View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-745 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.

Q261. An enterprise uses 802.1X for employee network access and wants authentication requests from switches to be centrally evaluated by an identity server. Which protocol is most commonly suited to this access-authentication role?

1. GRE
   2. RADIUS
   3. BGP
   4. Syslog

Correct Answer: 2. RADIUS

Explanation: RADIUS is commonly used for centralized authentication, authorization, and accounting in network-access scenarios such as 802.1X wired and wireless authentication and remote-access services. Network access devices act as RADIUS clients and forward authentication requests to a centralized server that evaluates identity and policy. RADIUS is especially well suited to user and endpoint network admission. TACACS+ is often preferred for administrative access to network devices because of its detailed command authorization capabilities. GRE provides tunneling, BGP exchanges routing information, and Syslog transports event messages rather than authenticating endpoints seeking network access.

Q262. A security architect wants to make BGP sessions harder to spoof by requiring received BGP packets to have an expected IP TTL associated with directly connected or closely located peers. Which protection should be considered?

1. DHCP snooping
   2. DNSSEC
   3. Port security
   4. Generalized TTL Security Mechanism

Correct Answer: 4. Generalized TTL Security Mechanism

Explanation: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism, commonly associated with BGP TTL security, helps protect BGP sessions by checking the TTL value of incoming packets. When peers are expected to be a known number of hops apart, packets arriving with unexpected TTL characteristics can be rejected. This makes certain remote spoofing attacks more difficult because an attacker must create packets that satisfy the configured hop expectation. TTL security should complement peer filtering, BGP authentication, prefix filtering, maximum-prefix limits, and route-origin validation. DHCP snooping, DNSSEC, and switch port security protect different infrastructure functions.

Q263. A company is replacing a legacy flat network. Which segmentation strategy best limits communication while allowing business policies to follow users and devices when they move between physical locations?

1. Identity- or group-based segmentation policy
   2. One VLAN for every user in the company
   3. Unrestricted routing between all subnets
   4. Source IP allowlists maintained manually on every server

Correct Answer: 1. Identity- or group-based segmentation policy

Explanation: Identity- or group-based segmentation allows security policy to follow the logical role of users, devices, or workloads rather than depending entirely on physical network placement. A finance user, contractor, IoT device, or application server can receive appropriate access based on identity or classification even when network location changes. This reduces dependence on large numbers of location-specific ACLs and supports more scalable segmentation. Creating a VLAN per individual user is operationally impractical, while unrestricted routing undermines isolation. Manually maintaining large IP allowlists is difficult to scale and often breaks as addressing changes.

Q264. A company wants administrators to reach a critical router only through a separate management interface even if the production forwarding network is unavailable. Which design is most appropriate?

1. In-band management over user VLANs only
   2. Public Telnet access
   3. Out-of-band management network
   4. Anonymous console access

Correct Answer: 3. Out-of-band management network

Explanation: An out-of-band management network provides an administrative path that is separate from the production data plane. This allows authorized engineers to reach infrastructure during routing failures, denial-of-service events, or production network misconfigurations. The management network should still use strong authentication, encryption, restricted source access, monitoring, and ideally dedicated hardened administrative workstations. In-band management depends on the same production infrastructure being managed and might become unavailable during an outage. Internet-exposed Telnet and anonymous console access are insecure and would significantly increase management-plane risk.

Q265. An organization needs private connectivity from its data center to a public-cloud environment and wants to avoid sending normal application traffic across the public Internet. Which approach best fits?

1. Unencrypted GRE across the Internet
   2. Public application addresses with no controls
   3. Open wireless bridging
   4. A private cloud interconnect or dedicated circuit

Correct Answer: 4. A private cloud interconnect or dedicated circuit

Explanation: Public cloud providers offer private connectivity options that extend customer networks to cloud environments through dedicated or provider-managed connectivity rather than ordinary Internet paths. Such services can provide predictable routing and performance and reduce exposure to public Internet transport. Architects should remember that private connectivity does not automatically mean traffic is encrypted; encryption may still be required according to risk and compliance requirements. GRE over the Internet does not provide confidentiality by itself, while unrestricted public addressing increases exposure. A dedicated private interconnect is therefore appropriate when private transport is a core requirement.

