Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 106
A company wants to restrict access to Microsoft 365 applications only to devices that are compliant and joined to Azure AD. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance and Azure AD join
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance and Azure AD join
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies combined with device compliance and Azure AD join enable organizations to enforce strict access controls. By requiring devices to be both compliant and joined to Azure AD, administrators ensure that only managed, secure devices can access Microsoft 365 applications. Compliance criteria can include encryption, updated OS, antivirus protection, and device configuration requirements. Devices that fail these checks are blocked from accessing sensitive resources or prompted to remediate compliance issues. Azure AD join ensures that devices are registered within the corporate directory, enabling consistent policy enforcement and device-based conditional access.
Security Defaults enforce baseline security measures such as mandatory MFA for all users, but they do not evaluate device compliance or enforce Azure AD join requirements. This limits their ability to restrict access based on managed device status.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and provides just-in-time access workflows. It does not enforce device compliance or Azure AD join for standard users accessing applications.
Access Reviews periodically evaluate user access to applications and groups, ensuring proper permissions, but they do not enforce real-time access controls based on device compliance or Azure AD join.
Conditional Access with device compliance and Azure AD join is correct because it allows IT administrators to implement adaptive access policies that enforce security at the device level. Policies can also combine user, location, and application-based conditions, creating a layered and comprehensive access control strategy. Monitoring and reporting capabilities provide visibility into compliance trends, remediate non-compliant devices, and maintain regulatory compliance. This approach minimizes risk, ensures only trusted devices access corporate resources, and maintains operational security and efficiency.
Question 107
A company wants to periodically review access to privileged roles and remove unnecessary assignments automatically. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Privileged Identity Management
B) Conditional Access
C) Access Reviews
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Privileged Identity Management
Explanation:
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides just-in-time access to privileged roles and ensures that elevated permissions are granted only when needed. PIM enables periodic access reviews for roles such as Global Administrator, ensuring unnecessary assignments are removed automatically. This process reduces the risk of over-provisioned privileges, enforces least-privilege principles, and supports compliance with internal policies and external regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO standards. PIM also integrates approval workflows, MFA enforcement, and audit logging, providing a comprehensive governance framework for managing privileged access.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies, such as MFA, device compliance, and location-based controls. While essential for securing sign-ins, it does not manage elevated roles or perform periodic reviews of privileged access.
Access Reviews evaluate standard user access to applications, groups, and roles periodically. While effective for general access governance, Access Reviews do not include just-in-time activation, automatic role assignment management, or approval workflows for privileged roles.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes, but they do not manage privileged role assignments or implement just-in-time access with governance controls.
Privileged Identity Management is correct because it combines just-in-time access, approval workflows, access reviews, and monitoring of privileged accounts. High-risk permissions are granted temporarily, and automated review cycles ensure that unnecessary role assignments are removed promptly. Audit logs and alerts provide transparency and support compliance and regulatory requirements. This approach minimizes risk associated with privileged accounts, enforces least-privilege access, and maintains a secure identity management framework for the organization.
Question 108
A company wants external contractors to have temporary access to multiple applications with approval and automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration allows organizations to provide secure, temporary access to external contractors or partners. Access Packages in Entitlement Management bundle multiple resources, including applications, groups, and SharePoint sites, into a single requestable package. Approval workflows ensure access is granted only after validation, and automatic expiration policies remove access when no longer required. This approach reduces risks associated with lingering permissions and unauthorized access while supporting secure external collaboration and regulatory compliance.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for internal users and does not handle external user provisioning, approvals, or expiration.
Dynamic Groups automate membership assignment based on attributes such as department or role but do not include approval workflows or enforce temporary access for external users.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies such as MFA or device compliance but does not provision resources, handle approvals, or implement temporary external access.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides a secure, automated framework for granting and revoking temporary access to external collaborators. Integration with Conditional Access enables additional security measures, and audit logs provide visibility into requests, approvals, and expirations. This ensures external partners can collaborate effectively while maintaining organizational security and governance.
