{"id":3375,"date":"2025-06-04T11:16:23","date_gmt":"2025-06-04T11:16:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=3375"},"modified":"2026-06-16T06:36:15","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T06:36:15","slug":"cisco-300-420-ensld-exam-guide-strategies-concepts-and-practice-for-enterprise-design-mastery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-300-420-ensld-exam-guide-strategies-concepts-and-practice-for-enterprise-design-mastery\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco 300-420 ENSLD Exam Guide: Strategies, Concepts, and Practice for Enterprise Design Mastery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Cisco 300-420 ENSLD exam, formally titled Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks, is a professional-level certification exam that validates a candidate&#8217;s ability to design scalable, resilient, and secure enterprise network architectures that meet specific business and technical requirements. This exam serves as a concentration exam within the Cisco Certified Network Professional Enterprise track and also contributes toward the Cisco Certified Design Professional certification, making it valuable for professionals pursuing either credential. Candidates who pass the ENSLD exam demonstrate that they can translate complex organizational requirements into well-structured network designs that support business continuity and growth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The exam covers four primary domains including advanced addressing and routing solutions, advanced enterprise campus networks, WAN design for enterprise networks, and network services design. Each domain carries specific weight in the overall exam score, and candidates who allocate their preparation time according to these weights tend to perform better than those who study all topics equally regardless of their relative importance. Understanding the business context of network design decisions is just as important as technical knowledge in this exam, as many questions present organizational scenarios and ask candidates to identify the most appropriate design choice given specific constraints such as budget limitations, scalability requirements, redundancy needs, and existing infrastructure considerations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Advanced Routing Design Concepts<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Routing design is one of the most heavily weighted domains in the ENSLD exam, covering how enterprise networks use dynamic routing protocols to build scalable, efficient, and fault-tolerant path selection systems across complex multi-site environments. Candidates must demonstrate deep understanding of OSPF design principles including area hierarchy, route summarization, stub area types, and virtual links that extend area connectivity across non-contiguous network segments. A well-designed OSPF deployment minimizes link-state database size through effective area segmentation, reduces convergence time through tuning of hello and dead intervals, and protects the backbone area from topology changes in peripheral areas through strategic use of stub and totally stubby area configurations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP design considerations are also examined in the ENSLD exam, with particular attention to named mode configuration, summarization strategies, and stub router deployment in hub-and-spoke topologies where spoke sites should not be used as transit paths for traffic between other sites. BGP design receives significant attention given its role in connecting enterprise networks to service providers and in multi-homed internet connectivity scenarios where organizations connect to multiple ISPs for redundancy and load distribution. Candidates must understand BGP path selection attributes including local preference, AS path length, MED, and weight, and know how to manipulate these attributes to achieve desired traffic engineering outcomes in designs with asymmetric or policy-driven routing requirements across multiple upstream providers.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Hierarchical Campus Network Design<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Campus network design questions in the ENSLD exam test whether candidates can apply the hierarchical three-tier model of core, distribution, and access layers to design networks that scale gracefully as organizations grow and add new users, devices, and applications. The access layer connects end devices to the network and provides services including PoE for IP phones and wireless access points, port security for unauthorized device prevention, and dynamic VLAN assignment through 802.1X authentication. Distribution layer switches aggregate access layer connections, enforce policy through QoS markings and access control lists, provide first-hop redundancy using HSRP or VRRP, and terminate VLANs to control broadcast domain boundaries within the campus.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The collapsed core design, which combines core and distribution functions into a single layer, is an important alternative architecture that the ENSLD exam covers in the context of smaller campus environments where the full three-tier model would introduce unnecessary complexity and cost without providing proportional benefit. Candidates must be able to evaluate which design model is appropriate for a given scenario based on the number of users, the physical scale of the campus, the required level of redundancy, and the traffic patterns between different parts of the network. High availability design within the campus, including redundant uplinks, spanning tree optimization through Rapid PVST or MSTP, and loop prevention through mechanisms like PortFast and BPDU Guard, are essential topics that appear consistently throughout the campus design domain of the exam.