Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional SAP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121:

A financial services company wants to implement a highly available, multi-region database to support global trading applications. The database must provide low-latency reads and writes, failover capability, and strong consistency for critical transactions. Which AWS service or combination should be used?

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database with multiple read replicas and cross-region replication
B) Single Amazon RDS instance in one region with multi-AZ deployment
C) Amazon DynamoDB with Global Tables
D) Amazon S3 with eventual consistency

Answer:

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database with multiple read replicas and cross-region replication

Explanation:

Designing a multi-region database for financial services demands high availability, low latency, strong consistency, and rapid failover to ensure uninterrupted global trading operations. Option A, Amazon Aurora Global Database, provides a fully managed relational database with multi-region support, offering cross-region replication with minimal latency, making it ideal for critical transaction workloads.

Amazon Aurora uses a distributed storage architecture that automatically replicates six copies of your data across three Availability Zones in each region. This provides durability, fault tolerance, and high availability for the database. Aurora Global Database extends this architecture across multiple AWS regions, allowing applications in different geographic locations to access low-latency reads locally while maintaining a single source of truth for writes. Cross-region replication typically occurs in less than a second, ensuring near real-time consistency of critical financial data, which is essential for trading operations where milliseconds can have significant impacts.

Multi-master support allows Aurora to handle failover scenarios seamlessly. In the event of a regional outage, the system can promote a secondary region to primary, enabling uninterrupted transactional operations. Read replicas in multiple regions reduce read latency for globally distributed applications. Aurora also provides automatic backup, point-in-time recovery, and continuous monitoring through Amazon CloudWatch, ensuring operational reliability and compliance with financial regulations.

Option B, a single RDS instance with multi-AZ deployment, offers failover within a region but does not provide global low-latency reads, which can significantly affect user experience and trading performance. Option C, DynamoDB Global Tables, offers eventual consistency and is optimized for NoSQL workloads. While suitable for some use cases, it may not provide the transactional consistency required for critical financial operations. Option D, S3 with eventual consistency, is completely unsuitable for transactional database workloads, as it is designed for object storage rather than structured, low-latency transactional operations.

Security is critical in financial applications. Aurora integrates with AWS IAM, VPC, KMS encryption for data at rest, and SSL for data in transit. Fine-grained access controls and auditing capabilities ensure compliance with regulations such as PCI DSS. Operational monitoring can be enhanced with Aurora metrics and CloudTrail for detailed tracking of all changes and access to the database.

Cost optimization in a multi-region Aurora setup can be achieved by scaling read replicas in regions with high demand while minimizing unused resources. Aurora’s serverless configuration can further reduce costs by automatically scaling compute capacity based on workload requirements, eliminating over-provisioning while maintaining availability and performance.

Question 122:

A logistics company wants to process and analyze real-time telemetry data from thousands of delivery vehicles. The solution must ingest high-velocity streams, transform the data, and provide analytics dashboards with minimal latency. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight
B) Amazon SQS with an EC2-based consumer application
C) Amazon SNS for all telemetry messages with manual aggregation
D) Single EC2 instance with local MySQL database

Answer:

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight

Explanation:

Processing and analyzing real-time telemetry data from thousands of vehicles requires a scalable, low-latency, and highly reliable data ingestion and analytics architecture. Option A leverages AWS services designed to handle high-throughput streaming data with minimal operational overhead.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams acts as the ingestion layer, capable of handling millions of events per second from globally distributed vehicles. It provides real-time streaming capabilities and ensures the ordered delivery of data records, which is essential for correlating telemetry metrics like location, speed, and engine diagnostics. Kinesis Data Streams scales dynamically, allowing the system to accommodate sudden spikes in vehicle activity without loss of data.

AWS Lambda processes the incoming streaming data in real time. Serverless compute allows automatic scaling to handle variable workloads and enables transformations such as filtering, aggregations, or enriching data with metadata from other sources. Lambda functions can write processed results to downstream storage, triggering additional analytics or alerting workflows. By removing the need to manage servers, Lambda simplifies operations and reduces infrastructure costs while maintaining high availability.

Amazon S3 serves as a durable, scalable storage layer for processed and historical telemetry data. It supports structured formats like Parquet or CSV, enabling efficient querying and long-term retention. S3 integrates seamlessly with analytics and machine learning tools, allowing historical analysis and predictive modeling. Its durability ensures that critical operational data is never lost, and its scalability accommodates increasing fleet size and telemetry volume.

Amazon QuickSight provides the business intelligence and dashboarding layer. It enables near real-time visualization of processed telemetry data, allowing operations teams to monitor vehicle performance, route efficiency, and delivery metrics. QuickSight integrates directly with S3 and Kinesis, allowing dynamic dashboards without extensive ETL operations. Users can filter, aggregate, and drill down into the telemetry data to identify trends, detect anomalies, and optimize logistics operations.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, cannot achieve the same low-latency real-time analytics and requires manual scaling, introducing operational complexity. Option C, SNS for telemetry messages, is a pub/sub system without guaranteed ordering and lacks built-in stream processing capabilities, making it unsuitable for real-time analytics. Option D, a single EC2 instance with MySQL, cannot handle high-velocity streams, introduces a single point of failure, and fails to provide scalable analytics.

