View Full Cisco 300-220 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps

 

Question 61.

Which telemetry is most useful for identifying unusual parent-child process relationships?

1. DNS query logs
2. Process creation events
3. Firewall rule sets
4. Certificate inventories

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Process creation events record which executable launched another process, creating a parent-child relationship. Threat hunters can use this information to identify unusual execution chains, such as a document reader spawning a scripting interpreter or a service launching an unexpected command shell. These relationships can reveal suspicious activity that simple file or network indicators may miss. DNS logs focus on name resolution, firewall rules describe traffic policy, and certificate inventories contain certificate information rather than execution lineage. Examining process ancestry is therefore particularly useful when investigating potentially malicious execution behavior across endpoints.

Question 62.

What should a hunter establish before querying a large telemetry dataset?

1. Search scope
2. Password rotation
3. Endpoint ownership
4. Certificate authority

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Defining the search scope before querying a large dataset makes threat hunting more focused and efficient. A hunter should determine which systems, users, time periods, event types, or behaviors are relevant to the hypothesis. Without a clear scope, queries may generate excessive results, consume unnecessary resources, and make meaningful findings harder to identify. Password rotation and certificate authorities address different security functions, while endpoint ownership may provide useful context but does not define the analytical boundaries of a hunt. A clearly established scope helps hunters maintain consistency and interpret results more accurately.

Question 63.

Which activity can reveal systems communicating with a suspicious destination?

1. Memory allocation review
2. File permission analysis
3. Network flow examination
4. Registry comparison

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Network flow examination can identify communication patterns between internal systems and external destinations. Flow records commonly provide information such as source and destination addresses, ports, protocols, and connection timing. Hunters can use these characteristics to identify unusual outbound communication, repeated connections, unexpected services, or traffic involving suspicious infrastructure. Memory allocation and registry analysis focus primarily on endpoint behavior, while file permission analysis examines access controls. Network flows are especially valuable during hunts involving command-and-control communication or unusual external connectivity because they provide visibility into communication relationships even when payload content is unavailable.

Question 64.

Why is event normalization valuable during threat hunting?

1. It removes all duplicate events
2. It blocks unauthorized accounts
3. It replaces endpoint telemetry
4. It standardizes comparable fields

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Event normalization converts information from different telemetry sources into a more consistent structure. Security environments often collect logs from operating systems, applications, network devices, cloud platforms, and security tools, each using different field names and formats. Standardized fields make it easier to correlate events and build reusable hunting queries across multiple data sources. Normalization does not automatically remove every duplicate event, replace endpoint telemetry, or block accounts. Its primary value is analytical consistency. By presenting comparable information in a common structure, normalization helps hunters correlate related activity and identify patterns across diverse environments.

Question 65.

Which endpoint artifact can indicate recently executed applications?

1. Execution-related records
2. Firewall configurations
3. DHCP reservations
4. Wireless profiles

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Execution-related records can provide valuable evidence about applications that have recently run on an endpoint. Depending on the operating system and available telemetry, these records may include process creation information, execution traces, application activity, or other artifacts associated with program launches. Such information can help hunters investigate suspicious tools, unexpected binaries, or unusual execution sequences. Firewall configurations describe traffic controls, DHCP reservations associate addresses with clients, and wireless profiles store connectivity settings. When investigating possible endpoint compromise, execution evidence can help establish what programs ran and when they were active.

Question 66.

What does temporal correlation help a hunter determine?

1. Asset ownership
2. Event relationships over time
3. Encryption algorithm
4. Hardware compatibility

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Temporal correlation examines events according to their timing and helps determine whether separate activities may be related. For example, an authentication event followed shortly by process creation and an outbound network connection may form a meaningful sequence. Timing can therefore provide important context when reconstructing potential attack activity. Asset ownership, encryption algorithms, and hardware compatibility answer different questions and are not the primary purpose of temporal correlation. Hunters commonly combine timestamps from multiple telemetry sources to identify sequences, establish timelines, and distinguish isolated events from coordinated activity.

Question 67.

Which approach starts with an expected malicious behavior and searches for evidence?