Question 109
A company wants to require MFA only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals enable organizations to implement adaptive security based on user risk. Identity Protection identifies suspicious activity such as compromised credentials, impossible travel, and atypical sign-ins. Users flagged as high-risk can be required to complete MFA or are blocked until remediation occurs, protecting sensitive resources without disrupting low-risk users. This targeted approach ensures security is applied intelligently, balancing usability and risk mitigation.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users uniformly and do not provide selective enforcement for high-risk accounts, potentially causing unnecessary friction for low-risk users.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts but does not enforce MFA adaptively for standard users based on risk signals.
Dynamic Groups manage memberships based on attributes like department or role but do not enforce authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals are correct because they allow real-time, risk-based MFA enforcement. High-risk users must authenticate using MFA or remediate issues, while low-risk users maintain seamless access. Reporting and audit logs provide visibility into risky sign-ins, policy enforcement, and mitigations. This creates an intelligent, proactive identity security strategy that reduces exposure to compromised accounts and supports compliance requirements.
Question 110
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This functionality in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) provides a powerful mechanism for automating identity and access management, ensuring that users are correctly provisioned without manual intervention. By leveraging attributes stored in the directory, administrators can create dynamic rules that evaluate properties of each user and automatically assign group memberships. For instance, when a new employee joins the Finance department, they can be automatically placed into the Finance group, granting access to financial systems, departmental file shares, reporting dashboards, and collaboration platforms specific to the department. Similarly, an employee in Marketing can be automatically assigned to Marketing-specific groups, gaining access to campaign management tools, analytics software, shared documentation, and communication channels. This automation ensures that access aligns precisely with job responsibilities, enforcing the principle of least privilege, which limits access to only what is necessary to perform job functions. Least-privilege access is critical for reducing the risk of data breaches, protecting sensitive information, and ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO standards.
During onboarding, Dynamic Groups evaluate user attributes in real time, provisioning new employees into the correct groups automatically. This eliminates delays that typically occur when IT administrators manually assign group memberships, reducing administrative overhead and the likelihood of errors. Immediate access to required resources allows new employees to start working productively on their first day, improving overall operational efficiency. Dynamic Groups are also adaptive: if an employee changes roles, transfers departments, or undergoes other attribute changes, their group memberships automatically update. For example, if a Sales employee is promoted to a management position, Dynamic Groups can remove access to standard Sales tools and grant access to management dashboards, reporting tools, and leadership communication channels. This ensures that group memberships and access rights remain current and accurately reflect the user’s responsibilities throughout their tenure.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing governance and compliance oversight. While Dynamic Groups automate the provisioning of users to the correct groups, Access Reviews evaluate existing access periodically to ensure it remains appropriate. Administrators or managers can review group memberships to identify over-provisioned users, dormant accounts, or users who no longer require access due to role changes or termination. Access Reviews are critical for maintaining security and regulatory compliance, allowing organizations to remove unnecessary permissions proactively. However, Access Reviews do not automate the assignment of new employees to groups; their purpose is retrospective, focusing on auditing and remediating existing access rather than provisioning access during onboarding. Together with Dynamic Groups, Access Reviews provide a complete lifecycle management solution: dynamic provisioning ensures accurate and timely access, while Access Reviews maintain ongoing compliance and reduce the risk of privilege creep.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on managing temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users. PIM provides approval workflows, enforces multi-factor authentication during role activation, and tracks activation history for auditing purposes. This is essential for securing sensitive accounts, such as administrators or users with elevated privileges. However, PIM does not automate standard user group assignments. Its primary focus is on governing high-privilege accounts rather than provisioning everyday access for general employees. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by ensuring that all standard users are automatically assigned to the appropriate groups, allowing IT administrators to concentrate on governing privileged accounts while routine provisioning occurs seamlessly in the background.
Conditional Access enforces authentication and device compliance policies, including requirements such as multi-factor authentication, location-based access controls, and device compliance checks. Conditional Access ensures that only authorized and compliant users can access organizational resources, providing an additional layer of adaptive security. While Conditional Access is crucial for enforcing security policies, it does not manage group memberships or automate provisioning for new employees. In this way, Conditional Access and Dynamic Groups serve complementary roles: Dynamic Groups handle automated assignment and provisioning, while Conditional Access ensures that access is secure and policy-compliant at the point of login.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding and ensuring accurate access provisioning. Automated group membership reduces the administrative burden on IT teams, minimizes errors, and ensures consistent access across the organization. Integration with Access Packages enhances the capability of Dynamic Groups by allowing multiple resources, including applications, groups, and permissions, to be bundled into a single automated workflow. For example, a new HR employee could automatically be added to the HR group and simultaneously provisioned with access to HR management tools, payroll systems, employee communication channels, and departmental file shares through a single Access Package. This integrated workflow simplifies onboarding, ensures consistent access, and aligns permissions with role responsibilities, reducing both administrative effort and security risk.
