hashing method. Hashing does not itself provide confidentiality, so encryption may also be necessary for sensitive backups. Compression, file renaming, and disk defragmentation do not establish content integrity. Backup verification should be incorporated into broader backup management, including restoration testing, access protection, retention, and secure storage.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 267<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company is preparing to allow a vendor to access an internal system for a limited maintenance task. Which control best supports this arrangement?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Permanent administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Time-limited authorized access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Shared employee credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anonymous remote access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Time-limited authorized access allows a vendor to perform an approved task while reducing the period during which external access remains available. The access should follow documented approval, least-privilege requirements, strong authentication, monitoring, and automatic or manual removal after the maintenance activity is completed. Permanent administrator access creates unnecessary long-term exposure, while shared employee credentials weaken accountability and make investigations more difficult. Anonymous remote access is inappropriate for sensitive administrative activities. Third-party access should also be governed by contractual requirements and reviewed to ensure that permissions remain appropriate throughout the relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 268<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which method can protect sensitive data displayed on a screen from being viewed by unauthorized individuals nearby?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Screen privacy controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network load balancing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Database replication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DNS caching<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Screen privacy controls can reduce the risk of unauthorized individuals viewing sensitive information displayed on a workstation or mobile device. Depending on the environment, controls may include privacy filters, automatic screen locking, appropriate workstation positioning, restricted viewing areas, and user awareness procedures. These measures are particularly relevant in public areas, shared offices, healthcare environments, financial operations, and other locations where unauthorized observation is possible. Network load balancing distributes traffic, database replication supports availability, and DNS caching improves name-resolution performance. Screen protection should complement broader physical and information-handling controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 269<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team needs to identify which users have permissions that exceed their current job responsibilities. Which activity is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Access rights review<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network cable replacement<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Storage compression<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer maintenance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An access rights review compares assigned permissions with current business responsibilities to identify excessive, outdated, or unauthorized access. Reviews should consider role changes, terminated accounts, temporary permissions, privileged access, and separation-of-duties requirements. Identified discrepancies should be corrected through an approved authorization process and documented for accountability. Network cable replacement, storage compression, and printer maintenance do not assess whether user permissions remain appropriate. Periodic access reviews are especially important for privileged accounts and sensitive systems because excessive access can increase the impact of compromised credentials or inappropriate activity.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 270<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which security measure can help ensure that only approved software executes on an endpoint?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application allowlisting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Open file sharing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anonymous authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrestricted scripting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application allowlisting permits execution only of software that has been explicitly approved according to organizational policy. This can reduce the risk of unauthorized applications, malicious executables, and unapproved tools running on managed endpoints. Effective allowlisting requires maintaining trusted application definitions and handling legitimate software changes through controlled processes. Open file sharing and anonymous authentication increase exposure, while unrestricted scripting can provide attackers with additional execution opportunities. Allowlisting should complement endpoint protection, patch management, least privilege, monitoring, and application control policies rather than being treated as the sole endpoint security mechanism.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 271<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to ensure that administrators use individually identifiable accounts when performing privileged tasks. Why is this important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It improves screen brightness<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It supports accountability<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It increases storage capacity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It reduces network latency<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Individually identifiable privileged accounts support accountability by allowing administrative actions to be associated with a specific person. This improves monitoring, auditing, incident investigation, and enforcement of administrative responsibilities. Shared administrator credentials make it difficult to determine who performed a particular action and can weaken both deterrence and investigation. Individual accounts should be combined with strong authentication, least privilege, privileged access management, logging, and appropriate session monitoring. Screen brightness, storage capacity, and network latency are unrelated to identity accountability. Organizations should avoid using shared privileged credentials except where technically necessary and properly controlled.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 272<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to determine whether an employee&#8217;s workstation is communicating with a known malicious domain. Which security capability is useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat intelligence and DNS monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disk formatting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employee scheduling<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat intelligence combined with DNS monitoring can help identify communications between internal systems and domains associated with known malicious infrastructure. Security teams can compare DNS requests against trusted threat intelligence sources and investigate suspicious resolutions or connection patterns. Detection should be supplemented with endpoint and network telemetry because threat intelligence may be incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate for some indicators. Printer management, disk formatting, and employee scheduling do not provide equivalent visibility into malicious domain communication. Organizations should establish procedures for validating alerts, investigating affected systems, and responding appropriately when suspicious communications are identified.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 273<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which practice helps prevent unauthorized modification of security policies?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allowing anyone to edit policies<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Controlled policy approval and version management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing policy ownership<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Storing policies without access restrictions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Controlled policy approval and version management help ensure that security policies are reviewed, authorized, documented, and protected against unauthorized modification. A defined approval process establishes accountability for policy ownership and confirms that changes have appropriate business and security justification. Version management also allows organizations to identify what changed and maintain historical records when necessary. Allowing unrestricted editing or storing policies without access controls weakens governance. Removing policy ownership creates uncertainty about responsibility. Policies should be reviewed periodically and updated when business processes, technology, regulations, or organizational risks materially change.