Security and compliance are ensured through IAM roles for Kinesis and Lambda, encryption at rest and in transit via KMS and SSL, and CloudTrail for auditing data access. Operational metrics are monitored using CloudWatch, ensuring prompt detection of data ingestion or processing issues. Cost optimization is achieved by leveraging serverless Lambda and scalable Kinesis shards, minimizing idle resources while supporting high throughput.

Question 123:

An e-commerce company wants to migrate its legacy monolithic application to a highly available, containerized microservices architecture. The application must scale dynamically based on user traffic and integrate with AWS managed databases. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon ECS with Fargate, Application Load Balancer, Amazon RDS, and Amazon ElastiCache
B) Single EC2 instance hosting the monolithic application with manual scaling
C) Amazon S3 hosting static application files only
D) On-premises Kubernetes cluster with RDS connectivity

Answer:

A) Amazon ECS with Fargate, Application Load Balancer, Amazon RDS, and Amazon ElastiCache

Explanation:

Migrating a monolithic e-commerce application to a containerized microservices architecture requires highly available, scalable compute, load balancing, and integration with managed database services. Option A leverages AWS managed services to achieve this efficiently, reducing operational overhead while ensuring scalability and resilience.

Amazon ECS with Fargate provides container orchestration with serverless compute, eliminating the need to provision or manage EC2 instances. Fargate automatically scales containerized workloads based on resource requirements and traffic, ensuring that each microservice can handle peak loads while reducing costs during idle periods. ECS supports task definitions, service discovery, and integration with IAM for secure container execution.

The Application Load Balancer distributes incoming traffic across multiple ECS services, supporting dynamic scaling, path-based routing, and TLS termination. This ensures high availability and resilience, allowing the system to handle large volumes of concurrent users while maintaining low latency. The ALB also integrates with AWS WAF for security protection against common web attacks.

Amazon RDS provides managed relational database support for transactional data. It supports automated backups, Multi-AZ deployments for high availability, and read replicas for scalability. Integration with ECS ensures seamless connectivity while maintaining security through VPC, security groups, and IAM authentication.

Amazon ElastiCache provides in-memory caching to accelerate database query performance and reduce latency for frequently accessed data, enhancing user experience during peak traffic events such as flash sales or promotions. Redis or Memcached can be chosen depending on use case requirements.

Option B, a single EC2 instance hosting the monolithic application, introduces a single point of failure, limited scalability, and manual operational overhead. Option C, S3 hosting static files, cannot support dynamic business logic or transactional operations. Option D, an on-premises Kubernetes cluster, increases operational complexity and fails to leverage AWS managed services for scaling, availability, and resilience.

Security considerations include IAM roles for ECS tasks, security groups for RDS and ElastiCache, encryption at rest and in transit, and auditing via CloudTrail. Operational monitoring is achieved with CloudWatch metrics and alarms for ECS, ALB, RDS, and ElastiCache. Cost optimization is achieved through serverless Fargate tasks and automated scaling, ensuring that resources match demand without over-provisioning.

Question 124:

A media streaming company wants to provide on-demand video content to millions of users globally. The solution must handle dynamic scaling for traffic spikes, deliver low-latency streaming, and integrate with a content delivery network. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon CloudFront, Amazon S3, AWS Elemental MediaConvert, and Amazon Elastic Load Balancer
B) Single EC2 instance hosting the video content with manual scaling
C) Amazon RDS hosting video files with CloudFront
D) Amazon DynamoDB for video storage with SNS notifications

Answer:

A) Amazon CloudFront, Amazon S3, AWS Elemental MediaConvert, and Amazon Elastic Load Balancer

Explanation:

Providing on-demand video streaming to millions of users globally requires an architecture that ensures scalability, low-latency delivery, durability, and integration with a content delivery network. Option A combines managed AWS services that provide each of these capabilities effectively.

Amazon S3 serves as the origin storage for video files. It is highly durable, scalable, and cost-efficient, allowing the company to store petabytes of video content without worrying about capacity constraints. S3 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services and supports lifecycle policies to optimize storage costs by transitioning older content to infrequent access or archival storage classes.

AWS Elemental MediaConvert enables the company to transcode video files into multiple formats and bitrates to support adaptive streaming. This ensures that end users with varying network conditions receive the optimal video quality, reducing buffering and improving user experience. MediaConvert supports a wide range of codecs and streaming protocols, allowing broad device compatibility, from mobile phones to smart TVs.

Amazon CloudFront, as a global content delivery network (CDN), caches video content at edge locations close to end users. This minimizes latency and reduces the load on origin servers. CloudFront supports features like signed URLs and geo-restriction, enabling content protection and compliance with licensing agreements. CloudFront integrates seamlessly with S3 and MediaConvert, providing a fully managed, scalable streaming solution.

The Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) can be used to distribute API requests or dynamic content requests that support the video platform, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance for web services or user-facing APIs. By using auto-scaling groups in conjunction with ELB, compute resources scale dynamically based on user demand, avoiding service disruptions during peak hours.