1. Random exploration
2. Asset inventory
3. Hypothesis-driven hunting
4. Configuration auditing

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Hypothesis-driven hunting begins with a specific, testable assumption about potentially malicious activity. The hunter then identifies the telemetry required to evaluate that assumption and constructs queries or investigative steps around it. For example, a hypothesis might involve suspicious scripting activity or unusual authentication behavior. The resulting evidence can support, weaken, or disprove the hypothesis. Random exploration lacks a defined analytical objective, asset inventory focuses on identifying systems and resources, and configuration auditing examines settings. A hypothesis-driven approach gives the investigation structure while still allowing the hunter to refine the investigation based on discovered evidence.

Question 68.

Which data source is particularly useful for investigating domain-resolution activity?

1. DNS telemetry
2. Process memory
3. USB inventory
4. Local group policy

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

DNS telemetry records domain-resolution activity and can help hunters investigate which systems queried particular domains. It may reveal repeated lookups, newly observed domains, unusual query patterns, or connections between endpoints and suspicious infrastructure. DNS information can be especially useful when investigating command-and-control behavior because malicious software often needs to resolve external destinations before establishing communication. Process memory provides runtime information, USB inventories track removable devices, and local group policy contains configuration settings. DNS telemetry therefore provides a direct source of evidence when the hunting hypothesis concerns domain-resolution behavior.

Question 69.

What is the main purpose of enriching a hunting result with asset context?

1. Determine processor speed
2. Identify business relevance
3. Compress event records
4. Disable unused services

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Asset context helps a hunter understand the importance and meaning of an observed event. Information such as asset role, business function, ownership, criticality, or environment can distinguish ordinary activity from potentially significant behavior. For example, an unusual connection from a critical server may deserve different attention than the same connection from a disposable test system. Asset enrichment does not primarily measure processor speed, compress records, or disable services. Adding contextual information allows analysts to prioritize findings more effectively and investigate suspicious activity according to the operational importance of the affected system.

Question 70.

Which indicator type identifies a specific network location?

1. File hash
2. Process name
3. IP address
4. Registry value

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

An IP address identifies a network location associated with a host or interface and can therefore serve as a network indicator during threat hunting. Hunters may investigate connections involving suspicious IP addresses, identify internal systems communicating with them, or correlate network activity with other evidence. File hashes identify specific file content, process names identify executing programs, and registry values represent stored configuration or system information. IP addresses are particularly useful when investigating network communication because they can connect observed traffic to a particular destination or source and support broader infrastructure analysis.

Question 71.

What does a successful threat-hunting query primarily provide?

1. Evidence for investigation
2. Automatic incident closure
3. Guaranteed attribution
4. Permanent threat removal

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

A successful hunting query produces evidence that can help investigators evaluate suspicious activity. The resulting records may reveal relevant users, systems, processes, network connections, timestamps, or other indicators that require further analysis. A query does not automatically close an incident, guarantee attribution to a particular actor, or permanently remove a threat. Threat hunting is an investigative process in which collected evidence is interpreted and validated. Findings may eventually support detection engineering or incident response, but the initial value of the query is providing useful evidence that advances the investigation.

Question 72.

Which behavior may suggest periodic command-and-control communication?

1. One-time local printing
2. Repeated timed connections
3. Static wallpaper changes
4. Routine keyboard input

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Repeated network connections occurring at regular or semi-regular intervals can indicate beacon-like communication. Malware may periodically contact external infrastructure to receive commands, send status information, or retrieve additional instructions. Hunters can examine connection timestamps, destinations, intervals, and related endpoint activity to determine whether the pattern is unusual. A one-time print job, wallpaper modification, or ordinary keyboard activity generally does not establish this type of network behavior. Periodicity alone is not proof of malicious activity, but it can provide a useful hunting signal when combined with destination reputation and endpoint evidence.

Question 73.

Which technique helps determine whether an observed indicator is trustworthy?

1. Indicator validation
2. Screen calibration
3. Storage defragmentation
4. Password synchronization

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Indicator validation determines whether an observed indicator is reliable enough to support an investigation or detection. Hunters may compare the indicator against authoritative intelligence, historical observations, internal telemetry, reputation information, or additional technical evidence. This helps reduce false positives caused by outdated, incorrect, shared, or benign indicators. Screen calibration, storage defragmentation, and password synchronization address unrelated operational functions. Validating indicators is particularly important before using them to make investigative conclusions or build automated detections because the quality and context of an indicator directly influence the usefulness of the resulting analysis.

Question 74.

What does process ancestry reveal during endpoint investigation?