Reporting and auditing capabilities within Azure AD provide visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and policy compliance. Administrators can monitor which users have access to which resources, track changes over time, and generate audit reports for internal governance or regulatory requirements. These capabilities provide transparency, accountability, and actionable insights, enabling organizations to quickly identify misconfigurations or anomalies. When combined with the automation provided by Dynamic Groups, reporting ensures that access is accurate, compliant, and aligned with corporate security policies, making it easier to maintain both operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and organizational growth. As businesses expand, the number of employees, applications, and resources grows, making manual provisioning increasingly difficult and error-prone. Dynamic Groups scale automatically to accommodate growth, adjusting memberships in real time based on attribute changes, departmental reorganizations, or onboarding events. This capability ensures that employees consistently receive appropriate access without manual intervention, maintaining security and operational efficiency even in large or rapidly changing organizations. By automating group assignments, organizations can maintain a robust identity management framework capable of supporting role-based access control, evolving workforce structures, and compliance requirements.
In Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-based access management in Azure Active Directory. They provide immediate, accurate provisioning of new employees, enforce least-privilege principles, reduce administrative effort, and maintain consistent access policies across the organization. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a complete identity management ecosystem that streamlines onboarding, reduces errors, enhances operational efficiency, and supports governance and compliance. This scalable approach ensures that access aligns with roles and responsibilities, strengthens security, and maintains a resilient identity management framework capable of supporting organizational growth and complex operational requirements. By automating access provisioning, Dynamic Groups minimize human error, improve compliance, and provide a secure, efficient, and scalable identity management solution for modern enterprises.
Question 111
A company wants to restrict access to Microsoft Teams to only devices that are compliant with Intune policies. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Conditional Access with device compliance policies allows organizations to enforce access based on the compliance status of devices. By integrating with Intune, administrators can define policies that ensure only devices meeting corporate security standards—including encryption, OS updates, antivirus, and configuration requirements—can access Microsoft Teams. Devices that are non-compliant or unmanaged can be blocked, redirected to remediate compliance issues, or required to enroll in Intune. This ensures sensitive collaboration data in Teams is protected while enabling productive access for compliant users.
Security Defaults enforce baseline security measures like mandatory MFA but do not evaluate device compliance. This makes them insufficient for scenarios requiring device-based access restrictions for Teams.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and just-in-time access. It does not enforce device compliance for standard users accessing collaboration applications.
Access Reviews evaluate existing user access periodically and remove unnecessary permissions, but they do not enforce real-time access restrictions based on device compliance or management state.
Conditional Access with device compliance policies is correct because it allows administrators to implement granular access rules for applications. Policies can combine user, device, location, and application-based conditions to create an adaptive security model. Monitoring and reporting provide visibility into compliance trends, non-compliant devices, and remediation actions. This approach minimizes risk, ensures only trusted devices access sensitive resources, and supports operational security and regulatory compliance, providing a secure collaboration environment.
Question 112
A company wants to periodically evaluate access to critical financial applications and automatically remove users who no longer require it. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Access Reviews
Explanation:
Access Reviews allow organizations to periodically assess and validate user access to applications, groups, and roles. Scheduling reviews for critical financial applications ensures that only authorized users maintain access, reducing the risk of over-provisioned permissions and enforcing least-privilege principles. Automated removal of unnecessary access supports compliance with internal policies and regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX. Notifications and reminders enhance participation, and audit logs track review actions and decisions, providing accountability and transparency.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies such as MFA or device compliance but does not evaluate existing access or revoke unnecessary permissions.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged users, but it does not evaluate access for standard users to critical financial applications periodically.
Dynamic Groups assign users to groups based on attributes like department or role but do not perform access evaluations or revoke unnecessary access automatically.