Option B, a single EC2 instance hosting video content, is unsuitable for handling millions of users due to capacity constraints, limited fault tolerance, and lack of global caching. Option C, RDS hosting video files, is inefficient because relational databases are not optimized for storing large objects like video, leading to high latency and high storage costs. Option D, DynamoDB for video storage, is also inefficient because NoSQL databases are not designed for large binary objects, and SNS notifications alone cannot provide low-latency streaming.

Security is critical for media streaming, including access control, encryption at rest and in transit, and DRM protection. S3 provides server-side encryption, and CloudFront supports HTTPS delivery and signed URLs for content protection. Monitoring and logging can be achieved through CloudWatch, AWS CloudTrail, and CloudFront logs, enabling operational visibility, performance metrics, and auditing.

Question 125:

A healthcare provider wants to implement a HIPAA-compliant analytics platform that collects patient data from multiple clinics, stores it securely, and provides advanced analytics and machine learning insights. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon S3 with encryption, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, Amazon SageMaker
B) Single EC2 instance with MySQL and local storage
C) Amazon DynamoDB with Lambda only
D) Amazon RDS in a single Availability Zone with manual backups

Answer:

A) Amazon S3 with encryption, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, Amazon SageMaker

Explanation:

Implementing a HIPAA-compliant analytics platform requires a secure, scalable, and fully managed data pipeline that supports both storage and advanced analytics. Option A leverages AWS services designed to meet these requirements, ensuring compliance and operational efficiency.

Amazon S3 provides durable and highly available storage for patient data. With server-side encryption using AWS Key Management Service (KMS), S3 ensures data at rest is secure, meeting HIPAA requirements. Versioning and lifecycle policies allow compliance teams to manage retention policies effectively. Data can be ingested from multiple clinics using secure transfer methods such as AWS Direct Connect, VPN, or S3 Transfer Acceleration.

AWS Glue acts as a fully managed ETL service to prepare and transform healthcare data. Glue crawlers automatically detect schema and metadata, catalog data, and enable integration with analytics tools. This allows data from heterogeneous sources—EHRs, IoT medical devices, lab results—to be standardized and prepared for analysis efficiently. Glue also integrates seamlessly with S3, Athena, and SageMaker, providing a comprehensive, managed data pipeline.

Amazon Athena enables serverless interactive querying of data stored in S3. With SQL-based queries, healthcare analysts can generate reports and insights without provisioning infrastructure, reducing operational overhead and ensuring near real-time access to data. Athena integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for fine-grained access control and audit logging to maintain HIPAA compliance.

Amazon SageMaker provides a managed machine learning platform for training, deploying, and monitoring predictive models on healthcare data. Models can analyze patient outcomes, identify patterns, and provide predictive insights, supporting clinical decision-making and operational optimization. SageMaker supports both built-in algorithms and custom ML models, and integrates with S3 for data access and Glue for data preprocessing.

Option B, a single EC2 instance with MySQL, fails to scale, introduces a single point of failure, and does not provide HIPAA-compliant managed services. Option C, DynamoDB with Lambda, cannot handle large-scale analytics or complex queries efficiently. Option D, RDS in a single Availability Zone, lacks the high availability and managed compliance features needed for sensitive healthcare data.

Security and compliance include encryption at rest and in transit, audit logging, fine-grained IAM roles, and monitoring through CloudWatch and CloudTrail. Automated backups, disaster recovery strategies, and cross-region replication enhance resilience and regulatory compliance. Cost optimization is achieved through serverless services like Athena and Glue, paying only for usage rather than idle capacity.

Question 126:

A global retail company wants to deploy a multi-region web application that requires low-latency access for users worldwide, automatic failover, and consistent data replication between regions. Which AWS services should be used?

A) Amazon Route 53 with latency-based routing, Amazon Aurora Global Database, and CloudFront
B) Single EC2 instance in one region with a local database
C) Amazon S3 for static hosting only with no replication
D) Amazon DynamoDB in one region without Global Tables

Answer:

A) Amazon Route 53 with latency-based routing, Amazon Aurora Global Database, and CloudFront

Explanation:

Deploying a global web application with low latency, automatic failover, and consistent multi-region data replication requires an architecture that combines global DNS routing, high-performance database replication, and content delivery. Option A leverages AWS services to provide all these capabilities in a fully managed, highly available architecture.

Amazon Route 53 supports latency-based routing, directing user requests to the region with the lowest network latency. This ensures that users around the globe experience fast response times, improving overall user experience. Route 53 also supports health checks and failover, automatically rerouting traffic if a regional endpoint becomes unavailable, ensuring continuous availability.

Amazon Aurora Global Database provides a multi-region relational database solution with fast cross-region replication. It allows write operations in one primary region while asynchronously replicating data to secondary regions with minimal latency. In the event of a primary region failure, one of the secondary regions can be promoted to primary, providing automatic failover and ensuring high availability. Aurora’s distributed storage system ensures durability, fault tolerance, and strong consistency for transactional workloads, which is critical for retail operations involving orders, payments, and inventory.

Amazon CloudFront delivers static and dynamic content from edge locations around the world, reducing latency and providing users with low-latency access to the application. CloudFront integrates with Aurora, S3, and other backend services, allowing dynamic content caching and secure delivery. Features like signed URLs and SSL support enhance security and compliance.

