Visit here for our full Microsoft MS-102 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 211:
A Microsoft 365 administrator must ensure that all emails containing personally identifiable information (PII) sent externally are automatically encrypted and cannot be forwarded or copied. The solution must also allow administrators to track all email access attempts and generate compliance reports. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with encryption and auditing
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Exchange Online transport rules
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with encryption and auditing
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels provide a comprehensive solution for protecting sensitive email content in Microsoft 365. When an organization needs to automatically detect, encrypt, and restrict emails containing personally identifiable information (PII) sent externally, sensitivity labels are the most appropriate approach. These labels allow administrators to define automatic or recommended classification policies that identify sensitive information using predefined or custom data patterns. For example, PII detection can include Social Security numbers, passport numbers, or other identifiers that are commonly used in regulatory contexts such as GDPR or HIPAA.
Once a sensitivity label is applied to an email, it can enforce encryption to ensure that only authorized internal recipients can access the content. In addition, the label can prevent forwarding, copying, or printing of the email, thereby ensuring that sensitive information does not leak outside the organization. Auditing and reporting features provide administrators with visibility into email access attempts, including who attempted to view or interact with the protected content, when the attempts occurred, and whether they were authorized or blocked.
This approach is critical in highly regulated industries or organizations that handle confidential personal data. It ensures that sensitive information is protected even if an email is accidentally sent to the wrong recipient. The automated classification and protection reduce human error while maintaining compliance with internal policies and external regulatory requirements. Administrators can adjust classification rules, monitor protection policies, and refine auditing processes to improve security and ensure ongoing compliance over time.
Alternative solutions such as Azure AD Conditional Access, Exchange Online transport rules, and Microsoft 365 retention policies do not provide the same level of automatic content protection. Conditional Access policies enforce device and user access controls but do not encrypt emails or prevent forwarding. Transport rules can block or redirect emails based on patterns but do not provide encryption or detailed auditing of access attempts. Retention policies preserve content for compliance but do not enforce real-time protection or control over sensitive data sharing.
By leveraging sensitivity labels with encryption and auditing, organizations can enforce a zero-trust approach to email security. This solution ensures that sensitive emails are only accessible by authorized recipients, prevents accidental or intentional data exposure, and provides a full audit trail for compliance purposes. Users continue to work efficiently while the organization maintains strong protection for sensitive data, aligning with Microsoft 365 security best practices.
The integration of sensitivity labels across Microsoft 365 applications allows for consistent enforcement of data protection policies beyond Exchange Online, including SharePoint Online, OneDrive for Business, and Teams. This unified approach strengthens overall data governance, reduces risk exposure, and ensures that organizational policies are applied consistently across the digital workspace. Administrators can also generate compliance reports that document protection policies in action, demonstrating adherence to regulatory requirements and supporting internal security audits.
Question 212:
A Microsoft 365 administrator wants to prevent users from installing unmanaged applications on corporate devices while still allowing them to access Microsoft 365 services. The solution must provide real-time enforcement and detailed reporting on compliance violations. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with Intune app protection policies
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with Intune app protection policies
Explanation:
Microsoft Endpoint Manager, combined with Intune app protection policies, is the recommended solution for controlling application installation on corporate devices. In this scenario, the administrator wants to block unmanaged applications while still permitting access to Microsoft 365 services. Endpoint Manager allows administrators to define policies that enforce which apps are permitted on corporate devices, ensuring compliance with organizational security standards.
Intune app protection policies allow administrators to define rules for both managed and unmanaged applications. Managed apps, such as Microsoft 365 apps, can be monitored, encrypted, and controlled, while access from unmanaged or unapproved apps can be blocked. This ensures that sensitive corporate data cannot be accessed or stored by untrusted applications that might compromise security. Administrators can also enforce conditional access policies in tandem with Intune to ensure that only devices compliant with app protection rules are granted access to Microsoft 365 services.
Real-time enforcement ensures that violations are immediately addressed. For instance, if a user attempts to install an unapproved app, the device can be blocked from accessing corporate data until it is brought into compliance. This provides a strong security layer against threats such as data exfiltration, malware, or accidental exposure of sensitive information. Reporting and analytics allow administrators to monitor policy enforcement, detect patterns of non-compliance, and generate audit logs to support regulatory requirements and internal governance objectives.
Alternative solutions do not provide the same level of enforcement and control. Azure AD Conditional Access policies can block or grant access based on device compliance, but they do not directly control which apps are installed on a device. Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels protect data content but do not manage application installation or runtime behavior. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance but do not enforce real-time app compliance or control app installation.
