Visit here for our full Google Professional Cloud Developer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 106: 

You are developing a microservices application on Google Kubernetes Engine. You need to ensure that services can discover and communicate with each other. What should you use?

A) Cloud DNS

B) Kubernetes Service

C) Cloud Load Balancing

D) Cloud CDN

Answer: B

Explanation:

Kubernetes Service provides the native service discovery and load balancing mechanism within Google Kubernetes Engine clusters enabling microservices to reliably discover and communicate with each other regardless of pod location or lifecycle changes. Services create stable network endpoints with consistent DNS names and IP addresses that route traffic to appropriate pod replicas even as pods are created, destroyed, or rescheduled across cluster nodes.

A Kubernetes Service acts as an abstraction layer defining logical sets of pods and access policies. When you create a Service, Kubernetes assigns a cluster IP address that remains constant throughout the service lifetime. The cluster DNS automatically creates DNS records allowing other services to resolve the service name to its IP address. Services use label selectors to identify target pods, automatically updating endpoints as matching pods change. Different service types support various access patterns including ClusterIP for internal cluster communication, NodePort for external access through node IPs, and LoadBalancer for cloud load balancer integration.

Cloud DNS provides external DNS resolution but does not offer the dynamic service discovery needed for rapidly changing microservice deployments within clusters. Cloud Load Balancing distributes traffic from external sources but is not the primary mechanism for inter-service communication within GKE. Cloud CDN accelerates content delivery but does not provide service discovery capabilities.

Service discovery in Kubernetes operates through the kube-dns or CoreDNS components that maintain DNS records for services and pods. When a service is created, DNS entries are automatically generated in the format servicename.namespace.svc.cluster.local enabling straightforward service references. Environment variables are also injected into pods containing service endpoint information. For microservices architectures, this means services can reference each other using simple DNS names without hardcoding IP addresses or implementing custom discovery mechanisms. Advanced scenarios include headless services for direct pod access, external services for integrating external endpoints, and service mesh solutions like Istio for enhanced traffic management. Proper service configuration ensures reliable communication, supports zero-downtime deployments through rolling updates, enables horizontal scaling without client reconfiguration, and provides basic load balancing across service instances creating a robust foundation for microservices architectures.

Question 107: 

You need to deploy a containerized application to Google Cloud that automatically scales based on HTTP traffic. Which service should you use?

A) Compute Engine with managed instance groups

B) Cloud Run

C) App Engine flexible environment

D) Google Kubernetes Engine with manual scaling

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Run provides the optimal solution for deploying containerized applications with automatic HTTP-based scaling, offering a fully managed serverless platform that scales container instances from zero to thousands based on incoming request volume without requiring infrastructure management. This service combines the flexibility of containers with the simplicity of serverless computing enabling developers to focus on application code rather than scaling configuration or infrastructure operations.

Cloud Run automatically creates and destroys container instances in response to traffic patterns. When requests arrive, the service instantiates containers to handle the load, and when traffic subsides, instances scale down to zero eliminating costs during idle periods. The platform handles load balancing, HTTPS endpoint provisioning, and request routing transparently. Each container instance handles one request at a time by default, though concurrency can be configured. Scaling parameters include maximum instance counts, minimum instances for warm starts, and concurrency values per instance. The service bills only for actual request processing time and resource consumption rather than continuous instance operation.

Compute Engine with managed instance groups requires more manual configuration for autoscaling policies and load balancing setup. App Engine flexible environment supports containers but involves longer deployment and scaling times compared to Cloud Run’s rapid scaling. GKE with manual scaling requires explicit configuration and does not provide automatic scale-to-zero capabilities without additional components like Knative.

Cloud Run deployment involves containerizing applications using Docker, pushing images to Container Registry or Artifact Registry, and deploying services through console, gcloud commands, or CI/CD pipelines. The service supports any language or runtime that runs in containers providing ultimate flexibility. Built-in features include automatic HTTPS provisioning with managed certificates, custom domain mapping, request timeout configuration, memory and CPU allocation, environment variable management, and secret injection from Secret Manager. Integration with Cloud Build enables continuous deployment from source repositories. Traffic splitting supports blue-green deployments and gradual rollouts. Cloud Run integrates with Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging for observability. The serverless nature eliminates infrastructure patching and maintenance. Organizations benefit from cost efficiency through precise usage-based billing, operational simplicity without server management, rapid scaling responding to traffic spikes, developer productivity from streamlined deployment workflows, and infrastructure abstraction allowing focus on application logic rather than scaling mechanics.

