Adobe 9A0-389 Practice Test Questions, Adobe 9A0-389 Exam Dumps

Passing the IT Certification Exams can be Tough, but with the right exam prep materials, that can be solved. ExamLabs providers 100% Real and updated Adobe 9A0-389 exam dumps, practice test questions and answers which can make you equipped with the right knowledge required to pass the exams. Our Adobe 9A0-389 exam dumps, practice test questions and answers, are reviewed constantly by IT Experts to Ensure their Validity and help you pass without putting in hundreds and hours of studying.

A Retrospective on the 9A0-389 Exam: AEM 6.3 Architecture and OSGi

The Adobe 9A0-389 exam, the "Adobe Experience Manager 6.3 Developer ACE Exam," was the industry standard for validating the skills of a developer working on the AEM 6.3 platform. Achieving this certification demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of AEM's architecture and the ability to build, extend, and deploy enterprise-grade web content management solutions. The 9A0-389 Exam covered the full development lifecycle, from creating components and templates to developing backend OSGi services and managing code deployments.

It is important to state that this exam, along with its specific focus on AEM 6.3, has been retired. Adobe has since shifted its certification tracks to focus on newer versions, particularly AEM as a Cloud Service. However, AEM 6.3 was a very popular and stable version, and many of its architectural patterns and development best practices are still highly relevant for developers working with on-premise AEM 6.5 installations. The concepts tested in the 9A0-389 Exam are foundational to all modern AEM development.

This series will provide a detailed look at the core competencies required to pass the 9A0-389 Exam, using its structure as a guide to learn AEM 6.3 development. We will explore the key technologies and patterns that defined this version of AEM, highlighting the best practices that were emphasized. This first part will revisit the core AEM architecture and take a deep dive into the modern, annotation-driven approach to building backend OSGi services, a central topic for any AEM developer.

AEM 6.3 Architectural Foundations

To succeed in the 9A0-389 Exam, a developer needed a rock-solid understanding of AEM's three core architectural pillars. The first is the Java Content Repository (JCR), implemented as Apache Jackrabbit Oak. In AEM, all data, code, and configuration are stored in this hierarchical content repository. The second pillar is the Apache Sling web framework, which maps incoming browser requests to resources in the JCR and then resolves the appropriate script to render the content. This resource-centric approach is a defining characteristic of AEM.

The third and most important pillar for backend development is the OSGi framework, implemented as Apache Felix. This framework provides a dynamic, modular environment for all the Java code running inside AEM. All custom business logic, integrations, and helper utilities are developed as OSGi services that are deployed in modular bundles. A developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam was expected to be an expert in building and managing code within this OSGi container, as it is the heart of AEM's backend extensibility.

These three technologies work in concert to provide a powerful and flexible platform. A developer's job is to leverage them correctly to build solutions. The 9A0-389 Exam was designed to test a developer's ability to not just understand these pillars in isolation, but to understand how they interact to deliver a complete web application.

OSGi Declarative Services (DS) Annotations

A major focus of the 9A0-389 Exam was the modern, annotation-driven approach to creating OSGi components and services. AEM 6.3 fully embraced the OSGi Declarative Services 1.2 annotation standard, which dramatically simplifies development. Instead of writing separate XML files to define your components, you could now use simple Java annotations directly in your code. The most fundamental annotation is @Component.

The @Component annotation marks a Java class as a component that should be managed by the OSGi container. The container is then responsible for instantiating the class and managing its lifecycle. Within this annotation, a developer can specify the service interface that the component should provide. For example, @Component(service = MyService.class) would register the component in the OSGi service registry as an implementation of MyService.

This annotation-driven model makes the code much cleaner, more readable, and less error-prone. It is the standard for all modern AEM development. A candidate for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be completely comfortable with this approach and understand the various attributes of the @Component annotation for controlling things like the component's name and activation policy.

Dependency Injection with @Reference

A core principle of the OSGi service model is dependency injection, which allows for the creation of loosely coupled systems. The standard way to achieve this in AEM 6.3, and a key skill for the 9A0-389 Exam, is by using the @Reference annotation. When a component needs to use another OSGi service, the developer simply declares a field for that service and annotates it with @Reference.

