View Full ACAMS CAMS Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps

 

Question 61. Which activity is a common indicator of potential money laundering?

1. Regular salary payments
2. Transactions inconsistent with the customer’s known profile
3. Routine utility payments
4. Normal account maintenance

Correct Answer: 2. Transactions inconsistent with the customer’s known profile

Explanation:

Transactions that are inconsistent with a customer’s established profile can be an important indicator of potential money laundering. Financial institutions generally develop an understanding of a customer’s expected activity based on factors such as occupation, business type, income, geography, account purpose, and historical transaction behavior. A sudden increase in transaction volume, unexplained international transfers, or activity involving unrelated businesses may warrant additional review. However, an unusual transaction is not automatically proof of criminal activity. AML professionals should consider the customer’s circumstances, available information, and other risk indicators before determining whether escalation or further investigation is appropriate.

Question 62. What is the primary purpose of transaction monitoring in an AML program?

1. To eliminate all customer transactions
2. To guarantee that no financial crime occurs
3. To identify potentially unusual or suspicious activity
4. To replace customer due diligence

Correct Answer: 3. To identify potentially unusual or suspicious activity

Explanation:

Transaction monitoring is designed to identify activity that may be unusual, inconsistent with customer expectations, or indicative of money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions evasion, or other financial crime. Monitoring systems may use rules, scenarios, thresholds, behavioral analysis, or other techniques to identify transactions requiring review. An alert does not establish that suspicious activity has occurred; it creates a trigger for investigation. AML professionals must evaluate the alert in context, considering the customer’s profile, transaction history, source of funds, counterparties, geography, and other relevant information. Effective monitoring supports the institution’s broader risk-based AML framework.

Question 63. What should an AML investigator primarily consider when reviewing an alert?

1. The customer’s transaction activity and relevant risk information
2. The customer’s preferred communication method
3. The age of the customer’s account alone
4. The number of employees at the financial institution

Correct Answer: 1. The customer’s transaction activity and relevant risk information

Explanation:

An AML investigator should assess an alert within the broader context of the customer’s relationship and risk profile. Relevant considerations can include transaction patterns, expected account activity, customer occupation or business, source of funds, geographic exposure, counterparties, previous alerts, adverse information, and other available due diligence. Reviewing only the individual transaction may result in an incomplete assessment. Investigators should determine whether there is a reasonable explanation for the activity and whether the available evidence supports closing the alert or escalating the matter. A structured investigation helps ensure decisions are consistent, documented, and supported by relevant facts.

Question 64. Which customer characteristic may increase AML risk?

1. Simple and transparent ownership
2. Consistent low-value activity matching the customer’s profile
3. A well-documented domestic salary
4. Complex ownership involving multiple jurisdictions

Correct Answer: 4. Complex ownership involving multiple jurisdictions

Explanation:

Complex ownership structures involving multiple jurisdictions may increase AML risk because they can make it more difficult to identify the individuals who ultimately own or control a legal entity. Multiple layers of companies, trusts, nominees, or offshore entities can create additional transparency challenges and may require enhanced due diligence. The existence of a complex structure does not itself mean that illicit activity is occurring. AML professionals should understand the legitimate purpose of the structure, identify beneficial owners, assess the jurisdictions involved, and determine whether the ownership arrangement is consistent with the customer’s stated business activities and overall risk profile.

Question 65. What is the purpose of identifying the beneficial owner of a legal entity?

1. To determine the company’s marketing strategy
2. To identify the natural person who ultimately owns or controls the entity
3. To determine the company’s tax rate only
4. To identify every employee of the company

Correct Answer: 2. To identify the natural person who ultimately owns or controls the entity

Explanation:

Beneficial ownership requirements are intended to establish who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity. Identifying beneficial owners helps financial institutions understand the individuals behind a corporate customer rather than relying solely on the company’s registered name or intermediary ownership layers. This information supports customer due diligence, risk assessment, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity investigations. Ownership and control can sometimes be difficult to establish where companies have multiple shareholders, nominee arrangements, trusts, or entities in different jurisdictions. Institutions should apply their applicable legal and regulatory requirements when determining and verifying beneficial ownership and should document the basis for their conclusions.

Question 66. What is a major AML concern associated with shell companies?