Question 108: 

You are building an application that needs to process files uploaded to Cloud Storage. You want the processing to trigger automatically when files are uploaded. What should you implement?

A) Cloud Scheduler calling a Cloud Function

B) Cloud Function with Cloud Storage trigger

C) Pub/Sub subscription with manual polling

D) Cron job on Compute Engine

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Function with Cloud Storage trigger provides the event-driven architecture for automatically processing files immediately upon upload to Cloud Storage buckets without polling or manual intervention. This serverless approach creates responsive systems that react to storage events including file creation, deletion, or updates executing custom processing logic efficiently and cost-effectively.

Cloud Storage triggers activate Cloud Functions when specific events occur in designated buckets. When a file is uploaded, Cloud Storage publishes an event that automatically invokes the associated function passing event data including bucket name, file name, size, and metadata. The function executes processing logic such as image transformation, data validation, format conversion, or triggering downstream workflows. Multiple functions can respond to events in the same bucket enabling parallel processing pipelines. The event-driven model eliminates continuous polling reducing costs and improving response times.

Cloud Scheduler with Cloud Functions requires time-based scheduling rather than event-driven activation resulting in processing delays and unnecessary executions. Pub/Sub subscriptions with manual polling introduce latency and complexity compared to native storage triggers. Cron jobs on Compute Engine require maintaining running instances and implementing polling logic increasing operational overhead and costs.

Implementation involves creating Cloud Functions specifying the trigger type as Cloud Storage, selecting the bucket and event type such as finalize for uploads or delete for removals, and implementing processing logic in supported languages including Node.js, Python, Go, Java, or .NET. Event data provides context about the triggering file enabling appropriate processing. Functions should be idempotent handling potential duplicate invocations gracefully. Error handling includes retries for transient failures and dead letter queues for persistent problems. Processing workflows might include validating file formats, extracting metadata, transforming content, moving files between buckets, updating databases, or publishing notifications. Advanced patterns include chaining functions where one function’s output triggers subsequent processing, parallel processing where multiple functions handle different aspects simultaneously, and conditional logic where processing varies based on file characteristics. Organizations benefit from reduced operational complexity through serverless architecture, cost efficiency paying only for actual processing time, automatic scaling handling variable upload volumes, faster time to market deploying processing logic without infrastructure setup, and reliable execution with built-in retry mechanisms ensuring consistent processing.

Question 109: 

You need to implement distributed tracing across microservices deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine. Which tool should you use?

A) Cloud Monitoring

B) Cloud Trace

C) Cloud Profiler

D) Cloud Debugger

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Trace provides the distributed tracing capabilities specifically designed for analyzing latency and understanding request flows across microservices architectures deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine and other platforms. This tool captures timing data as requests traverse multiple services enabling developers to identify performance bottlenecks, understand service dependencies, and optimize application response times in complex distributed systems.

Cloud Trace works by instrumenting applications to create and propagate trace contexts as requests flow between services. Each service operation creates a span representing that component’s processing time, and related spans form a trace showing the complete request path. The trace data includes timing information, service names, operation details, and custom annotations. Cloud Trace automatically integrates with many Google Cloud services and supports manual instrumentation through client libraries for various languages. The console provides visualization showing request timelines, service dependencies, and latency distributions helping developers understand system behavior.

Cloud Monitoring collects metrics and logs but does not provide the request-level tracing needed for understanding distributed call paths. Cloud Profiler analyzes CPU and memory usage but does not trace request flows across services. Cloud Debugger inspects application state but does not track distributed transactions.

Implementation involves adding trace client libraries to microservices, configuring trace context propagation ensuring trace IDs pass between services through HTTP headers or RPC metadata, instrumenting key operations to create meaningful spans, and optionally adding custom attributes or annotations for additional context. Modern frameworks and service meshes like Istio can provide automatic tracing instrumentation. OpenTelemetry offers standardized APIs for vendor-neutral instrumentation exportable to Cloud Trace. Analysis workflows include identifying slow requests by examining high-latency traces, discovering bottleneck services by analyzing where time is spent, detecting cascading failures by observing error patterns across services, and optimizing performance by understanding actual versus expected latencies. Trace sampling controls data volume for high-traffic applications. Integration with Cloud Logging correlates traces with log entries. Organizations benefit from improved observability in complex microservices environments, faster troubleshooting by visualizing request paths, better performance optimization through data-driven insights, enhanced system understanding revealing actual service dependencies, and proactive problem detection identifying degradation before user impact through comprehensive distributed tracing capabilities.

