Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-104 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 106: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Site Recovery for disaster recovery of VMs?
A) Enable Site Recovery, configure replication for VMs, define recovery plans, and test failover
B) Rely solely on manual VM backups
C) Store VM images in a single region only
D) Disable disaster recovery for simplicity
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Site Recovery (ASR) is a critical service for ensuring business continuity and disaster recovery for virtual machines by replicating workloads to a secondary region or site. Implementing ASR allows organizations to maintain availability of applications during planned or unplanned outages, ensuring minimal downtime and protecting against data loss. The correct approach involves enabling Site Recovery, configuring replication for VMs, defining recovery plans, and testing failover.
Option A emphasizes a structured disaster recovery strategy. Enabling Site Recovery starts with selecting the source environment and configuring replication for the virtual machines. Replication ensures that VM data is continuously copied to a target region, maintaining up-to-date copies that can be quickly activated in case of a failure. Recovery plans provide orchestration for failover and failback processes, allowing administrators to define the sequence in which VMs and workloads are restored. This ensures that dependencies between applications and services are respected, minimizing downtime and operational disruption.
Testing failover is a crucial part of ASR implementation. Administrators can perform planned or unplanned failover simulations without affecting production systems, validating the recovery plan and verifying that applications function correctly in the secondary environment. This proactive testing ensures that when an actual disaster occurs, the organization can recover quickly and confidently, meeting business continuity objectives.
Option B, relying solely on manual VM backups, is insufficient for full disaster recovery. While backups protect data at rest, they do not provide the continuous replication or orchestration necessary for rapid failover. Restoring from backups can take hours or days, increasing downtime and business impact.
Option C, storing VM images in a single region only, does not provide protection against regional outages, natural disasters, or infrastructure failures. Disaster recovery strategies must include geographically separated locations to ensure resilience and availability.
Option D, disabling disaster recovery for simplicity, exposes the organization to significant risks, including prolonged downtime, data loss, and inability to meet regulatory or service-level requirements. Skipping disaster recovery compromises business continuity and can lead to operational, financial, and reputational losses.
Implementation involves evaluating business-critical VMs and workloads, determining appropriate recovery regions, configuring replication policies, and defining Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) for each workload. Administrators can integrate ASR with Azure Automation to further streamline recovery processes and automate notifications during failover events. Monitoring replication health, reviewing alerts, and maintaining compliance with recovery objectives are essential for a reliable disaster recovery posture.
Planning includes conducting regular failover drills, updating recovery plans as infrastructure evolves, and ensuring all stakeholders understand their roles during a disaster. Proper implementation of Azure Site Recovery reduces operational risk, ensures high availability, and supports regulatory compliance.
Therefore, the correct approach is to enable Site Recovery, configure replication for VMs, define recovery plans, and test failover.
Question 107: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure SQL Database geo-replication for high availability?
A) Configure active geo-replication, create secondary databases in different regions, and monitor replication health
B) Rely solely on local backups
C) Deploy a single database without replication
D) Disable high availability to reduce costs
Answer: A
Explanation:
The recommended approach for ensuring high availability and business continuity in Azure SQL Database is option A: configuring active geo-replication, creating secondary databases in different regions, and monitoring replication health. Azure SQL Database is a fully managed relational database service that provides built-in features for high availability, disaster recovery, and data protection. Active geo-replication allows administrators to replicate a primary database asynchronously to one or more secondary databases located in different Azure regions. This configuration provides a robust strategy for disaster recovery, enabling applications to continue operating even if an entire region experiences an outage or catastrophic failure.
Active geo-replication creates readable secondary databases, which not only serve as failover targets but can also be used for reporting, load distribution, and read-only workloads. Administrators can configure up to four secondary databases per primary database, each in different geographical regions. This ensures that in case of regional outages, workloads can fail over quickly to a healthy secondary database with minimal downtime. Secondary databases continuously receive updates from the primary database asynchronously, ensuring that changes are reflected across replicas while maintaining high performance.
Monitoring replication health is a critical component of geo-replication. Azure provides built-in monitoring tools that track replication lag, database status, and connectivity between primary and secondary databases. Administrators can set up alerts for replication failures or latency thresholds to proactively address potential issues before they impact applications. This proactive monitoring ensures that secondary databases remain synchronized and ready for failover when required, maintaining recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) defined by business requirements.
