View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.

 

Question 181

Which factor is most important when determining whether a risk should be accepted?

1. The risk is within approved tolerance and management has authorized acceptance
2. The risk has existed for several years
3. The risk affects only an IT system
4. The risk owner prefers not to implement controls

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Risk acceptance should be based on whether the remaining exposure is within approved risk tolerance and whether an appropriately authorized individual has made the decision. Acceptance does not mean that the risk has disappeared. Instead, management acknowledges the exposure and agrees that additional treatment is not currently justified or necessary. The decision should be documented with the rationale, responsible owner, and review requirements. Acceptance should also be reconsidered when the risk environment changes significantly. A risk should never be accepted simply because it has existed for a long time or because implementing controls may be inconvenient.

Question 182

Which activity best supports the identification of risk dependencies?

1. Reviewing employee performance evaluations
2. Mapping relationships between business processes, assets, and third parties
3. Counting the number of security incidents
4. Reviewing software license agreements only

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation

Risk dependencies become clearer when relationships between business processes, technology assets, information, suppliers, and other supporting resources are mapped. A critical process may depend on several applications, infrastructure components, data sources, facilities, or external providers. Understanding these relationships helps identify how a failure in one area could affect another. Dependency mapping can also reveal single points of failure and concentration risks. Simply counting incidents does not provide sufficient information about these relationships. A well-maintained dependency view supports business impact analysis, risk assessment, continuity planning, and prioritization of controls for critical business activities.

Question 183

What should be the primary objective of risk monitoring?

1. Increase the number of controls
2. Identify changes that could affect the organization’s risk exposure
3. Eliminate the need for risk treatment
4. Reduce the number of risk owners

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation

Risk monitoring is intended to identify changes that could alter the organization’s risk exposure. These changes may involve threats, vulnerabilities, business processes, technology, regulations, control performance, suppliers, or strategic objectives. Monitoring allows risk owners to recognize when previously acceptable exposure may require reassessment or additional treatment. It also helps determine whether implemented controls continue to provide the expected level of risk reduction. Effective monitoring should use relevant indicators and defined thresholds where appropriate. The objective is not simply to collect information but to provide timely information that supports appropriate risk decisions and escalation.

Question 184

Which approach provides the strongest basis for prioritizing risk treatment?

1. Treating every risk identically
2. Prioritizing risks based only on technical complexity
3. Considering business impact, likelihood, and risk appetite
4. Selecting the risks identified most recently

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation

Risk treatment should be prioritized using factors that reflect the organization’s actual exposure and objectives. Business impact and likelihood are fundamental considerations, while risk appetite and tolerance determine whether the exposure is acceptable. Other factors may include regulatory requirements, control effectiveness, dependencies, cost, and urgency. Treating every risk identically can waste resources because risks have different levels of significance. Technical complexity alone also does not necessarily indicate business importance. A structured prioritization approach helps management focus resources on risks that could materially affect important objectives while ensuring treatment decisions remain consistent with organizational risk expectations.

Question 185

Which situation is an example of a preventive control?

1. Reviewing logs after an incident
2. Blocking unauthorized access before it occurs
3. Investigating a security breach
4. Performing a post-incident review

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation

A preventive control is designed to stop an unwanted event before it occurs. Access restrictions, authentication requirements, network segmentation, and input validation are examples of preventive controls. Detective controls, such as log monitoring, are primarily designed to identify events that have occurred or are occurring. Corrective controls help restore conditions after an issue has been identified. Organizations generally use combinations of control types because prevention alone may not be sufficient. When evaluating a preventive control, risk professionals should consider whether it is properly designed, consistently implemented, and capable of addressing the specific risk it was intended to reduce.

Question 186

Which factor should be considered when determining the business impact of loss of availability?

1. The color of the application’s user interface
2. The number of developers supporting the application
3. The criticality of the business process supported by the service
4. The age of the application’s documentation

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation

The criticality of the business process supported by a service is a key factor when assessing availability-related impact. If an unavailable system supports a critical process, disruption may result in significant financial, operational, regulatory, or customer consequences. Impact analysis should also consider acceptable downtime, dependencies, recovery requirements, and the timing of the disruption. Technical characteristics alone do not determine business impact. A relatively simple system may be extremely important if it supports a critical business activity. Understanding process criticality therefore helps organizations prioritize resilience measures, recovery capabilities, and risk treatments according to actual business needs.

Question 187

Which practice best supports effective risk communication between IT and business management?

1. Using only technical vulnerability terminology
2. Describing risks in terms of business objectives and potential consequences
3. Providing raw system logs without interpretation
4. Reporting only the number of security tools deployed

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation

Risk communication is most effective when technical conditions are translated into business consequences. Business management needs to understand how a risk could affect objectives, operations, finances, customers, compliance, or strategic priorities. Technical details can support the discussion, but they should be presented in context. For example, instead of reporting only a vulnerability identifier, a risk professional can explain which critical process could be affected and what the potential consequence would be. This approach creates a common understanding between IT and business stakeholders and helps management make informed decisions about treatment priorities and resource allocation.