By using Endpoint Manager with Intune app protection policies, organizations can maintain a secure corporate environment while enabling employees to use Microsoft 365 apps efficiently. The solution ensures that corporate devices remain compliant with security standards, sensitive data is protected from unapproved applications, and administrators have full visibility and control over policy enforcement. Organizations can adapt policies to changing business requirements or emerging threats while maintaining operational efficiency and a strong security posture.
The combination of app protection policies with conditional access also supports a zero-trust security framework. Only trusted applications on compliant devices can access corporate resources, while non-compliant devices or apps are automatically blocked. This minimizes the risk of security breaches, protects intellectual property, and ensures that corporate data remains secure across all endpoints and applications. Reporting and analytics provide actionable insights into compliance trends and potential vulnerabilities, enabling proactive risk management and informed decision-making.
Question 213:
A Microsoft 365 administrator is tasked with implementing conditional access to require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for users accessing Microsoft 365 from outside the corporate network. Internal users on the corporate network should not be prompted for MFA. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with trusted IPs and MFA enforcement
B) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) Exchange Online transport rules
Answer:
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with trusted IPs and MFA enforcement
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access is the ideal solution for enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) based on network location. In this scenario, the organization wants to prompt MFA for external users while allowing internal users on the corporate network to access Microsoft 365 services without additional authentication challenges. Conditional Access policies provide the necessary controls to define trusted IP ranges, enforce MFA requirements, and apply these rules dynamically to users attempting to access cloud services.
Trusted IPs are configured in Azure AD to represent the organization’s corporate network. When users access Microsoft 365 from these IP ranges, Conditional Access recognizes the connection as trusted and allows seamless access without MFA prompts. When users access Microsoft 365 from other networks outside the trusted IP range, the policy triggers MFA enforcement, requiring the user to complete an additional authentication factor, such as a text message, authenticator app notification, or phone call.
This approach improves security by verifying user identity in potentially high-risk scenarios while maintaining a seamless experience for internal users. It reduces the risk of unauthorized access from compromised credentials or untrusted networks. Additionally, Conditional Access policies support detailed monitoring and reporting, allowing administrators to track sign-ins, MFA prompts, successful authentications, and blocked access attempts. These insights enable security teams to identify trends, potential attacks, and areas where policy adjustments may be needed.
Alternative solutions are less suitable. Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels protect content but do not enforce access controls based on network location. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance purposes but cannot enforce authentication requirements. Exchange Online transport rules manage email routing and delivery but do not control MFA enforcement or conditional access scenarios.
By implementing Conditional Access policies with trusted IPs and MFA enforcement, organizations can apply adaptive security controls that balance usability and protection. Internal users benefit from streamlined access, while external users are verified through multi-factor authentication, reducing exposure to credential-based attacks. Administrators gain visibility into access patterns, network locations, and authentication events, supporting ongoing security management, risk mitigation, and regulatory compliance efforts.
This solution aligns with zero-trust principles, requiring verification of user identity based on contextual information such as device state, location, and risk level before granting access to corporate resources. Organizations can combine these policies with device compliance and application controls to create a comprehensive, adaptive security framework for Microsoft 365, ensuring that sensitive data remains protected without disrupting legitimate user workflows.
Question 214:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to implement a policy that ensures sensitive documents stored in SharePoint Online cannot be downloaded or shared with external users unless they are approved by the compliance team. The solution must also allow tracking of all access and sharing attempts. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with protection and approval workflows
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) SharePoint Online site permissions
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with protection and approval workflows
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels are designed to protect sensitive information in Microsoft 365 by applying classification, encryption, and access controls. In this scenario, the administrator needs to prevent documents in SharePoint Online from being downloaded or shared externally without explicit compliance approval while also ensuring detailed tracking of access and sharing activities. Sensitivity labels can enforce these requirements effectively.
When a sensitivity label is applied to a document, it can automatically restrict actions such as download, copy, or sharing outside the organization. By integrating approval workflows, the label ensures that external sharing is permitted only when a compliance manager explicitly approves the request. This allows organizations to maintain tight control over sensitive information while still enabling business collaboration in a secure and auditable manner.
The audit capabilities within Microsoft Purview provide detailed logging of every action taken on labeled content. Administrators and compliance officers can track who attempted to access a document, when the action occurred, whether it was approved or denied, and the type of access requested. This auditing is essential for regulatory compliance, internal governance, and incident response. It provides full visibility into information handling, ensuring organizations can demonstrate adherence to legal and regulatory requirements.