Access Reviews are correct because they provide governance, automation, and auditability. Integration with Dynamic Groups and Access Packages facilitates onboarding and offboarding processes while ensuring appropriate access levels. Reporting provides detailed insights into review completion, user access decisions, and justifications for removal. This proactive approach strengthens security, reduces the risk of unauthorized access, and maintains a compliant and efficient identity management framework.
Question 113
A company wants to grant temporary access to external contractors for multiple applications with approval and automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration allows secure external access for contractors or partners. Access Packages in Entitlement Management bundle multiple resources—including applications, groups, and SharePoint sites—into a single requestable package. Approval workflows ensure access is granted only after proper validation, and automatic expiration removes access when it is no longer required. This reduces the risk of lingering permissions and unauthorized access while supporting secure collaboration and regulatory compliance.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for internal users and does not provide temporary external access with approvals or expiration.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department or role but do not include approval workflows or enforce temporary access for external users.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies such as MFA or device compliance but does not manage resource provisioning, approvals, or expiration for external users.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides an automated and auditable process for granting temporary access. Integration with Conditional Access enables additional security measures, while audit logs track requests, approvals, and expirations. This ensures external contractors can collaborate effectively without compromising organizational security.
Question 114
A company wants to require MFA only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals provide adaptive, risk-based authentication. Identity Protection identifies suspicious activities, such as compromised credentials, impossible travel, and unusual sign-ins, and flags users as high-risk. Conditional Access policies enforce MFA or block access for high-risk accounts, while low-risk users maintain seamless access. This approach minimizes disruption while protecting sensitive resources and reduces the likelihood of account compromise.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users without considering risk levels, which may create unnecessary friction for low-risk users.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and does not enforce adaptive MFA based on risk signals for standard users.
Dynamic Groups manage group membership based on attributes like department or role but do not enforce authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access using Identity Protection risk signals is correct because it enables targeted enforcement of MFA based on real-time risk assessments. High-risk users must complete MFA or remediate risk, while low-risk users access applications seamlessly. Reporting and audit logs provide visibility into policy enforcement, risky sign-ins, and mitigation actions. This proactive strategy ensures security, supports compliance, and balances usability with risk mitigation.
Question 115
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This functionality in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) provides organizations with a scalable and efficient way to manage identity and access. By evaluating directory attributes, administrators can define dynamic rules that automatically assign users to the appropriate groups as they join the organization or when their attributes change. For example, a new employee in the Finance department can be automatically added to the Finance group, granting access to accounting software, departmental file shares, reporting tools, and collaboration platforms specific to that department. Similarly, employees in Marketing or IT can be assigned to relevant groups that provide access to tools, dashboards, and resources required for their roles. By aligning access with specific job responsibilities, Dynamic Groups enforce the principle of least privilege, ensuring users receive only the access necessary for their work, reducing potential security risks, and maintaining compliance with organizational policies and industry standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001.
During onboarding, Dynamic Groups evaluate user attributes in real time to provision new employees into the correct groups. This automated approach eliminates manual intervention by IT administrators, significantly reducing administrative workload and minimizing the potential for errors that can occur with manual group assignment. Immediate access to required resources allows employees to become productive from their first day, streamlining onboarding processes and ensuring a smooth experience. Dynamic Groups are also adaptive: if an employee changes roles, transfers to another department, or updates their profile attributes, group memberships can be automatically adjusted. For instance, an employee promoted from Sales Associate to Sales Manager can be automatically assigned access to management dashboards, leadership tools, and additional resources while removing access to standard sales applications no longer required. This ensures access remains current and accurate throughout the employee lifecycle, reducing risks associated with stale or inappropriate permissions.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing governance and compliance oversight. While Dynamic Groups automate onboarding and provisioning, Access Reviews enable administrators or managers to periodically evaluate whether users still require the access they have been granted. Access Reviews are valuable for identifying dormant accounts, over-provisioned users, or employees who have changed roles and no longer require specific access. They provide a structured process to remove unnecessary permissions, helping organizations maintain security hygiene and regulatory compliance. However, Access Reviews do not automate the initial assignment of new employees to groups; they function retrospectively, focusing on auditing and remediating existing access. When combined, Dynamic Groups handle automated provisioning, and Access Reviews maintain ongoing compliance and accuracy, creating a comprehensive identity lifecycle management system.