1. They always have too many employees
2. They cannot conduct international business
3. They may obscure ownership and the purpose of transactions
4. They are automatically illegal

Correct Answer: 3. They may obscure ownership and the purpose of transactions

Explanation:

Shell companies can present AML concerns when their ownership, control, business purpose, or transaction activity is difficult to understand. A shell company is not automatically illegal, and legitimate businesses may use corporate entities for lawful commercial or investment purposes. The risk arises when corporate structures are used to conceal beneficial owners, disguise the origin or destination of funds, create layers of transactions, or make economic activity difficult to explain. AML professionals should evaluate the entity’s business rationale, ownership structure, jurisdictions, expected activity, counterparties, and source of funds rather than treating the existence of a shell company alone as conclusive evidence of financial crime.

Question 67. What is the purpose of enhanced due diligence (EDD)?

1. To eliminate all high-risk customers
2. To apply additional measures to understand and manage higher risks
3. To avoid collecting customer information
4. To replace ongoing monitoring

Correct Answer: 2. To apply additional measures to understand and manage higher risks

Explanation:

Enhanced due diligence is used when a customer or relationship presents increased money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions, or other financial crime risk. EDD may involve obtaining additional information about the customer’s identity, business activities, source of wealth, source of funds, ownership structure, expected activity, geographic connections, or counterparties. Depending on applicable requirements and institutional policies, additional approval or more frequent monitoring may also be appropriate. EDD does not necessarily mean that a relationship must be rejected. Instead, it provides additional information and controls that help the institution understand the risk and determine whether the relationship can be managed appropriately.

Question 68. Which factor is commonly considered when assessing geographic AML risk?

1. The customer’s preferred account statement format
2. The customer’s favorite currency
3. The color of the customer’s company logo
4. Exposure to jurisdictions with elevated financial crime risks

Correct Answer: 4. Exposure to jurisdictions with elevated financial crime risks

Explanation:

Geographic exposure is an important factor in AML risk assessment. Institutions may consider where a customer resides, operates, sends or receives funds, conducts business, or maintains significant counterparties. Certain jurisdictions may present elevated risks because of factors such as corruption concerns, weak AML controls, sanctions exposure, organized crime, terrorist financing concerns, or other documented financial crime vulnerabilities. Geographic risk should not be assessed solely by applying a simplistic country label. Institutions should consider the specific nature of the customer’s connection to the jurisdiction, applicable regulatory requirements, transaction purpose, and other customer-specific risk factors before determining the appropriate level of controls.

Question 69. What does source of funds refer to?

1. The specific origin of money used in a transaction or relationship
2. The customer’s mailing address
3. The institution’s annual revenue
4. The customer’s employment history only

Correct Answer: 1. The specific origin of money used in a transaction or relationship

Explanation:

Source of funds refers to where the money involved in a particular transaction or customer relationship originated. Examples may include salary income, business revenue, sale proceeds, investment returns, inheritance, or other legitimate sources. Understanding the source of funds can help an institution determine whether the financial activity is consistent with the customer’s profile and stated purpose. Source of funds differs from source of wealth, which generally concerns how a customer’s overall wealth was accumulated. For higher-risk relationships, institutions may request additional documentation or information to establish a reasonable understanding of the origin of funds and assess whether the activity presents unexplained risks.

Question 70. What does source of wealth primarily describe?

1. The location of a customer’s bank branch
2. The customer’s transaction monitoring threshold
3. How a customer accumulated their overall wealth
4. The name of the customer’s employer only

Correct Answer: 3. How a customer accumulated their overall wealth

Explanation:

Source of wealth concerns the origin of a customer’s overall financial wealth. It may arise from legitimate business ownership, employment income accumulated over time, investments, inheritance, property sales, or other lawful activities. Understanding source of wealth can be particularly relevant for higher-risk customers and relationships involving substantial assets or unusual financial activity. It is distinct from source of funds, which focuses on the origin of particular money being used in a transaction. AML professionals should consider whether the customer’s stated wealth accumulation is reasonable in light of available information and should obtain appropriate supporting evidence when required by risk and regulatory considerations.

Question 71. What is a common red flag involving cash deposits?