Alternative solutions, such as Azure AD Conditional Access, cannot enforce document-level restrictions or integrate approval workflows for content. Conditional Access focuses on access controls based on device compliance, user location, or risk factors but does not provide granular document protection. Microsoft 365 retention policies can preserve content for compliance but do not control real-time access or sharing. SharePoint Online site permissions provide basic access control but cannot enforce automated workflows or block downloads for sensitive content based on classification.
Implementing sensitivity labels with protection and approval workflows ensures that sensitive data in SharePoint Online remains secure while enabling controlled collaboration. Users attempting to share documents externally are guided through an approval process, ensuring proper oversight and reducing the risk of accidental data leaks. Administrators can configure policies to cover various types of sensitive information, adjust access rules as business needs evolve, and maintain comprehensive audit logs for reporting and compliance purposes.
Additionally, sensitivity labels are integrated across Microsoft 365 services, including OneDrive for Business and Teams, allowing organizations to enforce consistent protection policies. The solution supports automated or recommended labeling, reducing user errors and increasing adherence to corporate security policies. By leveraging this approach, organizations achieve a balance between security, productivity, and compliance, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded while maintaining collaboration and business agility.
Question 215:
A Microsoft 365 administrator is tasked with ensuring that only managed devices running up-to-date operating systems can access Microsoft 365 services. Devices that are not compliant should be blocked from access automatically. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with device compliance policies
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Microsoft Endpoint Manager, which integrates Intune, provides comprehensive device management and compliance capabilities. In this scenario, the administrator’s requirement is to ensure that only managed devices with up-to-date operating systems can access Microsoft 365 services, and non-compliant devices should be automatically blocked. Device compliance policies in Intune are the most effective solution for achieving this goal.
Device compliance policies allow administrators to define rules for operating system version, security updates, antivirus status, encryption, and other configuration baselines. When a device attempts to access Microsoft 365 services, Intune evaluates it against these policies. Non-compliant devices are automatically flagged, and Conditional Access policies can then block access until the device meets the defined standards. This ensures that only secure and compliant endpoints can interact with corporate resources, reducing the risk of data breaches, malware infections, or unauthorized access.
Real-time monitoring and reporting are key benefits of Endpoint Manager. Administrators can track compliance trends, detect patterns of non-compliance, and generate detailed reports for internal audits or regulatory requirements. Reports include information about which devices are compliant, which users are associated with non-compliant devices, and the specific compliance issues detected. This level of visibility supports proactive management and helps identify areas where security policies may need refinement or additional user training.
Alternative solutions such as Azure AD Conditional Access alone are insufficient because they enforce access based on external compliance evaluation but do not directly manage device configuration or operating system updates. Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels protect content but do not control device compliance. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance purposes but do not enforce access or device security.
By implementing Endpoint Manager with device compliance policies, organizations maintain a strong security posture while allowing users to access Microsoft 365 services safely. The integration with Conditional Access ensures that only compliant devices can access critical resources, supporting a zero-trust security model. This approach protects sensitive corporate data, reduces risk exposure, and maintains operational continuity. Administrators can continually adjust policies to meet evolving security requirements, ensuring ongoing protection and compliance for all managed devices.
The combination of device compliance policies and reporting also supports regulatory adherence, internal governance, and auditing requirements. Organizations can demonstrate proactive management of device security, respond to incidents effectively, and provide detailed evidence of policy enforcement for auditors and compliance officers. This creates a comprehensive security and compliance framework that aligns with Microsoft 365 best practices and organizational risk management strategies.
Question 216:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to implement policies that prevent users from sharing emails containing confidential financial data outside the organization. The solution must automatically detect sensitive content, enforce encryption, and provide auditing for compliance purposes. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Exchange Online transport rules
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection provide a comprehensive solution for preventing unauthorized sharing of confidential financial data via email. In this scenario, the administrator requires automatic detection of sensitive content, enforcement of encryption, and auditing for compliance. Sensitivity labels can meet all these requirements effectively.
Automatic classification enables the system to identify emails containing financial data based on predefined patterns, keywords, or custom rules. Once detected, the sensitivity label can enforce encryption to ensure that only authorized internal recipients can access the email. In addition, the label can prevent forwarding, copying, or printing, reducing the risk of accidental or intentional data leakage.
Auditing and reporting are integral to sensitivity labels. Administrators can monitor access attempts, track who viewed or attempted to share protected emails, and generate reports for internal and regulatory compliance purposes. This ensures that the organization maintains visibility into sensitive data handling and demonstrates adherence to policies such as SOX or other financial data regulations.