Q266. A business application requires inbound HTTPS from customers, but the security team wants the internal application servers hidden from direct client connections. Which component best provides this architecture?

1. Reverse proxy
   2. DHCP server
   3. BGP route reflector
   4. Layer 2 hub

Correct Answer: 1. Reverse proxy

Explanation: A reverse proxy accepts client connections on behalf of back-end application servers and forwards approved requests to those servers. This can hide internal server addresses, centralize TLS certificate handling, apply security headers, perform request filtering, and integrate with load balancing or web application firewall capabilities. Back-end servers can be placed in protected network segments and configured to accept traffic only from the proxy tier. DHCP servers, BGP route reflectors, and Layer 2 hubs serve different networking roles and do not provide application-layer proxying or isolation between Internet clients and application servers.

Q267. A development team needs to protect an application against attacks caused by unsafe memory handling in third-party native libraries. Which design change can reduce the impact if the library is exploited?

1. Run the application with operating-system administrator privileges
   2. Disable process isolation
   3. Use sandboxing and least-privilege process permissions
   4. Give the application unrestricted filesystem access

Correct Answer: 3. Use sandboxing and least-privilege process permissions

Explanation: Sandboxing and least privilege can limit what an exploited process is able to do after a memory-safety vulnerability is successfully triggered. The process can be restricted from accessing unrelated files, administrative interfaces, devices, or network destinations. Operating-system controls such as process isolation, capability restrictions, mandatory access controls, and container boundaries can further contain compromise. These controls do not fix the vulnerable library, so patching remains necessary. Running applications with administrator privileges or unrestricted filesystem access greatly increases the potential impact of exploitation and violates least-privilege design principles.

Q268. A company wants to ensure that one container cannot modify the underlying host filesystem during normal operation. Which container-hardening control is most appropriate?

1. Run every container as privileged
   2. Use a read-only root filesystem where feasible
   3. Mount the entire host filesystem read-write
   4. Disable namespace isolation

Correct Answer: 2. Use a read-only root filesystem where feasible

Explanation: Configuring a container’s root filesystem as read-only prevents the application from modifying operating-system and application files that should remain static during runtime. Writable locations can be provided explicitly for temporary or application data when necessary. This reduces persistence opportunities and limits the effect of a compromised process. The control is stronger when combined with non-root execution, capability reduction, seccomp, workload segmentation, and trusted images. Privileged execution, host filesystem mounts, and disabled namespace isolation weaken container boundaries and can allow a compromise to affect the underlying host.

Q269. An organization wants to verify the exact build steps and source inputs used to produce a production software artifact. Which security concept is most relevant?

1. Software provenance
   2. DHCP lease tracking
   3. VLAN pruning
   4. DNS recursion

Correct Answer: 1. Software provenance

Explanation: Software provenance records information about how an artifact was produced, including source repositories, build systems, dependencies, workflow steps, and other relevant metadata. Provenance helps organizations verify that production software came from an approved build process and supports investigation when a supply-chain compromise is suspected. When combined with artifact signing and policy enforcement, provenance can prevent unauthorized build outputs from reaching production. DHCP leases, VLAN configuration, and DNS recursion describe network behavior rather than the origin and build history of software artifacts. Provenance is increasingly important in modern DevSecOps and supply-chain security.

Q270. A security architect wants to ensure an application’s API returns only the minimum fields required by the requesting business function. Which principle is being applied?

1. Maximum disclosure
   2. Default administrator access
   3. Data minimization
   4. Unrestricted serialization

Correct Answer: 3. Data minimization

Explanation: Data minimization limits the collection, processing, and disclosure of information to what is necessary for the intended business purpose. For an API, this can mean returning only required fields rather than entire database objects containing sensitive information the client does not need. Reducing unnecessary data exposure limits the impact of authorization errors, logging mistakes, client compromise, and accidental leakage. Data minimization also supports many privacy and regulatory objectives. Broad disclosure and unrestricted serialization increase exposure and should be avoided, particularly when API responses involve personal, confidential, or regulated information.

Q271. An analyst receives an alert from an endpoint that has already been reimaged. Which security data source is most valuable for understanding activity that occurred before the reimage?