Question 188

What is the main purpose of establishing control objectives?

1. To define what a control is intended to achieve
2. To identify every employee who uses a system
3. To determine annual IT spending
4. To replace risk assessments

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

A control objective describes the intended result that a control or group of controls should achieve. Clearly defined objectives provide a basis for designing controls and evaluating their effectiveness. For example, an objective may be to ensure that only authorized users can access sensitive information. Controls can then be designed and tested against that objective. Without clear objectives, organizations may implement controls without knowing whether they adequately address the underlying risk. Control objectives should be aligned with business requirements, risk conditions, policies, and applicable regulatory obligations. They also provide useful criteria for control testing and assurance activities.

Question 189

Which condition would most likely indicate that a risk assessment should be updated?

1. The organization changed its strategic objectives
2. A meeting room was renovated
3. Office furniture was replaced
4. An employee changed their desk location

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Changes to strategic objectives can significantly alter the organization’s risk landscape and therefore may require existing risk assessments to be updated. New business objectives can introduce different processes, technologies, markets, regulatory requirements, or dependencies. A risk that was previously considered low may become more significant if it affects a newly prioritized objective. Risk assessments should therefore be reviewed when major business changes occur. Other triggers can include significant technology changes, new regulations, major incidents, changes in threat conditions, and substantial third-party changes. Keeping assessments current helps ensure that risk decisions remain aligned with the organization’s present direction.

Question 190

Which statement best describes a key risk indicator (KRI)?

1. A measure used to provide insight into changes in risk exposure
2. A document listing all employees
3. A technical procedure for configuring servers
4. A replacement for internal controls

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

A key risk indicator is a measurable value used to provide insight into changes in risk exposure. KRIs can help identify increasing or decreasing risk and may provide early warning when exposure approaches a defined threshold. Examples include increasing critical vulnerabilities, rising third-party incidents, declining control performance, or increasing service outages. Effective KRIs should be relevant to the risk being monitored and should support meaningful management action. KRIs do not replace controls or risk assessments. Instead, they complement them by providing ongoing information that helps risk owners and management understand whether exposure is changing.

Question 191

What should be considered when evaluating a third-party’s ability to manage a significant risk?

1. The vendor’s office location only
2. The vendor’s security capabilities, contractual obligations, and relevant assurance evidence
3. The number of employees at the vendor
4. The vendor’s advertising budget

Correct Answer: 2

Explanation

Third-party risk assessment should consider whether the provider has appropriate capabilities and responsibilities for managing the relevant exposure. Useful information can include security controls, independent assurance reports, contractual commitments, incident response capabilities, regulatory compliance, business continuity arrangements, and service-level requirements. The organization’s assessment should be based on the significance of the services provided and the potential impact of provider failure. Vendor size or marketing activity does not by itself demonstrate effective risk management. Contracts should clearly establish responsibilities and expectations, while ongoing monitoring should verify that agreed requirements continue to be met throughout the relationship.

Question 192

Which activity is most appropriate when a control fails during testing?

1. Ignore the failure if no incident occurred
2. Delete the control from the risk register
3. Assess the resulting risk and initiate appropriate remediation
4. Immediately terminate the business process

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation

A failed control should be evaluated to determine its effect on risk exposure and whether corrective action is necessary. The organization should understand why the control failed, identify affected processes or assets, assess the resulting risk, and determine appropriate remediation. In some cases, a compensating control may temporarily reduce the exposure while the primary control is corrected. Simply ignoring a failure because no incident occurred does not address the underlying weakness. Remediation should be tracked to completion, and management should be informed when the resulting risk exceeds established thresholds or requires an authorized decision.

Question 193

Which factor is most relevant when determining the appropriate level of risk reporting to senior management?

1. The significance of the risk to business objectives
2. The number of pages available in the report
3. The personal preference of a system administrator
4. The number of technical terms used

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Risk reporting to senior management should be based primarily on the significance of risks to business objectives. Management needs information that supports decisions about strategy, resources, treatment, acceptance, and escalation. Significant risks should be communicated clearly with relevant information about impact, likelihood, trends, treatment status, and residual exposure. The amount of technical detail should depend on its usefulness to the decision being made. Reports that focus on volume rather than significance can overwhelm decision makers and obscure important issues. A risk-based reporting approach ensures that management attention is directed toward exposures that could materially affect organizational objectives.

Question 194

Which risk treatment reduces the likelihood or impact of a risk through controls?