Question 110: 

You are developing a REST API that needs to authenticate users using OAuth 2.0. Which Google Cloud service provides identity and access management capabilities?

A) Cloud IAM

B) Identity Platform

C) Cloud Armor

D) VPC Service Controls

Answer: B

Explanation:

Identity Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management capabilities specifically designed for authenticating end users in applications using OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and other modern authentication protocols. This fully managed service enables developers to add user authentication, authorization, and identity management to applications without building custom authentication systems, supporting various authentication methods including email/password, social providers, and enterprise identity federation.

Identity Platform offers SDKs and APIs for integrating authentication into web, mobile, and backend applications. The service handles user registration, login, password management, email verification, and multi-factor authentication. It supports authentication through multiple identity providers including Google, Facebook, Twitter, GitHub, and SAML/OpenID Connect providers enabling enterprise single sign-on integration. Token-based authentication issues JWT tokens that applications verify to authenticate API requests. The platform scales automatically handling authentication load and provides security features like account protection, suspicious activity detection, and compliance with authentication best practices.

Cloud IAM manages access to Google Cloud resources for service accounts and organizational users but is not designed for end-user application authentication. Cloud Armor provides DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities but does not handle user authentication. VPC Service Controls define security perimeters for Google Cloud resources rather than managing user identities.

Implementation involves creating an Identity Platform project, configuring authentication providers, integrating client SDKs into applications for handling authentication flows, securing backend APIs by verifying identity tokens, and managing user accounts through console or Admin APIs. Authentication flows include sign-up where users create accounts, sign-in where credentials are verified and tokens issued, password reset for account recovery, and token refresh for maintaining sessions. Backend APIs validate tokens by verifying signatures and claims ensuring requests come from authenticated users. Custom claims enable role-based access control adding application-specific authorization data to tokens. Advanced features include multi-tenancy supporting multiple independent user bases, account linking connecting multiple authentication methods to single users, and audit logging tracking authentication events. Organizations benefit from reduced development time by using managed authentication, improved security through professionally maintained systems, better user experience with familiar authentication methods, scalability handling growing user bases, and compliance meeting authentication security standards without extensive security expertise required for building custom authentication systems.

Question 111: 

You need to store application configuration that should be encrypted and accessible only to authorized services. Which Google Cloud service should you use?

A) Cloud Storage with encryption

B) Cloud SQL

C) Secret Manager

D) Firestore

Answer: C

Explanation:

Secret Manager provides the specialized service for securely storing, managing, and accessing sensitive configuration data such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and connection strings with built-in encryption, access control, and audit logging. This purpose-built solution addresses the critical security requirement of protecting secrets separately from application code and configuration ensuring sensitive data is never exposed in source repositories, environment variables, or configuration files.

Secret Manager encrypts all secret data at rest using Google-managed or customer-managed encryption keys. Secrets are versioned allowing rotation without breaking existing references and enabling rollback if needed. Fine-grained IAM policies control who can read, write, or manage secrets. Secret access is logged in Cloud Audit Logs providing visibility into usage patterns and potential security issues. Secrets can be accessed programmatically through client libraries in various languages or directly mounted into GKE pods and Cloud Run containers. The service integrates with automatic secret rotation for supported services like Cloud SQL.

Cloud Storage with encryption stores files but is not optimized for managing secrets with rotation, versioning, and granular access control. Cloud SQL is a database service for application data rather than secret management. Firestore provides a document database but lacks the specialized secret management features like automatic rotation, audit logging of accesses, and secret versioning.

Implementation involves creating secrets through console, gcloud commands, or APIs, adding secret versions containing actual values, configuring IAM permissions granting access to specific service accounts or users, and accessing secrets from applications using client libraries or API calls. Best practices include separating secrets by purpose and access requirements, implementing least privilege access granting minimum necessary permissions, rotating secrets regularly particularly for highly sensitive credentials, monitoring access through audit logs detecting unusual patterns, and automating secret injection avoiding hardcoded values in code. Integration patterns include mounting secrets as environment variables in Cloud Run services, using secretKeyRef in GKE pod specifications, retrieving secrets programmatically in Cloud Functions, and accessing during Cloud Build processes for deployment credentials. Organizations benefit from centralized secret management with single source of truth, enhanced security through encryption and access controls, improved compliance with audit trails of secret usage, operational efficiency through programmatic access and integration, and reduced risk by removing secrets from code repositories and configuration files creating a secure approach to managing sensitive application credentials and configurations.