Option B, a single EC2 instance with a local database, introduces a single point of failure, cannot provide multi-region replication, and fails to meet latency requirements. Option C, S3 hosting alone, is suitable only for static content and cannot manage dynamic transactional workloads or provide global failover. Option D, DynamoDB in a single region, cannot provide strong consistency or multi-region failover without using Global Tables, which introduces additional complexity for relational workloads.

Security is ensured through IAM roles, VPC integration, encryption in transit and at rest, and CloudTrail logging for auditing. Operational monitoring and alarms are provided through CloudWatch for application metrics, Aurora performance, and CloudFront distribution health. Cost efficiency is achieved by using CloudFront to offload traffic from origin servers and by leveraging Aurora read replicas in secondary regions for read-intensive workloads.

Question 127:

A financial services company needs to deploy a highly secure, multi-account AWS environment to isolate workloads for different business units. The solution must enforce governance, centralized logging, and compliance controls across accounts. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) AWS Organizations, AWS Control Tower, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Config
B) Single AWS account with IAM groups
C) Amazon S3 bucket for each account without centralized management
D) EC2 instances in each account manually managed

Answer:

A) AWS Organizations, AWS Control Tower, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Config

Explanation:

Deploying a multi-account AWS environment for a financial services company requires a strategy that enforces governance, security, compliance, and operational efficiency. Using AWS Organizations, AWS Control Tower, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Config together provides a fully managed, best-practice approach for multi-account management, central logging, and policy enforcement.

AWS Organizations allows the company to create and manage multiple AWS accounts under a single organizational structure. This provides isolation of workloads, better billing visibility, and simplified management of policies. Through service control policies (SCPs), administrators can enforce permission boundaries across accounts, ensuring that business units only have access to approved services and actions. This is critical in financial services, where strict compliance requirements, regulatory controls, and data segregation are mandatory. Organizations also simplify billing consolidation, cost allocation, and cross-account resource sharing.

AWS Control Tower provides an automated setup of a secure, multi-account environment, implementing industry best practices. Control Tower provisions accounts into organizational units (OUs), applies guardrails to enforce governance, and sets up central logging and auditing. Guardrails include preventive rules, which prevent non-compliant actions, and detective rules, which monitor and alert on policy violations. This reduces manual configuration and enforces consistent policies across all accounts.

AWS CloudTrail ensures centralized logging and auditing of all API calls and user activity across the multi-account environment. Centralized logging allows security teams to detect unauthorized activity, maintain an audit trail for regulatory compliance, and support forensic investigations if needed. By integrating CloudTrail with Amazon S3 and Amazon CloudWatch, the company can implement automated alerts for suspicious activity, helping maintain a strong security posture.

AWS Config continuously monitors AWS resources for compliance with defined configurations and organizational policies. Config allows defining rules for specific compliance requirements, such as encryption standards, network configurations, and IAM permissions. In combination with CloudTrail, Config provides a complete visibility framework for auditing, troubleshooting, and reporting. Automated remediation actions can also be configured to correct non-compliant resources, further enhancing governance.

Option B, a single AWS account with IAM groups, lacks isolation between workloads, making it difficult to enforce strict governance or compliance for different business units. Option C, creating separate S3 buckets for each account without centralized management, provides only storage isolation but does not enforce governance, logging, or compliance policies. Option D, manually managing EC2 instances across accounts, introduces operational overhead and is prone to configuration drift and compliance failures.

Security and compliance considerations are paramount in financial services, including encryption, access control, logging, and monitoring. AWS Organizations with Control Tower enables the implementation of preventive and detective controls. CloudTrail provides immutable logs for audit purposes, while Config ensures resources remain compliant with regulatory and corporate standards. Together, these services provide a robust, scalable, and secure multi-account architecture, reducing risk, operational complexity, and ensuring adherence to compliance standards while enabling rapid scaling of new accounts for future business units.

The combination of AWS Organizations, AWS Control Tower, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Config provides a secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-account environment, fulfilling the financial services company’s requirement for governance, central logging, and continuous compliance monitoring.

Question 128:

A global e-commerce company wants to implement a hybrid cloud architecture to extend its on-premises data center to AWS. The solution must allow low-latency access to cloud-based applications, support disaster recovery, and integrate with existing Active Directory for user authentication. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) AWS Direct Connect, AWS Transit Gateway, Amazon VPC, and AWS Managed Microsoft AD
B) VPN connection only with S3 access
C) Public internet access to EC2 instances with manual routing
D) Amazon RDS Multi-AZ deployment without connectivity to on-premises

Answer:

A) AWS Direct Connect, AWS Transit Gateway, Amazon VPC, and AWS Managed Microsoft AD

Explanation:

Extending an on-premises data center to AWS in a hybrid architecture requires low-latency connectivity, seamless integration with existing identity systems, disaster recovery capabilities, and high security. Option A provides a robust solution combining AWS networking and identity services to meet these requirements efficiently.

AWS Direct Connect establishes a dedicated, private network connection between the on-premises data center and AWS. Direct Connect provides consistent low-latency and high-throughput connectivity, critical for workloads requiring near real-time access between on-premises and cloud-based applications. It reduces dependency on the public internet, improving performance and security. Direct Connect supports multiple virtual interfaces, enabling separation of production, development, and backup traffic.