1. A deposit matching the customer’s normal salary
2. Numerous cash deposits that appear structured to avoid reporting thresholds
3. A routine cash withdrawal for a documented business expense
4. A single small deposit consistent with account history

Correct Answer: 2. Numerous cash deposits that appear structured to avoid reporting thresholds

Explanation:

Repeated cash deposits that appear deliberately divided into smaller amounts may indicate structuring, particularly when the activity seems designed to avoid applicable reporting or recordkeeping requirements. Investigators should examine the timing, locations, amounts, account relationships, customer profile, and overall transaction pattern. Structuring is a recognized AML concern because individuals may attempt to make transactions less noticeable by keeping individual amounts below certain reporting thresholds. However, institutions should not conclude that structuring occurred based only on transaction amounts. The complete pattern and available customer information should be evaluated, documented, and escalated when the facts support further investigation.

Question 72. Which activity may indicate possible structuring?

1. One annual insurance payment
2. Regular payroll deposits from an identified employer
3. A mortgage payment consistent with the customer’s income
4. Repeated deposits deliberately kept below a reporting threshold

Correct Answer: 4. Repeated deposits deliberately kept below a reporting threshold

Explanation:

Structuring involves arranging transactions to avoid applicable reporting or recordkeeping requirements. A potential indicator is a series of deposits or withdrawals that repeatedly remain just below a relevant threshold, particularly when the pattern has no clear legitimate explanation. Investigators may examine whether transactions occur across multiple branches, accounts, individuals, or institutions and whether the customer appears to be attempting to conceal the aggregate amount. The threshold itself is not proof of criminal activity. Legitimate customers can also make similarly sized transactions. AML professionals should therefore evaluate the broader circumstances and document the reasoning behind any decision to close or escalate the activity.

Question 73. Why are correspondent banking relationships considered important from an AML perspective?

1. They eliminate the need for customer due diligence
2. They can create additional risks because one institution may process transactions for another institution’s customers
3. They prevent international transactions
4. They guarantee that all transactions are legitimate

Correct Answer: 2. They can create additional risks because one institution may process transactions for another institution’s customers

Explanation:

Correspondent banking relationships can create additional AML risks because a financial institution may provide services that allow another institution’s customers to access payment or financial services indirectly. The correspondent institution may have limited direct visibility into the underlying customers and transactions. Appropriate due diligence on the respondent institution is therefore important. Depending on the relationship and applicable requirements, institutions may assess the respondent’s ownership, management, business activities, AML controls, regulatory environment, reputation, and expected transaction activity. Effective correspondent banking controls help institutions understand the risks associated with providing services to other financial institutions and support appropriate ongoing monitoring.

Question 74. What should a bank consider when conducting due diligence on a respondent bank?

1. The respondent bank’s AML controls and ownership
2. The color of its corporate branding
3. The number of social media followers it has
4. The preferred office furniture of its employees

Correct Answer: 1. The respondent bank’s AML controls and ownership

Explanation:

Due diligence on a respondent bank should help the correspondent institution understand the nature and risk of the relationship. Relevant information can include the respondent’s ownership structure, management, business activities, jurisdictions, regulatory status, AML and sanctions controls, reputation, and expected use of the correspondent account. The institution should also understand whether the respondent has appropriate procedures for identifying and monitoring its customers and transactions. The extent of due diligence should reflect the risk presented by the relationship. A strong assessment helps the correspondent institution determine whether the relationship can be managed within its AML risk appetite and applicable regulatory requirements.

Question 75. What is trade-based money laundering (TBML)?

1. Money laundering conducted exclusively through cash withdrawals
2. The use of trade transactions or trade-related mechanisms to move or disguise illicit value
3. A method used only by securities firms
4. A routine international shipping process

Correct Answer: 2. The use of trade transactions or trade-related mechanisms to move or disguise illicit value

Explanation:

Trade-based money laundering involves using legitimate-looking trade transactions to transfer value or disguise the proceeds of illicit activity. Criminals may manipulate invoices, quantities, prices, descriptions, shipping information, or counterparties to move value across borders while creating the appearance of ordinary commercial activity. TBML can be difficult to detect because trade transactions may involve multiple parties, jurisdictions, currencies, financial institutions, and complex documentation. AML professionals should consider whether the transaction makes commercial sense and whether the parties, goods, prices, routes, and payment patterns are consistent with the stated business purpose. Unusual trade activity may warrant enhanced review.