Alternative solutions are less suitable. Azure AD Conditional Access policies control access based on user identity, device, and location, but do not enforce content-level protection. Exchange Online transport rules can inspect email content and enforce basic rules, but they do not provide encryption or prevent unauthorized sharing effectively. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance but cannot enforce real-time protection or auditing of sensitive data.
Implementing sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection ensures a robust, automated, and auditable mechanism to secure confidential financial data. Users benefit from streamlined protection without manual intervention, while administrators gain centralized control and oversight. Organizations achieve regulatory compliance, reduce the risk of data breaches, and maintain secure collaboration across Microsoft 365.
By integrating sensitivity labels across Microsoft 365 applications, including Outlook, Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive for Business, organizations can enforce consistent data protection policies. This approach ensures sensitive financial information remains secure, prevents unauthorized sharing, and allows detailed tracking of all access and protection actions. Administrators can refine classification rules, monitor trends, and generate compliance reports that demonstrate adherence to financial regulations and corporate policies, ensuring data security and governance are maintained across all organizational communications.
Question 217:
A Microsoft 365 administrator is responsible for ensuring that all users in the finance department can only access Excel and Outlook on their mobile devices while blocking access to other Microsoft 365 apps. The solution must also prevent corporate data from being saved to personal storage or apps. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with Intune app protection policies
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Endpoint Manager with Intune app protection policies
Explanation:
Microsoft Endpoint Manager combined with Intune app protection policies provides a comprehensive way to control which Microsoft 365 apps users can access on mobile devices and to enforce data protection policies. In this scenario, the finance department requires access only to Excel and Outlook while blocking other apps. Intune allows administrators to define app protection policies targeting specific apps and user groups, ensuring that only authorized apps can access corporate data.
App protection policies can enforce multiple controls on managed apps. For instance, administrators can prevent copy-paste operations from corporate apps to personal apps, restrict saving of corporate data to non-approved locations, and encrypt app data. These measures help ensure that sensitive financial or corporate information remains secure on mobile devices, which are often outside the direct management of IT.
Using Intune, policies can be assigned to specific groups, such as the finance department, providing granular control. Administrators can also combine these policies with Conditional Access to ensure that only devices meeting compliance requirements can access protected apps. For example, devices that are jailbroken or have outdated OS versions can be blocked automatically, reducing the risk of data exposure.
Alternative solutions such as Azure AD Conditional Access alone enforce access based on device compliance, location, or user risk, but they do not control which specific apps can access corporate data or enforce app-level protection. Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels are effective for classifying and protecting content but do not control app access or prevent data leakage through mobile devices. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance purposes but do not enforce app-level restrictions or prevent unauthorized data transfer.
Intune app protection policies also provide detailed monitoring and reporting. Administrators can track policy enforcement, detect attempts to bypass restrictions, and generate reports for compliance and auditing purposes. This allows organizations to ensure that corporate data remains secure, regulatory requirements are met, and security incidents are detected and addressed promptly.
By restricting access to only Excel and Outlook, finance department users can continue their work without unnecessary exposure to other apps, reducing the attack surface and minimizing potential data leaks. The combination of device compliance, app protection, and reporting establishes a secure framework for mobile productivity, balancing usability with security, and ensuring organizational policies are consistently applied across all mobile endpoints.
Question 218:
A Microsoft 365 administrator must implement a policy to ensure that external guests invited to Teams meetings cannot download files, copy chat messages, or forward meeting invitations. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Teams meeting policies with guest access restrictions
B) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
C) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Teams meeting policies with guest access restrictions
Explanation:
Microsoft Teams provides granular controls through meeting policies and guest access settings to manage what external participants can do during meetings. In this scenario, the administrator wants to prevent external guests from downloading files, copying chat messages, or forwarding meeting invitations. Teams meeting policies with guest access restrictions are the most appropriate solution to enforce these requirements effectively.
Teams meeting policies allow administrators to define default behaviors for meetings, including permissions for guests. By restricting download capabilities, file copying, chat editing, and forwarding of invitations, the organization can ensure that sensitive information shared during meetings remains protected. These policies are particularly important when collaborating with external vendors, partners, or clients, as external participants may not be bound by the same internal security policies.