AWS Transit Gateway simplifies network management by acting as a hub connecting multiple VPCs and on-premises networks. It enables scalable and centralized connectivity, avoiding complex peering relationships and route table management. Transit Gateway supports multi-region and cross-account connectivity, facilitating a scalable hybrid cloud architecture. It also supports integration with Direct Connect, providing private connectivity to multiple VPCs without configuring individual VPN connections for each VPC.

Amazon VPC allows the creation of logically isolated cloud networks where applications can be deployed. VPCs can be designed to mimic on-premises network topologies, providing security groups, NACLs, and private subnets. Integration with Transit Gateway allows seamless routing between VPCs and on-premises networks, enabling low-latency access for applications hosted in the cloud. VPC endpoints further enable private access to AWS services without traversing the public internet, enhancing security and performance.

AWS Managed Microsoft AD allows seamless integration with the company’s existing Active Directory environment. By extending on-premises AD to AWS, users can authenticate using the same credentials, and permissions can be centrally managed. Managed AD supports Group Policy, trust relationships, and other AD features, ensuring that existing identity and access management processes are preserved. Applications in AWS can authenticate users without modifying authentication mechanisms, providing operational consistency and security.

Option B, using only a VPN connection, is less reliable and provides higher latency compared to Direct Connect. Option C, relying on public internet access, introduces variability in latency, exposes workloads to security risks, and complicates authentication. Option D, RDS Multi-AZ without on-premises connectivity, does not address hybrid architecture requirements and fails to integrate with existing Active Directory for authentication.

Disaster recovery considerations in a hybrid environment include replicating critical workloads to AWS, using multi-AZ deployments and backups, and leveraging services such as AWS Backup. Monitoring and operational visibility can be achieved using CloudWatch, CloudTrail, and VPC Flow Logs to ensure network and application health. Security controls, including IAM, encryption in transit and at rest, and network segmentation, protect sensitive data while maintaining compliance with corporate policies.

The combination of AWS Direct Connect, AWS Transit Gateway, Amazon VPC, and AWS Managed Microsoft AD provides a robust, low-latency, secure, and integrated hybrid cloud architecture that supports seamless user authentication, disaster recovery, and operational efficiency, enabling the e-commerce company to extend its data center to the cloud without disrupting existing workflows.

Question 129:

A logistics company wants to build a real-time fleet tracking solution that ingests GPS data from thousands of vehicles, stores it, and provides analytics and visualization with minimal latency. The solution must scale automatically to handle peaks in data ingestion. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight
B) Single EC2 instance with MySQL and periodic batch uploads
C) Amazon S3 only with manual polling
D) Amazon RDS Multi-AZ with Lambda for ingestion only

Answer:

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon S3, and Amazon QuickSight

Explanation:

Building a real-time fleet tracking solution requires the ingestion of high-velocity GPS data, storage with low-latency access, analytics for operational insights, and visualization for decision-making. Option A provides a combination of managed AWS services optimized for streaming, storage, analytics, and visualization.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams enables real-time ingestion of streaming GPS data from thousands of vehicles. Kinesis can handle hundreds of thousands of records per second, automatically scaling to accommodate peak data loads. This ensures that fleet tracking data is captured reliably and in near real-time. Kinesis integrates with downstream services such as DynamoDB, S3, and Lambda, enabling processing pipelines and analytics workflows without managing infrastructure.

Amazon DynamoDB provides low-latency, scalable storage for real-time tracking data. DynamoDB is ideal for storing GPS coordinates and vehicle metadata, supporting high read and write throughput, and ensuring data consistency. Its managed nature removes operational overhead for scaling, backups, and replication. Time-to-live (TTL) policies can automatically expire older data, optimizing storage costs while retaining relevant information for analytics and operational monitoring.

Amazon S3 provides durable storage for long-term retention of GPS data, historical analysis, and batch processing. Data in S3 can be archived to Glacier or analyzed using Athena or EMR for deeper insights, enabling trend analysis, route optimization, and compliance reporting. S3’s integration with Kinesis Firehose ensures seamless ingestion and storage without building custom pipelines.

Amazon QuickSight provides business intelligence and visualization, enabling the company to create dashboards that display fleet locations, movement patterns, and performance metrics in real-time. QuickSight integrates with DynamoDB, S3, and Athena, providing interactive and actionable insights for operational decision-making.

Option B, using a single EC2 instance with MySQL, cannot handle high-velocity data streams and fails to scale during peaks. Option C, using S3 only, lacks real-time ingestion and low-latency access for operational dashboards. Option D, RDS with Lambda, provides limited real-time ingestion and cannot handle large-scale streaming workloads efficiently.

Security and compliance include encrypting data in transit and at rest, implementing fine-grained access controls using IAM, and monitoring operations using CloudWatch and CloudTrail. High availability is achieved by distributing Kinesis shards across multiple availability zones and leveraging DynamoDB’s multi-AZ replication. Automated scaling and serverless architecture reduce operational overhead and ensure resilience during unpredictable traffic spikes.