The OSGi container then takes care of the rest. At runtime, it will find an available implementation of the referenced service in the service registry and automatically inject it into the field. This means the component does not need to know how to find or create the services it depends on; it simply declares its needs, and the framework fulfills them. This makes components more modular, reusable, and easier to test.

A developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam needed to understand how to use the @Reference annotation effectively. This included knowing how to handle situations where a dependency might be optional or might have multiple implementations available. The ability to build a robust application by correctly wiring together different services was a hallmark of a skilled AEM developer.

Managing OSGi Configurations

Most real-world OSGi services need to be configurable. For example, a service that connects to an external API needs a configurable endpoint URL and API key. The 9A0-389 Exam required developers to know the modern, best-practice way to handle this using OSGi Configuration Admin Service and a specific set of annotations. The primary annotation for this is @Designate.

A developer first defines a configuration interface using another set of annotations (@ObjectClassDefinition). This interface defines all the configurable properties for the service, including their type, a label, and a description. This automatically creates a user interface in the AEM Web Console's configuration manager, allowing administrators to easily manage the settings for the service without touching the code.

The developer then uses the @Designate annotation on their OSGi component class, pointing it to their newly created configuration interface. This links the component to its configuration. Inside the component's activate method, the developer can then access the configured properties. This provides a clean, type-safe, and highly manageable way to handle service configurations, and was a key practice tested in the 9A0-389 Exam.

The AEM Web Console (Felix Console)

An indispensable tool for any AEM developer, and a necessary area of knowledge for the 9A0-389 Exam, is the AEM Web Console, also known as the Felix Console. This is a web-based administration interface that provides deep insight into the state of the OSGi container. It is the primary tool for debugging and managing the backend of an AEM instance.

Within the console, a developer can view a list of all the OSGi bundles installed in the system. They can see each bundle's status (e.g., Active, Resolved, Installed) and inspect its details, such as the packages it exports and imports. This is crucial for diagnosing deployment issues, such as missing dependencies, that might prevent a bundle from starting.

The console also provides tabs for viewing all the registered OSGi services and components. A developer can use this to verify that their custom service has been registered correctly or to see which component is providing a particular service. The console also contains the Configuration Manager, where administrators can manage the OSGi configurations we discussed earlier. A candidate for the 9A0-389 Exam was expected to be proficient in using this console for daily development and troubleshooting tasks.

Introduction to the Modern Component Stack

The developer experience for building components in Adobe Experience Manager underwent a significant modernization in the versions leading up to AEM 6.3. The 9A0-389 Exam placed a heavy emphasis on these modern development patterns, which were designed to promote a cleaner separation of concerns, improve security, and increase developer productivity. The two cornerstone technologies of this modern stack are the HTML Template Language (HTL) and Sling Models.

HTL (formerly known as Sightly) became the preferred server-side templating language, replacing the older and more complex JavaServer Pages (JSP). Sling Models provided an elegant, annotation-driven way to access JCR content and encapsulate business logic, serving as the backend for the HTL templates. A developer preparing for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be an expert in using these two technologies in concert to build robust and maintainable AEM components.

This part of the series will provide a deep dive into this modern component architecture. We will explore the key features of HTL, including its focus on simplicity and security. We will then take a comprehensive look at Sling Models, covering how they are created, how they are populated with data using injectors, and how they are invoked from an HTL script. This is the core, day-to-day workflow for a modern AEM developer.

The HTML Template Language (HTL) in Depth

HTL is a templating language that is designed to be as close to pure HTML5 as possible. This makes it very easy for front-end developers who may not be Java experts to work with AEM templates. The 9A0-389 Exam required a thorough understanding of HTL's syntax and block statements. The language is intentionally simple and does not allow for complex business logic to be embedded in the markup. All logic is deferred to a backend Use-API, typically a Sling Model.

HTL's expressions, using the ${...} syntax, are used to output content. A key feature, and an important topic for the 9A0-389 Exam, is its automatic, context-aware XSS protection. HTL understands the context in which an expression is being displayed (e.g., within an HTML element, an href attribute, or a JavaScript string) and applies the correct escaping to prevent Cross-Site Scripting attacks. This makes it a much more secure templating language by default.