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users. PIM ensures that administrators and other high-privilege accounts have access only when necessary, with multi-factor authentication and approval workflows to safeguard critical resources. While PIM is essential for managing elevated privileges securely, it does not handle standard user group assignments or automate access provisioning for general employees. Its focus is on governance, security, and auditing for sensitive roles rather than day-to-day onboarding. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by automatically assigning standard users to groups based on their attributes, ensuring operational efficiency and accurate access while PIM focuses on controlling privileged accounts.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies, device compliance, and adaptive access controls, such as multi-factor authentication, location-based restrictions, and device compliance requirements. Conditional Access ensures that only authorized and compliant users can access organizational resources, mitigating risks from unauthorized or insecure access. However, Conditional Access does not automate the assignment of users to groups or provision access to applications based on job roles. While Conditional Access secures access at login, Dynamic Groups provide automated provisioning and ensure that the right resources are assigned to users. Together, they form a comprehensive approach to identity and access management, combining efficient provisioning with robust security enforcement.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding, ensuring accurate access provisioning, and supporting operational efficiency. By automatically assigning users to groups based on directory attributes, organizations can reduce administrative overhead, minimize errors, and maintain consistent access policies. Integration with Access Packages enhances this functionality, allowing multiple resources—such as applications, groups, and permissions—to be bundled into a single workflow. For example, a new HR employee could be automatically added to the HR group while simultaneously receiving access to payroll systems, human resources management tools, internal communications platforms, and shared documentation through one Access Package. This integration improves efficiency, reduces the risk of misconfigured access, and ensures that employees have immediate access to all the resources needed to perform their job.
Reporting and auditing capabilities within Azure AD provide visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and policy compliance. Administrators can track who has access to which resources, validate that assignments comply with internal and regulatory standards, and generate audit reports for governance purposes. These capabilities provide transparency and accountability, enabling organizations to detect and remediate misconfigurations, maintain regulatory compliance, and ensure that access policies are consistently enforced. When combined with automated provisioning through Dynamic Groups, reporting ensures a secure, compliant, and well-governed identity management framework.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and organizational growth. As companies expand, the number of employees, applications, and resources increases, making manual provisioning increasingly complex and error-prone. Dynamic Groups scale automatically, adjusting group memberships based on attribute changes, onboarding events, or departmental transfers. This ensures employees consistently receive appropriate access without requiring manual intervention, improving efficiency, minimizing errors, and reducing security risks. Automated group assignment also supports organizational changes such as mergers, acquisitions, or internal restructures, ensuring that access is quickly aligned with updated business requirements.
In Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-driven access management in Azure Active Directory. They provide accurate and immediate provisioning of new employees, enforce least-privilege access principles, reduce administrative workload, and maintain consistent access policies across the organization. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a comprehensive, scalable, and secure identity management ecosystem. This approach streamlines onboarding, minimizes errors, enhances operational efficiency, and ensures governance and compliance. By automating access assignment based on directory attributes, organizations maintain a robust and scalable identity management framework that supports growth, operational complexity, and secure access to resources across the enterprise.
Question 116
A company wants to enforce that only compliant devices can access Exchange Online. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Conditional Access with device compliance policies ensures that only devices meeting corporate security standards can access Exchange Online. By integrating Intune-managed devices, administrators can define policies requiring encryption, OS updates, antivirus, and proper configuration. Devices that do not meet compliance criteria can be blocked from accessing email or prompted to remediate compliance issues. This approach prevents unauthorized or insecure devices from accessing sensitive email data while allowing compliant devices seamless access.
Security Defaults enforce basic security measures like MFA for all users but do not evaluate device compliance, which is critical for controlling access to Exchange Online.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged users but does not enforce access restrictions based on device compliance for standard users.
Access Reviews allow periodic evaluation of existing user access and removal of unnecessary permissions but do not enforce real-time access controls based on device compliance.
Conditional Access with device compliance policies is correct because it enables adaptive access based on device health and management state. Policies can also incorporate additional conditions such as user risk, location, or application sensitivity. Reporting and monitoring provide visibility into compliance trends, non-compliant devices, and remedial actions. This ensures that only trusted devices access sensitive email resources, mitigating risks and supporting compliance requirements.