Using meeting policies, administrators can target specific users or groups and configure a combination of settings that enforce security and compliance without disrupting the productivity of internal participants. The controls also integrate with Microsoft 365 compliance features to track meeting activity, providing an audit trail of guest actions such as attempts to download files, copy messages, or access shared content. This audit capability is crucial for regulatory compliance and internal security governance.
Alternative solutions, such as Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels, provide document-level protection but do not directly control guest behaviors during Teams meetings. Azure AD Conditional Access policies enforce access control based on device compliance, location, or risk, but they do not limit guest actions in meetings. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance purposes but cannot enforce real-time restrictions on guest actions during live meetings.
By implementing Teams meeting policies with guest access restrictions, organizations ensure that external collaborators can participate in meetings while the confidentiality of corporate data is maintained. These policies help prevent accidental or intentional data leakage, maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards, and reduce the risk of sensitive information exposure during virtual meetings.
Additionally, combining meeting policies with other Microsoft 365 tools, such as DLP policies and sensitivity labels, allows organizations to implement multi-layered protection strategies. This ensures that both content and collaborative sessions are protected, providing comprehensive security across communications, collaboration, and file-sharing scenarios. Administrators can continuously monitor policy effectiveness, adjust restrictions as business needs evolve, and maintain visibility into guest interactions to enforce accountability and safeguard organizational assets.
Question 219:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to ensure that all emails containing legal or contractual agreements are automatically classified, encrypted, and restricted from forwarding or copying. Administrators must be able to generate reports showing all attempts to access these emails. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
B) Exchange Online transport rules
C) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection are the most effective solution for managing emails containing legal or contractual agreements. In this scenario, the administrator needs to ensure that such emails are automatically classified, encrypted, restricted from forwarding or copying, and auditable. Sensitivity labels allow organizations to enforce these protections automatically based on the content detected within the emails.
Automatic classification uses pre-defined or custom patterns to identify legal or contractual content. Once identified, the sensitivity label applies protection settings, such as encryption, copy and forward restrictions, and printing prevention. This ensures that sensitive contractual content remains confidential and accessible only to authorized recipients within the organization.
Auditing and reporting features are essential for compliance and oversight. Administrators can track who attempted to access emails, whether the access was permitted or blocked, and any attempts to forward, copy, or print the content. These detailed reports support regulatory requirements, legal accountability, and internal governance, ensuring that the organization can demonstrate adherence to data protection policies and contractual obligations.
Alternative solutions are not suitable for this scenario. Exchange Online transport rules can inspect emails and apply basic actions, such as redirecting or blocking messages, but they do not provide encryption, forwarding restrictions, or detailed auditing. Azure AD Conditional Access policies enforce access based on device, location, and risk, but they do not protect email content or restrict email actions. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content for compliance purposes but do not control real-time protection or user actions.
Implementing sensitivity labels with automatic classification ensures that emails containing legal or contractual agreements are protected consistently and automatically, reducing the risk of human error. Users can continue to send and receive emails efficiently, while administrators maintain visibility into sensitive content and enforce protection policies.
Furthermore, sensitivity labels integrate seamlessly with other Microsoft 365 services, such as Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive for Business. This allows organizations to enforce consistent protection policies across all collaboration platforms, ensuring that sensitive legal content remains secure regardless of where it is stored or shared. Administrators can refine classification rules, adjust protection settings, and monitor reporting to continuously improve the security and compliance posture of the organization.
By adopting sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection, organizations implement a proactive, automated, and auditable method for safeguarding legal and contractual communications, mitigating risks associated with data breaches, unauthorized access, and regulatory non-compliance.
Question 220:
A Microsoft 365 administrator is tasked with configuring multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users in the organization. The administrator wants to enforce MFA only for users accessing sensitive financial data and allow other users to access standard apps without MFA. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies targeting specific users and apps
B) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) Microsoft Endpoint Manager compliance policies
Answer:
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies targeting specific users and apps
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access policies are the most effective solution to implement selective multi-factor authentication (MFA) based on risk, user groups, and the applications being accessed. In this scenario, the administrator needs to enforce MFA for users accessing sensitive financial data while allowing other users to access standard Microsoft 365 applications without MFA. Conditional Access policies provide granular control over when and how MFA is required, ensuring security without disrupting user productivity.
Conditional Access allows administrators to define policies based on a combination of conditions, such as user or group membership, application being accessed, location, device state, and risk signals. By targeting only the users accessing sensitive financial apps, the organization can enforce MFA where it matters most while minimizing friction for users accessing standard apps that do not contain critical information. This balance supports both security and usability.