Option B, relying solely on local backups, is insufficient for high availability. While backups protect against data loss, they do not provide near-real-time failover capabilities, leaving applications vulnerable to extended downtime in case of hardware failures, network disruptions, or regional outages. Backups also require manual restoration processes, which can increase recovery time and operational complexity.
Option C, deploying a single database without replication, creates a single point of failure. Any issue affecting the primary database, whether hardware failure, corruption, or regional outage, can result in complete service disruption. This approach fails to meet enterprise requirements for uptime, operational resilience, or compliance with service level agreements (SLAs).
Option D, disabling high availability to reduce costs, introduces significant operational and business risks. Downtime, data loss, and service disruption can have severe financial, reputational, and regulatory consequences. The cost savings achieved by avoiding replication are outweighed by the potential impact of system failures or outages.
Active geo-replication also supports manual or automatic failover, allowing administrators to switch client applications to a secondary database during primary database outages. This process can be transparent to users when applications are designed with retry logic and connection resiliency. Integration with Azure Monitor and Azure Automation allows tracking, alerting, and automated failover workflows, further enhancing operational efficiency and reducing downtime.
In addition to high availability, geo-replication enhances disaster recovery planning, supports global business operations, and provides compliance with regulatory requirements for data redundancy and geographic separation. Organizations can leverage read-only secondary databases to offload reporting workloads, improving primary database performance and scalability.
The best practice is to configure active geo-replication, create secondary databases in different regions, and monitor replication health. This approach ensures high availability, fault tolerance, and rapid recovery from regional failures, providing reliable, scalable, and resilient database services that align with enterprise continuity and operational excellence goals.
Question 108: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Storage Account network restrictions?
A) Configure firewalls and virtual network rules to restrict access
B) Allow all traffic to reduce administrative effort
C) Use public endpoints without restrictions
D) Disable network restrictions for simplicity
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Storage Accounts are foundational components for storing data, including blobs, files, queues, and tables. Securing access to these resources is critical to prevent unauthorized access, data breaches, and potential compliance violations. The recommended approach is to configure firewalls and virtual network rules to restrict access, ensuring that only trusted networks, subnets, or IP ranges can communicate with the storage account.
Option A highlights implementing network-level security controls by enabling the storage account firewall and defining virtual network (VNet) rules. Administrators can specify which VNets or subnets have access to the storage account, effectively isolating storage traffic from untrusted networks. This ensures that applications running within specific VNets or from allowed IP ranges can communicate with the storage account securely while blocking all other unauthorized traffic. Firewall rules provide granular control over network access, and VNets can be linked to allow seamless communication for enterprise workloads hosted in Azure. Additionally, enabling private endpoints further strengthens security by providing access over a private IP within the VNet instead of using public endpoints, reducing exposure to the internet.
Option B, allowing all traffic, reduces administrative overhead but exposes the storage account to unauthorized access and potential cyberattacks. Public access without restrictions increases risk of data exfiltration or malicious activities targeting the storage resources.
Option C, using public endpoints without restrictions, also increases the security attack surface, allowing connections from any source without authentication or verification of origin. While convenient, this approach is not suitable for production workloads handling sensitive data or regulated information.
Option D, disabling network restrictions, simplifies administration but significantly compromises security and compliance. Without restrictions, the storage account is vulnerable to attacks, which can lead to data leakage, service disruption, and regulatory non-compliance.
Implementation involves enabling the storage account firewall, configuring VNets and subnets, optionally setting up service endpoints or private endpoints, and validating access from approved networks. Administrators should combine network restrictions with Azure Active Directory (AAD) authentication, Shared Access Signatures (SAS), or role-based access control (RBAC) to provide layered security for storage access. Continuous monitoring and logging of storage access through Azure Monitor or diagnostic settings ensure unauthorized attempts are detected and addressed promptly.
Planning includes identifying the workloads and applications that require access, defining the network boundaries, testing connectivity, and updating access rules as infrastructure evolves. Combining these measures ensures that only authorized traffic reaches the storage account while minimizing operational risk.
Proper implementation of network restrictions for Azure Storage Accounts provides robust protection against unauthorized access, supports compliance requirements, and strengthens overall security posture. Therefore, the correct approach is to configure firewalls and virtual network rules to restrict access.