Question 130:

A media company needs to distribute large video files globally to viewers with low latency and high availability. The solution should minimize costs while scaling automatically based on demand. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon S3, Amazon CloudFront, and AWS Lambda@Edge
B) Single EC2 instance with EBS volume and manual scaling
C) Amazon RDS with replication to multiple regions
D) Amazon S3 without a CDN

Answer:

A) Amazon S3, Amazon CloudFront, and AWS Lambda@Edge

Explanation:

Delivering large media content globally requires a solution that addresses latency, scalability, cost efficiency, and user experience. The combination of Amazon S3, Amazon CloudFront, and Lambda@Edge provides a managed architecture that addresses all these requirements efficiently.

Amazon S3 serves as the origin for storing large video files. S3 is highly durable, scalable, and cost-effective for storing vast amounts of media content. It supports different storage classes such as Standard, Intelligent-Tiering, and Glacier, enabling cost optimization by automatically moving data between tiers based on access patterns. With S3, the media company does not need to worry about provisioning storage capacity or managing infrastructure, and can rely on AWS to handle durability, replication, and availability.

Amazon CloudFront, the AWS content delivery network (CDN), caches content at edge locations worldwide. By distributing content closer to end users, CloudFront reduces latency and ensures a consistent, high-quality viewing experience. CloudFront automatically scales based on user demand, handling sudden spikes in traffic without manual intervention. Its integration with S3 as the origin allows for seamless and efficient content delivery. CloudFront also supports caching policies, signed URLs, and geo-restrictions, which are critical for media companies to control access, manage content rights, and optimize delivery.

AWS Lambda@Edge extends CloudFront functionality by enabling code execution at edge locations. Media companies can use Lambda@Edge to manipulate HTTP requests and responses, perform A/B testing, implement security controls, and customize content delivery based on user location or device type. For example, Lambda@Edge can dynamically adjust video quality based on network performance, compress content, or handle authentication and authorization before content reaches the user. This ensures a personalized and efficient user experience without increasing latency or requiring changes at the origin.

Option B, using a single EC2 instance with an EBS volume and manual scaling, cannot provide the high availability, low latency, or scalability required for a global audience. EC2 instances are limited by region and cannot handle large numbers of simultaneous users without significant operational overhead. Option C, Amazon RDS with replication, is primarily designed for transactional databases and is not suitable for large-scale media delivery or content caching. Option D, using S3 without a CDN, would result in higher latency and poor performance for global users because all requests would need to traverse long distances to the origin, increasing load times and negatively impacting user experience.

Security and compliance considerations include encrypting media files at rest in S3 using server-side encryption (SSE), encrypting content in transit using SSL/TLS with CloudFront, and using signed URLs or cookies to control access. Monitoring and analytics can be implemented using Amazon CloudWatch, CloudFront access logs, and AWS CloudTrail to track usage patterns, performance metrics, and operational issues. Cost optimization strategies include using S3 Intelligent-Tiering, implementing cache-control headers for CloudFront to maximize caching, and minimizing Lambda@Edge execution duration by efficient coding.

Question 131:

A healthcare provider wants to implement a solution to store sensitive patient data with strict access control, automated backups, and encryption at rest and in transit. The solution must comply with HIPAA regulations. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon S3 with SSE-KMS, AWS Key Management Service, AWS CloudTrail, and Amazon Macie
B) Amazon S3 with public access enabled
C) Amazon RDS without encryption and manual backup
D) Single EC2 instance with local storage

Answer:

A) Amazon S3 with SSE-KMS, AWS Key Management Service, AWS CloudTrail, and Amazon Macie

Explanation:

Healthcare providers handling sensitive patient data must meet stringent regulatory requirements such as HIPAA, ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability of protected health information (PHI). The combination of Amazon S3 with server-side encryption using AWS KMS (SSE-KMS), AWS CloudTrail, and Amazon Macie provides a comprehensive and compliant solution.

Amazon S3 provides durable, highly available storage with support for encryption, versioning, lifecycle policies, and access controls. Using SSE-KMS, data is encrypted at rest with encryption keys managed in AWS Key Management Service. KMS provides centralized key management, access control policies, and detailed audit logging for key usage, which is critical for regulatory compliance. Each write operation to S3 can be encrypted using KMS-managed keys, ensuring that data is always encrypted before storage.

AWS CloudTrail ensures comprehensive auditing of all API calls and activities related to S3 and KMS. CloudTrail logs provide visibility into who accessed data, what actions were performed, and when. This level of auditing is required for HIPAA compliance, enabling healthcare providers to maintain accountability, detect suspicious activity, and perform forensic analysis in case of security incidents. CloudTrail integrates seamlessly with CloudWatch for monitoring and automated alerting, further enhancing security and operational awareness.

Amazon Macie automatically discovers, classifies, and protects sensitive data in S3. Macie uses machine learning to identify personally identifiable information (PII), PHI, and other sensitive data, providing visibility and enabling the enforcement of security policies. Macie helps healthcare organizations maintain compliance by continuously monitoring S3 buckets for unintended exposure or risk of data leakage, generating alerts for potential policy violations.

Option B, enabling public access to S3, is highly insecure and would violate HIPAA regulations by exposing sensitive data. Option C, using RDS without encryption and manual backups, does not provide adequate data protection, audit capabilities, or compliance controls. Option D, a single EC2 instance with local storage, is not scalable, lacks high availability, and requires manual management of backups, encryption, and auditing, making it non-compliant for HIPAA standards.

