Specialty device OEM features may not be present in generic Android profiles. The controlling technical behavior here is A legacy GPO export cannot be assumed one-to-one equivalent to a modern MDM profile.

The proposition ‘Importing an on-premises GPO for analytics automatically migrates and enforces every included setting’ is not the reason the selected control works. A legacy GPO export cannot be assumed one-to-one equivalent to a modern MDM profile.

Multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy. The controlling technical behavior here is A legacy GPO export cannot be assumed one-to-one equivalent to a modern MDM profile.

The proposed observation ‘The Group Policy XML import is accepted by the analytics service, without checking MDM support or endpoint behavior’ does not establish the target state. The assessment identifies supported, unsupported and deprecated policy settings.

A pilot reports the desired effective policy in the browser or registry. The required observation is the assessment identifies supported, unsupported and deprecated policy settings.

A test room system receives its intended policy without unsupported generic settings. The required observation is the assessment identifies supported, unsupported and deprecated policy settings.

The suggested safeguard ‘Keep the original legacy GPO as the only policy inventory and never reconcile unsupported Intune settings’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Preserve the original GPO inventory and remediate unsupported settings intentionally.

The alternative ‘Maintain approved ADMX versions and test conflicts with existing profiles’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Preserve the original GPO inventory and remediate unsupported settings intentionally’.

The alternative ‘Track platform/supervision compatibility before assigning iOS settings’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Preserve the original GPO inventory and remediate unsupported settings intentionally’.

The proposed ‘Import the legacy GPO XML as an Intune policy and assume every old Group Policy setting is automatically enforced’ does not implement the required change. Multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

The alternative ‘Use the supported enrollment time group selected in the device preparation policy’ does not implement the required action ‘Find the effective policy conflict in Intune and establish a single authoritative configuration’. Multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

The alternative ‘Import the supported third-party ADMX and ADML template pair, then create and assign an imported administrative-template policy for the vendor setting’ does not implement the required action ‘Find the effective policy conflict in Intune and establish a single authoritative configuration’. Multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

Platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect. The controlling technical behavior here is multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

The proposition ‘Importing an on-premises GPO for analytics automatically migrates and enforces every included setting’ is not the reason the selected control works. Multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

ADMX-backed settings can expose specific Windows or application management controls in Intune. The controlling technical behavior here is multiple assignments can create unresolved configuration conflicts even when both profiles deploy.

The proposed observation ‘The Group Policy XML import is accepted by the analytics service, without checking MDM support or endpoint behavior’ does not establish the target state. The test endpoint reports a single expected policy value with no conflict.

The assessment identifies supported, unsupported and deprecated policy settings. The required observation is the test endpoint reports a single expected policy value with no conflict.

A pilot Mac reports the desired configuration after MDM check-in. The required observation is the test endpoint reports a single expected policy value with no conflict.

The suggested safeguard ‘Keep the original legacy GPO as the only policy inventory and never reconcile unsupported Intune settings’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Manage profile ownership and peer review changes to overlapping settings.

The alternative ‘Maintain approved ADMX versions and test conflicts with existing profiles’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Manage profile ownership and peer review changes to overlapping settings’.

The alternative ‘Rotate Wi-Fi credentials or certificates through a controlled configuration lifecycle’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Manage profile ownership and peer review changes to overlapping settings’.

The proposed ‘Assign a device-wide fully managed Android restriction to personal work-profile devices without checking applicability’ does not implement the required change. Platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

The alternative ‘Consolidate network configuration and resolve overlapping Android profile assignments’ does not implement the required action ‘Create an Android device configuration profile compatible with dedicated-device enrollment’. Platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

The alternative ‘Use settings supported in the current Android enrollment mode or change management design deliberately’ does not implement the required action ‘Create an Android device configuration profile compatible with dedicated-device enrollment’. Platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

The proposition ‘Android Enterprise dedicated, fully managed, and work-profile deployments all support the same device-wide settings’ is not the reason the selected control works. Platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

Device ownership and management mode limit which Android configuration controls are applicable. The controlling technical behavior here is platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

Conflicting wireless policies can leave corporate devices disconnected or misconfigured. The controlling technical behavior here is platform configuration settings must match the Android management mode to take effect.

The proposed observation ‘The Android device exists in the Intune inventory, with no inspection of the targeted configuration result’ does not establish the target state. Kiosks receive the expected network and lock-down controls.

A pilot associates with the approved SSID without a configuration conflict. The required observation is kiosks receive the expected network and lock-down controls.

A test work-profile endpoint reports the expected supported settings as applied. The required observation is kiosks receive the expected network and lock-down controls.

The alternative ‘Keep a management-mode compatibility matrix for Android profiles’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Pilot each supported Android OS version before wide policy distribution’.

The alternative ‘Audit duplicate mobile Wi-Fi profiles after endpoint migrations’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Pilot each supported Android OS version before wide policy distribution’.

The suggested safeguard ‘Maintain one untested device-wide Android configuration for every ownership and enrollment mode’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Pilot each supported Android OS version before wide policy distribution.