Question 117
A company wants to periodically review access to high-risk applications and automatically remove users who no longer require access. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Access Reviews
Explanation:
Access Reviews enable organizations to evaluate and validate user access to applications, groups, and roles on a recurring basis. By scheduling reviews for high-risk applications, administrators and application owners can ensure that only authorized users maintain access. Automated removal of unnecessary access reduces risks associated with over-provisioned accounts and enforces least-privilege principles. Notifications and reminders improve participation, while audit logs track review completion and decisions, providing accountability and compliance evidence.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies such as MFA or device compliance but does not evaluate or revoke access automatically for existing users.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged users but does not conduct recurring access evaluations for standard application access.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes but do not perform periodic evaluations or remove unnecessary access.
Access Reviews are correct because they provide governance, automation, and auditability. They can integrate with Dynamic Groups and Access Packages to streamline onboarding and offboarding processes. Detailed reporting ensures proper oversight of access, decisions, and removal actions. This proactive approach strengthens security, ensures compliance, and maintains operational efficiency.
Question 118
A company wants to grant temporary access to external vendors for multiple applications with approval workflows and automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration allows secure external access for vendors, contractors, or partners. Access Packages in Entitlement Management bundle multiple resources such as applications, groups, and SharePoint sites into a single requestable package. Approval workflows ensure access is granted only after validation, and automatic expiration removes access when it is no longer needed. This reduces the risk of lingering permissions, unauthorized access, and supports regulatory compliance while enabling efficient collaboration.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for internal users but does not provide temporary external access with approvals and expiration.
Dynamic Groups assign users to groups based on attributes but do not handle approval workflows or enforce temporary access for external users.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies like MFA or device compliance but does not provision resources, handle approvals, or manage expiration for external users.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides a secure, automated, and auditable method for granting temporary access. Integration with Conditional Access ensures additional security enforcement, while audit logs track requests, approvals, and expirations. This solution minimizes security risks, maintains governance, and enables productive external collaboration.
Question 119
A company wants to require MFA only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals allow organizations to implement adaptive security based on real-time risk assessments. Identity Protection detects suspicious activity, such as compromised credentials, unusual sign-ins, and impossible travel. Users identified as high-risk are required to perform MFA or are blocked until remediation occurs, while low-risk users maintain seamless access. This targeted approach reduces friction for low-risk users while securing sensitive resources and minimizing potential account compromise.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users without considering risk levels, which may create unnecessary friction for low-risk users.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles but does not enforce MFA adaptively based on risk signals for standard users.
Dynamic Groups manage membership based on attributes but do not enforce authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection signals are correct because they enable selective MFA enforcement based on real-time risk. High-risk users complete MFA or remediate issues, while low-risk users access resources seamlessly. Reporting and audit logs track policy enforcement, risky sign-ins, and mitigation actions. This provides a proactive identity security approach, balancing security, usability, and regulatory compliance.
Question 120
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on their department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This feature in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) is a fundamental component of modern identity and access management, enabling organizations to automate provisioning and reduce administrative overhead. By leveraging attributes stored in the directory, administrators can define dynamic rules that evaluate user properties and assign memberships to the correct groups automatically. For instance, when a new employee joins the Finance department, dynamic membership rules can automatically place them into the Finance group, granting access to financial reporting tools, accounting systems, and collaboration platforms specific to the department. Similarly, a Marketing employee could automatically be assigned to the Marketing group, gaining immediate access to campaign management tools, analytics platforms, and department-specific resources. This ensures that access is consistently aligned with the employee’s responsibilities, reinforcing the principle of least privilege by limiting access to only what is necessary for the role, thereby reducing security risks and supporting compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO 27001.