Question 76. Which is a potential indicator of trade-based money laundering?

1. Consistent pricing supported by normal commercial documentation
2. A routine domestic purchase from a known supplier
3. Trade transactions involving unexplained price discrepancies
4. Regular payments matching established contracts

Correct Answer: 3. Trade transactions involving unexplained price discrepancies

Explanation:

Unexplained discrepancies between the stated value of goods and their apparent market value can be a potential TBML indicator. Investigators may also examine unusually complex trade structures, inconsistent product descriptions, unusual shipping routes, transactions involving unrelated counterparties, repeated amendments to trade documents, or payments that do not correspond with the underlying commercial activity. No single indicator establishes that TBML has occurred. A legitimate business may have unusual pricing for many reasons, including specialized products, market conditions, or contractual arrangements. AML professionals should therefore evaluate the broader transaction context, obtain relevant documentation, and determine whether the observed activity has a reasonable commercial explanation.

Question 77. What is the primary purpose of sanctions screening?

1. To identify potential matches to sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions
2. To calculate customer income
3. To determine employee performance
4. To replace transaction monitoring

Correct Answer: 1. To identify potential matches to sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions

Explanation:

Sanctions screening is designed to identify potential relationships or transactions involving individuals, entities, vessels, organizations, or jurisdictions subject to applicable sanctions restrictions. Screening may occur during customer onboarding, periodically throughout the relationship, and during relevant transactions. A screening alert does not necessarily represent a true sanctions match. It may be a false positive caused by similarities in names or other identifying information. Financial institutions should investigate potential matches using appropriate identifiers such as date of birth, nationality, address, registration details, or other available information. Confirmed matches should be handled according to applicable sanctions laws, regulations, and institutional procedures.

Question 78. What should an institution do when a sanctions screening alert is generated?

1. Automatically close the customer relationship
2. Ignore the alert if the name is common
3. Immediately approve the transaction
4. Investigate the alert to determine whether it is a true or false match

Correct Answer: 4. Investigate the alert to determine whether it is a true or false match

Explanation:

A sanctions screening alert requires appropriate investigation before the institution determines how to proceed. Screening systems can generate false positives when customer or transaction information resembles information on a sanctions list. Analysts should compare relevant identifying information and follow the institution’s sanctions procedures and applicable legal requirements. If the available information establishes that the customer or transaction is not the listed party, the alert may be documented and closed as a false positive. If the evidence indicates a potential or confirmed sanctions match, the institution should follow its required escalation, blocking, rejection, reporting, or other applicable procedures.

Question 79. Why is documentation important when closing an AML alert as non-suspicious?

1. It eliminates the need for future monitoring
2. It provides a record supporting the investigation and decision
3. It guarantees that the customer is low risk
4. It prevents regulators from reviewing the case

Correct Answer: 2. It provides a record supporting the investigation and decision

Explanation:

Documentation provides an audit trail showing what information was reviewed, what investigative steps were performed, and why an AML alert was closed without further escalation. A well-documented case can identify the customer’s relevant profile information, transaction details, explanations obtained, supporting evidence, investigative analysis, and final rationale. This is important because an institution may need to demonstrate that alerts were handled consistently and according to its procedures. Documentation should be sufficiently clear for another qualified reviewer to understand the reasoning without repeating the entire investigation. Proper records also support quality assurance, independent testing, regulatory examinations, and future investigations.

Question 80. What is an important principle for conducting an AML investigation?

1. Base conclusions on objective information and documented evidence
2. Assume every alert represents money laundering
3. Close alerts without reviewing customer information
4. Rely exclusively on customer explanations

Correct Answer: 1. Base conclusions on objective information and documented evidence

Explanation:

AML investigations should be objective, evidence-based, and appropriately documented. Investigators should examine relevant customer information, transaction activity, risk factors, explanations, supporting documentation, and other available information before reaching a conclusion. An alert is a starting point for review rather than proof of suspicious activity. Similarly, a customer’s explanation should be evaluated against available evidence rather than accepted or rejected automatically. A strong investigation considers information that supports different possible explanations and documents the reasoning behind the final decision. This approach promotes consistency, supports effective escalation, and helps demonstrate that the institution’s AML controls are operating according to established procedures.