View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-745 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.

Q21. A multinational organization wants branch users to access SaaS and Internet applications through the closest security enforcement point instead of backhauling traffic to a central data center. Which architecture best meets this requirement?

1. Centralized hub-and-spoke VPN only
   2. Layer 2 trunking between all sites
   3. Static GRE tunnels to headquarters
   4. SASE with distributed cloud-delivered security controls

Correct Answer: 4. SASE with distributed cloud-delivered security controls

Explanation: Secure Access Service Edge, or SASE, combines networking and cloud-delivered security capabilities so users and branches can reach applications through geographically appropriate enforcement points. This can reduce latency caused by backhauling Internet and SaaS traffic to a central data center. A SASE design can integrate functions such as secure web gateway, zero-trust access, firewall services, and SD-WAN connectivity. Traditional hub-and-spoke VPNs may create inefficient traffic paths for distributed users. Layer 2 trunks and static GRE tunnels also do not provide the integrated cloud security and location-independent policy enforcement required for modern hybrid and branch access.

Q22. Which control is most appropriate for protecting the routing protocol process and other critical control-plane functions on a network device from excessive traffic?

1. Web Application Firewall
   2. Control Plane Policing
   3. DLP
   4. Browser isolation

Correct Answer: 2. Control Plane Policing

Explanation: Control Plane Policing, commonly called CoPP, protects the control plane of routers and switches by classifying and rate-limiting traffic destined for the device itself. This helps prevent excessive or malicious traffic from overwhelming routing protocols, management protocols, and other CPU-dependent services. CoPP is distinct from normal transit-data filtering because it focuses on traffic processed by the infrastructure device’s control plane. A WAF protects web applications, DLP protects sensitive information, and browser isolation addresses risky web browsing. CoPP is therefore an important design control for maintaining infrastructure stability during denial-of-service attempts or accidental traffic floods.

Q23. An enterprise wants remote employees to access one internal application without providing full network-level VPN connectivity. Which design best follows least-privilege principles?

1. Zero Trust Network Access to the specific application
   2. Full-tunnel VPN with unrestricted access to all private subnets
   3. Publicly expose the application with no authentication
   4. Give users a shared administrator account

Correct Answer: 1. Zero Trust Network Access to the specific application

Explanation: Zero Trust Network Access, or ZTNA, provides application-specific access based on identity, device posture, context, and policy rather than extending broad network connectivity to the remote user. This reduces lateral-movement opportunities because the user receives access only to authorized applications rather than the entire internal network. A traditional full-network VPN can still be appropriate in some scenarios, but unrestricted subnet access violates least privilege when only one application is required. Public exposure without authentication creates significant risk, and shared administrator credentials weaken accountability and access control. ZTNA is therefore the stronger design for narrowly scoped remote application access.

Q24. A security architect needs visibility into malicious behavior inside a Kubernetes cluster without relying solely on perimeter firewalls. Which technology can provide fine-grained visibility and enforcement at the Linux kernel level?

1. SMTP relay filtering
   2. GRE encapsulation
   3. eBPF-based security controls
   4. Traditional NAT only

Correct Answer: 3. eBPF-based security controls

Explanation: Extended Berkeley Packet Filter, or eBPF, can run verified programs within the Linux kernel and provide detailed visibility into networking, processes, system calls, and workload behavior. In cloud-native environments, eBPF-based security platforms can enforce policy and observe traffic between containers or services without depending only on traditional network choke points. This is particularly useful in Kubernetes, where workloads are dynamic and east-west traffic may never pass through a perimeter firewall. GRE and NAT provide networking functions rather than behavioral workload security. SMTP filtering protects email. eBPF therefore supports granular runtime visibility and policy enforcement close to the workload.

Q25. A company wants to reduce the chance that stolen passwords can be used to access cloud applications. Which identity design provides the greatest improvement?

1. Longer usernames
   2. Passwordless authentication using phishing-resistant credentials
   3. Shared passwords stored in spreadsheets
   4. Disabling login logging

Correct Answer: 2. Passwordless authentication using phishing-resistant credentials

Explanation: Passwordless authentication can reduce reliance on reusable secrets that attackers steal through phishing, credential stuffing, keylogging, and password database breaches. Phishing-resistant methods such as FIDO2-based authenticators can bind authentication to legitimate services and require possession of an approved device or hardware-backed credential. This significantly reduces the effectiveness of fake login pages compared with traditional password-only authentication. Longer usernames do not protect credentials, shared passwords reduce accountability, and disabling login logs weakens detection. Passwordless authentication should still be combined with device trust, conditional access, lifecycle management, and recovery controls for a complete identity-security architecture.

