Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-100 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 196
Your organization wants to detect risky cloud applications, enforce session controls, and prevent data exfiltration in real time. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Intune
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces policies based on identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals. While it can restrict access to cloud applications, it does not provide visibility into unsanctioned cloud apps, evaluate cloud app risk, or enforce session-level controls to prevent data exfiltration. Its scope is primarily access control rather than cloud app governance.
Microsoft Intune manages devices, enforces compliance policies, and deploys applications. While it ensures endpoint security and compliance, it does not provide cloud app discovery, risk scoring, or session control capabilities for SaaS applications. Its function is device management rather than cloud app security.
Azure Firewall secures network traffic and blocks malicious IPs or domains. Although important for perimeter protection, it cannot monitor or prevent risky actions within cloud applications or enforce controls on real-time sessions. Its enforcement occurs at the network level rather than at the application or user level.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps provides visibility into all cloud application usage, detects risky or unsanctioned applications, evaluates cloud app risk, and enforces policies for approved applications. Real-time session controls allow organizations to block risky activities, prevent data exfiltration, and enforce governance policies within SaaS applications. Integration with Conditional Access enables adaptive access based on risk signals, while detailed reporting ensures auditability and compliance. Defender for Cloud Apps combines cloud app discovery, risk management, and session control, making it the correct solution for preventing data loss and managing shadow IT.
Question 197
Your organization wants to monitor Azure AD sign-ins for risky users, detect impossible travel scenarios, and enforce automated remediation such as MFA or password resets. Which solution should you use?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Identity
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors on-premises and hybrid Active Directory to detect identity-based attacks like lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, and Golden Ticket attacks. While critical for identity threat detection, it does not evaluate Azure AD sign-ins for impossible travel, risky user behavior, or compromised credentials in real time. Its focus is identity threat detection rather than cloud authentication risk management.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management focuses on behavioral monitoring within Microsoft 365 workloads. It detects anomalous activities such as excessive downloads, unauthorized sharing, or unusual email forwarding. While useful for insider threat detection, it does not analyze sign-in patterns, risk scores, or authentication events in Azure AD.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides endpoint security against malware, ransomware, and exploits. While it protects devices, it does not monitor Azure AD sign-ins, detect risky user behavior, or enforce automated remediation such as MFA or password resets.
Azure AD Identity Protection continuously evaluates Azure AD sign-ins using risk-based analytics. It detects anomalies such as impossible travel, logins from unfamiliar locations, or potentially compromised credentials. Risk scores allow administrators to automatically enforce remediation actions, including MFA, password resets, or access blocking. Integration with Conditional Access allows adaptive policies to restrict access based on real-time risk signals, ensuring that compromised accounts are mitigated immediately. Reporting and audit capabilities provide visibility for compliance and incident response. By combining detection, risk scoring, and automated remediation, Azure AD Identity Protection ensures a proactive approach to identity security, making it the correct solution.
Question 198
Your organization wants to continuously monitor cloud workloads across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud, detect misconfigurations, and provide prioritized remediation recommendations. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure Policy
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure Security Center
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Azure Policy enforces compliance rules for Azure resources. While effective for governance within Azure, it does not provide continuous monitoring across AWS or Google Cloud, nor does it prioritize remediation actions based on risk severity. Its function is limited to policy enforcement rather than holistic cloud security posture management.
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM solution that collects logs and detects threats. While it provides centralized monitoring and incident response, it does not evaluate cloud resource configurations continuously or provide actionable remediation for misconfigurations. Its focus is threat detection and event management rather than resource security posture.
Azure Security Center, now integrated into Microsoft Defender for Cloud, provides security recommendations and threat detection primarily for Azure resources. Although valuable for Azure environments, it lacks comprehensive multicloud coverage and prioritization for remediation actions in AWS and Google Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud continuously monitors cloud resources across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. It identifies misconfigurations, evaluates compliance against regulatory frameworks, and provides risk-prioritized remediation recommendations. Integration with native cloud APIs ensures accurate real-time assessments, while Secure Score reporting tracks improvements over time. Defender for Cloud also provides Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) features, enhancing threat detection for workloads, virtual machines, and containers. By combining CSPM and CWPP, Defender for Cloud ensures comprehensive multicloud security, proactive remediation, and regulatory compliance, making it the correct solution for continuous cloud security posture management.