Question 109: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Monitor Workbooks for resource analysis?
A) Create Workbooks, define queries and visualizations, and share with teams
B) Review raw logs manually
C) Use only default dashboards without customization
D) Disable monitoring to reduce overhead
Answer: A
Explanation:
The recommended approach for analyzing and visualizing Azure resource data is option A: creating Azure Monitor Workbooks, defining queries and visualizations, and sharing them with teams. Azure Monitor Workbooks provide a powerful, flexible, and interactive platform for aggregating, analyzing, and presenting telemetry from Azure resources. Workbooks enable administrators and operations teams to gain deep insights into infrastructure, applications, and service health, allowing for proactive monitoring, rapid troubleshooting, and data-driven decision-making.
Creating a workbook begins with defining the scope of the analysis. Administrators can select one or more Azure resources, resource groups, or subscriptions as the data source. Azure Monitor Workbooks use Kusto Query Language (KQL) to query logs collected from Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, or other telemetry sources. These queries can extract metrics, performance counters, diagnostic logs, and other relevant information from VMs, databases, network components, and applications. By applying KQL queries, administrators can filter, aggregate, and correlate data to identify trends, anomalies, and operational issues.
Once queries are defined, administrators can create visualizations such as charts, grids, timelines, and heatmaps. Visual representations make it easier to interpret complex datasets, identify performance bottlenecks, and communicate findings across teams. Workbooks can include multiple sections and tabs, allowing for consolidated analysis of related resources or services in a single interface. This flexibility enables teams to build custom dashboards tailored to operational requirements, business KPIs, and application performance monitoring.
Workbooks also support interactive features such as parameters, drop-down menus, and dynamic filters, enabling users to adjust queries or visualizations on the fly. This interactivity allows administrators, developers, and other stakeholders to explore data from different perspectives without requiring modifications to the underlying queries or dashboards. Sharing workbooks across teams ensures that operational insights, troubleshooting procedures, and resource usage patterns are visible to the right stakeholders, promoting collaboration and informed decision-making. Role-based access controls (RBAC) can be applied to ensure secure sharing while protecting sensitive information.
Option B, reviewing raw logs manually, is inefficient and error-prone. Manually parsing log files or metrics does not scale in large environments, increases troubleshooting time, and risks overlooking critical information. Option C, using only default dashboards without customization, provides limited insights, as default views may not cover specific operational needs, complex dependencies, or detailed performance metrics required for proactive monitoring. Option D, disabling monitoring to reduce overhead, is detrimental to operational reliability and increases the risk of undetected failures, performance degradation, or security incidents.
Azure Monitor Workbooks also integrate with alerting and automation workflows. Metrics and log data analyzed in workbooks can be correlated with alerts, enabling administrators to take automated or manual corrective actions. Integration with Azure DevOps or ITSM tools allows teams to track incidents and operational tasks efficiently. Workbooks are particularly useful in multi-resource or hybrid environments, providing consolidated visibility across on-premises, Azure, and connected services.
The best practice is to create Azure Monitor Workbooks, define queries and visualizations, and share them with teams. This approach enables interactive, customizable, and centralized resource analysis, improving operational awareness, facilitating proactive troubleshooting, and supporting data-driven decision-making. Workbooks enhance collaboration, increase transparency, and ensure that Azure resources are monitored effectively to maintain high availability, performance, and compliance.
Question 110: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Network Watcher for troubleshooting network issues?
A) Enable Network Watcher, configure diagnostic tools, monitor traffic flows, and analyze connectivity
B) Use manual packet captures only
C) Disable network monitoring
D) Rely solely on NSG logs without additional tools
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Network Watcher provides network monitoring, diagnostic, and visualization capabilities for Azure environments. Enabling Network Watcher, configuring diagnostic tools, monitoring traffic flows, and analyzing connectivity allows administrators to proactively detect and troubleshoot network issues, optimize performance, and ensure security compliance.
Manual packet captures are inefficient for large-scale environments and lack centralized visibility. Disabling network monitoring reduces operational awareness and increases risk of undetected network failures. Relying solely on NSG logs provides limited information and cannot give a complete picture of network health or topology.
