View Full PMI PMI-RMP Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps

Question: 221. A project manager identifies a threat that could create significant financial losses if it occurs. The organization has limited expertise in managing the financial exposure, so the team considers purchasing insurance. Which risk response strategy is being applied?

1. Acceptance
   2. Mitigation
   3. Transfer
   4. Avoidance

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Transferring a risk involves shifting ownership or financial consequences of a threat to a third party. Purchasing insurance is a common example because the organization pays a premium and the insurer assumes specified financial consequences if the covered event occurs. The underlying risk itself may still exist, but the financial impact is transferred according to the contractual arrangement. Mitigation would reduce probability or impact, avoidance would eliminate the threat or its cause, and acceptance would involve taking no proactive action beyond what is appropriate for monitoring or contingency planning. Therefore, insurance represents a transfer strategy.

Question: 222. A project manager wants to determine which uncertain variable has the greatest influence on the project’s total cost. Which quantitative risk analysis technique should be used?

1. Sensitivity analysis
   2. Delphi technique
   3. Risk categorization
   4. Risk audit

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Sensitivity analysis examines how changes in individual uncertain variables affect a project outcome. In this scenario, the project manager wants to identify which cost-related uncertainty has the greatest influence on total project cost. Sensitivity analysis can reveal the variables that contribute most significantly to cost variability, helping the team focus further analysis and response planning on the most influential uncertainties. Delphi is an expert elicitation technique, risk categorization groups risks by characteristics, and a risk audit evaluates the effectiveness of risk management processes. Therefore, sensitivity analysis is the appropriate technique.

Question: 223. During a project review, the team discovers that a key resource previously assumed to be available full-time will only be available part-time. What should the project manager do first?

1. Immediately close all risks related to the resource
   2. Assess how the changed assumption affects identified risks and project objectives
   3. Transfer the resource-related risks to the sponsor
   4. Ignore the change because the assumption was already documented

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

When an important assumption changes, the project manager should reassess its potential effects on identified risks and project objectives. A resource availability assumption can influence schedule, cost, quality, and scope risks, so simply documenting the original assumption is no longer sufficient. The team should determine whether probability or impact ratings need revision and whether new risks have emerged. Closing the risks prematurely could overlook increased exposure, while transferring them to the sponsor does not address the need for assessment. Therefore, evaluating the consequences of the changed assumption is the appropriate first action.

Question: 224. A project team identifies an opportunity that, if realized, could significantly increase the project’s expected benefits. The team has sufficient control over the conditions required to make the opportunity occur. Which response strategy should be considered?

1. Exploit
   2. Share
   3. Enhance
   4. Accept

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Exploitation is an opportunity response strategy used when the project team wants to ensure that a positive risk occurs. The strategy involves taking action to make the opportunity happen rather than simply increasing its probability or accepting it if it occurs. In this scenario, the team has sufficient control over the conditions required to realize the opportunity and the potential benefit is significant, making exploitation appropriate. Enhancement would increase the probability or impact without necessarily guaranteeing the opportunity. Sharing involves working with another party, while acceptance means taking advantage of the opportunity if it occurs without proactively pursuing it.

Question: 225. A risk response that was selected several weeks ago is no longer effective because the underlying conditions have changed. What should the risk manager do?

1. Continue using the original response because it was formally approved
   2. Close the risk without further analysis
   3. Reassess the risk and determine whether an alternative response is required
   4. Remove the risk from the risk register

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Risk responses should be monitored throughout the project because assumptions, conditions, and exposure can change. If an approved response becomes ineffective, the risk manager should reassess the risk and determine whether the existing response should be modified or replaced. Continuing an ineffective response simply because it was previously approved can leave the project exposed. Closing or removing the risk without analysis could hide unresolved exposure. Effective risk management requires the team to compare the current risk exposure with applicable thresholds and select an appropriate updated response when conditions change.

Question: 226. Senior stakeholders indicate that the organization is willing to accept some uncertainty in exchange for pursuing strategic opportunities, but only within defined limits. What concept describes the organization’s overall willingness to take risk?

1. Risk threshold
   2. Risk appetite
   3. Risk trigger
   4. Risk response

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Risk appetite describes the degree of uncertainty an organization or stakeholder is willing to pursue or retain in anticipation of desired outcomes. An organization may have a relatively high appetite for strategic opportunities while still establishing specific limits for individual risks. A risk threshold represents a specific level of risk exposure that may trigger action or escalation. A risk trigger is an event or condition indicating that a risk may occur or that a response should be initiated. Risk response refers to actions taken to address identified risks. Therefore, the overall willingness to accept uncertainty is risk appetite.

Question: 227. Several schedule, cost, and quality risks appear unrelated, but analysis shows that they all originate from inadequate requirements definition. Which technique would best help the project team address this situation?

1. Root cause analysis
   2. Monte Carlo simulation
   3. Sensitivity analysis
   4. Risk transfer

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Root cause analysis helps the team identify the fundamental source of multiple related problems or risks. In this scenario, inadequate requirements definition is a common underlying cause of schedule, cost, and quality risks. Addressing the root cause may reduce exposure across several individual risks at once and can lead to a more efficient response strategy. Monte Carlo simulation models aggregate uncertainty, sensitivity analysis identifies variables that have strong influence on outcomes, and risk transfer shifts certain consequences to another party. Since the team needs to identify the common underlying source, root cause analysis is most appropriate.

Question: 228. A project’s risk threshold specifies that exposure above $100,000 must be reported to the steering committee. During monitoring, the calculated exposure increases to $135,000. What should the project manager do?

1. Wait until the risk becomes an issue
   2. Close the risk because its probability has already been assessed
   3. Escalate the risk according to the established governance process
   4. Remove the threshold from the risk management plan

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

A risk threshold establishes a defined level of exposure that requires attention or action. Because the project’s exposure has exceeded the documented $100,000 threshold, the project manager should follow the established escalation and governance process. Escalation does not necessarily mean the risk will become an issue; it means the current exposure requires attention from the appropriate authority. Waiting for occurrence would delay action unnecessarily. Closing the risk is inappropriate because exposure remains, and changing the threshold simply to avoid escalation would undermine the project’s risk governance framework