You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
A global report displays an apparently healthy 100 percent compliance rate but excludes recently inactive devices. After implementing: Review report filters, check-in age, missing-record handling and data freshness. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Publish report population definitions and investigate missing check-ins. Filtered denominators can conceal unmanaged or stale devices that are still operational risks. The corrected report includes or separately flags stale excluded endpoints.
The alternative ‘Track service communications and communicate data freshness limitations’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Publish report population definitions and investigate missing check-ins’.
The suggested safeguard ‘Maintain dashboards without versioned filters, population definitions, export timestamps or access controls’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Publish report population definitions and investigate missing check-ins.
The alternative ‘Version the export schema and protect device/user information’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Publish report population definitions and investigate missing check-ins’.
An endpoint team wants to understand why corporate Windows PCs take too long to become usable after startup. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication. The analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
The proposed ‘Treat successful app-launch timing as proof that overall Windows OS startup time meets the target’ does not implement the required change. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
The alternative ‘Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script’ does not implement the required action ‘Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population’. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
The proposed ‘Use a healthy Windows OS boot score as proof that every business app is reliable and launches promptly’ does not implement the required change. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
An endpoint team wants to understand why corporate Windows PCs take too long to become usable after startup. An endpoint administrator proposes: Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication. The analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
The proposition ‘Overall startup time and per-application reliability and launch timing are the same measured metric’ is not the reason the selected control works. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy. The controlling technical behavior here is startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required. The controlling technical behavior here is startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
An endpoint team wants to understand why corporate Windows PCs take too long to become usable after startup. The approved approach is: Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication.
Repeatable per-app performance measurements identify the slow launch and show improvement after a controlled remediation. The required observation is the analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
The proposed observation ‘A startup score improved but the affected business app still reports slow launches or crash events’ does not establish the target state. The analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state. The required observation is the analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
An endpoint team wants to understand why corporate Windows PCs take too long to become usable after startup. After implementing: Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Establish a baseline and monitor hardware/OS cohort changes. Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication. The analytics view identifies the slowest measured devices and relevant startup phases.
The alternative ‘Track performance regressions after app updates and endpoint policy changes’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Establish a baseline and monitor hardware/OS cohort changes’.
The alternative ‘Monitor script failures, run frequency and privilege boundaries’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Establish a baseline and monitor hardware/OS cohort changes’.
The suggested safeguard ‘Approve analytic recommendations without a before/after measurement on affected device cohorts’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Establish a baseline and monitor hardware/OS cohort changes.
A fleet needs proactive repair of a known configuration issue before support tickets spike. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy. A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
The proposed ‘Use a healthy Windows OS boot score as proof that every business app is reliable and launches promptly’ does not implement the required change. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
The alternative ‘Use Intune Endpoint Analytics startup performance data for a defined device population’ does not implement the required action ‘Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script’. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
The alternative ‘Correlate available Endpoint Analytics app performance/reliability insights with the specific application and version before remediating’ does not implement the required action ‘Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script’. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
A fleet needs proactive repair of a known configuration issue before support tickets spike. An endpoint administrator proposes: Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy. A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
Delayed detection allows a configuration issue to block large numbers of new devices. The controlling technical behavior here is detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
The proposition ‘Overall startup time and per-application reliability and launch timing are the same measured metric’ is not the reason the selected control works. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required. The controlling technical behavior here is detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
A fleet needs proactive repair of a known configuration issue before support tickets spike. The approved approach is: Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy.
The proposed observation ‘A startup score improved but the affected business app still reports slow launches or crash events’ does not establish the target state. A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
Repeatable per-app performance measurements identify the slow launch and show improvement after a controlled remediation. The required observation is A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
App reliability data shows a reproducible crash tied to the complained-about version. The required observation is A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
A fleet needs proactive repair of a known configuration issue before support tickets spike. After implementing: Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Monitor script failures, run frequency and privilege boundaries. Detection identifies a device problem while remediation attempts to correct it under policy. A pilot reports detection followed by successful remediation and a changed device state.
The alternative ‘Publish report population definitions and investigate missing check-ins’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Monitor script failures, run frequency and privilege boundaries’.
The suggested safeguard ‘Approve analytic recommendations without a before/after measurement on affected device cohorts’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Monitor script failures, run frequency and privilege boundaries.
The alternative ‘Establish a baseline and monitor hardware/OS cohort changes’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Monitor script failures, run frequency and privilege boundaries’.
A managed Windows device has slow business-app launches even though its OS startup report is healthy. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Correlate available Endpoint Analytics app performance/reliability insights with the specific application and version before remediating. Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required. Repeatable per-app performance measurements identify the slow launch and show improvement after a controlled remediation.
The proposed ‘Use a healthy Windows OS boot score as proof that every business app is reliable and launches promptly’ does not implement the required change. Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
The alternative ‘Use Endpoint Analytics Remediations with a detection script and a controlled remediation script’ does not implement the required action ‘Correlate available Endpoint Analytics app performance/reliability insights with the specific application and version before remediating’. Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
The proposed ‘Treat healthy OS startup scores as conclusive evidence that every managed business application launches promptly’ does not implement the required change. Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
A managed Windows device has slow business-app launches even though its OS startup report is healthy. An endpoint administrator proposes: Correlate available Endpoint Analytics app performance/reliability insights with the specific application and version before remediating. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required. Repeatable per-app performance measurements identify the slow launch and show improvement after a controlled remediation.
The proposition ‘Overall startup time and per-application reliability and launch timing are the same measured metric’ is not the reason the selected control works. Fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
Startup measurements can distinguish slow device startup from unrelated app access or network authentication. The controlling technical behavior here is fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
A local configuration regression can resemble a service issue; baseline comparison separates them. The controlling technical behavior here is fast Windows startup alone cannot demonstrate acceptable application launch performance; app-specific measurements are required.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.