The architecture also ensures encryption in transit using HTTPS (TLS) when transmitting data to and from S3. Access controls are enforced using IAM policies, bucket policies, and optional S3 Access Points to provide fine-grained permissions for different users or applications. Versioning and cross-region replication support disaster recovery and resilience, ensuring that patient data is available even in the event of hardware failure or region-wide outage.

Question 132:

An online gaming company wants to implement a scalable leaderboard system that updates in real-time as players finish games globally. The solution must provide sub-millisecond latency for read and write operations and scale automatically to millions of players. Which AWS services combination should be used?

A) Amazon DynamoDB with DAX, Amazon ElastiCache, and Amazon CloudFront
B) Single EC2 instance with MySQL
C) Amazon S3 with Athena queries
D) Amazon RDS with Multi-AZ deployment only

Answer:

A) Amazon DynamoDB with DAX, Amazon ElastiCache, and Amazon CloudFront

Explanation:

Real-time leaderboard systems require extremely low-latency read and write operations, the ability to scale dynamically based on player activity, and high availability across regions. The combination of Amazon DynamoDB with DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX), ElastiCache, and CloudFront provides a fully managed, high-performance solution capable of meeting these requirements.

Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, NoSQL database that delivers single-digit millisecond performance at any scale. It automatically scales throughput capacity to accommodate spikes in traffic, ensuring consistent performance for millions of concurrent players globally. DynamoDB provides flexible schema design, allowing rapid updates to leaderboard entries without downtime, and supports features such as streams for capturing real-time changes in data.

DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is an in-memory cache for DynamoDB, reducing read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. DAX is fully managed, seamlessly integrates with DynamoDB, and removes the operational overhead of managing caching layers. Using DAX ensures that leaderboard queries, such as top players or player rankings, are extremely fast, supporting real-time updates and user interactions without delays.

Amazon ElastiCache provides additional caching capabilities for complex queries or aggregations that are frequently accessed but not part of the DynamoDB key-value store. By using Redis or Memcached, the system can cache intermediate results, session data, or temporary leaderboard calculations, further reducing latency and improving responsiveness for global players.

Amazon CloudFront ensures low-latency distribution of static leaderboard pages or related assets to players worldwide. CloudFront caches content at edge locations, reducing round-trip times for users in different regions, and integrates seamlessly with DynamoDB and ElastiCache for dynamic content delivery.

Option B, using a single EC2 instance with MySQL, cannot provide the low-latency or auto-scaling capabilities required for millions of concurrent players. Option C, using S3 with Athena, is suitable for batch analytics but cannot provide sub-millisecond latency for real-time operations. Option D, RDS Multi-AZ, provides high availability but lacks the required low-latency performance at massive scale and would require significant operational overhead for scaling.

Security considerations include encrypting leaderboard data at rest using DynamoDB encryption, using IAM roles and policies for access control, and monitoring with CloudWatch for performance metrics and alerts. Multi-region replication and backups ensure durability and high availability, while automated scaling ensures the system can handle sudden spikes during peak gaming events without performance degradation.

Question 133:

A financial services company needs a highly available and fault-tolerant system to process millions of transactions per day. The system should handle unpredictable spikes in load and provide strong consistency for critical data. Which AWS architecture is most suitable?

A) Amazon DynamoDB with DynamoDB Streams and Global Tables
B) Single EC2 instance with local storage
C) Amazon S3 with periodic batch processing using AWS Lambda
D) Amazon RDS in a single availability zone

Answer:

A) Amazon DynamoDB with DynamoDB Streams and Global Tables

Explanation:

Financial institutions require systems capable of handling massive transaction volumes, maintaining strong consistency, providing high availability, and being resilient against failures. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, serverless NoSQL database designed for high-performance transactional workloads at scale. Its ability to handle millions of read and write operations per second, automatically scale, and maintain predictable performance makes it suitable for critical financial applications.

DynamoDB supports strong consistency, which ensures that a read immediately after a write returns the latest data. This is critical for financial transactions where eventual consistency might lead to discrepancies or errors, such as double-spending or incorrect account balances. For global applications, DynamoDB Global Tables allow for multi-region replication, enabling applications to read and write data in multiple AWS regions while maintaining strong consistency and low-latency access worldwide. This ensures that users in different geographic locations experience minimal latency without compromising data integrity.

DynamoDB Streams captures real-time changes in table data, providing a reliable mechanism for triggering additional processing or workflows. For instance, transaction records can be streamed to AWS Lambda functions for fraud detection, analytics, notifications, or other business logic. This decouples data processing from the main transaction workflow, ensuring scalability and responsiveness. Streams also facilitate replication, auditing, and integration with downstream systems, which is essential in financial services where traceability and accountability are paramount.

Option B, using a single EC2 instance with local storage, is highly unreliable, lacks fault tolerance, and cannot scale to millions of transactions without significant operational overhead. Option C, using S3 with periodic batch processing via Lambda, introduces latency and is not suitable for real-time transaction processing where immediate consistency and low-latency writes are required. Option D, RDS in a single availability zone, lacks multi-region redundancy and scalability for unpredictable spikes in demand and is susceptible to outages in the event of AZ failures.