Question 199
Your company wants to implement Zero Trust access policies that evaluate user identity, device compliance, and real-time risk signals before granting access to sensitive applications. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Microsoft Purview
Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on endpoint security by detecting malware, ransomware, and exploits. While it can assess device health, it does not enforce access to applications or evaluate user identity and real-time risk signals to implement Zero Trust policies. Its function is endpoint threat protection rather than access control.
Microsoft Sentinel is a SIEM solution that aggregates logs, detects threats, and manages incidents. While it supports monitoring and alerting, it does not evaluate access conditions in real time or enforce Zero Trust access policies for users and devices. Its scope is threat detection rather than access governance.
Microsoft Purview provides data governance, classification, and compliance features. While critical for data protection, it does not evaluate identity, device compliance, or risk signals before granting access to applications. Its function is content-focused rather than access control.
Azure AD Conditional Access evaluates user identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals in real time to determine access. Policies can require MFA, restrict access to managed devices, or block sessions with high risk. By integrating with Intune and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, it ensures devices meet compliance standards before granting access. This solution enables organizations to implement Zero Trust principles effectively, providing adaptive access policies that reduce risk while maintaining productivity. The combination of real-time risk evaluation, policy enforcement, and integration with other Microsoft security solutions makes Azure AD Conditional Access the correct solution.
Question 200
Your organization wants to protect sensitive information by detecting leaks, enforcing encryption, and restricting access to documents and emails in Microsoft 365. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Azure AD Conditional Access
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides threat protection for devices, including malware and ransomware detection. While it secures endpoints, it does not detect leaks, enforce encryption, or restrict access to sensitive documents and emails in Microsoft 365. Its focus is endpoint security rather than data loss prevention.
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies based on user, device, location, or risk signals. While it can block access to resources based on compliance, it does not analyze content, detect leaks, or enforce data protection policies for Microsoft 365 workloads. Its function is access management rather than content protection.
Azure Firewall secures network traffic by filtering inbound and outbound connections. Although important for perimeter protection, it cannot monitor document or email content for sensitive data, nor enforce encryption or access restrictions. Its enforcement occurs at the network layer rather than the content layer.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) monitors documents and emails across Microsoft 365, including Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. It detects sensitive content, enforces encryption, restricts access, and provides real-time policy enforcement to prevent data leaks. Integration with Microsoft Purview Information Protection enhances classification and labeling, ensuring sensitive information is consistently protected. DLP also provides audit logs and reporting for compliance and investigation purposes. By combining detection, protection, and governance, Microsoft Purview DLP ensures sensitive data remains secure, mitigates risk, and complies with regulatory standards, making it the correct solution for data loss prevention across Microsoft 365.
Question 201
Your organization wants to implement just-in-time access for privileged roles in Azure AD, enforce Multi-Factor Authentication for activation, and log all actions for compliance audits. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Microsoft Defender for Identity
C) Microsoft Intune
D) Azure AD Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity is designed to detect identity-based attacks such as Pass-the-Ticket, Golden Ticket, and lateral movement in on-premises and hybrid Active Directory environments. While it provides advanced threat detection, it does not manage privileged accounts, enforce just-in-time role activation, or record audit logs of privileged activity. Its primary focus is on threat detection rather than privilege governance.
Microsoft Intune manages device compliance, configuration, and app deployment. Although it ensures that devices meet security standards and supports conditional access policies, it does not provide administrative role management or detailed logging of privileged account activities. Its scope is endpoint and device management, not privilege management.
Azure AD Conditional Access evaluates identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals to enforce access policies. While it can require MFA for access to applications and services, it does not manage just-in-time privileged roles, provide approval workflows, or log all administrative actions for compliance. Its function is access control rather than comprehensive privilege governance.