Question 112: 

You are developing a data processing pipeline that needs to handle variable workloads. You want a managed service that can process data in parallel across multiple workers. Which service should you use?

A) Compute Engine with custom scripts

B) Cloud Dataflow

C) Cloud Functions

D) App Engine

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Dataflow provides the fully managed service for executing data processing pipelines with automatic parallel processing, dynamic worker scaling, and optimized resource management making it ideal for handling variable workloads and complex data transformations. This service implements the Apache Beam programming model supporting both batch and streaming data processing with the same unified pipeline code enabling flexible scalable data analytics without infrastructure management.

Dataflow automatically provisions worker instances, distributes data processing across workers, and scales resources based on pipeline requirements and data volume. The service handles worker failures with automatic retries, optimizes execution through dynamic work rebalancing, and manages resource allocation adapting to processing demands. Developers define pipelines as directed acyclic graphs of transformations including reading from sources, applying transformations like filtering, grouping, or aggregating, and writing results to sinks. Built-in connectors support various data sources including Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Pub/Sub, and Cloud Spanner. The service provides exactly-once processing semantics for streaming pipelines and automatic checkpointing for fault tolerance.

Compute Engine with custom scripts requires manual implementation of parallelization, worker management, and fault tolerance adding significant development and operational complexity. Cloud Functions suits event-driven processing of individual items but is not designed for coordinated pipeline processing with complex transformations. App Engine provides application hosting but lacks specialized data processing capabilities.

Pipeline development uses Apache Beam SDKs available in Java, Python, and Go defining data sources, transformation steps, and output destinations. Common transformations include ParDo for element-wise processing, GroupByKey for aggregations, windowing for time-based groupings in streaming, and side inputs for enrichment. Dataflow templates provide reusable pipeline patterns for common scenarios like bulk data movement or format conversion. Flex templates allow custom Docker containers for specialized processing logic. Monitoring through Cloud Monitoring tracks pipeline execution, worker utilization, and processing throughput. Integration with Cloud Composer enables orchestrating Dataflow jobs within complex workflows. Organizations benefit from serverless operation without cluster management, automatic scaling matching processing capacity to workload, cost optimization through right-sized resource allocation, developer productivity using high-level programming abstractions, unified programming model handling both batch and streaming data, and reliability through automatic fault handling creating robust scalable data processing capabilities for analytics, ETL, real-time processing, and machine learning feature engineering.

Question 113: 

You need to implement continuous integration and continuous deployment for a containerized application. Which Google Cloud service provides native CI/CD capabilities?

A) Cloud Source Repositories only

B) Cloud Build

C) Artifact Registry only

D) Deployment Manager

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Build provides the fully managed continuous integration and continuous deployment platform native to Google Cloud that automates building, testing, and deploying applications through configurable pipelines triggered by source code changes. This service supports containerized applications and various deployment targets enabling teams to implement modern DevOps practices without maintaining dedicated build infrastructure.

Cloud Build executes build processes defined in configuration files specifying steps to compile code, run tests, build container images, and deploy applications. Builds trigger automatically from commits to Cloud Source Repositories, GitHub, or Bitbucket. Each build runs in a dedicated environment with configurable machine types and disk sizes. The service provides built-in builders for common tasks like Docker image creation, kubectl commands, and gcloud deployments, while custom builders support specialized requirements. Build artifacts are stored in Artifact Registry or Container Registry. Build history, logs, and status are accessible through console and APIs. Integration with other Google Cloud services enables comprehensive deployment workflows.

Cloud Source Repositories provides Git hosting but not build execution capabilities. Artifact Registry stores build artifacts but does not orchestrate build processes. Deployment Manager provisions infrastructure resources but is not a CI/CD pipeline orchestrator.