Security, compliance, and operational monitoring are critical for financial applications. DynamoDB supports encryption at rest using AWS-managed or customer-managed keys, integration with IAM for fine-grained access control, and VPC endpoints to isolate traffic. Monitoring can be implemented using Amazon CloudWatch metrics, alarms, and DynamoDB’s built-in capacity management tools. Automated backups, point-in-time recovery, and Global Tables replication further enhance resilience and ensure that data can be recovered rapidly in case of accidental deletion or region failure.

Question 134:

A retail company wants to implement a recommendation engine for its e-commerce platform. The solution should provide personalized product recommendations in real-time, using historical customer behavior and purchase patterns. Which AWS services combination is most appropriate?

A) Amazon Personalize, Amazon DynamoDB, and Amazon S3
B) Amazon SageMaker only
C) Amazon Redshift with Athena queries
D) Amazon RDS with manual analysis

Answer:

A) Amazon Personalize, Amazon DynamoDB, and Amazon S3

Explanation:

A recommendation engine must analyze user behavior and historical purchase patterns to provide personalized suggestions in real-time. Amazon Personalize is a fully managed machine learning service that enables developers to build individualized recommendation systems without requiring extensive ML expertise. Personalize can process large volumes of user interaction data to generate recommendations based on collaborative filtering, item-to-item similarity, and personalized ranking algorithms.

Amazon S3 serves as the storage backbone, housing historical interaction and purchase data. It provides highly durable and scalable storage for structured or unstructured datasets, enabling the recommendation engine to ingest large volumes of historical events efficiently. S3 can store raw logs, transaction history, product metadata, and user profiles, which are crucial for training ML models. Using S3 ensures cost efficiency and elasticity, allowing the system to handle seasonal spikes in user activity and data growth over time.

Amazon DynamoDB can store real-time user sessions, active recommendation caches, and frequently accessed metadata. DynamoDB’s low-latency read and write performance ensures that recommendation results are served to end users almost instantly. This is critical for online retail environments where customer attention spans are short and responsiveness directly impacts engagement and conversion rates.

Option B, using only SageMaker, would require building, training, deploying, and maintaining custom ML models without pre-built recommendation algorithms. While feasible, it increases operational complexity and requires deep expertise in model optimization and deployment. Option C, Redshift with Athena, is optimized for analytics and batch processing rather than low-latency, real-time recommendation delivery. Option D, RDS with manual analysis, cannot scale to millions of users or deliver personalized recommendations in real-time without complex custom logic.

Security and compliance are essential when dealing with customer data. Personalize integrates with IAM for access control, while S3 supports encryption at rest using SSE and encryption in transit using SSL/TLS. DynamoDB also supports encryption and fine-grained access control to protect sensitive user information. Monitoring and logging can be achieved through CloudWatch and CloudTrail, ensuring transparency in operations and model behavior.

Question 135:

A multinational enterprise needs a centralized logging and monitoring solution to collect logs from multiple AWS accounts and regions, visualize operational metrics, and trigger automated responses to specific events. Which AWS services should be used?

A) Amazon CloudWatch, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Systems Manager
B) Amazon S3 with local analysis scripts
C) EC2 instances writing logs to local storage
D) Amazon RDS with application-level logging

Answer:

A) Amazon CloudWatch, AWS CloudTrail, and AWS Systems Manager

Explanation:

Centralized logging and monitoring across multiple accounts and regions are essential for large enterprises to maintain visibility, detect anomalies, comply with governance policies, and automate operational responses. Amazon CloudWatch is the foundational service for monitoring metrics, logs, and events in real-time. It enables the aggregation of operational data from multiple AWS services, EC2 instances, containers, and serverless applications. CloudWatch Logs provides a centralized repository for log ingestion, search, and retention, supporting compliance and troubleshooting requirements.

AWS CloudTrail records all API activity across AWS accounts and regions, providing a detailed audit trail. CloudTrail logs include who performed an action, what actions were taken, and when. By integrating CloudTrail with CloudWatch, enterprises can monitor specific operational events, detect suspicious activity, and trigger automated workflows based on predefined conditions. This is critical for security auditing, operational governance, and regulatory compliance.

AWS Systems Manager allows for operational automation and orchestration of responses based on CloudWatch events. Using Systems Manager Automation, enterprises can define runbooks to remediate common issues, such as restarting failed services, isolating compromised instances, or applying security patches automatically. Systems Manager also enables centralized configuration management, parameter storage, and secure access to resources across multiple accounts and regions, ensuring consistency and control.

Option B, using S3 with local analysis scripts, introduces latency, lacks real-time capabilities, and requires significant operational effort to maintain and scale. Option C, EC2 instances writing logs locally, is prone to data loss during instance failures and does not provide centralized visibility or automated responses. Option D, using RDS with application-level logging, only captures database-level events and cannot consolidate logs across multiple AWS services or regions effectively.

Security and compliance considerations include encrypting logs at rest in S3 or CloudWatch Logs, ensuring access control through IAM, and maintaining log retention policies to meet regulatory requirements. Enterprises can also implement metric filters and alarms in CloudWatch to detect deviations from normal operations, trigger automated workflows via Systems Manager or Lambda, and maintain operational continuity.