Implementation involves enabling Network Watcher in regions, configuring tools like IP flow verify, next hop, connection troubleshoot, packet capture, and topology views. Administrators can schedule packet captures, monitor flow logs, and integrate with Azure Monitor or SIEM tools for analytics and alerting.
Planning includes defining critical network paths, establishing diagnostic policies, training teams on network troubleshooting using Network Watcher, and integrating monitoring into operational procedures. Proper Network Watcher implementation enhances visibility, enables proactive troubleshooting, reduces downtime, and supports security and compliance objectives. Therefore, the correct approach is to enable Network Watcher, configure diagnostic tools, monitor traffic flows, and analyze connectivity.
Question 111: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure ExpressRoute for private connectivity?
A) Create an ExpressRoute circuit, configure routing, and connect on-premises network to Azure
B) Use public internet connections only
C) Disable private connectivity for simplicity
D) Rely solely on VPN connections
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure ExpressRoute enables private, dedicated network connections between on-premises infrastructure and Azure datacenters. Creating an ExpressRoute circuit, configuring routing, and connecting the on-premises network to Azure provides low-latency, secure, and reliable connectivity, independent of the public internet.
Using public internet connections exposes traffic to latency, jitter, and potential security risks. Disabling private connectivity simplifies management but compromises performance and security. Relying solely on VPN connections is less efficient for high-throughput workloads and may not meet SLA requirements for enterprise applications.
Implementation involves provisioning an ExpressRoute circuit with a service provider, configuring Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing for redundancy and failover, connecting virtual networks using ExpressRoute Gateways, and integrating with network security policies. Administrators can monitor circuit health, utilization, and routing performance using Azure Monitor and diagnostic tools.
Planning includes determining bandwidth requirements, defining redundancy and failover strategies, establishing routing policies for optimal traffic flow, assessing SLA commitments, and ensuring compliance with security standards. Proper ExpressRoute deployment ensures private, high-speed connectivity, improves application performance, enhances security, and supports hybrid cloud architectures. Therefore, the correct approach is to create an ExpressRoute circuit, configure routing, and connect the on-premises network to Azure.
Question 112: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Front Door for global web application delivery?
A) Configure Front Door endpoints, enable routing rules, enable caching, and configure health probes
B) Use a single regional endpoint for simplicity
C) Disable content delivery optimization
D) Rely solely on DNS-based load balancing
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Front Door is a global, scalable entry point for delivering high-performance, secure, and reliable web applications. It provides capabilities such as application acceleration, global load balancing, SSL offloading, caching, and health monitoring. Proper implementation ensures users across the globe experience low-latency access and high availability, while also enhancing security and reliability.
Option A is correct because it outlines the key steps for leveraging Front Door effectively. Administrators configure Front Door endpoints to expose web applications globally. Routing rules are defined to determine how incoming requests are directed to backend pools, which may consist of multiple application instances deployed in different regions. Caching is enabled to improve performance by storing frequently accessed content closer to users, reducing latency and load on origin servers. Health probes are configured to continuously monitor the status of backend servers, allowing Front Door to automatically route traffic away from unhealthy instances to ensure high availability. These configurations together provide a resilient, fast, and secure global delivery solution.
Option B, using a single regional endpoint, does not take advantage of Front Door’s global capabilities. A single region can create bottlenecks, increase latency for distant users, and reduce availability in case of regional failures. It is suitable only for small-scale or testing scenarios, not production-grade global deployments.
Option C, disabling content delivery optimization, negates one of Front Door’s core advantages. Without caching and content acceleration, the performance benefits for global users are lost, resulting in slower load times, increased server load, and poor user experience.
Option D, relying solely on DNS-based load balancing, lacks the real-time routing intelligence, health checks, and failover capabilities provided by Front Door. DNS routing alone cannot handle dynamic traffic rerouting during failures or provide SSL offloading and application acceleration.
Implementation involves planning backend pools with application instances in multiple regions to ensure redundancy and low latency. Administrators define routing rules based on URL paths, latency, or priority, configure caching policies for static content, set up health probes to monitor backend availability, and apply security measures like Web Application Firewall (WAF) to protect against attacks. Analytics and logging are enabled to monitor traffic patterns, identify performance issues, and adjust configurations as needed.