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 274<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator wants to reduce the likelihood that a compromised workstation can directly communicate with sensitive database servers. Which architecture is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Flat network design<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network segmentation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrestricted routing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Public addressing for all systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network segmentation separates systems into controlled security zones and limits communication between them according to defined requirements. A workstation used by general employees can therefore be prevented from directly communicating with sensitive database servers unless an approved application or administrative path is required. Segmentation can reduce lateral movement opportunities and limit the potential impact of compromised endpoints. A flat network, unrestricted routing, and broad public addressing can increase exposure. Effective segmentation should be supported by firewalls, access-control rules, monitoring, documented communication requirements, and periodic review to ensure that permitted connections remain necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 275<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to confirm that an employee&#8217;s access was removed after termination. Which evidence is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Updated access and identity records<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Office temperature readings<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer usage statistics<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Marketing reports<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Updated access and identity records can demonstrate that accounts, credentials, group memberships, and other permissions were disabled or removed after an employee&#8217;s termination. Organizations should establish procedures that connect personnel status changes with identity-management workflows so that deprovisioning occurs promptly. Evidence may include timestamps, account status changes, revoked sessions, removed group memberships, and confirmation from responsible administrators. Office temperature, printer usage, and marketing reports do not directly verify authorization removal. Deprovisioning should also consider remote sessions, application-specific accounts, physical access badges, cloud services, and privileged credentials.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 276<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which recovery objective specifies the maximum acceptable amount of data loss measured in time?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recovery point objective<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recovery testing frequency<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recovery staffing level<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recovery budget<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The recovery point objective, or RPO, defines the maximum amount of data loss an organization is prepared to tolerate, expressed as a period of time. For example, an organization with a one-hour RPO would generally require recovery capabilities that limit data loss to approximately one hour of transactions or changes. RPO influences backup frequency, replication strategies, and recovery architecture. It differs from the recovery time objective, which addresses how quickly a service should be restored. Recovery staffing, testing frequency, and budget support recovery planning but do not define the acceptable period of data loss.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 277<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team is investigating an incident and needs to preserve evidence in a condition suitable for later review. Which practice is important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Evidence handling and chain of custody<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Random evidence deletion<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrestricted evidence access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrecorded evidence transfer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Evidence handling and chain of custody help demonstrate how evidence was collected, transferred, stored, accessed, and preserved throughout an investigation. Proper documentation can support evidence integrity and establish accountability for individuals who handled the material. Investigators should follow approved procedures, restrict access, record relevant actions, and use appropriate storage protections. Random deletion, unrestricted access, and unrecorded transfers can undermine confidence in evidence integrity and make later review more difficult. Evidence procedures should address both digital and physical material and should be aligned with organizational, legal, and investigative requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 278<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A system administrator plans to make a significant security-related configuration change to a production server. What should normally occur before implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Informal verbal approval only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Approved change review<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removal of backups<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabling monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An approved change review helps evaluate the security and operational consequences of significant modifications before they are introduced into production. The process can document the requested change, business justification, affected systems, implementation steps, testing requirements, rollback procedures, approvals, and maintenance timing. Significant changes should not rely solely on informal verbal approval because that may provide inadequate accountability or risk assessment. Removing backups or disabling monitoring increases risk during the change. Change management helps organizations maintain configuration integrity while ensuring that necessary modifications can be implemented in a controlled and traceable manner.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 279<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which activity helps determine whether security controls continue to operate as intended after implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Control effectiveness assessment<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Password sharing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrestricted configuration changes<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removal of audit records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A control effectiveness assessment evaluates whether a security control is operating as designed and achieving its intended objective. Testing may include reviewing configurations, examining logs, observing processes, sampling transactions, interviewing responsible personnel, or performing technical validation. Regular assessment can identify controls that have become ineffective because of technology changes, process modifications, new threats, or implementation errors. Password sharing and unrestricted configuration changes weaken security, while removing audit records eliminates useful evidence. Control assessments should be documented, findings should be addressed according to risk, and remediation should be verified.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 280<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security manager wants to ensure employees know how to report suspected phishing messages. Which measure is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove reporting procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Establish a defined phishing-reporting process<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Encourage employees to forward messages publicly<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable email security monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A defined phishing-reporting process gives employees a clear and consistent method for reporting suspicious messages to the security team. The process may use a reporting button, dedicated mailbox, ticketing workflow, or another approved mechanism. Clear reporting procedures help security personnel collect indicators, investigate campaigns, protect other users, and provide timely feedback. Employees should also receive awareness training explaining how to recognize suspicious messages and avoid interacting with potentially malicious content. Publicly forwarding suspicious messages can expose additional users, while removing reporting procedures or disabling monitoring reduces the organization&#8217;s ability to detect and respond to phishing activity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ISC SSCP Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 261 Which security principle requires two different individuals to complete sensitive activities? Data masking Separation of duties Network redundancy Data aggregation Correct Answer: 2 Explanation Separation of duties divides sensitive responsibilities among multiple individuals so that one person cannot independently complete an entire [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24922"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24922"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24922\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24923,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24922\/revisions\/24923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}