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>WAN Technology Design Considerations<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">WAN design is a critical domain in the ENSLD exam that covers how enterprise networks connect geographically distributed sites using a variety of transport technologies and overlay architectures suited to different performance, cost, and security requirements. Traditional WAN technologies including MPLS Layer 3 VPN and DMVPN remain relevant exam topics because many enterprise networks still rely on carrier-provided MPLS services for predictable performance and built-in quality of service across branch connectivity. Candidates must understand how MPLS VPNs use route distinguishers and route targets to maintain separate routing tables for different customers or organizational units sharing the same provider infrastructure while keeping their traffic logically isolated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Software-defined WAN has become an increasingly prominent topic in the ENSLD exam as enterprises adopt SD-WAN solutions to gain application-aware routing, centralized policy management, and the ability to use cost-effective internet broadband connections alongside or instead of expensive private WAN circuits. Candidates should understand the architectural components of SD-WAN including the orchestrator that manages policy distribution, the controller that handles routing intelligence, and the edge devices that enforce policies and forward traffic based on real-time path quality measurements. The ability to compare traditional WAN architectures with SD-WAN alternatives and recommend the appropriate solution based on organizational requirements for cost optimization, application performance visibility, and operational simplicity is a skill that ENSLD exam scenarios frequently test through detailed case study style questions.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>IPv6 Design and Transition Strategies<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IPv6 design is a topic that appears throughout the ENSLD exam in the context of addressing planning, routing protocol configuration, and transition mechanisms that allow organizations to introduce IPv6 connectivity while maintaining compatibility with existing IPv4 infrastructure and applications. Candidates must understand IPv6 address types including global unicast addresses for internet-routable connectivity, link-local addresses automatically configured on every IPv6-enabled interface for local segment communication, and unique local addresses for private network use that are the IPv6 equivalent of RFC 1918 private address space used in IPv4 networks. Proper IPv6 address planning using hierarchical allocation that aligns with the network topology enables effective route summarization that keeps routing tables manageable as the network grows.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Transition mechanisms including dual-stack deployment, 6to4 tunneling, ISATAP, and NAT64 with DNS64 address different scenarios in the migration from IPv4-only to IPv6-capable network infrastructure. Dual-stack is the preferred long-term transition approach because it runs both protocol versions simultaneously on all network devices and endpoints, eliminating the complexity of translation mechanisms while allowing gradual migration of applications and services to native IPv6. Candidates should understand the design tradeoffs between different transition approaches and be able to recommend the most appropriate mechanism given specific organizational constraints such as the proportion of IPv6-capable endpoints, the availability of native IPv6 from upstream providers, and the sensitivity of applications to the additional latency that tunneling and translation mechanisms can introduce.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Network Redundancy Design Patterns<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Redundancy design is fundamental to enterprise networks that must meet availability requirements expressed as percentages of uptime or maximum tolerable downtime during planned and unplanned outages. The ENSLD exam tests candidates on redundancy patterns at multiple layers of the network including physical link redundancy through port channeling and dual-homed connections, device-level redundancy through chassis with redundant supervisors and power supplies, and protocol-level redundancy through first-hop redundancy protocols and dynamic routing that automatically reroutes traffic around failed components. Designing redundancy appropriately requires understanding the cost and complexity implications of each redundancy mechanism and matching them to the criticality of the application or network segment being protected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First-hop redundancy protocols including HSRP, VRRP, and GLBP provide gateway redundancy for end devices that are configured with a single default gateway address, ensuring that traffic can continue flowing through an alternate gateway when the primary fails. GLBP extends basic gateway redundancy by providing load balancing across multiple active gateways simultaneously, improving bandwidth utilization compared to HSRP and VRRP where standby gateways carry no traffic during normal operation. Candidates must understand the configuration differences between these protocols, how to tune their timers for faster failover detection, and how to align gateway redundancy configurations with spanning tree topology to ensure that the active gateway and the spanning tree forwarding path lead through the same distribution switch, preventing suboptimal traffic flows through the campus during normal operation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Quality of Service Design Principles<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QoS design is a domain that the ENSLD exam addresses extensively because enterprise applications including voice, video conferencing, and real-time collaboration tools have strict latency, jitter, and packet loss requirements that cannot be met through best-effort forwarding in congested networks. Candidates must understand the DiffServ QoS model, in which traffic is classified and marked at the network edge and then treated according to per-hop behaviors defined at each network device along the path. The expedited forwarding per-hop behavior provides the low latency and guaranteed bandwidth characteristics needed for voice traffic, while assured forwarding classes provide differentiated levels of drop preference for data traffic during periods of congestion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">QoS policy design involves decisions about where in the network to classify and mark traffic, which marking values to trust from connected devices, how to configure queuing policies on WAN interfaces where congestion most commonly occurs, and how to apply traffic shaping or policing to manage the rate of traffic entering the network from specific sources or destined for specific paths. Candidates should understand how to design an end-to-end QoS policy that begins with classification and marking at the access layer where traffic enters the network, maintains those markings consistently across the campus and WAN, and applies appropriate queuing and scheduling policies at every congestion point along the path to ensure that high-priority traffic receives preferential treatment without starving lower-priority traffic of the bandwidth it needs for acceptable performance.