Implementation involves creating build configuration files typically named cloudbuild.yaml defining build steps as sequences of commands, configuring triggers specifying when builds execute such as commits to specific branches or pull requests, setting substitution variables for dynamic values, configuring permissions for service accounts, and connecting to deployment targets like GKE, Cloud Run, or App Engine. Build steps can execute any container enabling flexibility through custom builders. Common pipeline patterns include building container images with Docker, running unit and integration tests, scanning images for vulnerabilities, deploying to staging environments, running smoke tests, and deploying to production with approval gates. Advanced features include parallel step execution for faster builds, build caching to speed up subsequent builds, encrypted secrets for sensitive data, and private worker pools for builds requiring VPC connectivity. Integration with vulnerability scanning automatically detects security issues in container images. Organizations benefit from faster release cycles through automated pipelines, improved code quality through integrated testing, reduced operational overhead with managed infrastructure, better security through artifact scanning and vulnerability detection, enhanced traceability with complete build history and audit logs, and flexible deployment workflows supporting various platforms and strategies creating comprehensive CI/CD capabilities for modern application development.

Question 114: 

You are developing an application that needs to make authenticated API calls to other Google Cloud services. Which approach should you use for service-to-service authentication?

A) API keys

B) OAuth 2.0 client credentials

C) Service accounts

D) Username and password

Answer: C

Explanation:

Service accounts provide the recommended authentication mechanism for service-to-service communication within Google Cloud enabling applications to authenticate and access other Google Cloud APIs without requiring human user credentials. Service accounts represent application identities with associated IAM permissions and cryptographic keys allowing secure programmatic access to resources while maintaining principle of least privilege through granular permission management.

Service accounts function as special Google accounts belonging to applications rather than individuals. Each service account has an email address identifier and associated IAM policies defining what resources it can access. Applications authenticate using service account credentials either through automatic mechanisms like Application Default Credentials in Google Cloud environments or explicit key files in external environments. When code runs on Compute Engine, GKE, Cloud Functions, Cloud Run, or App Engine, the runtime automatically provides credentials for attached service accounts eliminating the need for credential management. The authentication library handles token acquisition and refresh transparently. Short-lived access tokens are used for API calls ensuring security even if intercepted.

API keys provide simple authentication but lack fine-grained permissions and audit trails making them unsuitable for production service authentication. OAuth 2.0 client credentials are designed for external applications authenticating to third-party services rather than internal Google Cloud service communication. Username and password authentication is inappropriate for automated service accounts requiring human interaction.

Implementation involves creating service accounts through console, gcloud commands, or APIs, assigning IAM roles granting necessary permissions, attaching service accounts to compute resources or providing key files for external applications, and using client libraries that automatically handle authentication. Best practices include using separate service accounts for different applications or components, granting minimum necessary permissions following least privilege principle, rotating service account keys regularly if using external key files, monitoring service account usage through audit logs, and avoiding key file distribution preferring automatic credentials when possible. Advanced scenarios include service account impersonation where one service account temporarily assumes another’s identity, workload identity federation enabling external workloads to authenticate without key files, and domain-wide delegation for G Suite API access. Organizations benefit from secure automated authentication without human credentials, granular access control through IAM policies, comprehensive audit trails tracking all API calls, simplified credential management especially in Google Cloud environments, and reduced security risk through short-lived tokens and key rotation capabilities creating robust security foundations for cloud-native applications.

Question 115: 

You need to ensure that your application can handle traffic spikes without manual intervention. Which App Engine scaling type should you configure?

A) Manual scaling

B) Basic scaling

C) Automatic scaling

D) Fixed scaling

Answer: C

Explanation:

Automatic scaling in App Engine provides dynamic instance management that responds to traffic patterns by creating and destroying instances based on request rate, latency, and other metrics without requiring manual intervention. This scaling type optimizes application availability and cost efficiency by maintaining enough instances to handle current load while minimizing unnecessary instance costs during low-traffic periods.

Automatic scaling continuously monitors application metrics including request rate, request latency, and concurrent requests adjusting instance counts to meet demand. Configuration parameters control scaling behavior including target CPU utilization, target throughput, maximum concurrent requests per instance, minimum idle instances for handling sudden spikes, and maximum instances to cap costs. The scheduler routes requests across available instances with automatic load balancing. When traffic increases, new instances are created within seconds. When traffic subsides, excess instances are terminated after completing in-flight requests. This elastic behavior ensures applications handle traffic spikes gracefully without degraded performance or manual scaling operations.

Manual scaling requires explicit instance count specification without automatic adjustment. Basic scaling creates instances on demand but shuts them down after idle periods making it suitable for intermittent workloads but not optimal for variable continuous traffic. Fixed scaling is not a valid App Engine scaling type.