Planning also includes evaluating the global distribution of users, expected traffic patterns, and business continuity requirements. Integration with other Azure services like Traffic Manager or CDN can further enhance delivery performance and resilience. By implementing Front Door according to best practices, administrators ensure scalable, fast, and secure web application delivery across multiple regions.
Therefore, the correct approach is to configure Front Door endpoints, enable routing rules, enable caching, and configure health probes. This ensures optimized performance, high availability, and a secure experience for users worldwide.
Question 113: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Application Gateway for web traffic management?
A) Deploy Application Gateway, configure routing rules, enable WAF, and monitor performance
B) Use network load balancers only
C) Route traffic directly to VMs without security
D) Disable traffic management for simplicity
Answer: A
Explanation:
The recommended approach for managing web traffic in Azure is option A: deploying Azure Application Gateway, configuring routing rules, enabling the Web Application Firewall (WAF), and monitoring performance. Azure Application Gateway is a layer 7 load balancer designed specifically for HTTP and HTTPS traffic, providing advanced traffic routing, security, and scalability for web applications. By implementing Application Gateway, administrators can ensure that web traffic is distributed efficiently across backend resources, secure against attacks, and monitored for performance and availability.
Deployment begins by creating the Application Gateway and configuring its core components. Backend pools define the set of web servers, virtual machines, or virtual machine scale sets that will handle incoming traffic. This allows administrators to distribute traffic across multiple resources, ensuring load balancing, high availability, and redundancy. Routing rules determine how traffic is mapped from frontend listeners to backend pools. Administrators can configure path-based routing to direct different types of requests to specific backend endpoints, host-based routing for multi-domain applications, and SSL termination for offloading encryption tasks from backend servers.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a critical security feature integrated with Application Gateway. WAF inspects incoming web traffic and protects applications from common vulnerabilities and exploits such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and malicious bots. Administrators can configure WAF policies and custom rules to align with organizational security standards and regulatory compliance requirements. By leveraging WAF, organizations significantly reduce the risk of security breaches while maintaining uninterrupted access for legitimate users.
Monitoring and performance management are essential for operational efficiency. Application Gateway provides integration with Azure Monitor, enabling administrators to track metrics such as request counts, response times, throughput, and failed requests. Logs and diagnostics can be analyzed in real-time to identify performance bottlenecks, detect unusual traffic patterns, and troubleshoot potential issues. Alerts can also be configured to notify teams of abnormal behavior, ensuring rapid response to incidents and proactive management of the application environment.
Option B, using network load balancers only, is insufficient for web applications that require layer 7 intelligence. Network load balancers operate at layer 4, providing only basic distribution of TCP or UDP traffic without path-based routing, SSL offloading, or WAF protection. This limits functionality for modern web applications that need fine-grained traffic management and security.
Option C, routing traffic directly to virtual machines without security, exposes web applications to attacks and increases the risk of downtime or data breaches. Direct access bypasses critical features like SSL termination, WAF, and automated traffic routing, leading to operational inefficiencies and vulnerabilities.
Option D, disabling traffic management for simplicity, is not viable in enterprise environments. Without centralized traffic control and security, applications are prone to inconsistent performance, limited scalability, and exposure to attacks. This approach reduces operational reliability and user experience.
Azure Application Gateway also supports autoscaling, enabling resources to adjust automatically based on traffic demands. This ensures consistent performance during peak periods without manual intervention. Multi-site hosting, session affinity, and integration with Azure Front Door or CDN further optimize traffic distribution and content delivery globally.
The best practice is to deploy Azure Application Gateway, configure routing rules, enable WAF, and monitor performance. This approach ensures secure, scalable, and highly available web traffic management, providing operational efficiency, threat protection, and enhanced user experience across enterprise applications.
Question 114: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Traffic Manager for multi-region application availability?
A) Create Traffic Manager profiles, configure routing methods, enable endpoint monitoring, and define failover priorities
B) Use single-region deployments only
C) Disable Traffic Manager to simplify operations
D) Rely solely on local DNS for traffic routing
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Traffic Manager provides DNS-based global traffic distribution to ensure high availability, performance optimization, and failover for applications deployed in multiple regions. Creating Traffic Manager profiles, configuring routing methods, enabling endpoint monitoring, and defining failover priorities ensures continuous service availability even during regional outages.