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Multicast Network Design Solutions<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Multicast design questions in the ENSLD exam test whether candidates can design networks that efficiently deliver one-to-many and many-to-many traffic flows for applications like video streaming, financial market data distribution, and software distribution without the bandwidth waste of replicating unicast streams to each individual receiver. Protocol Independent Multicast is the standard multicast routing protocol used in enterprise networks, with two primary operational modes suited to different deployment scenarios. PIM Sparse Mode is appropriate for networks where receivers are distributed across multiple subnets and the ratio of multicast receivers to total network hosts is relatively low, using a rendezvous point as a meeting place where sources and receivers register before establishing optimized source-specific distribution trees.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rendezvous point design is a critical aspect of multicast architecture that significantly affects the reliability and scalability of the overall multicast deployment. Static RP configuration is simple but creates a single point of failure unless redundant RPs are configured with failover mechanisms. Auto-RP and PIM Bootstrap Router provide dynamic RP discovery and redundancy through election mechanisms that automatically select a new RP when the current one becomes unavailable. Anycast RP using MSDP allows multiple routers to share the same RP address and synchronize source registration information between them, providing both redundancy and load distribution for large-scale multicast deployments where a single RP would become a bottleneck for source registration traffic from high-volume streaming sources.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Network Security Design Integration<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security design questions in the ENSLD exam assess whether candidates can integrate security controls into network architectures without creating bottlenecks, single points of failure, or operational complexity that undermines the usability of the network for legitimate business purposes. Defense-in-depth design applies security controls at multiple layers of the network so that a failure or bypass of any single control does not expose the entire organization to risk. Perimeter security through next-generation firewalls, internal segmentation through zone-based policies, and endpoint security through network access control work together to limit the blast radius of security incidents and prevent lateral movement by attackers who have compromised one part of the network.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network access control design using 802.1X authentication, MAC Authentication Bypass, and web authentication provides a layered approach to verifying the identity and compliance posture of devices before granting them access to network resources. Candidates should understand how to design NAC deployments that handle the full spectrum of device types present in modern enterprise environments, from managed corporate laptops that support full 802.1X supplicant software to printers, IoT devices, and guest equipment that require alternative authentication methods or restricted network access through isolated guest VLANs. Micro-segmentation through software-defined access policies that assign devices to virtual networks based on their identity and compliance status rather than their physical port location is an advanced security design concept that appears in ENSLD exam scenarios involving Cisco SD-Access deployments.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Software Defined Access Design<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco Software-Defined Access is an enterprise network architecture that uses intent-based networking principles to automate network provisioning, enforce consistent policy, and provide comprehensive visibility across campus and branch environments through a centralized management platform called Cisco DNA Center. ENSLD exam candidates must understand the SD-Access fabric architecture, which consists of a control plane node that maintains endpoint-to-location mappings using the LISP protocol, fabric edge nodes that connect end devices to the fabric and register their locations with the control plane, fabric border nodes that connect the SD-Access fabric to external networks including the internet and data centers, and fabric intermediate nodes that provide high-speed transit connectivity within the fabric.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The policy plane in SD-Access uses Cisco TrustSec scalable group tags to assign endpoints to logical groups based on their identity and enforce group-based access control policies that determine which groups can communicate with each other regardless of their physical location in the network. This identity-based policy model decouples security policy from network topology, allowing consistent enforcement of access restrictions as users and devices move between physical locations or connect through different access methods. Candidates should understand how to design SD-Access fabrics for different organizational requirements, how to plan the integration of SD-Access with existing network infrastructure through border node design, and how DNA Center automation capabilities reduce the manual effort required to provision and manage large campus networks compared to traditional command-line-based management approaches.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Data Center Connectivity Design<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data center connectivity design appears in the ENSLD exam in the context of how enterprise campus and WAN networks connect to data center resources in ways that meet the performance, availability, and security requirements of business-critical applications hosted in on-premises facilities or hybrid cloud environments. Candidates must understand data center network architectures including the spine-leaf topology that has become the standard design for modern data centers because it provides predictable latency through consistent two-hop paths between any two endpoints, scales horizontally by adding leaf and spine switches without redesigning the existing fabric, and eliminates spanning tree dependency through the use of routing protocols at every layer of the fabric.