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) allows organizations to enforce least-privilege access by granting temporary roles that expire automatically. It requires Multi-Factor Authentication for activation, supports approval workflows, and logs all administrative actions to provide detailed audit trails for compliance. Integration with Azure AD and Microsoft 365 ensures consistent governance across hybrid environments. By reducing standing privileges and providing transparency into privileged activity, PIM strengthens security posture, meets regulatory requirements, and ensures accountability. Its combination of just-in-time access, MFA enforcement, and auditing makes it the correct solution for managing privileged roles securely and compliantly.
Question 202
Your organization wants to classify and label sensitive documents and emails automatically, apply encryption, and enforce retention policies across Microsoft 365 workloads. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Azure AD Conditional Access
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint protects endpoints from malware, ransomware, and exploits. While it secures devices, it does not classify documents or emails, apply encryption, or enforce retention policies within Microsoft 365 workloads. Its scope is endpoint threat protection, not content protection.
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies based on user identity, device compliance, location, or risk signals. Although it restricts access to sensitive resources, it does not classify or label documents, nor does it apply encryption or retention policies to content. Its function is access control rather than data governance.
Azure Firewall filters inbound and outbound network traffic to block malicious connections. While essential for network security, it cannot identify sensitive content, enforce encryption, or manage document and email retention policies within Microsoft 365 services. Its enforcement occurs at the network layer rather than the content layer.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection enables automatic classification and labeling of sensitive content in Microsoft 365 workloads such as Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. It can detect predefined sensitive information types or custom patterns, apply encryption, restrict access, and enforce retention policies. Integration with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention ensures monitoring and enforcement, while reporting provides visibility and compliance tracking. By automatically identifying and protecting sensitive content, organizations reduce the risk of data leaks, comply with regulations, and maintain a secure and well-governed data environment. This combination of automated classification, labeling, protection, and retention makes Purview Information Protection the correct solution.
Question 203
Your company wants to detect insider threats such as unusual downloads, email forwarding, and excessive sharing in Microsoft 365, and generate actionable alerts for security teams. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates sign-ins and identifies risky users based on anomalies like impossible travel, anonymous IP logins, or leaked credentials. While critical for identity security, it does not monitor user behavior, document sharing, or communication patterns in Microsoft 365 workloads. Its focus is authentication risk, not insider threat detection.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint protects endpoints against malware, ransomware, and exploits. While it secures devices, it does not monitor user behavior in Microsoft 365 or generate alerts for unusual activity such as excessive downloads or email forwarding. Its scope is endpoint threat protection rather than insider risk management.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention enforces policies to prevent accidental or intentional data leaks by monitoring content. Although it protects sensitive data, it does not analyze user behavior, detect anomalies, or assign risk scores to generate actionable alerts for insider threats. Its primary focus is content protection, not behavior monitoring.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management continuously analyzes user activity across Microsoft 365, including Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. It detects abnormal behavior such as excessive downloads, unauthorized sharing, or suspicious email forwarding. Machine learning assigns risk scores, generates alerts, and provides security teams with actionable cases for investigation. Integration with DLP enhances protection of sensitive information. By combining behavioral analytics, risk scoring, and alerts, Insider Risk Management allows organizations to proactively mitigate insider threats while maintaining compliance, making it the correct solution.
Question 204
Your organization wants to monitor hybrid Active Directory environments to detect lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, and Golden Ticket attacks, and provide alerts in real time for security operations teams. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
Explanation:
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management manages privileged roles and just-in-time access for Azure AD. While it reduces risks associated with standing administrative privileges, it does not monitor authentication traffic or detect advanced attacks such as lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, or Golden Ticket attacks. Its focus is privilege management, not identity threat detection.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management monitors user behavior within Microsoft 365, identifying anomalies such as excessive downloads or suspicious sharing. While it mitigates insider threats, it does not analyze Active Directory authentication events or detect attacks targeting hybrid AD environments. Its focus is behavioral monitoring rather than identity threat detection.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint protects devices against malware, ransomware, and exploits. Although endpoints may be involved in attack paths, it does not detect lateral movement or authentication-based attacks in Active Directory. Its scope is device security rather than identity monitoring.
