View Full Fortinet FCSS_SASE_AD-25 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps

 

Question 361.

What can identify endpoints using unauthorized network adapters?

1. Browser extension auditing
2. Printer queue inspection
3. Desktop session tracking
4. Network adapter compliance monitoring

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Network adapter compliance monitoring checks whether endpoint network interfaces match approved organizational requirements. Unauthorized adapters can introduce unmonitored connectivity paths or create communication channels that bypass expected security controls. Monitoring adapter information helps administrators identify changes involving physical or virtual network interfaces and determine whether those changes are permitted. The presence of an adapter does not automatically indicate malicious activity, since legitimate hardware and software can create additional interfaces. Browser extensions, printer queues, and desktop sessions do not provide equivalent network-interface visibility. Adapter compliance monitoring can therefore strengthen endpoint posture assessment and help maintain controlled connectivity across managed devices.

Question 362.

Which capability confirms an endpoint has an approved security certificate chain?

1. Certificate chain validation
2. Browser bookmark inspection
3. Printer status analysis
4. Desktop theme verification

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Certificate chain validation confirms that certificates presented by an endpoint or service can be traced through an approved trust hierarchy. This process helps determine whether the certificate is issued by a trusted authority and whether the associated chain satisfies organizational requirements. Validating the chain can strengthen device and service authentication by preventing untrusted certificate relationships from being accepted. Browser bookmarks, printer status, and desktop themes do not establish certificate trust. Certificate chain validation is therefore useful when certificate-based identity forms part of endpoint authentication or access control within a distributed SASE environment.

Question 363.

What can identify unexpected endpoint DNS configuration changes?

1. Browser cache analysis
2. Printer configuration review
3. DNS configuration change monitoring
4. Desktop layout inspection

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

DNS configuration change monitoring identifies modifications to DNS settings on endpoints. DNS configuration influences how devices resolve destinations, so unexpected changes can affect connectivity, security filtering, and traffic routing. Monitoring these changes gives administrators visibility into alterations that may have been introduced by legitimate software, network changes, administrative actions, or unauthorized activity. Browser caches and printer configurations do not provide comprehensive DNS configuration visibility, while desktop layouts are unrelated. DNS change monitoring can therefore complement secure DNS controls by helping security teams understand when an endpoint’s name-resolution configuration has changed.

Question 364.

Which control can prevent unmanaged devices from reaching private applications?

1. Browser rendering enforcement
2. Managed-device access restriction
3. Printer access filtering
4. Desktop preference validation

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Managed-device access restriction prevents endpoints that are not under approved organizational management from reaching protected private applications. Managed devices generally provide stronger visibility, configuration enforcement, and security telemetry than unmanaged systems. By requiring management status as an access condition, organizations can reduce exposure from devices whose security state cannot be reliably verified. Browser rendering, printer filtering, and desktop preferences do not establish whether a device is managed. This control is particularly useful for private application access where organizations want resource availability limited to known and appropriately governed endpoints.

Question 365.

What can reveal an endpoint using an outdated operating-system build?

1. Operating-system build assessment
2. Browser cookie analysis
3. Printer event monitoring
4. Desktop icon review

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Operating-system build assessment determines whether an endpoint is running an approved operating-system version or build. Organizations may define supported builds because newer versions can contain security fixes, management capabilities, and compatibility improvements. Detecting an outdated build allows administrators to apply remediation requirements or restrict access until the device is updated. Browser cookies, printer events, and desktop icons do not establish operating-system version information. Build assessment can therefore serve as an endpoint posture signal and support policies that require devices to maintain approved software versions before accessing protected applications.

Question 366.

Which capability can detect abnormal endpoint process creation rates?

1. Browser activity analysis
2. Process creation rate monitoring
3. Printer event correlation
4. Desktop appearance tracking

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Process creation rate monitoring measures how frequently new processes are started on an endpoint. A sudden increase can result from legitimate workloads, software updates, automation, or other normal activity, but it may also provide a useful signal for investigating suspicious behavior. Monitoring process creation rates helps establish a behavioral baseline and identify significant deviations from expected endpoint activity. Browser activity, printer events, and desktop appearance do not directly measure process creation. Rate monitoring should be considered alongside other endpoint and identity signals rather than treated as independent proof of malicious behavior.

Question 367.

What can identify endpoints with unsupported security agent versions?