Single-region deployments increase the risk of downtime and do not support global reach or disaster recovery. Disabling Traffic Manager simplifies management but exposes applications to service interruptions. Relying solely on local DNS does not provide intelligent routing or failover capabilities.
Implementation involves creating Traffic Manager profiles with chosen routing methods such as Performance, Priority, or Weighted, configuring endpoints for each region, enabling health probes to monitor endpoint availability, and defining failover or priority rules to ensure proper traffic distribution during outages. Administrators can integrate Traffic Manager with other Azure services for automated failover and monitoring.
Planning includes assessing global user distribution, defining SLA requirements, determining critical endpoints, monitoring traffic patterns, and evaluating failover scenarios. Proper Traffic Manager deployment enhances performance, ensures high availability, reduces latency, and improves operational resilience. Therefore, the correct approach is to create Traffic Manager profiles, configure routing methods, enable endpoint monitoring, and define failover priorities.
Question 115: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Virtual Network Peering?
A) Establish peering connections between VNets, configure routing, and enable traffic flow
B) Connect VNets via public internet only
C) Disable network connectivity between VNets
D) Use VPNs exclusively without peering
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Virtual Network (VNet) Peering is a networking solution that allows seamless communication between two Azure VNets. It is designed to provide low-latency, high-bandwidth connectivity without the need for gateways or public internet exposure. Implementing VNet peering correctly ensures that resources across VNets, such as virtual machines, applications, or databases, can communicate securely and efficiently.
Option A is the correct approach because it involves establishing peering connections between VNets, configuring routing appropriately, and enabling traffic flow. When peering is established, Azure automatically creates routes that allow traffic to flow between the peered VNets as if they were part of the same network. Administrators can also configure whether to allow traffic to traverse to other peered VNets (transitive routing) and can control traffic via Network Security Groups (NSGs) for added security. Peering is useful for scenarios such as multi-tier applications, cross-department workloads, and global deployments where VNets exist in the same or different regions.
Option B, connecting VNets via the public internet, is not recommended for production workloads. Public connections increase latency, reduce reliability, and expose traffic to potential security risks. Unlike peering, internet-based connectivity does not offer the same high-speed, private communication between VNets.
Option C, disabling network connectivity between VNets, may simplify configuration but prevents collaboration between applications and resources. It is impractical for organizations that require integrated services across multiple VNets or regions.
Option D, relying exclusively on VPNs without peering, introduces additional overhead, including gateway management, bandwidth limitations, and higher latency. While VPNs are useful for hybrid scenarios involving on-premises connectivity, they are less efficient for intra-Azure VNet communication compared to peering.
Implementation of VNet peering involves several steps. First, administrators select the VNets to peer and confirm that their address spaces do not overlap. Next, the peering connection is created in both VNets, with configurations to allow or restrict traffic, manage gateway transit if needed, and control forwarded traffic. After configuration, routing tables are updated to ensure proper traffic flow, and NSGs are applied to regulate communication between resources. Monitoring peering status and traffic flow is essential for troubleshooting and maintaining network performance.
Planning includes assessing which VNets require connectivity, verifying IP address ranges to prevent conflicts, defining traffic rules, considering hub-and-spoke architectures for scalability, and ensuring compliance with organizational network policies. Proper VNet peering reduces operational complexity, improves network performance, and provides secure, private communication between Azure resources.
Therefore, the correct approach is to establish peering connections between VNets, configure routing, and enable traffic flow. This ensures efficient, secure, and scalable connectivity across Azure networks.
Question 116: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Policy for enforcing allowed VM sizes across subscriptions?
A) Create a policy definition specifying allowed VM sizes, assign it to subscriptions, and monitor compliance
B) Allow users to deploy any VM size
C) Disable policies to simplify operations
D) Use RBAC only without policy enforcement
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Policy is a governance tool that allows administrators to enforce rules and standards for resources deployed across Azure subscriptions. When controlling virtual machine (VM) sizes, administrators can define policies specifying allowed VM SKUs to manage costs, ensure performance consistency, and maintain compliance with organizational requirements. Creating a policy definition specifying allowed VM sizes, assigning it to subscriptions, and monitoring compliance ensures that only approved VM types are deployed, avoiding resource sprawl, cost overruns, and potential operational issues.