Microsoft Defender for Identity continuously monitors on-premises and hybrid Active Directory environments to detect identity-based attacks such as lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, and Golden Ticket attacks. Behavioral analytics and machine learning identify anomalous activity, generate real-time alerts, and provide actionable intelligence for security operations. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel enables centralized monitoring and automated response workflows. By focusing specifically on identity threats in hybrid AD, Defender for Identity ensures timely detection, risk mitigation, and operational visibility, making it the correct solution.
Question 205
Your organization wants to enforce Zero Trust access policies for sensitive applications, requiring evaluation of user identity, device compliance, and session risk before granting access. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Microsoft Purview
Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on endpoint threat protection, including malware, ransomware, and exploit detection. While it evaluates device health, it does not enforce access policies based on user identity, session risk, or compliance status. Its scope is endpoint security rather than access control.
Microsoft Sentinel aggregates logs, detects threats, and coordinates incident response. While valuable for monitoring and alerting, it does not evaluate access conditions in real time or enforce Zero Trust policies for applications and sessions. Its focus is threat detection and incident management rather than access governance.
Microsoft Purview provides data governance, classification, and compliance features. While important for protecting data, it does not evaluate identity, device compliance, or risk before granting access to applications. Its primary function is content governance, not access control.
Azure AD Conditional Access evaluates multiple signals, including user identity, device compliance, location, and session risk, before granting access to sensitive applications. Policies can require MFA, restrict access to compliant devices, or block risky sessions. Integration with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint enhances device compliance enforcement, while real-time evaluation ensures that access decisions align with Zero Trust principles. By providing adaptive access based on risk, Conditional Access ensures secure and controlled access to applications, making it the correct solution.
Question 206
Your organization wants to detect compromised user accounts, enforce risk-based sign-in policies, and automatically trigger Multi-Factor Authentication or password resets for high-risk accounts. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Identity
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors hybrid and on-premises Active Directory environments for advanced attacks such as Pass-the-Ticket, Golden Ticket, and lateral movement. While it is critical for detecting identity-based attacks on-premises, it does not provide cloud-based risk scoring, enforce risk-based sign-in policies, or automate remediation for compromised Azure AD accounts. Its primary focus is identity threat detection rather than cloud authentication risk management.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management analyzes user activity within Microsoft 365 workloads to detect anomalous behavior indicative of insider threats, such as excessive downloads, email forwarding, or unauthorized sharing. While effective for insider threat detection, it does not evaluate sign-ins, assess account compromise, or enforce risk-based remediation actions like MFA or password resets. Its scope is behavioral monitoring rather than authentication risk enforcement.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint protects devices from malware, ransomware, and exploits. While essential for endpoint security, it does not monitor cloud authentication, assess sign-in risk, or enforce access remediation for high-risk accounts. Its primary function is endpoint threat protection rather than identity risk management.
Azure AD Identity Protection continuously evaluates Azure AD sign-ins for risk, including unusual locations, impossible travel, anonymous IP addresses, or leaked credentials. It assigns risk scores to users and automatically enforces remediation actions based on policy, such as requiring Multi-Factor Authentication, initiating password resets, or blocking access for high-risk accounts. Integration with Conditional Access allows adaptive policies that respond in real time to emerging threats. Audit logs provide visibility and compliance tracking, enabling security teams to understand, investigate, and mitigate identity risks proactively. By combining detection, risk scoring, and automated remediation, Azure AD Identity Protection ensures that compromised accounts are handled quickly, minimizing potential security breaches and making it the correct solution for enforcing risk-based sign-in policies.
Question 207
Your organization wants to continuously monitor cloud workloads across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud, identify misconfigurations, and provide prioritized recommendations for remediation. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure Policy
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure Security Center
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Azure Policy evaluates resource compliance within Azure and enforces organizational standards. While effective for policy governance in Azure, it does not extend to AWS or Google Cloud, nor does it provide continuous monitoring or risk-based prioritization for remediation actions. Its primary function is policy enforcement rather than comprehensive cloud security posture management.
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM platform that collects security logs, detects threats, and manages incidents. While valuable for threat detection and centralized monitoring, it does not continuously assess cloud resource configurations or provide actionable, prioritized remediation guidance. Its scope is threat monitoring rather than resource security management.