The language also provides a set of powerful block statements, which are implemented as data-sly-* attributes on HTML tags. For example, data-sly-list is used to iterate over a collection, data-sly-test is used for conditional rendering, and data-sly-resource is used to include one component within another. A candidate for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be fluent in using these block statements to build dynamic component markup.

Introduction to Sling Models

Sling Models are the preferred way to access and encapsulate business logic for AEM components, and they were a major focus of the 9A0-389 Exam. A Sling Model is an annotation-driven Java Plain Old Java Object (POJO) that can be automatically populated with data from the JCR or the current request. They provide a clean way to move all the data access and logic out of the rendering scripts and into testable, reusable Java classes.

To create a Sling Model, a developer creates a Java class and annotates it with @Model. They specify what the model can be "adapted" from, which is typically a Sling Resource (representing the component's JCR node) or a SlingHttpServletRequest. The fields within the model class are then annotated with "injectors," which tell the framework how to populate them with data.

This pattern promotes a clean Model-View-Controller style of architecture within the component. The Sling Model acts as the "Model," retrieving and preparing the data. The HTL script acts as the "View," responsible only for displaying the data provided by the model. A developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be an expert in this architectural pattern.

Using Sling Model Injectors

The real power of Sling Models comes from the set of available injectors that automatically populate the model's fields. A candidate for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be familiar with the most common ones. The most basic injector is @Inject, which can be used to inject common Sling objects like the current resource, request, or page.

For injecting properties from the component's JCR node (i.e., the values from the dialog), the @ValueMapValue injector is used. A developer simply annotates a field with this, and Sling Models will automatically look for a JCR property with the same name as the field and inject its value, performing the necessary type conversion. This dramatically reduces the amount of boilerplate JCR API code that a developer needs to write.

Other powerful injectors include @ChildResource for injecting child resources, @OSGiService for injecting an OSGi service directly into the model, and @RequestAttribute for injecting request attributes. The 9A0-389 Exam would test a developer's ability to choose the correct injector for a given task and to use them effectively to populate their models with all the necessary data.

Invoking Sling Models from HTL

Once a Sling Model has been created, it needs to be used by the HTL script to render the component's markup. This is done using the data-sly-use block statement. A developer adds this attribute to an HTML tag in their HTL file and provides an identifier for the model and the fully qualified name of the Sling Model Java class.

For example, <div data-sly-use.model="com.myproject.models.MyComponentModel">. This tells HTL to instantiate the MyComponentModel class. The instantiated object is then available within that block of the template, referenced by the identifier "model." The HTL script can then access the public getter methods of the Sling Model to retrieve the data it needs for rendering. For example, ${model.title} would call the getTitle() method on the model.

This clear and simple contract between the HTL "view" and the Sling Model "model" is a core tenet of modern AEM development. It ensures a clean separation of concerns and makes both the front-end and back-end code easier to understand and maintain. The 9A0-389 Exam required a developer to be proficient in this entire workflow, from creating the model to invoking it in the HTL.

Introduction to Editable Templates

One of the most significant architectural changes introduced in modern AEM, and a central topic of the 9A0-389 Exam, was the move from "static templates" to "editable templates." In older versions of AEM, the relationship between a page and its template was fixed. A developer defined the entire structure of the template, and an author could only fill in the content areas provided. Editable templates fundamentally changed this relationship, giving more power and flexibility to authors.

With editable templates, the developer still creates the foundational page rendering component, but the assembly of the template's structure and the policies governing its components are managed through a special authoring UI. This empowers a new role, the "template author" (often a power user or business user), to create and modify template layouts without needing a developer to write or change code. The 9A0-389 Exam required a deep understanding of this new, more flexible model.

This part of the series will focus on this paradigm shift. We will explore the architecture of editable templates, the role of the template editor and policies, and how developers create the components that are used within this new framework. We will also revisit the creation of Touch UI dialogs, which remain the core interface for component authoring.

The Architecture of Editable Templates

The 9A0-389 Exam required a developer to understand the key architectural differences between static and editable templates. Unlike static templates, editable templates do not store a copy of the template's structure on each page that is created. Instead, each page maintains a dynamic reference to its template. This means that a change made to the template can be automatically reflected on all pages that use it, which is a huge advantage for maintainability.