1. Browser plugin inspection
2. Printer configuration analysis
3. Security agent version assessment
4. Desktop notification monitoring

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Security agent version assessment checks whether endpoint security software is running an approved version. Organizations may establish version requirements to ensure that security agents contain required capabilities, fixes, and compatibility support. Devices running unsupported versions can be flagged for remediation or restricted according to policy. Browser plugins, printer configurations, and desktop notifications do not provide reliable security-agent version information. Version assessment therefore provides an important endpoint posture signal, particularly when access to sensitive applications depends on the presence of current security software.

Question 368.

Which mechanism can detect unauthorized endpoint firewall changes?

1. Browser history inspection
2. Printer queue analysis
3. Desktop configuration review
4. Host firewall change monitoring

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Host firewall change monitoring identifies modifications to firewall settings on an endpoint. Firewall configuration can influence which inbound or outbound communications are permitted, making unexpected changes relevant to endpoint security. Monitoring changes allows administrators to investigate whether modifications were authorized, introduced by software, or potentially associated with suspicious activity. Browser history, printer queues, and general desktop configuration do not provide equivalent firewall visibility. Firewall change monitoring can therefore complement endpoint configuration assessment and help maintain required local security controls across managed devices.

Question 369.

What can verify that endpoint protection services are actively running?

1. Browser session validation
2. Printer service inspection
3. Desktop notification review
4. Endpoint protection service verification

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Endpoint protection service verification checks whether required security services are currently running on a device. Merely having security software installed does not guarantee that its protection components are operational. A stopped or malfunctioning service can reduce the endpoint’s effective security posture even when the application appears present. Verification can therefore be used as an access condition or monitoring signal. Browser sessions, printer services, and desktop notifications do not establish endpoint protection status. Continuous service verification helps organizations identify devices that may require remediation before they continue accessing sensitive resources.

Question 370.

Which capability can identify excessive endpoint outbound connections?

1. Browser history analysis
2. Printer activity monitoring
3. Outbound connection volume analysis
4. Desktop preference auditing

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Outbound connection volume analysis measures the number or frequency of external connections generated by an endpoint. Significant increases can have legitimate explanations, such as software updates or business applications, but unusual connection volume may warrant further investigation. Combining volume information with destination, application, identity, and timing data can provide stronger behavioral context. Browser history, printer activity, and desktop preferences do not provide equivalent network connection visibility. Outbound connection analysis can therefore support endpoint behavior monitoring and help identify devices whose communication patterns differ substantially from established expectations.

Question 371.

What can determine whether a device belongs to an approved group?

1. Endpoint group membership validation
2. Browser cache inspection
3. Printer status analysis
4. Desktop layout monitoring

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Endpoint group membership validation checks whether a device is associated with an approved organizational group. Groups can represent departments, device classes, business units, or security categories and may be used to apply different access requirements. Confirming group membership helps ensure that policies are applied according to the device’s intended classification. Browser caches, printer status, and desktop layouts do not establish group membership. Validation can therefore support centralized policy assignment and prevent devices from receiving permissions intended for another endpoint category.

Question 372.

Which control can detect endpoint attempts to disable security protections?

1. Browser extension monitoring
2. Security protection tampering detection
3. Printer configuration analysis
4. Desktop wallpaper auditing

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Security protection tampering detection identifies attempts to modify, disable, or interfere with required endpoint security controls. Security software may provide protection services that attackers or unauthorized users could attempt to weaken before performing other actions. Detecting tampering provides an important signal for investigation and can support automated remediation or access restriction. Browser extensions, printer configurations, and desktop wallpaper settings do not directly identify security-control tampering. This capability can therefore strengthen endpoint protection by monitoring not only whether controls exist, but also whether their expected operational state is being deliberately changed.

Question 373.

What can identify endpoints connecting through unauthorized wireless networks?

1. Browser language monitoring
2. Printer queue tracking
3. Wireless network compliance monitoring
4. Desktop theme inspection

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Wireless network compliance monitoring identifies endpoint connections to wireless networks and compares them with organizational requirements. Organizations may restrict devices from using unapproved wireless networks because those connections can introduce security, privacy, or monitoring concerns. Monitoring the wireless network context provides another factor for endpoint access decisions. Browser language, printer queues, and desktop themes do not establish wireless network usage. Wireless compliance monitoring can therefore help organizations identify devices operating outside approved connectivity conditions and apply appropriate restrictions when necessary.

Question 374.

Which capability can track endpoint remediation progress?