Azure Security Center, now integrated into Microsoft Defender for Cloud, provides recommendations for Azure resources but does not offer multicloud visibility or prioritization of remediation actions across AWS and Google Cloud. While useful for Azure workloads, it lacks comprehensive CSPM functionality.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud continuously monitors cloud resources across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. It identifies misconfigurations, evaluates compliance with regulatory standards, and provides risk-prioritized remediation recommendations. Secure Score reporting helps track improvements over time, while Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) capabilities protect virtual machines, containers, and applications. By combining CSPM and CWPP, Defender for Cloud provides continuous assessment, proactive remediation, and enhanced visibility into multicloud environments. This enables organizations to maintain a strong security posture, address misconfigurations promptly, and ensure regulatory compliance, making it the correct solution for continuous cloud workload security.
Question 208
Your organization wants to implement Zero Trust access policies for sensitive applications, evaluating user identity, device compliance, and session risk before granting access. Which solution should you use?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Microsoft Purview
Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint secures devices against malware, ransomware, and exploits. While it can provide device compliance signals to Conditional Access, it does not evaluate user identity, session risk, or enforce access policies to applications based on Zero Trust principles. Its scope is endpoint protection rather than adaptive access control.
Microsoft Sentinel aggregates logs, detects threats, and manages incidents. Although it is critical for monitoring and alerting, it does not evaluate real-time access conditions or enforce Zero Trust policies for sensitive applications. Its primary function is security information and event management rather than access governance.
Microsoft Purview focuses on data classification, labeling, and governance. While it helps protect sensitive information, it does not enforce access policies based on identity, device compliance, or session risk. Its scope is data governance rather than application access control.
Azure AD Conditional Access evaluates multiple risk signals, including user identity, device compliance, location, and real-time session risk, before granting access to applications. Policies can require Multi-Factor Authentication, restrict access to compliant devices, or block risky sessions. Integration with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint ensures devices meet security standards before access. This combination allows organizations to implement adaptive, risk-based access controls that align with Zero Trust principles. By evaluating user and device risk in real time and enforcing access policies dynamically, Conditional Access reduces exposure to threats and ensures secure access, making it the correct solution.
Question 209
Your company wants to monitor insider threats by detecting unusual downloads, excessive sharing, and email forwarding in Microsoft 365 and generate actionable alerts for investigation. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management (IRM) is a specialized service designed to detect, investigate, and mitigate insider threats by monitoring user behavior across Microsoft 365 workloads. Insider threats include malicious or inadvertent actions by employees, contractors, or trusted third parties that may compromise organizational data, intellectual property, or sensitive business processes. Insider Risk Management uses advanced analytics, machine learning, and policy-driven insights to evaluate activities such as document downloads, email forwarding, unauthorized sharing, unusual access patterns, and other indicators of potential insider risk. By continuously monitoring activity across Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and other integrated Microsoft 365 services, it provides a comprehensive view of user behavior, enabling organizations to proactively identify risky activities before they result in data loss, compliance violations, or operational damage.