During onboarding, Dynamic Groups evaluate user attributes in real time and automatically provision new employees into appropriate groups. This eliminates delays typically associated with manual provisioning, reducing the burden on IT administrators and minimizing the risk of human errors that could lead to misconfigured access or inappropriate permissions. Immediate access to required applications and resources enables new employees to start performing their roles effectively from day one, enhancing productivity and improving the overall onboarding experience. Dynamic Groups are also adaptive; if an employee transfers departments, changes roles, or updates key attributes, their group memberships automatically adjust to reflect the new responsibilities. For example, if a Sales Associate is promoted to Sales Manager, they may automatically lose access to standard sales tools while gaining access to management dashboards, team oversight tools, and reporting platforms. This dynamic behavior ensures that group memberships remain accurate, current, and aligned with business requirements throughout the employee lifecycle.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing governance and compliance oversight. While Dynamic Groups automate the assignment of users to groups, Access Reviews allow administrators and managers to periodically evaluate whether users still require access to resources. Access Reviews are particularly useful for identifying over-provisioned users, dormant accounts, or employees who have changed roles and no longer need specific permissions. They help maintain security and regulatory compliance by ensuring that access remains appropriate over time. However, Access Reviews do not automate the initial provisioning of new employees; their purpose is retrospective, focusing on auditing and remediating existing access rather than onboarding. Combining Dynamic Groups and Access Reviews provides a comprehensive identity lifecycle management solution: automated provisioning ensures accurate access for new employees, while periodic reviews maintain ongoing compliance and security hygiene.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on managing temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users. PIM enforces approval workflows, requires multi-factor authentication during role activation, and tracks activation history for auditing purposes. This is crucial for securing high-privilege accounts such as administrators or other critical roles. However, PIM does not handle standard user group assignments or automate the provisioning of everyday access for general employees. Its focus is on controlling and securing sensitive accounts rather than managing routine access. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by automatically assigning standard users to groups based on attributes, ensuring that everyday access is provisioned efficiently and accurately while administrators focus on governance and security of privileged roles.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies and device compliance requirements, including multi-factor authentication, location-based restrictions, and device health verification. Conditional Access ensures that only authorized and compliant users can access organizational resources, providing an adaptive security layer that protects sensitive data and applications. While essential for enforcing security policies, Conditional Access does not assign users to groups or provision access based on job role or attributes. Dynamic Groups and Conditional Access work together to provide a complete identity and access management solution: Dynamic Groups automate access assignment, while Conditional Access enforces secure and compliant access, ensuring that users can only access resources they are authorized to use under the conditions defined by organizational policies.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding, ensuring accurate access provisioning, and maintaining operational efficiency. By automatically assigning users to groups based on directory attributes, organizations reduce administrative effort, minimize errors, and ensure consistent access policies. Integration with Access Packages further enhances functionality, allowing multiple resources—including applications, groups, and permissions—to be bundled into a single automated workflow. For example, a new HR employee could automatically be added to the HR group while simultaneously receiving access to payroll systems, HR management applications, employee communication tools, and departmental file shares through a single Access Package. This ensures consistent access, reduces administrative workload, and allows employees to begin productive work immediately.
Reporting and auditing capabilities within Azure AD provide visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and compliance with organizational policies. Administrators can track which users have access to specific resources, monitor changes over time, and generate reports for governance or regulatory requirements. These capabilities provide transparency, accountability, and actionable insights, allowing organizations to quickly detect misconfigurations or unauthorized access. When combined with automated provisioning through Dynamic Groups, reporting ensures a secure, compliant, and well-governed identity management framework, minimizing risks and supporting efficient operations.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and organizational growth. As organizations expand, the number of employees, applications, and resources increases, making manual provisioning both complex and error-prone. Dynamic Groups scale automatically to accommodate growing workforce and resource requirements, adjusting group memberships in real time based on attribute changes, onboarding events, or departmental transitions. This capability ensures that employees consistently receive appropriate access without manual intervention, improving efficiency, reducing errors, and maintaining security. Automated group assignment also helps organizations adapt quickly to structural changes such as mergers, acquisitions, or reorganization, ensuring access remains aligned with evolving business needs.
Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-based access management in Azure Active Directory. They provide accurate and immediate provisioning of new employees, enforce least-privilege principles, reduce administrative workload, and maintain consistent access policies across the organization. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a complete, secure, and scalable identity management ecosystem. This approach streamlines onboarding, minimizes errors, enhances operational efficiency, and supports governance and compliance. By automating access assignment based on directory attributes, organizations maintain a robust, scalable, and secure identity management framework capable of supporting growth, role-based access control, and complex operational requirements. Dynamic Groups not only improve operational efficiency but also strengthen security, reduce administrative errors, and enable organizations to provide timely access to resources while maintaining control and compliance across the enterprise.