An editable template is composed of two main parts: the structure and the initial content. The "structure" is what the template author defines in the template editor. It includes the layout and the components that will be part of every page created from that template. This structure is locked and cannot be changed by a content author on an individual page. The "initial content" is a blueprint of content that will be copied to a new page when it is first created.

This separation of concerns is a core concept. The developer creates the building blocks (the components). The template author assembles these blocks into a locked structure (the template). The content author then uses this template to create pages, filling in the editable areas with content. The 9A0-389 Exam tested a developer's knowledge of all parts of this workflow.

The Template Editor and Policies

The Template Editor is the web-based user interface that template authors use to create and manage editable templates. A developer preparing for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be familiar with this environment. In the editor, a template author can add components to the page structure and configure their layout. They can also define which components are locked and which are editable on the final pages.

A central concept in the Template Editor is the "Policy." A policy is a set of design configurations that are applied to a component or a set of components within the template. For example, a template author could create a policy for a "Text" component that defines which Rich Text Editor features are available. They could create another policy for a layout container that specifies which other components are allowed to be added to it by a content author.

These policies are stored centrally under /conf, separate from both the code (/apps) and the content (/content). This clean separation was a key improvement in AEM 6.3. It allows for the reuse of policies across multiple templates and sites. A developer's job is often to create the components and their dialogs, which then expose the configurable options that can be controlled by a template author through these policies.

The Role of the Page Component

Even with editable templates, the developer is still responsible for creating the page rendering component. This was still a fundamental skill for the 9A0-389 Exam. The page component provides the main outer shell for the page, including the <html>, <head>, and <body> tags. It is responsible for including the necessary client libraries (CSS/JS) and for rendering the main structural elements of the page.

The key difference is that the body of the page component is much simpler. Instead of containing a hardcoded layout with specific paragraph systems, it typically contains a single main paragraph system that is managed by the editable template's structure. The editable template effectively injects its defined structure and components into this main container provided by the page component.

A developer must configure their page component to indicate that it is compatible with the editable template framework. This involves setting specific properties on the component definition in the JCR. A candidate for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to know how to create a page component that could serve as the foundation for a new editable template.

Building Touch UI Dialogs

While template authors control the overall layout and policies, content authors still interact with individual components through their Touch UI dialogs. The skills for building these dialogs, as tested in the 9A0-389 Exam, remained a core competency for developers. This involves creating a cq:dialog node structure under the component using the XML-based Granite UI framework.

A developer must define the tabs, sections, and fields that make up the authoring interface for their component. They need to be proficient in using the various Granite UI resource types to create text fields, path browsers, select dropdowns, and other common form inputs. The name property of each field is critical, as it determines the name of the JCR property where the author's content will be saved.

A well-designed dialog is a key part of a successful AEM project. It should be intuitive for the author, providing them with the flexibility they need while also enforcing any necessary constraints. A developer's ability to translate a set of business requirements into a user-friendly and robust component dialog was a skill that the 9A0-389 Exam was designed to validate.

Introduction to Workflows and Performance

Beyond building the visible parts of a website, a professional AEM developer, as validated by the 9A0-389 Exam, must be proficient in managing the less visible but equally critical aspects of the platform: business process automation and performance optimization. These two areas are essential for the stability, efficiency, and scalability of any enterprise-level AEM implementation.

AEM Workflows are the primary tool for automating content-centric processes. They allow developers and administrators to create structured, repeatable sequences of steps for tasks like content review and approval, asset processing, or notifications. The 9A0-389 Exam required developers to know how to not only model these workflows but also how to extend them with custom Java code to meet specific business needs.

Performance is a paramount concern for any public-facing website. An AEM developer needs to understand the key factors that influence performance, from backend query efficiency to front-end optimization. A major part of this is understanding the role of the AEM Dispatcher for caching. This part of the series will cover these crucial backend and operational topics.

Developing Custom AEM Workflow Steps

While AEM provides a variety of out-of-the-box workflow steps, real-world business processes often require custom logic. A key skill for a developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam was the ability to create a custom workflow process step. This is done by writing a Java class that implements the WorkflowProcess interface. This class is then deployed as an OSGi component.

The core of the custom step is the execute method. When a running workflow instance reaches this custom step, the AEM workflow engine invokes this method. The developer has access to the workflow's payload (the JCR resource being processed), the workflow's metadata, and the user's session. This allows them to perform virtually any action, such as modifying JCR properties, calling external services, or making decisions to route the workflow down different paths.