Azure AD Identity Protection is a cloud-based solution that evaluates authentication events to detect identity-related risks, including compromised credentials, risky sign-ins, impossible travel scenarios, or suspicious token usage. Identity Protection assigns risk scores to users and sessions based on behavioral and contextual signals, helping organizations enforce adaptive policies such as conditional access or multi-factor authentication. While Identity Protection is essential for mitigating identity compromise and credential misuse, it does not analyze user activity within Microsoft 365 workloads such as email, document sharing, or collaboration behaviors. It does not detect insider threats related to sensitive content handling or anomalous user interactions with corporate data. Its primary scope is identity security and risk management rather than behavioral threat detection within collaboration platforms.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive endpoint protection platform focused on securing devices from malware, ransomware, exploits, and advanced persistent threats. Defender for Endpoint continuously monitors endpoint behavior, applies threat intelligence, and automates investigation and remediation processes to protect devices from compromise. While endpoint security is critical for preventing malware propagation, device compromise, and lateral movement attacks, it does not provide behavioral monitoring for insider threat scenarios within Microsoft 365. Defender for Endpoint lacks the capability to analyze email forwarding patterns, unusual document access, or unauthorized sharing across cloud workloads. Its primary function is device-level threat detection, making it complementary but not sufficient for insider risk management.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is designed to protect sensitive information by identifying, monitoring, and controlling the movement of critical data across Microsoft 365 services. DLP policies detect sensitive content such as personally identifiable information (PII), financial data, health records, or intellectual property and prevent accidental or intentional exfiltration via email, downloads, or cloud sharing. While DLP provides strong content protection, it does not assign risk scores to users, generate actionable alerts for insider threat scenarios, or analyze behavioral anomalies that may indicate malicious intent. Its scope is focused on preventing sensitive data leakage rather than evaluating patterns of risky behavior, making it distinct from insider risk management solutions.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management combines behavioral monitoring with machine learning to identify and assess risky activities within Microsoft 365. It continuously ingests signals from Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and other connected services, analyzing patterns such as excessive file downloads, repeated sharing with external recipients, abnormal email forwarding, access to sensitive content during off-hours, and attempts to bypass data security controls. These patterns are evaluated against organizational policies and risk indicators, allowing the system to assign risk scores that quantify the likelihood that an activity represents a potential insider threat. High-risk behaviors trigger alerts for security or compliance teams, enabling prompt investigation and mitigation.
Machine learning in Insider Risk Management improves detection accuracy by establishing baseline behaviors for users and identifying deviations that may indicate risky actions. The system can differentiate between legitimate workflow activity and anomalous behavior that could pose a threat. For example, an employee who suddenly downloads a large volume of sensitive documents or shares them externally may be flagged for review. Similarly, a contractor accessing critical intellectual property outside of normal hours or from unusual locations may generate risk alerts. These signals are correlated to provide context for analysts, allowing them to understand the intent, scope, and potential impact of the behavior.
Integration with DLP enhances Insider Risk Management’s ability to detect activities involving sensitive information. When DLP policies identify sensitive content accessed or shared by users, Insider Risk Management evaluates the associated user behavior to determine whether the activity is part of a potential insider threat. For example, if a user attempts to download multiple files containing classified data in a short period, DLP detects the sensitive content while Insider Risk Management assesses whether the pattern indicates unusual or risky behavior. This combined approach allows organizations to respond proactively to both data exposure risks and behavioral threats, maintaining compliance and protecting critical business assets.
Insider Risk Management supports policy configuration to define what constitutes risky behavior for the organization. Policies can be tailored to specific roles, departments, or sensitivity levels of data. Organizations can create rules that evaluate a combination of user actions, content sensitivity, and contextual signals, enabling risk scoring and prioritization. Alerts can be configured to notify security teams, compliance officers, or managers, and automated workflows can be established to guide investigations and remediation actions. This ensures that insider threats are addressed consistently and in accordance with organizational policies.
Investigation capabilities within Insider Risk Management provide detailed insights into user activities and contextual information about potential risks. Analysts can view timelines of user actions, access patterns, shared content, and related communications, enabling comprehensive assessments of incidents. The platform supports collaboration among security, legal, and HR teams to ensure that investigations are thorough, evidence-based, and compliant with organizational procedures and regulatory requirements. Detailed reporting and dashboards offer visibility into risk trends, policy effectiveness, and the overall insider threat landscape within the organization.
Insider Risk Management also supports automated response and integration with other Microsoft security services. Alerts can trigger workflow automation in Microsoft Power Automate or integration with Microsoft Sentinel for advanced correlation with other security telemetry. This allows organizations to implement immediate mitigation steps, such as restricting access to sensitive content, flagging accounts for review, or escalating incidents to the appropriate teams. By integrating detection, investigation, and response capabilities, Insider Risk Management creates a comprehensive approach to reducing the impact of insider threats while maintaining operational efficiency.