The configuration process includes defining the scope of users and groups, selecting the cloud applications to which the policy applies, and specifying the access requirements, such as MFA. Administrators can also configure session controls, including limiting download or copy actions, blocking legacy authentication protocols, and monitoring real-time risk signals to adjust access dynamically.
Alternative solutions such as Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels, Microsoft 365 retention policies, or Microsoft Endpoint Manager compliance policies do not directly enforce user authentication methods based on app or user risk. Sensitivity labels focus on content protection, retention policies preserve data, and Endpoint Manager enforces device compliance, but none of these solutions implement adaptive MFA enforcement.
By leveraging Conditional Access for MFA, organizations align with modern security best practices, including zero-trust principles, which assume that access should be verified and continuously monitored regardless of the user location. Conditional Access policies provide auditing and reporting features, allowing administrators to monitor MFA enforcement, detect policy violations, and generate compliance reports for internal governance or regulatory requirements.
Additionally, these policies can be integrated with risk-based signals from Microsoft’s security analytics, allowing dynamic policy adjustments based on user behavior, login risk, or location anomalies. This enables the organization to respond quickly to potential threats, reducing the likelihood of account compromise or unauthorized access to sensitive financial data. The flexibility and granularity of Conditional Access policies make them indispensable for organizations aiming to implement selective MFA enforcement while maintaining operational efficiency across the enterprise.
Question 221:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to ensure that only approved devices can access Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online. Devices that are not enrolled in Microsoft Endpoint Manager should be automatically blocked. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements
B) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) Exchange Online transport rules
Answer:
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements provide an effective method to control access to Microsoft 365 services based on device enrollment and compliance. In this scenario, the administrator wants to ensure that only approved devices can access Teams and SharePoint Online, and non-enrolled devices should be blocked automatically. Conditional Access policies allow administrators to enforce these requirements by checking the compliance state of devices managed through Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune).
Device compliance policies in Intune define the required configuration for a device, including operating system version, encryption status, antivirus updates, and security baselines. Conditional Access policies then evaluate these compliance states before granting access to cloud applications. Non-compliant or unmanaged devices are automatically blocked from accessing Teams, SharePoint Online, and other sensitive Microsoft 365 services, ensuring that corporate data is protected against threats originating from unapproved devices.
Conditional Access also allows administrators to combine compliance with other signals, such as user risk, location, and authentication method, to create a layered security model. For example, even a compliant device may be denied access if it is being used from an unusual geographic location or if the user account has been flagged for suspicious activity. These policies provide granular control, enabling organizations to enforce zero-trust security principles while maintaining operational flexibility for authorized users.
Alternative solutions, such as Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels, provide content-level protection but do not manage access based on device compliance. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve content but do not enforce access restrictions, and Exchange Online transport rules apply to email traffic but cannot enforce device-based access for Teams or SharePoint.
Implementing Conditional Access with device compliance provides administrators with detailed monitoring and reporting tools. These reports help track which devices are compliant, which users are attempting to access services with non-compliant devices, and the specific compliance failures detected. This data is critical for security audits, regulatory compliance, and proactive management of IT assets.
By requiring managed and compliant devices, organizations can reduce the risk of data breaches, ensure that only secure endpoints are interacting with corporate resources, and maintain control over sensitive data. Conditional Access policies also integrate seamlessly with Microsoft 365 security features such as identity protection, providing a holistic security framework that balances usability, productivity, and protection across all endpoints accessing cloud services.
Question 222:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to configure a policy that prevents users from forwarding, copying, or printing emails containing sensitive HR information. The organization also requires detailed reporting of all access attempts to these emails. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
B) Exchange Online transport rules
C) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic classification and protection are specifically designed to manage and protect sensitive information, including HR data, within Microsoft 365. In this scenario, the administrator needs to prevent users from forwarding, copying, or printing emails containing sensitive HR information, while maintaining detailed reporting for compliance purposes. Sensitivity labels meet these requirements effectively by automatically identifying relevant content and enforcing protection policies at the email level.
Automatic classification uses pre-configured or custom rules to detect sensitive HR information within emails. Once identified, a sensitivity label applies encryption, restricts actions such as forwarding, copying, or printing, and ensures that only authorized recipients can access the content. This reduces the risk of accidental or intentional data leakage and ensures that sensitive HR information remains secure within the organization.
Reporting and auditing capabilities allow administrators to monitor how emails are accessed, track unauthorized attempts to bypass restrictions, and generate comprehensive reports for compliance purposes. These reports are critical for internal governance, regulatory adherence, and incident response, providing visibility into user behavior and ensuring accountability for sensitive information handling.
