You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
An Intune operations team wants a repeatable daily report of managed Windows devices with stale check-in dates. An endpoint administrator proposes: Use authenticated Microsoft Graph Intune endpoints through an approved PowerShell automation. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run. The script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set.
The proposition ‘Microsoft Graph automatically returns the complete fleet in one list response and never uses nextLink pagination’ is not the reason the selected control works. Graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run.
Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case. The controlling technical behavior here is graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run.
A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes. The controlling technical behavior here is graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run.
An Intune operations team wants a repeatable daily report of managed Windows devices with stale check-in dates. The approved approach is: Use authenticated Microsoft Graph Intune endpoints through an approved PowerShell automation. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set. Graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run.
The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied. The required observation is the script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set.
The proposed observation ‘A Graph script runs without errors but has not reconciled its device count or per-page continuation’ does not establish the target state. The script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set.
A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures. The required observation is the script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set.
An Intune operations team wants a repeatable daily report of managed Windows devices with stale check-in dates. After implementing: Use authenticated Microsoft Graph Intune endpoints through an approved PowerShell automation. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Use least-privileged Graph permissions, pagination and throttling controls. Graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run. The script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set.
The suggested safeguard ‘Give a read-only reporting automation tenant-wide write permissions and no pagination or throttling safeguards’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Use least-privileged Graph permissions, pagination and throttling controls.
The alternative ‘Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Use least-privileged Graph permissions, pagination and throttling controls’.
The alternative ‘Periodically review Graph app secrets, certificate lifetimes and permissions’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Use least-privileged Graph permissions, pagination and throttling controls’.
A PowerShell script updates Intune group assignments but fails midway through a large tenant batch. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes. A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
The proposed ‘Return only the first Microsoft Graph response page and assume the tenant has no further managed devices’ does not implement the required change. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
The alternative ‘Use authenticated Microsoft Graph Intune endpoints through an approved PowerShell automation’ does not implement the required action ‘Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation’. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
The alternative ‘Use supported PowerShell custom compliance discovery with an appropriate JSON output and rules’ does not implement the required action ‘Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation’. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
A PowerShell script updates Intune group assignments but fails midway through a large tenant batch. An endpoint administrator proposes: Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes. A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
A broad disruptive action can cause unnecessary downtime when the diagnosed fault is uncertain. The controlling technical behavior here is A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
The proposition ‘Microsoft Graph automatically returns the complete fleet in one list response and never uses nextLink pagination’ is not the reason the selected control works. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case. The controlling technical behavior here is A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
A PowerShell script updates Intune group assignments but fails midway through a large tenant batch. The approved approach is: Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes.
The proposed observation ‘A Graph script runs without errors but has not reconciled its device count or per-page continuation’ does not establish the target state. A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
A targeted device sample associates the change with a specific version and measured CPU behavior. The required observation is A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied. The required observation is A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
A PowerShell script updates Intune group assignments but fails midway through a large tenant batch. After implementing: Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs. A single long unbounded API operation can hit service limits or partially apply changes. A simulation resumes safely without duplicate assignment changes and reports failures.
The suggested safeguard ‘Give a read-only reporting automation tenant-wide write permissions and no pagination or throttling safeguards’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs.
The alternative ‘Retain diagnostic traces and review agent recommendation consistency’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs’.
The alternative ‘Use least-privileged Graph permissions, pagination and throttling controls’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs’.
An engineer proposes giving a scheduled device-reporting script full tenant write privileges for convenience. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case. The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
The proposed ‘Return only the first Microsoft Graph response page and assume the tenant has no further managed devices’ does not implement the required change. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
The alternative ‘Review the agent's evidence and corroborate it with Defender incident details before remediation’ does not implement the required action ‘Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task’. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
The alternative ‘Add bounded Graph retry handling, pagination and idempotent checkpointing to the automation’ does not implement the required action ‘Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task’. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
An engineer proposes giving a scheduled device-reporting script full tenant write privileges for convenience. An endpoint administrator proposes: Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case. The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
The proposition ‘Microsoft Graph automatically returns the complete fleet in one list response and never uses nextLink pagination’ is not the reason the selected control works. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
Custom compliance requires a defined result contract and rule evaluation rather than a free-form script note. The controlling technical behavior here is excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
Graph API queries expose manageable device inventory data rather than requiring manual portal export for every run. The controlling technical behavior here is excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
An engineer proposes giving a scheduled device-reporting script full tenant write privileges for convenience. The approved approach is: Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case.
The proposed observation ‘A Graph script runs without errors but has not reconciled its device count or per-page continuation’ does not establish the target state. The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
Affected devices show a repeatable startup delay and a trial configuration improves the metric. The required observation is the script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
The script returns correct device identifiers and last-sync timestamps for an authorized test set. The required observation is the script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
An engineer proposes giving a scheduled device-reporting script full tenant write privileges for convenience. After implementing: Grant a scoped Graph application or delegated permission appropriate to the read-only task. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Periodically review Graph app secrets, certificate lifetimes and permissions. Excess Graph rights expand automation impact beyond the permitted reporting use case. The script reads intended device data and an unauthorized write request is denied.
The suggested safeguard ‘Give a read-only reporting automation tenant-wide write permissions and no pagination or throttling safeguards’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Periodically review Graph app secrets, certificate lifetimes and permissions.
The alternative ‘Audit Graph permission grants and retain per-item outcome logs’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Periodically review Graph app secrets, certificate lifetimes and permissions’.
The alternative ‘Review custom compliance scripts for least privilege and read-only behavior’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Periodically review Graph app secrets, certificate lifetimes and permissions’.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.