Behavioral monitoring in Insider Risk Management covers a wide range of activities. It tracks document access and movement, email communication patterns, collaboration activities in Teams, and file sharing across SharePoint and OneDrive. It can also detect attempts to circumvent security controls, such as using personal storage accounts, forwarding emails to external domains, or manipulating file permissions. Risk scoring combines multiple indicators to generate an overall assessment of potential threat level, allowing organizations to prioritize their response to the highest-risk activities first.
Insider Risk Management helps organizations maintain regulatory compliance and protect sensitive data. Many industries require monitoring and mitigation of insider threats to meet legal or regulatory obligations, and the platform provides the tools needed to demonstrate proactive security measures. By documenting detected activities, risk scoring, alerts, and response actions, organizations can provide auditors with evidence of compliance, reduce liability, and strengthen internal governance.
By continuously monitoring user activity, analyzing behavioral patterns, applying machine learning for risk scoring, generating actionable alerts, and integrating with DLP and other security solutions, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management enables organizations to detect, investigate, and mitigate insider threats effectively. It provides security teams with visibility into anomalous activities, prioritization based on risk, and actionable intelligence to protect sensitive data, maintain compliance, and reduce the likelihood of insider-related incidents while complementing identity, endpoint, and data protection solutions across Microsoft 365 workloads.
Question 210
Your organization wants to detect advanced identity attacks, including Pass-the-Ticket, Golden Ticket, and lateral movement in hybrid Active Directory environments, and alert security teams in real time. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity is an enterprise-grade security solution specifically designed to protect hybrid and on-premises Active Directory (AD) environments. Its primary purpose is to detect identity-based attacks, including lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, Golden Ticket attacks, and other advanced persistent threats targeting directory services. By continuously monitoring authentication events, replication traffic, and changes within AD, it identifies suspicious activity that may indicate compromise, misuse of privileged accounts, or attempts to escalate access. This service leverages behavioral analytics, machine learning, and a deep understanding of Active Directory protocols to differentiate normal user behavior from malicious or anomalous activity. Defender for Identity allows organizations to respond proactively to identity threats rather than reacting to incidents after they occur.
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on managing privileged roles within Azure AD, providing just-in-time administrative access, approval workflows, and logging of administrative actions for compliance purposes. PIM helps reduce the risks associated with standing administrative privileges by ensuring that elevated access is granted only when needed and monitored for accountability. While PIM is critical for governance, compliance, and reducing over-privileged accounts, it does not actively monitor authentication traffic in on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments. It does not detect advanced identity attacks such as lateral movement between systems, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, or Golden Ticket attacks, which are tactics commonly used by sophisticated threat actors to compromise domain controllers or persist in AD environments. Its focus is privilege management rather than continuous identity threat detection. PIM’s value lies in controlling who can perform sensitive actions within Azure AD and logging those actions, which complements security monitoring but does not replace proactive detection of attacks.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is designed to analyze user behavior within Microsoft 365 workloads to identify potential insider threats. This solution monitors patterns such as excessive document downloads, unusual file sharing, risky email activity, or abnormal collaboration behaviors. It leverages machine learning and policy-driven alerts to flag potential insider risks, providing organizations with a framework to investigate and mitigate internal threats. Although effective for detecting policy violations or anomalous behavior within M365 applications, Purview Insider Risk Management does not evaluate Active Directory authentication events, nor does it detect lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, or Golden Ticket attacks in hybrid AD environments. Its scope is behavioral monitoring for insider threat detection, focusing on user activities rather than identity compromise at the domain or authentication protocol level. It provides valuable insights into internal misuse or accidental exposure but does not actively protect the directory from sophisticated identity attacks.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust endpoint protection platform designed to defend devices from malware, ransomware, exploits, and other advanced threats. It provides real-time threat detection, automated investigation and response, and integration with centralized security operations platforms such as Microsoft Sentinel. While Defender for Endpoint may detect suspicious activity on devices that could be part of an attack path in a hybrid environment, it does not monitor Active Directory authentication events directly. It cannot identify lateral movement attempts, Pass-the-Ticket, or Golden Ticket attacks because these attacks typically exploit domain-level credentials, ticketing mechanisms, or replication protocols that do not necessarily generate endpoint-specific malware signals. Its focus is on securing endpoints, reducing attack surfaces, and remediating device-level threats, making it complementary to directory-focused monitoring but not sufficient for identity-focused threat detection.