This ability to inject custom server-side logic into an automated business process is incredibly powerful. It allows developers to tailor AEM's workflow engine to the unique needs of their organization. The 9A0-389 Exam would test a candidate's knowledge of the entire process, from writing the Java class with the correct OSGi annotations to making it available in the workflow editor.

The Role of the AEM Dispatcher

The AEM Dispatcher is the cornerstone of AEM performance and security, and a conceptual understanding of its function was essential for the 9A0-389 Exam. The Dispatcher is a module that runs on an external web server (like Apache or IIS) that sits in front of the AEM publish instances. Its primary job is to cache as much content as possible, serving static HTML and assets directly to users without having to contact the AEM server.

This caching dramatically reduces the load on the publish instances and allows an AEM site to scale to handle very high traffic loads. A developer's code and component design can have a significant impact on how "cacheable" the site is. For example, rendering user-specific information directly in a component can make that component un-cacheable, so developers must use client-side techniques like AJAX to pull in personalized content.

The second key role of the Dispatcher is security. It acts as a reverse proxy and can be configured with a strict set of filtering rules that define which requests are allowed to reach the AEM publish server. This provides a critical layer of protection against common web vulnerabilities. A developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam needed to understand this dual role of caching and security.

Managing Dispatcher Cache Invalidation

A caching system is only useful if there is a reliable way to invalidate the cache when the underlying content changes. A developer preparing for the 9A0-389 Exam needed to understand AEM's cache invalidation mechanism. When an author activates a page from the author instance to the publish instance, the publish instance sends a special invalidation request to the Dispatcher.

This request typically involves updating the timestamp of a special empty file in the web server's document root called the .stat file. The Dispatcher is configured to check the timestamp of this file. If it sees that the .stat file has been touched, it knows that some content has changed, and it considers its entire cache to be stale. The next request for a page will then be forwarded to the publish instance to get the fresh content, which is then re-cached.

More advanced configurations can use auto-invalidation, where the Dispatcher will delete only the specific cached files that correspond to the content that was activated. A developer needs to be aware of how their component rendering might affect this. For example, if a component on one page renders content from another page, the developer must ensure that activating the source content correctly invalidates the page where it is displayed.

Front-End Performance with Client Libraries

Backend performance is only one half of the equation. The 9A0-389 Exam also expected developers to know how to manage front-end resources (CSS and JavaScript) for optimal performance using AEM's Client Library framework. A Client Library, or "clientlib," is a mechanism for organizing, managing, and delivering front-end code to the browser.

A key best practice for performance is to minimize the number of HTTP requests a browser has to make. The clientlib framework helps with this by providing built-in features for concatenating multiple CSS or JS files into a single file. It also provides minification, which removes whitespace and shortens variable names to reduce the overall file size. A developer can enable these features with a simple configuration.

Another important feature tested in the 9A0-389 Exam was the ability to manage dependencies and categories. A developer can create a base clientlib with common site-wide styles and scripts. Other, component-specific clientlibs can then declare a dependency on this base library. AEM will then ensure that the libraries are loaded in the correct order. Using categories allows for the conditional loading of clientlibs on different templates, ensuring that a page only loads the code it actually needs.

Introduction to AEM Security and Deployment

The final set of skills required for a developer to pass the 9A0-389 Exam and be considered a proficient AEM professional involves the crucial topics of security, repository querying, and application deployment. These areas are fundamental to creating a secure, performant, and maintainable enterprise application. An AEM developer is responsible not just for writing code, but for writing code that is secure and efficient, and for understanding how that code is packaged and moved through a professional deployment pipeline.

AEM's security model is granular and powerful, built on the access control features of the underlying JCR. Querying the JCR efficiently is a critical skill for building dynamic applications without causing performance bottlenecks. And a standardized, automated deployment process is the hallmark of a mature development team. The 9A0-389 Exam ensured that a certified developer was competent in all of these areas.

This concluding part of our series will explore these final topics. We will cover the basics of managing permissions in AEM. We will then focus on the best-practice way to search for content using the QueryBuilder API. Finally, we will review the standard, Maven-based workflow for building and deploying AEM projects.