Configuration involves selecting automatic scaling in app.yaml or application settings, specifying scaling parameters matching application characteristics and performance requirements, setting resource limits like maximum instances or daily budget, and optionally configuring warmup requests for faster instance initialization. Scaling parameters balance cost and performance with conservative settings minimizing costs but potentially allowing brief performance degradation during rapid spikes, and aggressive settings ensuring excellent performance but increasing costs through more idle instances. Application design impacts scaling effectiveness with stateless applications scaling better than those requiring sticky sessions, efficient startup times enabling faster scaling response, and appropriate request timeouts preventing resource exhaustion. Monitoring through Cloud Monitoring reveals scaling patterns, instance utilization, and cost trends. Organizations benefit from improved reliability through automatic capacity adjustment, better user experience with consistent performance during traffic variations, operational efficiency eliminating manual scaling, cost optimization scaling down during low traffic, and development focus on features rather than capacity planning creating flexible responsive applications that adapt automatically to changing demand patterns.

Question 116: 

You are building a globally distributed application that needs low-latency data access. Which database service should you use?

A) Cloud SQL

B) Cloud Spanner

C) Cloud Bigtable

D) Firestore in Datastore mode

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Spanner provides the globally distributed relational database service combining horizontal scalability with strong consistency and SQL capabilities enabling low-latency data access for users worldwide. This unique service offers synchronous replication across multiple regions maintaining ACID transaction guarantees while delivering single-digit millisecond read latencies in local regions and sub-second commit latencies globally making it ideal for applications requiring global presence with consistent data access.

Cloud Spanner architecture replicates data across zones and regions using Google’s global network with automatic failover and transparent resharding as data grows. The service provides standard SQL interfaces supporting joins, secondary indexes, and complex queries while handling distributed transaction coordination. Multi-region configurations place data geographically close to users reducing latency. Horizontal scaling adds capacity by increasing node count without downtime or migration. External consistency ensures globally consistent reads and linearizable reads reflecting all previously committed transactions. The service automatically handles replication, sharding, and load balancing.

Cloud SQL provides regional relational databases but lacks global distribution and horizontal scalability. Cloud Bigtable offers low-latency NoSQL storage but does not provide SQL interfaces or multi-row transactions. Firestore in Datastore mode provides globally distributed document storage but with eventual consistency and different query capabilities than SQL.

Implementation involves creating Spanner instances with regional or multi-region configurations, defining database schemas using standard DDL with additional directives for primary keys and indexes, designing schema for optimal distribution avoiding hotspots, loading data through bulk import or application writes, and accessing data through client libraries or JDBC. Schema design considerations include choosing appropriate primary keys to distribute data evenly, using interleaved tables for related data locality, and creating secondary indexes strategically. Best practices include batching mutations for efficiency, using stale reads when absolute consistency is not required, partitioning large reads, and monitoring key metrics like CPU utilization and storage. Multi-region configurations provide disaster recovery and improved global latency but increase cost and commit latency compared to regional deployments. Organizations benefit from global scalability supporting worldwide applications from single databases, strong consistency eliminating complex application-level coordination, high availability with automatic failover, operational simplicity without sharding management, and familiar SQL interfaces reducing learning curves. Use cases include financial systems requiring globally consistent transactions, retail applications serving international customers, gaming platforms with worldwide players, and SaaS applications requiring multi-tenancy with strong isolation creating foundation for globally distributed mission-critical applications.

Question 117: 

You need to implement caching to reduce latency and database load for frequently accessed data. Which Google Cloud service should you use?

A) Cloud Storage

B) Cloud Memorystore

C) Persistent Disk

D) Local SSD

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud Memorystore provides fully managed Redis and Memcached services specifically designed for caching frequently accessed data with sub-millisecond latency, significantly reducing application latency and backend database load. This service delivers in-memory data stores with high throughput and low latency enabling applications to cache computation results, session data, frequently queried information, and other hot data improving performance and scalability.

Cloud Memorystore offers Redis and Memcached options. Redis provides advanced features including persistence, replication, automatic failover, and data structures like lists, sets, and sorted sets. Memcached offers simple key-value caching with distributed memory architecture. Both options provide microsecond latency for reads and writes. The service handles provisioning, patching, monitoring, and scaling. High availability configurations replicate data across zones with automatic failover. Instances connect through private IP addresses within VPC networks ensuring security and low latency. The service integrates with Cloud Monitoring for performance tracking and Cloud Logging for operational visibility.