1. Current endpoint filesystem only
   2. Centralized historical telemetry and logs
   3. The user’s current desktop wallpaper
   4. Printer configuration

Correct Answer: 4. Centralized historical telemetry and logs

Explanation: Reimaging an endpoint can destroy local evidence of what occurred during the compromise. Centralized EDR telemetry, SIEM logs, authentication records, proxy logs, DNS data, firewall records, and other historical sources can preserve evidence even after the original endpoint is rebuilt. This demonstrates why security logging should be forwarded to protected external repositories rather than stored solely on the monitored asset. Current local files may no longer represent the compromised state. Wallpapers and printer settings provide little investigative value. Centralized historical telemetry supports reconstruction of attacker activity across time and multiple systems.

Q272. An organization wants to identify unauthorized persistence by comparing current server configurations against an approved secure state. Which technique best meets the requirement?

1. Configuration and file-integrity monitoring
   2. Disable baseline documentation
   3. Increase routing protocol timers
   4. Remove audit trails

Correct Answer: 2. Configuration and file-integrity monitoring

Explanation: Configuration and file-integrity monitoring compare current system state against approved baselines or previous trusted values. Changes to important binaries, configuration files, startup entries, policies, or system settings can generate alerts for investigation. This can help detect persistence, unauthorized administrative changes, or malware modification. The controls should distinguish expected authorized changes from suspicious activity to reduce noise. Removing baselines and audit records makes detection harder, while routing timers do not provide host-integrity assurance. Integrity monitoring is particularly valuable on critical servers and security infrastructure where unauthorized configuration changes can have broad impact.

Q273. A security manager needs to determine the organization’s willingness to accept risk related specifically to production outages lasting longer than two hours. Which concept best describes this more specific boundary?

1. Risk tolerance
   2. Risk appetite only
   3. Threat intelligence
   4. Vulnerability severity

Correct Answer: 3. Risk tolerance

Explanation: Risk appetite describes the broad amount and type of risk an organization is willing to accept or pursue. Risk tolerance provides more specific boundaries or acceptable variation around particular objectives or risk categories. A statement that production downtime should never exceed two hours is a specific operational threshold and therefore aligns closely with risk tolerance. Security architects use such limits to derive resilience, redundancy, monitoring, and recovery requirements. Threat intelligence and vulnerability severity provide security context but do not define management’s specific allowable range of operational risk.

Q274. An organization identifies a risk, assigns an owner, and requires that person to ensure mitigation activities are completed. What is the primary purpose of assigning a risk owner?

1. Eliminate all technical vulnerabilities automatically
   2. Avoid documenting the risk
   3. Transfer the risk to the SOC
   4. Establish accountability for managing and monitoring the risk

Correct Answer: 2. Establish accountability for managing and monitoring the risk

Explanation: A risk owner is responsible for ensuring that an identified risk is appropriately monitored and treated according to organizational policy and management decisions. The owner coordinates or tracks mitigation activities, reviews changes to likelihood or impact, and helps escalate decisions when residual risk exceeds acceptable thresholds. Assigning an owner does not automatically remove vulnerabilities or transfer responsibility to another technical team. Clear ownership prevents important risks from remaining unresolved simply because no individual or business function is accountable for following through on the treatment plan.

Q275. Which security requirement is best written as a measurable statement?

1. “The application should be very secure.”
   2. “Administrators must use strong security.”
   3. “All production administrative access must require phishing-resistant MFA.”
   4. “The firewall should be good.”

Correct Answer: 1. “All production administrative access must require phishing-resistant MFA.”

Explanation: Security requirements should be specific, measurable, and testable. Requiring phishing-resistant MFA for all production administrative access clearly states the population, control, and expected condition. Architects, implementers, and assessors can verify whether the requirement is satisfied. Statements such as “very secure” or “strong security” are subjective and provide little guidance for implementation or testing. Good requirements connect business and risk objectives to concrete security outcomes and can include measurable performance, availability, logging, encryption, or access-control criteria. Clear requirements improve both architecture quality and later validation.

Q276. A design review finds that every major security control depends on the same identity provider. What risk should the architect investigate?