Q26. An application contains publicly reachable APIs that are being abused through malformed requests and attempts to exploit application-layer vulnerabilities. Which security control should be positioned closest to the application?

1. MPLS CE router
   2. Layer 2 port security
   3. NTP authentication
   4. Web Application Firewall with API-aware protections

Correct Answer: 4. Web Application Firewall with API-aware protections

Explanation: A Web Application Firewall with API-aware capabilities is designed to inspect HTTP and HTTPS requests and enforce application-layer protections. It can identify malformed inputs, suspicious request patterns, protocol violations, and attacks targeting APIs or web applications. Positioning the control close to the application helps ensure that requests are evaluated before reaching vulnerable application components. Layer 2 port security protects switch access ports, while MPLS routing and NTP authentication solve unrelated networking problems. An API-aware WAF should be paired with strong application authentication, secure coding, schema validation, rate limiting, and continuous vulnerability management.

Q27. A network architect needs to securely connect cloud workloads in two public cloud providers while maintaining encrypted traffic across the Internet. Which approach is most appropriate?

1. IPsec tunnels between the cloud environments
   2. Unencrypted GRE over the Internet
   3. Public IP communication with no encryption
   4. Layer 2 spanning tree between clouds

Correct Answer: 1. IPsec tunnels between the cloud environments

Explanation: IPsec provides network-layer confidentiality, integrity, peer authentication, and anti-replay protection, making it suitable for encrypted connectivity between cloud environments over untrusted networks. Most public cloud providers support VPN gateways capable of establishing standards-based IPsec tunnels. GRE can provide encapsulation flexibility but does not provide encryption by itself. Direct public IP communication without encryption exposes traffic unnecessarily, while extending spanning tree between public cloud providers is neither practical nor a secure inter-cloud design. IPsec is therefore a common architectural choice when private dedicated connectivity is unavailable or when encrypted overlay connectivity is required between clouds.

Q28. Which security architecture best reduces lateral movement if an attacker compromises one virtual machine in a data center?

1. Flat VLAN containing all servers
   2. One firewall only at the Internet edge
   3. Distributed firewalling with workload-level segmentation
   4. Disable east-west traffic logging

Correct Answer: 3. Distributed firewalling with workload-level segmentation

Explanation: Distributed firewalling places policy enforcement close to individual workloads, enabling granular control over east-west communication. Instead of assuming that all systems inside a data center are trusted, administrators can define which services, application tiers, and workloads are permitted to communicate. If one virtual machine is compromised, segmentation can prevent the attacker from freely scanning or accessing neighboring systems. A flat VLAN and perimeter-only firewall provide limited protection against internal lateral movement. Disabling east-west logging further reduces visibility. Distributed policy enforcement therefore reduces the blast radius of workload compromise and supports zero-trust segmentation inside the data center.

Q29. A security architect is designing controls for an IoT network containing thousands of sensors that cannot run endpoint security agents. What is the best compensating design?

1. Give all sensors unrestricted Internet access
   2. Place sensors on the employee wireless network
   3. Disable device inventory
   4. Segment IoT devices and enforce network-based access policies

Correct Answer: 4. Segment IoT devices and enforce network-based access policies

Explanation: Many IoT devices have limited processing capabilities, proprietary operating systems, or long support cycles that prevent traditional endpoint-security agents from being installed. Network-based segmentation and access control can compensate by limiting which systems and services the devices can reach. Device profiling, NAC, firewall policy, anomaly detection, and controlled Internet access can further strengthen the design. Placing IoT devices on the employee network increases lateral-movement risk, while unrestricted Internet access creates unnecessary exposure. Maintaining accurate device inventory is also essential. Segmentation provides containment even when the endpoint itself cannot support advanced security software.

Q30. Which firewall capability provides both application awareness and intrusion prevention beyond traditional port-based filtering?

1. Next-generation firewall
   2. Basic packet-filter ACL only
   3. Layer 2 hub
   4. DHCP relay

Correct Answer: 1. Next-generation firewall

Explanation: A next-generation firewall extends traditional stateful firewalling with deeper application identification, user-aware policy, intrusion prevention, threat intelligence integration, URL controls, file inspection, and other advanced capabilities. This allows policy decisions to consider the actual application and threat context rather than relying only on source, destination, protocol, and port numbers. Basic ACLs remain useful for simple traffic controls but lack the same application and threat awareness. Layer 2 hubs and DHCP relays perform networking functions rather than threat inspection. NGFW capabilities are therefore appropriate when the architecture requires integrated firewalling and advanced threat prevention.