Managing AEM Permissions

A developer preparing for the 9A0-389 Exam needed a solid understanding of the AEM security model. Security in AEM is managed by controlling access to nodes in the JCR. The main security principals are Users and Groups. A developer or administrator can grant or deny specific privileges to a user or group on a specific JCR path. These privileges include actions like jcr:read, jcr:write, and crx:replicate.

These permissions are managed through Access Control Lists (ACLs). Each ACL entry specifies a principal (user or group), a privilege, and whether it is an "allow" or "deny" rule. It is a best practice to manage permissions by adding users to groups and then applying permissions to the groups, rather than to individual users. This makes the security model much easier to manage and audit.

A key concept for the 9A0-389 Exam was understanding that AEM has a "deny-first" security evaluation. This means that if a user is a member of two groups, one of which is allowed to read a resource and the other is denied, the deny rule will always take precedence. Developers must keep this in mind when designing their content structure and security models to ensure that the correct users have access to the correct content.

Querying with the QueryBuilder API

While developers can query the JCR using languages like JCR-SQL2 or XPath, the recommended and most commonly used method tested in the 9A0-389 Exam was the QueryBuilder API. The QueryBuilder provides a simple, map-based way to construct queries without having to write complex query strings. This makes the code cleaner and, more importantly, it allows AEM to perform optimizations and use the most efficient search indexes.

To use the QueryBuilder, a developer creates a map of predicates. Each predicate is a key-value pair that defines a constraint for the search. For example, path=/content/my-site, type=cq:Page, and property=jcr:content/jcr:title are all common predicates. The developer passes this map to the QueryBuilder service, which then executes the search and returns a list of matching resources.

This API is versatile and can be used from both server-side Java code and from client-side AJAX calls via a provided servlet. A developer taking the 9A0-389 Exam needed to be proficient in using the various predicates to build queries that could find content based on path, node type, property values, full-text search terms, and more. Using the QueryBuilder correctly is a critical skill for building performant AEM applications.

Building Projects with Apache Maven

The industry-standard tool for building and managing AEM projects, and a required area of knowledge for the 9A0-389 Exam, is Apache Maven. Maven is a build automation tool that handles everything from compiling Java code and managing dependencies to packaging the final application for deployment. Adobe provides a standard AEM Project Archetype, which is a template that generates a new, best-practice Maven project structure.

A typical AEM Maven project is a multi-module project. It will have a core module that contains all the Java source code and is compiled into an OSGi bundle. It will have a ui.apps module that contains all the JCR content for the application, such as components, templates, and client libraries, that will be installed under /apps. There may also be modules for content, configurations, and tests.

A developer uses Maven commands to build the project. The mvn clean install command will compile the code, run tests, and produce the final artifacts. The key output is a content package, which is a zip file that contains all the other artifacts, ready to be deployed to an AEM instance. The 9A0-389 Exam recognized that proficiency with this standardized Maven workflow is a core competency for any professional AEM developer.

Conclusion

The final step in the development workflow is deploying the application. As covered in the 9A0-389 Exam, the unit of deployment in AEM is the Content Package. The Maven build process produces this package, which contains the compiled OSGi bundle and all the JCR content from the ui.apps module. This single package represents a complete, versioned snapshot of the application.

This content package can then be deployed to an AEM instance in a number of ways. For local development, a developer can configure their Maven build to automatically upload and install the package on their local AEM server every time they build the project. For higher environments like QA, Staging, and Production, the package is typically uploaded and installed manually through the AEM Package Manager UI, or more commonly, through an automated CI/CD pipeline.

This package-based deployment model is robust and reliable. It ensures that all parts of the application are deployed together and allows for easy rollbacks by simply uninstalling a package or reinstalling a previous version. Understanding this entire lifecycle, from writing code to building a package with Maven to deploying it to a server, was a comprehensive skill set that the 9A0-389 Exam was designed to validate.

Choose ExamLabs to get the latest & updated Adobe 9A0-389 practice test questions, exam dumps with verified answers to pass your certification exam. Try our reliable 9A0-389 exam dumps, practice test questions and answers for your next certification exam. Premium Exam Files, Question and Answers for Adobe 9A0-389 are actually exam dumps which help you pass quickly.

Hide