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Campus-to-data-center connectivity design involves selecting appropriate interconnection technologies based on bandwidth requirements, distance constraints, and redundancy objectives. Dark fiber, DWDM wavelength services, and carrier Ethernet are common physical transport options for connecting campus buildings to co-located data center facilities. Logical connectivity through routed interfaces, port channels, and overlay technologies like VXLAN that extend Layer 2 segments between campus and data center locations without the scalability limitations of traditional spanning tree-based stretched VLANs are important design topics. Candidates should also understand the design implications of hybrid cloud connectivity, including how enterprise networks connect to public cloud environments through direct connect services or encrypted VPN tunnels that extend on-premises network segments into cloud virtual private clouds.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Network Management Design Architecture<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network management design is a topic that the ENSLD exam addresses in the context of how enterprise networks are monitored, configured, and troubleshot at scale using management plane architectures that provide comprehensive visibility without creating security risks or operational complexity. Out-of-band management networks that provide dedicated access to device management interfaces through separate physical or logical paths that are isolated from production traffic allow administrators to access and troubleshoot network devices even when production network connectivity is disrupted. Designing a robust out-of-band management network with appropriate access controls, authentication requirements, and logging capabilities is a best practice that distinguishes mature network operations from environments where management access competes with production traffic for the same network paths.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network monitoring design involves selecting and positioning tools for different visibility needs including SNMP polling for device health metrics, NetFlow or IPFIX for traffic analysis and capacity planning, syslog for event correlation and security monitoring, and synthetic monitoring through IP SLA probes that continuously test network performance between key locations and alert operations teams when metrics degrade below acceptable thresholds. Candidates should understand how to design monitoring architectures that scale to large enterprise environments with hundreds or thousands of managed devices, how to implement network time protocol hierarchies that ensure accurate timestamps across all managed devices for effective log correlation, and how automation tools including Ansible, Python scripts, and REST API integrations with platforms like Cisco DNA Center can reduce the manual effort required to maintain configuration consistency across large device populations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>High Availability Design Strategies<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">High availability design strategies tested in the ENSLD exam cover the architectural decisions and protocol configurations that allow enterprise networks to continue operating through hardware failures, software crashes, and planned maintenance events with minimal disruption to users and applications. Nonstop forwarding with stateful switchover is a high availability feature supported on chassis-based platforms with redundant supervisor modules that allows a standby supervisor to take over forwarding responsibilities when the active supervisor fails, maintaining routing adjacencies and forwarding tables without resetting connections or causing a routing reconvergence event that would temporarily disrupt traffic. NSF and SSO are important design considerations for core and distribution layer devices in campus networks where any disruption to routing affects large numbers of users simultaneously.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bidirectional Forwarding Detection provides sub-second failure detection for routing protocol adjacencies by sending rapid hello packets between adjacent devices and declaring a neighbor down when hellos stop arriving, enabling much faster convergence than relying on routing protocol hello timers alone. BFD integrates with OSPF, EIGRP, BGP, and HSRP to accelerate failure detection and trigger rerouting within milliseconds rather than the seconds or tens of seconds that native protocol timers would require. Candidates should understand how to design BFD deployments that balance the benefits of faster failure detection against the increased control plane overhead of maintaining BFD sessions across many adjacencies simultaneously, and how to set BFD timer values appropriately for the capabilities of the hardware platforms involved in each specific deployment scenario.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>ENSLD Exam Study Preparation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Effective preparation for the ENSLD exam requires a structured approach that combines conceptual study with design practice exercises that develop the ability to apply knowledge to realistic organizational scenarios rather than recalling isolated facts. Cisco&#8217;s official exam preparation resources including the official certification guide published by Cisco Press provide comprehensive coverage of all exam domains with depth appropriate for candidates targeting a professional-level credential. Supplementing the official guide with Cisco Validated Design guides, which document proven architecture patterns and design recommendations developed through extensive testing by Cisco engineers, provides practical design context that helps candidates understand why specific approaches are recommended rather than simply memorizing what those approaches are.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Practice with design scenario exercises is essential because a significant portion of ENSLD exam questions present organizational requirements and ask candidates to select the most appropriate design decision from among plausible alternatives that all have merit in different contexts. Working through design scenarios by explicitly identifying the requirements stated in the scenario, listing the tradeoffs of each candidate solution, and selecting the option that best satisfies the stated requirements builds the analytical discipline that these questions demand. Cisco Learning Network study groups, design-focused study guides, and practice exam providers that offer scenario-based questions provide opportunities to develop and test this analytical approach in a low-stakes environment before the actual exam.