Alternative solutions, such as Exchange Online transport rules, can inspect email content and take basic actions, but they do not provide encryption, granular action restrictions, or detailed auditing. Azure AD Conditional Access policies enforce access control based on device or user risk but do not protect email content directly. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve email content for regulatory purposes but do not enforce real-time restrictions on email actions.
By implementing sensitivity labels with automatic classification, organizations can enforce consistent, automated protection of HR data across all email communications. Users are guided through secure handling of sensitive information, while administrators maintain full oversight. Integration with Microsoft 365 applications ensures consistent enforcement across Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive, providing comprehensive protection and visibility for HR-related content.
The solution also aligns with regulatory requirements, corporate policies, and industry best practices, reducing risk and ensuring that sensitive information is handled securely throughout its lifecycle. Administrators can refine classification rules, monitor policy enforcement, and generate detailed reports, enabling proactive management of information protection and demonstrating compliance with HR data security requirements.
Question 223:
A Microsoft 365 administrator is responsible for ensuring that all employees in the finance department can access Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online from their mobile devices, but only if the devices are compliant with the organization’s security policies. Devices that are not compliant must be blocked automatically. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements
B) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) Exchange Online transport rules
Answer:
A) Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access policies with device compliance requirements are designed to enforce access rules for Microsoft 365 services based on the compliance state of devices. In this scenario, the administrator needs to ensure that finance department employees can access Teams and SharePoint Online only from compliant devices, while non-compliant devices are automatically blocked. This ensures that sensitive corporate data remains secure while still allowing authorized users to maintain productivity across mobile devices.
Device compliance is managed through Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Intune), which allows administrators to define specific security policies that devices must meet to be considered compliant. These policies may include requirements such as device encryption, password complexity, OS version, antivirus software installation, and threat protection status. When Conditional Access policies are applied in conjunction with these compliance requirements, only devices meeting these security standards are granted access to corporate resources, while non-compliant or unmanaged devices are denied access automatically.
Conditional Access policies can also include multiple conditions, such as user or group membership, application being accessed, location, risk signals, and sign-in frequency. This level of granularity allows organizations to implement zero-trust security principles, where access decisions are continuously evaluated based on real-time risk assessments. For example, even if a device is compliant, access may still be blocked if the user is attempting to log in from an unusual geographic location or if the system detects suspicious login behavior.
Alternative solutions such as Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels, Microsoft 365 retention policies, or Exchange Online transport rules do not provide the capability to enforce device-based access. Sensitivity labels are focused on protecting content based on classification, retention policies preserve data for compliance, and transport rules control email flow but cannot enforce device compliance for accessing Teams or SharePoint.
By using Conditional Access with device compliance requirements, organizations gain visibility into which devices are compliant and non-compliant, ensuring that security risks are minimized. Detailed reporting allows administrators to monitor policy enforcement, track failed sign-in attempts, and generate audit logs for compliance purposes. This approach aligns with best practices in cloud security and modern workplace management, providing a balance between security, usability, and compliance.
Moreover, integrating Conditional Access policies with Microsoft 365 security tools enables adaptive access control. Organizations can apply additional risk-based measures, such as requiring MFA for devices that pass compliance checks but exhibit unusual activity. This multi-layered approach strengthens the organization’s security posture while maintaining flexibility for authorized users who need to access corporate applications from mobile or remote locations.
Overall, Conditional Access policies combined with device compliance provide a robust solution for ensuring secure access to Microsoft 365 applications. Administrators can configure policies to meet specific departmental needs, maintain compliance with organizational security requirements, and reduce the likelihood of data breaches originating from unsecured or unmanaged devices. The seamless integration of device management, risk assessment, and access control enables organizations to protect sensitive information while supporting a modern, mobile workforce.
Question 224:
A Microsoft 365 administrator wants to prevent users from sharing documents containing sensitive project data with external users. The organization also requires auditing of all sharing attempts. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with protection and auditing
B) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
C) Microsoft 365 retention policies
D) Exchange Online transport rules
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with protection and auditing
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with protection and auditing provide a comprehensive method to manage and secure sensitive documents within Microsoft 365. In this scenario, the administrator wants to prevent users from sharing documents containing project data externally and requires auditing of all sharing attempts. Sensitivity labels meet these requirements by automatically classifying sensitive content, applying protective actions, and enabling detailed reporting.