1. Browser activity reporting
2. Printer status tracking
3. Desktop configuration review
4. Remediation status tracking

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Remediation status tracking records the progress of corrective actions applied to endpoints that fail security requirements. A device may need software updates, configuration corrections, security-agent restoration, or other changes before it returns to an acceptable posture. Tracking remediation status helps administrators determine whether the issue remains unresolved, is being addressed, or has been completed. Browser activity, printer status, and desktop configuration review do not provide dedicated remediation tracking. This capability supports operational visibility and can help ensure that noncompliant endpoints do not remain in an unresolved state indefinitely.

Question 375.

What can identify endpoint connections using obsolete protocols?

1. Protocol version compliance monitoring
2. Browser bookmark inspection
3. Printer activity review
4. Desktop theme tracking

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Protocol version compliance monitoring identifies network communications that use protocol versions outside approved organizational requirements. Older protocols may lack modern security capabilities or may no longer satisfy organizational standards. Monitoring protocol versions allows administrators to identify endpoints or applications that require configuration changes or upgrades. Browser bookmarks, printer activity, and desktop themes do not provide protocol-level visibility. Protocol compliance monitoring can therefore support network security governance by helping organizations maintain approved communication standards across endpoint connections.

Question 376.

Which control can restrict access after endpoint security posture deteriorates?

1. Browser cache filtering
2. Dynamic posture-based access restriction
3. Printer permission management
4. Desktop theme enforcement

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Dynamic posture-based access restriction adjusts access when an endpoint’s security condition changes. A device that initially satisfies requirements may later become noncompliant because of software changes, disabled protection, expired credentials, or other posture changes. Dynamic enforcement allows access decisions to respond to the updated condition rather than relying only on the original assessment. Browser caches, printer permissions, and desktop themes do not provide posture-aware enforcement. This control supports continuous access evaluation by connecting endpoint security state with the authorization decision for protected applications and resources.

Question 377.

What can identify endpoints generating unusual encrypted traffic patterns?

1. Browser bookmark analysis
2. Printer event monitoring
3. Desktop activity inspection
4. Encrypted traffic behavior analysis

Correct Answer: 4

Explanation:

Encrypted traffic behavior analysis examines characteristics of encrypted communications without necessarily decrypting their contents. Factors such as connection frequency, destination patterns, timing, and traffic volume can provide useful behavioral information. Unusual patterns may warrant investigation, although encryption-related anomalies can have legitimate explanations. Browser bookmarks, printer events, and desktop activity do not provide equivalent network behavior visibility. Analyzing encrypted traffic behavior can therefore contribute to security monitoring when organizations need visibility into communication patterns while preserving the confidentiality provided by encryption.

Question 378.

Which capability can verify endpoint compliance before privileged access?

1. Browser compatibility checking
2. Printer status validation
3. Privileged-access posture verification
4. Desktop preference analysis

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation:

Privileged-access posture verification checks whether an endpoint satisfies required security conditions before allowing privileged access. Administrative or privileged resources generally require stronger controls because misuse can have broader consequences. Posture verification can evaluate conditions such as device management, security software, encryption, or other organizational requirements. Browser compatibility, printer status, and desktop preferences do not provide equivalent security assurance. Applying posture verification before privileged access creates an additional condition that helps ensure sensitive administrative functions are performed from appropriately secured endpoints.

Question 379.

What can detect unauthorized changes to endpoint routing information?

1. Endpoint route change monitoring
2. Browser session inspection
3. Printer queue analysis
4. Desktop icon tracking

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation:

Endpoint route change monitoring identifies modifications to routing information on a device. Routing changes can influence where traffic is sent and may affect connectivity, security inspection, or communication paths. Some changes occur for legitimate operational reasons, but unexpected modifications can warrant investigation because they may alter the intended network path. Browser sessions, printer queues, and desktop icons do not provide routing visibility. Monitoring route changes can therefore complement broader network configuration controls and help administrators understand unexpected changes in endpoint traffic behavior.

Question 380.

Which mechanism can identify endpoints repeatedly failing compliance checks?

1. Browser activity correlation
2. Repeated compliance failure tracking
3. Printer event analysis
4. Desktop preference monitoring

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation:

Repeated compliance failure tracking identifies endpoints that consistently fail one or more security requirements. Repeated failures can indicate unresolved configuration problems, missing software, outdated components, or other persistent conditions. Tracking these events over time provides more useful context than evaluating isolated compliance failures and can help prioritize remediation workflows. Browser activity, printer events, and desktop preferences do not establish compliance history. This capability can therefore support continuous endpoint governance by highlighting devices that repeatedly remain outside approved security standards and may require additional administrative attention.