Q31. A development team wants to detect vulnerable third-party libraries before an application reaches production. Which DevSecOps capability is most appropriate?

1. Network address translation
   2. Software Composition Analysis
   3. BGP route filtering
   4. Physical badge control

Correct Answer: 2. Software Composition Analysis

Explanation: Software Composition Analysis, or SCA, identifies open-source and third-party components used by an application and compares them against known vulnerability and licensing information. Integrating SCA into CI/CD pipelines helps development teams identify vulnerable dependencies before software reaches production. This is particularly important because modern applications often contain far more third-party code than custom code. SCA should be combined with dependency pinning, approved repositories, automated updates, and risk-based security gates. NAT, BGP filtering, and physical access controls address different infrastructure security problems and cannot identify vulnerable software libraries within an application build.

Q32. Which application security test analyzes source or compiled code without executing the application?

1. Dynamic Application Security Testing
   2. Runtime network IDS
   3. Static Application Security Testing
   4. Penetration testing against production only

Correct Answer: 3. Static Application Security Testing

Explanation: Static Application Security Testing, or SAST, analyzes source code, bytecode, or compiled application code without executing the application. It can identify insecure coding patterns, potential injection flaws, unsafe functions, and other vulnerabilities early in development. This makes SAST suitable for integration into CI pipelines where developers can receive feedback before deployment. Dynamic Application Security Testing evaluates a running application externally and therefore operates differently. Network IDS analyzes network traffic rather than application source. Effective DevSecOps programs often combine SAST, DAST, SCA, secret detection, and runtime controls because each method identifies different categories of security weakness.

Q33. An incident reveals that attackers moved from a compromised user workstation to a sensitive database because both systems were in the same broad network segment. Which architecture change most directly addresses the finding?

1. Implement segmentation between user, application, and database tiers
   2. Increase mailbox size
   3. Reduce password length
   4. Disable incident logging

Correct Answer: 1. Implement segmentation between user, application, and database tiers

Explanation: Segmentation limits which systems can communicate and reduces an attacker’s ability to move laterally after compromising one endpoint. In this scenario, user workstations should not have unrestricted direct access to sensitive database systems. A better design would permit only required application-to-database flows and tightly control administrative access. Microsegmentation, internal firewalls, ACLs, or identity-aware policy can enforce those boundaries. Increasing mailbox capacity and reducing password strength do not address lateral movement. Disabling logs would make the situation worse by reducing investigative visibility. Incident findings should feed back into architecture improvements that remove the exposed attack path.

Q34. Which risk treatment approach involves transferring some financial impact of a security incident to another party through a contractual mechanism?

1. Risk avoidance
   2. Risk acceptance
   3. Risk mitigation
   4. Risk transfer

Correct Answer: 4. Risk transfer

Explanation: Risk transfer shifts some consequences of a risk to another organization through mechanisms such as cyber insurance, outsourcing contracts, warranties, or indemnification agreements. Transfer does not eliminate the underlying threat or vulnerability, so organizations still need appropriate security controls. Risk mitigation reduces likelihood or impact through technical or procedural controls. Risk avoidance removes the activity that creates the risk, while risk acceptance acknowledges that remaining risk will be tolerated. Security architects should understand these treatment strategies because technical controls are only one part of broader business risk management, and organizations may apply multiple treatments to the same risk.

Q35. Which design framework is focused on understanding business assets, threats, vulnerabilities, and attack scenarios to support threat modeling?

1. DHCP
   2. SMTP
   3. SABSA-style business-driven security architecture principles
   4. ARP

Correct Answer: 3. SABSA-style business-driven security architecture principles

Explanation: Business-driven security architecture frameworks such as SABSA help architects connect security design decisions to business objectives, assets, risks, and required security services. Threat modeling within such an approach considers valuable assets, possible threat actors, vulnerabilities, and attack paths so controls are selected according to real business risk. DHCP, SMTP, and ARP are networking protocols rather than security architecture methodologies. The key idea is that security architecture should not begin with a product list. It should begin with business requirements and risk, then derive appropriate controls, patterns, and technologies that support those requirements.