Allowing users to deploy any VM size without governance can lead to inconsistent performance, unexpected costs, and increased complexity in managing capacity and scalability. Disabling policies for simplicity removes the ability to enforce standards, leaving the organization vulnerable to misconfiguration and inefficient resource utilization. Using RBAC alone controls who can deploy resources but does not enforce the types or sizes of resources that can be provisioned, leaving gaps in governance.
Implementation involves defining the policy rule, which can include a list of allowed VM SKUs, assigning the policy at the appropriate scope such as subscription or resource group, and monitoring compliance through the Azure Policy dashboard. Administrators can enable remediation tasks to automatically correct non-compliant resources, such as stopping or resizing unauthorized VMs. Integration with Azure Monitor and Log Analytics allows tracking policy compliance trends over time, providing insights for capacity planning and cost management.
Planning for policy deployment includes evaluating organizational requirements, identifying approved VM sizes for various workloads, aligning policies with cost optimization strategies, and defining exceptions for critical scenarios. Properly implemented policies reduce administrative overhead, ensure predictable resource deployment, improve financial governance, and strengthen overall compliance posture. By monitoring and analyzing policy compliance, administrators can also optimize cloud resources, detect anomalies, and proactively enforce best practices, ensuring that the environment aligns with business objectives and operational standards. Therefore, the correct approach is to create a policy definition specifying allowed VM sizes, assign it to subscriptions, and monitor compliance.
Question 117: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Backup for SQL Databases?
A) Enable Azure Backup service, configure backup policies for SQL databases, and monitor backup health
B) Perform manual backups periodically
C) Disable backups to reduce costs
D) Store SQL backups on VM disks without retention
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Backup provides a centralized, automated solution for protecting SQL databases hosted in Azure, ensuring recoverability and compliance with data retention requirements. Enabling the Azure Backup service, configuring backup policies for SQL databases, and monitoring backup health allows administrators to define backup frequency, retention periods, and redundancy options, ensuring that business-critical data can be recovered in case of corruption, accidental deletion, or other disasters.
Manual backups are time-consuming, prone to errors, and cannot guarantee compliance with recovery objectives or organizational standards. Disabling backups reduces costs in the short term but exposes the organization to potential data loss, operational downtime, and regulatory non-compliance. Storing SQL backups on VM disks without retention policies is risky because disk failures, accidental deletions, or regional outages can render backups unavailable.
Implementation involves creating a Recovery Services vault, configuring backup policies for each SQL database specifying full, differential, or transaction log backups, selecting storage redundancy options (LRS, GRS), scheduling backups to minimize business disruption, and setting up monitoring and alerting for backup job success or failure. Administrators can also test restore operations to validate recovery procedures and ensure that recovery objectives such as RTO and RPO are achievable.
Planning includes identifying mission-critical databases, aligning backup frequency and retention with business requirements, ensuring compliance with internal and external regulations, integrating backup monitoring with operational dashboards, and optimizing storage costs. Proper implementation enhances data protection, improves operational resilience, ensures business continuity, and provides a structured and auditable backup strategy. By leveraging Azure Backup, administrators can automate backup processes, reduce human error, and ensure that SQL databases are consistently protected and recoverable, aligning with organizational goals and compliance requirements. Therefore, the correct approach is to enable the Azure Backup service, configure backup policies for SQL databases, and monitor backup health.
Question 118: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Active Directory Conditional Access policies?
A) Define Conditional Access policies to require MFA, location restrictions, and device compliance for users
B) Allow all users to access resources without restrictions
C) Disable Conditional Access for simplicity
D) Use only RBAC without additional access controls
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Conditional Access provides a mechanism to enforce access control based on conditions such as user, location, device compliance, and risk level. Defining Conditional Access policies to require multi-factor authentication (MFA), location restrictions, and device compliance ensures that access to resources is secure, controlled, and aligned with organizational security policies.
Allowing unrestricted access for users exposes resources to unauthorized access, potential breaches, and identity compromise. Disabling Conditional Access simplifies access management but removes critical security layers. Using RBAC alone controls what users can do but does not control how or from where they can access resources, leaving gaps in protection against identity-based attacks.