1. Excessive monitor resolution
   2. A concentration or single-point-of-failure risk
   3. DNS caching efficiency
   4. Ethernet frame size

Correct Answer: 4. A concentration or single-point-of-failure risk

Explanation: Centralizing identity provides major operational and security benefits, but if every security control depends on a single identity-provider instance or failure domain, an outage or compromise can affect many services simultaneously. Architects should evaluate redundancy, geographic resilience, emergency access, recovery procedures, and how applications behave when the identity service is unavailable. Concentration risk also applies to other shared services such as DNS, certificate authorities, cloud regions, and management platforms. The goal is not necessarily to decentralize identity but to design the dependency with appropriate resilience and controlled fallback mechanisms.

Q277. A CI/CD pipeline uses a third-party hosted runner to build confidential source code. Which supply-chain consideration is most important before adoption?

1. Evaluate the runner provider’s isolation, data handling, identity, and security controls
   2. Assume the provider is trusted because it is cloud-hosted
   3. Disable build logging entirely
   4. Store production root keys on every runner

Correct Answer: 2. Evaluate the runner provider’s isolation, data handling, identity, and security controls

Explanation: A hosted build runner processes source code, dependencies, credentials, and build outputs, making it part of the software supply chain. Before adoption, organizations should evaluate tenant isolation, runner lifecycle, credential handling, data retention, network connectivity, logging, compliance, and the provider’s own security practices. Sensitive signing keys should generally remain in dedicated protected key-management systems rather than being copied onto ephemeral third-party workers. Cloud hosting does not automatically make a service trustworthy. Third-party build infrastructure must be assessed according to the sensitivity of the workloads it processes.

Q278. An infrastructure automation script should be tested without making real changes to production resources. Which feature is most useful?

1. Permanent administrator access
   2. Disabled logging
   3. Dry-run or plan mode
   4. Unrestricted delete permissions

Correct Answer: 1. Dry-run or plan mode

Explanation: Dry-run or plan functionality shows what an automation workflow intends to change without actually applying the modifications. This helps administrators detect unexpected resource deletions, overly permissive firewall updates, routing changes, or other errors before production impact occurs. The output can be reviewed by humans or evaluated automatically through policy-as-code checks. Dry runs do not guarantee that execution will succeed, but they add an important validation layer. Broad administrator access and unrestricted destructive permissions increase risk, while disabling logs makes automation outcomes more difficult to verify and troubleshoot.

Q279. A generative AI system produces security recommendations that sound plausible but include nonexistent product features and commands. Which AI risk does this illustrate?

1. Hallucination
   2. ARP spoofing
   3. Route flapping
   4. DHCP starvation

Correct Answer: 4. Hallucination

Explanation: Hallucination occurs when a generative AI model produces information that appears confident and plausible but is unsupported or incorrect. In security operations, hallucinated commands, product capabilities, indicators, or remediation instructions can create serious risk if automatically trusted. Architectures using generative AI should therefore validate important outputs against authoritative data, use deterministic controls for high-impact actions, and maintain human oversight where appropriate. Network attacks such as ARP spoofing or DHCP starvation are unrelated. Generative AI can be valuable for summarization and assistance, but its output should not automatically be treated as verified fact.

Q280. An enterprise is evaluating migration from classical public-key cryptography to post-quantum algorithms. Which strategy best reduces interoperability risk during the transition?

1. Replace every cryptographic system in one untested overnight change
   2. Use phased testing and hybrid transition mechanisms where supported
   3. Disable encryption until migration is complete
   4. Ignore vendor support requirements

Correct Answer: 3. Use phased testing and hybrid transition mechanisms where supported

Explanation: Post-quantum migration affects certificates, applications, VPNs, protocols, hardware, software libraries, and external partners. A phased transition allows organizations to test compatibility, performance, key sizes, certificate behavior, and operational processes before broad deployment. Hybrid approaches can combine classical and post-quantum mechanisms during transitional periods where standards and products support them. Abrupt replacement without testing can cause widespread interoperability problems. Disabling encryption would create immediate security exposure. A successful migration depends on cryptographic inventory, crypto-agility, vendor readiness, testing, and controlled rollout.