Cloud Storage provides object storage optimized for large files but not low-latency key-value caching. Persistent Disk offers block storage for instances but with higher latency than in-memory caching. Local SSD provides fast storage attached to instances but requires application-level cache management and lacks managed service benefits.

Implementation involves creating Memorystore instances specifying Redis or Memcached, choosing memory capacity and high availability options, configuring VPC and authorized networks, connecting from applications using standard Redis or Memcached clients, and implementing caching strategies in application code. Common caching patterns include cache-aside where applications check cache before database, write-through where updates go to cache and database simultaneously, and read-through where cache automatically loads missing data. Cache invalidation strategies manage data freshness through time-to-live expiration, explicit invalidation on updates, or event-driven invalidation. Appropriate key design and data structures optimize cache effectiveness. Monitoring tracks cache hit rates, memory utilization, and connection counts. Organizations benefit from dramatically reduced latency accessing cached data compared to database queries, decreased database load through cache hits, improved scalability handling higher traffic with existing backend resources, cost optimization reducing expensive database operations, and simplified operations through fully managed infrastructure. Use cases include session storage for web applications, leaderboard and counting scenarios, real-time analytics with frequently updated data, content caching for faster page loads, and API response caching reducing redundant computation creating performance improvements throughout application stacks.

Question 118: 

You are deploying a web application that needs automatic SSL certificate provisioning and management. Which load balancer type should you use?

A) Network Load Balancer

B) HTTP(S) Load Balancer

C) TCP Proxy Load Balancer

D) Internal Load Balancer

Answer: B

Explanation:

HTTP(S) Load Balancer provides the global load balancing solution with built-in automatic SSL certificate provisioning, management, and renewal through Google-managed certificates or integration with Certificate Manager. This Layer 7 load balancer terminates SSL connections, distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic across backend services in multiple regions, and provides advanced features like URL-based routing, header manipulation, and Cloud CDN integration making it the optimal choice for web applications requiring secure global access.

The HTTP(S) Load Balancer operates at the application layer understanding HTTP protocols enabling content-based routing decisions. For SSL/TLS, it provides multiple options including Google-managed certificates that automatically provision and renew certificates for specified domains, self-managed certificates uploaded to the load balancer, and Certificate Manager integration for centralized certificate lifecycle management. The load balancer handles SSL termination, supports modern TLS versions and cipher suites, and provides automatic HTTP to HTTPS redirects. Global anycast IP addresses route users to nearest healthy backends. Backend services can span multiple regions with automatic failover. URL maps enable sophisticated routing based on hostnames and paths.

Network Load Balancer operates at Layer 4 passing through SSL connections rather than terminating them eliminating automatic certificate management. TCP Proxy Load Balancer provides Layer 4 load balancing without HTTP-specific features. Internal Load Balancer serves traffic within VPC networks rather than internet-facing applications.

Implementation involves creating global external HTTP(S) load balancer, configuring frontend with IP address and protocols, creating URL maps defining routing rules, setting up backend services with health checks, and configuring SSL certificates either through Google-managed certificates by specifying domains or uploading existing certificates. Google-managed certificates automatically handle ACME DNS challenges for validation and renew certificates before expiration. Backend services group instances, NEGs, or Cloud Run services with health checking ensuring traffic routes only to healthy backends. Advanced features include Cloud Armor for DDoS protection and WAF rules, Cloud CDN for content caching, IAP for access control, custom request and response headers, traffic steering based on headers or cookies, and connection draining for graceful shutdown. Organizations benefit from simplified SSL management with automatic provisioning and renewal, global reach with single anycast IP serving worldwide users, high availability with cross-region failover, advanced routing capabilities for sophisticated applications, integrated security features, and scalability handling massive traffic volumes. The load balancer is essential for production web applications requiring reliable secure scalable global access with minimal operational overhead.

Question 119: 

You need to store and query time-series data from IoT devices at scale. Which database service is most appropriate?

A) Cloud SQL

B) Cloud Spanner

C) Cloud Bigtable

D) Cloud Firestore

Answer: C

Explanation:

Cloud Bigtable provides the fully managed NoSQL database service specifically optimized for handling massive volumes of time-series data with high throughput and low latency making it ideal for IoT applications generating continuous streams of sensor readings and telemetry. This service offers seamless scalability, consistent sub-10ms latency at any scale, and high throughput for both reads and writes supporting real-time analytics and operational monitoring of IoT device fleets.