Q36. A regulated organization needs evidence showing that firewall policy changes were reviewed and approved before deployment. Which process provides the strongest support for this requirement?

1. Allow administrators to make undocumented changes
   2. Version-controlled change workflow with peer review and approval
   3. Disable audit logging
   4. Share the same root account among all engineers

Correct Answer: 2. Version-controlled change workflow with peer review and approval

Explanation: A version-controlled workflow creates an auditable history of proposed, reviewed, approved, and deployed policy changes. Peer review reduces the likelihood of unsafe configuration, while approval gates provide evidence that authorized personnel evaluated the change before production deployment. Infrastructure as Code and policy-as-code approaches can further automate testing and produce traceable deployment records. Undocumented changes and shared administrator accounts weaken accountability. Disabling audit logs removes evidence required for compliance and investigation. A controlled change workflow therefore strengthens both technical security and governance by showing who proposed, reviewed, approved, and deployed each security-policy modification.

Q37. A security automation platform needs to retrieve threat intelligence from another system programmatically. Which interface is most appropriate?

1. REST API
   2. VGA
   3. Serial console only
   4. Analog modem

Correct Answer: 1. REST API

Explanation: REST APIs provide standardized programmatic access to security platforms and are commonly used to retrieve threat intelligence, query events, update objects, or trigger automated actions. They integrate naturally with orchestration systems, scripts, CI/CD pipelines, and SOAR platforms. Authentication should use secure methods such as tokens, certificates, or appropriately scoped service identities, and permissions should follow least privilege. VGA, serial console access, and analog modems do not provide scalable application-to-application integration for modern security automation. API-based integration is therefore a foundational capability for automating security operations and infrastructure workflows.

Q38. An organization wants generative AI to summarize security incidents but does not want the model to take containment actions without human review. Which design principle best fits the requirement?

1. Give the AI unrestricted administrative access
   2. Keep a human approval step before high-impact actions
   3. Disable incident logs after AI processing
   4. Allow the AI to reset all user accounts automatically

Correct Answer: 2. Keep a human approval step before high-impact actions

Explanation: Human-in-the-loop controls are appropriate when AI systems assist with security decisions but the consequences of automated actions could significantly affect business operations. Generative AI can help summarize incidents, extract indicators, suggest response steps, and prioritize evidence, while an authorized analyst approves disruptive actions such as disabling accounts, isolating servers, or blocking infrastructure. This reduces the risk of hallucinations, incorrect classifications, or overly broad automated responses. Unrestricted administrative authority increases operational risk. Good AI security architecture combines automation with scoped permissions, validation, logging, explainability where practical, and human oversight for high-impact decisions.

Q39. What is the primary security objective of signing software artifacts produced by a CI/CD pipeline?

1. Increase application screen resolution
   2. Reduce DNS lookup latency
   3. Verify artifact integrity and provenance before deployment
   4. Increase BGP convergence speed

Correct Answer: 3. Verify artifact integrity and provenance before deployment

Explanation: Artifact signing provides cryptographic evidence that software packages, container images, or other build outputs originate from an expected source and have not been modified since signing. Deployment systems can verify the signature before allowing the artifact into production, reducing the risk of supply-chain tampering. Signing is stronger when private keys are protected in secure key-management systems and when verification is enforced automatically through pipeline or admission-control policies. Artifact signing does not improve display quality, DNS performance, or routing convergence. Its purpose is establishing software integrity and trusted provenance throughout the delivery pipeline.

Q40. A company wants to prepare its cryptographic architecture for future quantum-computing threats. Which approach is most appropriate?

1. Create a cryptographic inventory and plan migration toward quantum-resistant algorithms
   2. Stop using encryption immediately
   3. Replace encryption with plaintext compression
   4. Use one permanent RSA key forever

Correct Answer: 1. Create a cryptographic inventory and plan migration toward quantum-resistant algorithms

Explanation: Quantum computing presents a long-term risk to widely used public-key algorithms. A practical preparation strategy begins with cryptographic discovery: identifying where algorithms, certificates, keys, and cryptographic libraries are used across applications and infrastructure. Organizations can then develop crypto-agility and migration plans toward standardized post-quantum cryptography as products and protocols support it. Immediately abandoning encryption would create far greater current risk, while keeping one permanent key undermines security and agility. Preparing for quantum threats is therefore an architectural lifecycle problem involving inventory, standards tracking, testing, phased migration, and the ability to replace algorithms without redesigning entire systems.