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Practical Design Skills Development<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Developing practical design skills beyond theoretical knowledge requires engaging with network simulation tools, design documentation exercises, and review of real enterprise network architectures that illustrate how the concepts covered in the ENSLD exam are applied in production environments. Cisco Packet Tracer and Cisco Modeling Labs provide simulation environments where candidates can build and test the network topologies described in exam scenarios, verifying their understanding of how protocols behave under different design configurations and exploring the effects of design changes on network performance and convergence behavior. Hands-on experimentation with routing protocol designs, redundancy configurations, and QoS policies in a simulated environment reinforces conceptual understanding in ways that reading alone cannot achieve.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Creating design documentation for practice scenarios using the formats and conventions that professional network designers use in real projects helps candidates develop the structured thinking required to approach complex design problems methodically. Documenting design decisions with explicit rationale that references specific business or technical requirements, identifying risks and mitigations for each design choice, and considering how the design will scale and evolve as organizational needs change are skills that separate candidates who genuinely understand enterprise network design from those who have only memorized the content of exam preparation materials. Reviewing published Cisco design guides and case studies from organizations that have shared their network architecture experiences in conference presentations or technical publications provides exposure to the diversity of design approaches that experienced network architects bring to different organizational contexts and constraints.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Cisco 300-420 ENSLD exam represents a meaningful validation of enterprise network design expertise that goes substantially beyond the configuration and troubleshooting skills tested at the associate and early professional levels of the Cisco certification track. Earning this credential demonstrates that a candidate can engage with complex organizational requirements, evaluate competing design approaches against specific technical and business constraints, and produce network architectures that are scalable, resilient, secure, and aligned with the long-term strategic direction of the organization being served.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The domains covered throughout this guide reflect the genuine breadth of knowledge required to design modern enterprise networks that integrate advanced routing, campus architecture, WAN connectivity, security controls, and emerging technologies like SD-Access and SD-WAN into cohesive systems that support business operations reliably. Each domain builds on foundational networking knowledge while extending it into the design thinking dimension that distinguishes architects from implementers and positions certified professionals for the most technically demanding and professionally rewarding roles in enterprise networking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Preparation for this exam is most effective when it combines structured study of the official curriculum with hands-on practice in simulation environments and engagement with real design scenarios that require candidates to apply knowledge rather than simply recall it. The analytical skills developed through this kind of active preparation pay dividends not just on exam day but throughout a career in network architecture, where the ability to reason clearly about design tradeoffs and communicate design decisions persuasively to both technical and business stakeholders is what ultimately drives professional advancement and organizational impact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The ENSLD certification opens doors to senior network design roles, enterprise architecture positions, and consulting engagements where clients expect verified expertise in the design disciplines the exam covers. Professionals who hold this credential alongside practical experience in enterprise network environments are well-positioned to contribute to the most complex and consequential network projects their organizations undertake, from large-scale campus modernization initiatives to WAN transformation programs that move organizations from legacy MPLS architectures to modern SD-WAN platforms with superior visibility and operational agility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Continued learning beyond the certification is essential in a field where technologies evolve as rapidly as enterprise networking. The SD-Access, SD-WAN, and cloud connectivity concepts that now feature prominently in the ENSLD exam were emerging topics just a few years ago, and the next wave of architectural evolution driven by intent-based networking, AI-powered operations, and deeper integration between network infrastructure and cloud platforms will require ongoing investment in learning and adaptation. Candidates who approach the ENSLD certification not as a terminal destination but as a foundation for continuous professional development will find that the design thinking skills and architectural knowledge they build through this preparation remain valuable and increasingly applicable throughout a long and rewarding career in enterprise network design and architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Cisco 300-420 ENSLD exam, formally titled Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks, is a professional-level certification exam that validates a candidate&#8217;s ability to design scalable, resilient, and secure enterprise network architectures that meet specific business and technical requirements. This exam serves as a concentration exam within the Cisco Certified Network Professional Enterprise track and also contributes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1650],"tags":[1441,31,349,1442,772],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3375"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3375"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3375\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11246,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3375\/revisions\/11246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}