Cloud Bigtable stores data in tables with rows identified by keys and columns organized into column families. The service automatically shards data across multiple nodes enabling horizontal scaling to petabytes while maintaining performance. Time-series data naturally fits Bigtable’s data model using composite row keys combining device identifiers and timestamps ensuring related data is stored together. Sequential writes and range scans perform efficiently. The service integrates with data processing tools like Cloud Dataflow, Dataproc, and BigQuery for analytics. High availability configurations replicate data across zones or regions. SSD and HDD storage options balance performance and cost.

Cloud SQL provides relational databases suitable for moderate data volumes but not optimized for time-series scale and ingestion rates. Cloud Spanner offers global distribution and SQL but at higher cost for time-series workloads that rarely need cross-row transactions. Cloud Firestore provides document storage but without the same time-series optimization and throughput as Bigtable.

Implementation involves creating Bigtable instances with appropriate cluster configurations, designing table schemas with row keys optimized for access patterns, using column families to group related data, implementing data ingestion through client libraries or streaming pipelines, and querying data through direct API access or integrated analytics tools. Effective row key design is critical for performance, typically incorporating device ID, reverse timestamp for recent-first access, and measurement type. This design distributes writes across cluster nodes avoiding hotspots while enabling efficient range scans. Column qualifiers represent different metrics or attributes. Time-to-live policies automatically expire old data managing storage costs. Monitoring tracks key metrics like CPU utilization, storage usage, and request latencies. Organizations benefit from unlimited scalability growing from gigabytes to petabytes, consistent low latency regardless of data volume, high throughput supporting millions of operations per second, cost-effective storage for massive datasets, and operational simplicity through managed infrastructure. Use cases include IoT sensor data ingestion and analytics, application metrics and monitoring, financial market data, adtech click streams, and any scenario requiring high-volume time-ordered data storage and retrieval creating foundation for real-time analytics and operational intelligence.

Question 120: 

You need to ensure that your Cloud Run service only accepts requests from your GKE cluster. Which approach should you implement?

A) Use Cloud Run service with public access

B) Configure Cloud Run with Ingress set to internal and Cloud Load Balancing

C) Use API keys for authentication

D) Deploy Cloud Run service in a different project

Answer: B

Explanation:

Configuring Cloud Run with Ingress set to internal and Cloud Load Balancing provides the secure networking approach restricting access to the Cloud Run service so only requests from authorized sources within your Google Cloud environment such as GKE clusters can reach it. This configuration prevents public internet access while enabling internal services to communicate through internal load balancers maintaining security through network isolation and access controls.

Cloud Run ingress settings control network access paths to services. Setting ingress to internal restricts the service to accept traffic only from resources within the same project VPC network or through internal load balancers and Cloud Service Mesh. Combined with an internal HTTP(S) Load Balancer, the configuration creates a private endpoint accessible from GKE pods through internal networking. The load balancer routes requests to Cloud Run while enforcing additional security policies. IAM permissions further restrict invocation to authorized service accounts. GKE pods use workload identity to authenticate as service accounts with Cloud Run Invoker role allowing legitimate requests while blocking unauthorized access.

Public access Cloud Run services accept internet requests violating the isolation requirement. API keys provide limited authentication without network-level access control. Deploying in different projects adds complexity without addressing fundamental network access control needs.

Implementation involves deploying Cloud Run service with ingress set to internal only, configuring IAM policies granting Cloud Run Invoker role to GKE service accounts through workload identity, setting up internal HTTP(S) Load Balancer with backend service pointing to Cloud Run NEG, configuring DNS for the internal load balancer IP, and accessing from GKE pods using load balancer hostname with workload identity credentials. Workload identity binds Kubernetes service accounts to Google service accounts eliminating the need for key files. The GKE service account needs cloudrun.services.invoke permission on the Cloud Run service. Advanced configurations include Cloud Armor policies for additional request filtering, Identity-Aware Proxy for user-level access control, VPC Service Controls for additional security perimeters, and service mesh integration for sophisticated traffic management. Organizations benefit from enhanced security through network isolation preventing public access, granular access control through IAM policies, audit trails logging all invocation attempts, compliance meeting requirements for internal-only services, and flexibility supporting multi-tier architectures where frontend services in GKE call backend Cloud Run services. This pattern is common in microservices architectures where some services handle external traffic through exposed GKE ingress while others remain internal through restricted Cloud Run services creating layered security appropriate for different service risk profiles.