Implementation involves creating Conditional Access policies targeting specific users or groups, defining conditions such as IP ranges, device platforms, or application types, requiring controls like MFA, compliant devices, or session restrictions, testing policies in report-only mode, and monitoring policy effectiveness through Azure AD sign-in logs. Administrators can adjust policies based on user behavior, risk events, and compliance requirements.
Planning includes assessing high-risk users and groups, identifying critical applications, defining access conditions to balance security and usability, integrating with identity protection tools, and maintaining clear documentation for auditing purposes. Proper Conditional Access deployment strengthens identity security, reduces risk of compromise, ensures regulatory compliance, and provides granular control over access to sensitive resources. By enforcing context-aware access, administrators can enhance security while minimizing disruptions to legitimate users, ensuring both operational efficiency and organizational protection. Therefore, the correct approach is to define Conditional Access policies to require MFA, location restrictions, and device compliance for users.
Question 119: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Resource Locks to protect critical resources?
A) Apply ReadOnly or Delete locks to subscriptions, resource groups, or individual resources to prevent accidental modification or deletion
B) Avoid locks to simplify management
C) Rely solely on RBAC for protection
D) Delete resources frequently to reduce clutter
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Resource Locks provide a mechanism to prevent accidental deletion or modification of critical resources. Applying ReadOnly or Delete locks at the subscription, resource group, or resource level ensures that essential workloads and configurations are protected against human error or misconfigurations.
Avoiding locks may simplify management but increases the risk of accidental deletion or unwanted modifications, which can lead to service interruptions, data loss, or operational issues. Relying solely on RBAC limits what users can do but does not protect against mistakes made by authorized personnel with legitimate access. Deleting resources frequently to reduce clutter is operationally risky and undermines governance and compliance.
Implementation involves identifying critical resources such as production databases, networking configurations, or virtual machines, applying appropriate lock types (ReadOnly or Delete), testing lock effectiveness, monitoring locked resources, and documenting lock policies for operational clarity. Administrators can also use Azure Policy to enforce automatic locks on newly created resources in critical environments.
Planning includes assessing the organizational impact of accidental modifications, defining a governance model for resource protection, educating teams on lock management, integrating with operational processes, and balancing operational flexibility with security. Proper implementation of resource locks ensures operational stability, reduces human error, enforces governance, and protects organizational assets. By applying ReadOnly or Delete locks strategically, administrators can safeguard critical resources while maintaining efficient operational workflows, aligning with best practices for governance and compliance. Therefore, the correct approach is to apply ReadOnly or Delete locks to subscriptions, resource groups, or individual resources to prevent accidental modification or deletion.
Question 120: How should an Azure Administrator implement Azure Cost Management for optimizing cloud expenditure?
A) Configure budgets, cost alerts, resource tagging, and analyze spending trends using Azure Cost Management
B) Ignore cost reporting and manage resources ad-hoc
C) Disable cost monitoring to reduce administrative overhead
D) Rely solely on invoices from the portal
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Cost Management provides tools to monitor, allocate, and optimize cloud spending. Configuring budgets, cost alerts, resource tagging, and analyzing spending trends enables administrators to proactively manage costs, avoid overspending, and align resource usage with business objectives.
Ignoring cost reporting results in unexpected bills, inefficient resource utilization, and challenges in cost accountability. Disabling cost monitoring reduces visibility into cloud expenditure and hampers strategic financial management. Relying solely on invoices provides only historical data and does not enable proactive cost control or resource optimization.
Implementation involves defining budgets for subscriptions or resource groups, setting up cost alerts to notify stakeholders when spending thresholds are exceeded, implementing consistent resource tagging for accurate cost allocation, analyzing trends and patterns, and optimizing workloads through resizing, shutting down idle resources, or leveraging reserved instances. Administrators can integrate cost management insights with operational planning and forecasting, aligning with both technical and business goals.
Planning includes assessing organizational cost priorities, establishing cost accountability structures, defining governance policies for resource provisioning, regularly reviewing usage metrics, and applying automation for cost optimization. Proper Azure Cost Management ensures financial control, improves operational efficiency, encourages responsible resource usage, and provides data-driven insights for strategic cloud investment decisions. Therefore, the correct approach is to configure budgets, cost alerts, resource tagging, and analyze spending trends using Azure Cost Management.