Microsoft Defender for Identity continuously monitors authentication events, replication traffic, LDAP queries, Kerberos tickets, and other directory interactions in hybrid and on-premises Active Directory environments. It analyzes these activities using behavioral analytics and machine learning to detect anomalies that may indicate compromise or malicious activity. For example, lateral movement, which involves attackers moving from one compromised machine to another to escalate privileges or gain access to sensitive resources, can be detected by tracking unusual authentication requests or abnormal account behavior. Pass-the-Ticket attacks, in which attackers reuse stolen Kerberos tickets to authenticate without knowing the account password, are identified by correlating ticket usage patterns and unusual logon behaviors. Golden Ticket attacks, where attackers forge Kerberos tickets to gain domain-wide access, are detected through deviations from normal ticket lifetimes, ticket issuance sources, and access patterns.
Real-time alerts generated by Defender for Identity provide actionable intelligence to security teams, enabling immediate investigation and remediation. These alerts are prioritized based on risk level, type of attack, and potential impact, allowing security teams to focus on the most critical threats. Detailed forensic data accompanying each alert includes the affected accounts, devices, IP addresses, timestamps, and observed suspicious behaviors. This information supports rapid threat containment, investigation, and subsequent mitigation strategies.
Integration with Microsoft Sentinel enhances the value of Defender for Identity by centralizing threat monitoring across the organization. Sentinel acts as a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platform, aggregating alerts from multiple sources, including Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, Azure AD logs, and other security solutions. Correlation rules in Sentinel enable the combination of identity alerts with endpoint, network, and application telemetry, providing a holistic view of potential attack campaigns. Automated playbooks can trigger responses such as temporarily disabling compromised accounts, notifying administrators, or isolating suspicious endpoints, thereby reducing dwell time and potential impact.
Defender for Identity also provides baseline behavioral profiles for users and devices, which are continuously refined using machine learning. These profiles establish a “normal” pattern of authentication and access activity, against which anomalies are detected. The system can identify unusual logons at unexpected times, from uncommon locations, or across multiple devices, highlighting behaviors that may signify credential theft or compromise. This approach ensures high detection accuracy while minimizing false positives.
Attack detection in hybrid AD environments includes monitoring on-premises domain controllers, Azure AD synchronized accounts, and federated identities. Defender for Identity can detect suspicious replication requests, abnormal service ticket activity, unusual modifications to privileged groups, and anomalous credential usage patterns. These capabilities are essential in preventing attackers from escalating privileges, creating persistence mechanisms, or accessing sensitive resources undetected. Continuous monitoring of directory-level interactions ensures that even complex attacks leveraging advanced techniques are identified early.
Advanced reporting capabilities allow security teams to analyze historical trends, identify recurring threats, and refine detection rules. Administrators can generate reports showing the number of alerts by type, affected users, attack stages, and remediation actions taken. This information supports regulatory compliance, executive reporting, and strategic improvements to the security posture. The solution also supports automated response integration, including coordination with Conditional Access policies to restrict access for compromised users or devices detected as part of an attack sequence.
Defender for Identity complements other Microsoft security solutions, creating a multi-layered defense framework. While PIM reduces the risk of over-privileged accounts, and Defender for Endpoint protects devices from malware and exploits, Defender for Identity focuses specifically on detecting and mitigating attacks targeting directory services and identity credentials. This combination ensures that attacks targeting both users and devices are addressed across multiple layers, with coordinated alerts, investigation, and remediation workflows.
By continuously monitoring hybrid and on-premises Active Directory environments, analyzing authentication traffic, applying machine learning for behavioral anomaly detection, and providing real-time alerts, Microsoft Defender for Identity ensures comprehensive protection against lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, Golden Ticket attacks, and other identity-focused threats. Its integration with Microsoft Sentinel, automated response capabilities, and detailed forensic data provide security teams with actionable insights, rapid remediation options, and a robust framework for managing hybrid AD security risks while complementing device protection and privilege management strategies.