1. Risk acceptance
2. Risk avoidance
3. Risk mitigation
4. Risk escalation

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation

Risk mitigation involves implementing measures that reduce the likelihood or potential impact of a risk. Examples include access controls, encryption, redundancy, monitoring, security awareness, and process improvements. Mitigation does not necessarily eliminate the underlying risk; instead, it aims to reduce exposure to an acceptable level. After controls are implemented, residual risk should be assessed to determine whether it remains within approved tolerance. If it does not, additional treatment or escalation may be required. Mitigation decisions should consider effectiveness, cost, business impact, regulatory requirements, and the organization’s overall risk appetite.

Question 195

Which practice helps ensure that risk treatment remains aligned with business priorities?

1. Reviewing treatment decisions when business objectives or risk conditions change
2. Keeping all treatments unchanged indefinitely
3. Allowing vendors to determine business priorities
4. Removing completed treatments from management oversight

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Risk treatment should be reviewed when business objectives, risk conditions, technology, regulations, or organizational priorities change. A treatment that was appropriate under previous conditions may no longer provide sufficient risk reduction or may become unnecessarily costly. Periodic review allows management to confirm that treatments continue to support current objectives and remain consistent with risk appetite. Treatment effectiveness should also be monitored through appropriate indicators and control assessments. Maintaining alignment ensures that resources are being used where they provide meaningful risk reduction. It also helps identify situations where additional, modified, or discontinued treatments may be appropriate.

Question 196

What is the primary purpose of risk governance?

1. To establish direction, accountability, and oversight for risk management
2. To configure security devices
3. To perform all technical vulnerability scans
4. To replace business process owners

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Risk governance establishes the direction, accountability, authority, and oversight needed to manage organizational risk effectively. It defines how risk decisions are made, who is responsible, how risks are escalated, and how management receives assurance about the organization’s risk position. Governance should align risk management with business strategy and organizational objectives. Technical activities such as vulnerability scanning may support risk management but do not constitute governance. Effective governance helps ensure that risk decisions are consistent, transparent, and made at the appropriate level of authority. It also establishes expectations for monitoring, reporting, and accountability.

Question 197

Which situation represents a weakness in risk monitoring?

1. Risk indicators are reviewed according to defined thresholds
2. Significant changes are escalated to management
3. Risk information is never updated after major business changes
4. Treatment effectiveness is periodically evaluated

Correct Answer: 3

Explanation

Failing to update risk information after major business changes is a weakness in risk monitoring. Risk exposure can change significantly when organizations modify their strategy, technology, processes, suppliers, or regulatory environment. Monitoring should identify such changes and trigger reassessment when appropriate. Defined indicators and thresholds can help detect changes systematically, while periodic evaluation provides evidence about treatment effectiveness. Without updated information, management may make decisions based on outdated assumptions. Effective monitoring therefore requires both ongoing observation and a mechanism for updating risk assessments and communicating significant changes to appropriate stakeholders.

Question 198

Which factor should influence the frequency of control assessments?

1. The criticality and risk associated with the control
2. The number of employees in the organization only
3. The color of the control documentation
4. The age of the audit department

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Control assessment frequency should be based on factors such as control criticality, associated risk, regulatory requirements, changes in the environment, and previous control performance. High-risk controls supporting critical business processes may require more frequent assessment than low-risk controls. Significant changes or previous control failures may also justify additional testing. A risk-based frequency helps organizations use assurance resources efficiently while maintaining appropriate oversight. Assessment schedules should not be determined solely by administrative factors. The objective is to obtain sufficient evidence that important controls continue to operate effectively and that risk remains within approved boundaries.

Question 199

Which action best demonstrates accountability for a risk treatment?

1. Assigning an owner and tracking the treatment through completion
2. Recording the treatment without assigning responsibility
3. Allowing the treatment to remain undocumented
4. Assuming the vendor is responsible for all outcomes

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Accountability for risk treatment requires a clearly assigned owner who is responsible for coordinating and tracking the agreed response. The owner should have sufficient authority and resources to implement the treatment or coordinate the necessary actions. Progress should be monitored, documented, and reported according to established governance requirements. If implementation is delayed or the treatment does not achieve the expected outcome, the issue should be escalated appropriately. Simply recording a treatment without assigning responsibility creates uncertainty and increases the likelihood that actions will remain incomplete. Clear ownership supports effective risk reduction and management oversight.

Question 200

What is the primary purpose of periodic enterprise risk reviews?

1. To confirm that the organization’s risk profile remains aligned with objectives and risk appetite
2. To eliminate all risks from the organization
3. To replace individual control assessments
4. To reduce the number of business processes**

Correct Answer: 1

Explanation

Periodic enterprise risk reviews provide management with an opportunity to confirm that the organization’s overall risk profile remains aligned with business objectives, risk appetite, and risk capacity. These reviews can identify changes in significant risks, emerging threats, control effectiveness, treatment progress, concentrations, and areas requiring escalation. Enterprise reviews complement rather than replace detailed risk assessments and control testing. They provide a broader perspective that helps management understand cumulative exposure across business units and dependencies. Regular reviews also help ensure that risk management continues to support strategic decision making as the organization, technology environment, and external conditions evolve.