1. Wireless signal strength
2. Parent-child execution structure
3. Disk partition capacity
4. Certificate expiration dates

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Process ancestry shows how processes were launched in relation to one another. This parent-child structure can reveal suspicious execution chains that may otherwise appear as isolated events. For example, an office application launching a scripting engine or an unexpected service creating a command shell can warrant investigation. Wireless signal strength, disk capacity, and certificate expiration provide useful information in other contexts but do not describe execution lineage. By examining process ancestry, hunters can understand how activity originated, identify unusual launch relationships, and connect multiple execution events into a more meaningful investigative sequence.

Question 75.

Which source can help identify suspicious authentication patterns?

1. Identity logs
2. Printer queues
3. Display settings
4. BIOS configuration

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Identity and authentication logs provide information about account activity, including login attempts, authentication methods, source systems, timestamps, and sometimes authentication outcomes. Hunters can analyze these records for unusual locations, unexpected access times, repeated failures, or abnormal authentication sequences. Printer queues, display settings, and BIOS configuration do not normally provide the necessary visibility into account authentication behavior. Identity telemetry is therefore an important source when investigating possible credential misuse, unauthorized access, or anomalous account activity. Correlating authentication records with endpoint and network events can further strengthen the investigation.

Question 76.

What is a key benefit of retrospective threat hunting?

1. Reviewing past telemetry
2. Replacing security controls
3. Resetting every account
4. Encrypting historical logs

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Retrospective hunting examines previously collected telemetry to determine whether suspicious activity occurred during an earlier period. This can become particularly valuable after a new indicator, technique, or threat behavior is identified. Hunters can search historical records to determine whether the environment experienced related activity before the indicator was known. Retrospective hunting does not require replacing existing controls, resetting every account, or encrypting historical logs. Its main value is allowing defenders to revisit stored evidence and identify potentially missed activity that occurred before a new detection capability or intelligence insight became available.

Question 77.

Which output is most useful for documenting a confirmed hunting discovery?

1. Unrelated screenshots
2. Validated evidence summary
3. Random configuration files
4. Temporary browser cache

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

A validated evidence summary provides a structured record of what was discovered, how it was verified, and which evidence supports the conclusion. Good documentation can include affected systems, relevant timestamps, observed behaviors, indicators, investigative queries, and validation results. Unrelated screenshots, random configuration files, or temporary browser cache do not provide a coherent representation of a confirmed finding. Clear documentation also helps other security teams reproduce the investigation, improve detections, and maintain an organizational knowledge base. Recording validated evidence transforms an individual hunting discovery into information that can support broader defensive operations.

Question 78.

Which technology commonly aggregates security events for correlation?

1. SIEM platform
2. USB controller
3. Graphics adapter
4. Print server

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

A Security Information and Event Management platform aggregates security-related events from multiple sources and provides capabilities for searching, correlation, alerting, and analysis. Hunters can use SIEM data to connect authentication events, endpoint activity, network traffic, and other telemetry within a common investigative environment. A USB controller manages device connectivity, a graphics adapter handles visual processing, and a print server manages printing services. SIEM platforms are therefore particularly useful for threat hunting when analysts need to examine relationships among events originating from different systems or security technologies.

Question 79.

What should a hunter do when evidence disproves the initial hypothesis?

1. Ignore contradictory results
2. Repeat identical queries indefinitely
3. Refine the hypothesis
4. Delete the collected telemetry

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Threat hunting is an iterative analytical process. When evidence disproves an initial hypothesis, the hunter should use the results to refine or replace the hypothesis and determine what additional evidence may be relevant. Ignoring contradictory results undermines the investigation, while repeatedly running identical queries without learning from the results adds little value. Deleting collected telemetry can also remove evidence needed for further analysis. A disciplined hunter treats negative or contradictory findings as useful information because they can narrow the investigation, reveal incorrect assumptions, and guide the development of a more precise hypothesis.

Question 80.

Which action can turn a repeatable hunting discovery into continuous monitoring?

1. Archive the workstation
2. Build a detection rule
3. Remove event collection
4. Disable network logging

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

When a hunting investigation repeatedly identifies a meaningful malicious behavior, the observed pattern can often be converted into a detection rule. Continuous detection allows security systems to identify similar activity automatically rather than relying exclusively on periodic manual hunts. The rule should be validated and tuned to reduce false positives before deployment. Archiving the workstation, removing event collection, or disabling network logging would reduce visibility rather than improve detection. Converting successful hunting logic into detection content helps organizations operationalize investigative knowledge and establish more persistent monitoring for known behaviors.