When a sensitivity label is applied, it can enforce actions such as encryption, access restrictions, and usage rights, which prevent unauthorized users, including external recipients, from opening, copying, printing, or forwarding sensitive documents. Labels can be configured for automatic or recommended classification based on specific content types, keywords, or patterns associated with project data. Automatic classification ensures consistent protection across all documents, reducing the risk of accidental or intentional data leaks.
Auditing capabilities allow administrators to track user interactions with labeled content, including attempts to access, share, or modify sensitive documents. This provides transparency and accountability, allowing organizations to demonstrate compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements. Audit logs can also be analyzed for unusual behavior patterns, helping administrators proactively identify and mitigate potential security incidents.
Alternative solutions such as Azure AD Conditional Access policies can control access based on user or device risk but do not provide content-level protection or enforce restrictions on document sharing. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve documents for compliance but do not prevent external sharing. Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow but are not applicable for protecting documents in SharePoint, OneDrive, or Teams.
Sensitivity labels also integrate with Microsoft 365 apps, ensuring consistent protection across Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Teams, and SharePoint. This integration enables a unified approach to information protection and reduces administrative overhead. Administrators can refine labeling policies, monitor enforcement, and adjust settings based on organizational needs and evolving security requirements.
Implementing sensitivity labels aligns with best practices for data loss prevention (DLP) and zero-trust security principles. By automatically identifying sensitive project data and applying protective measures, organizations reduce the risk of unauthorized access or leaks while maintaining productivity. The combination of protection, auditing, and reporting provides a comprehensive approach to secure information management, ensuring that sensitive documents remain controlled and monitored throughout their lifecycle.
Overall, sensitivity labels provide a robust and scalable solution for protecting sensitive project data in Microsoft 365. Administrators can configure policies to meet organizational compliance standards, enforce access restrictions, and monitor all access attempts. This ensures that confidential project data remains secure, prevents unauthorized sharing, and provides detailed insights into document usage, supporting effective governance and risk management practices across the organization.
Question 225:
A Microsoft 365 administrator needs to implement a policy that automatically encrypts emails containing personally identifiable information (PII) sent to external recipients. The administrator also wants detailed reporting of all encrypted email activity. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic encryption and auditing
B) Exchange Online transport rules
C) Azure AD Conditional Access policies
D) Microsoft 365 retention policies
Answer:
A) Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic encryption and auditing
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels with automatic encryption and auditing are designed to protect sensitive information in transit and provide comprehensive visibility into user activity. In this scenario, the administrator needs to automatically encrypt emails containing personally identifiable information (PII) sent externally and track detailed usage reports. Sensitivity labels achieve this by classifying content based on predefined policies, applying encryption automatically, and logging all access and sending activity.
Automatic classification uses keywords, regular expressions, or custom data patterns to detect PII within email messages. Once detected, the sensitivity label enforces encryption using Microsoft Information Protection (MIP), ensuring that only authorized recipients can access the email content. The encryption applies to email content and attachments, maintaining confidentiality during transmission and storage.
Auditing capabilities allow administrators to generate detailed reports on encrypted email activity, including who sent the email, who accessed it, and whether any unauthorized access attempts occurred. These reports are essential for demonstrating compliance with regulatory requirements, internal policies, and industry standards related to data privacy. Auditing also provides insights into usage patterns, enabling proactive security measures to prevent data leaks.
Alternative solutions, such as Exchange Online transport rules, can inspect email content and take basic actions like blocking or redirecting messages, but they do not provide encryption or detailed auditing at the content level. Azure AD Conditional Access policies manage access based on user and device risk but cannot encrypt emails. Microsoft 365 retention policies preserve email data for compliance but do not enforce real-time encryption.
Sensitivity labels integrate seamlessly with Microsoft 365 apps, ensuring consistent encryption across Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Automatic classification and protection reduce administrative overhead and ensure consistent enforcement of security policies, minimizing the risk of accidental PII exposure.
Implementing sensitivity labels for automatic encryption aligns with privacy regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and industry best practices for protecting sensitive personal information. By combining automatic protection with detailed auditing, organizations maintain control over sensitive communications, provide visibility into usage, and reduce the risk of data breaches. Administrators can monitor policy enforcement, refine classification rules, and generate comprehensive reports to support compliance initiatives and strengthen the organization’s overall security posture.
This approach ensures that sensitive emails are consistently protected, external recipients receive secure communications, and administrators have full oversight of all encrypted email activity. By leveraging sensitivity labels, organizations implement a proactive, scalable, and auditable solution to safeguard PII while enabling secure collaboration and communication across Microsoft 365 services.