Test semantic-model security using actual role mappings and representative test users. is an approach for a different requirement: A filter rule must be evaluated under the intended viewer identity to establish the effective access boundary. In the present case, source-layer security may not automatically apply identically through semantic-model storage and identities.

Implement semantic-model row-level security with appropriately scoped role filters. is an approach for a different requirement: RLS filters rows returned by the model according to assigned users or groups. In the present case, source-layer security may not automatically apply identically through semantic-model storage and identities.

Apply semantic model object-level security to restricted tables or columns. is an approach for a different requirement: OLS hides metadata and access to model objects rather than only filtering their rows. In the present case, source-layer security may not automatically apply identically through semantic-model storage and identities.

That observation would verify a different goal: Contractor changes the permitted artifact but fails when trying to edit another workspace item. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged.

That observation would verify a different goal: Analyst creates a thin report using the shared model while direct model editing remains blocked. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged.

That observation would verify a different goal: Administrator adds a member and updates workspace settings while permissions are audit logged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged.

That observation would verify a different goal: The permitted user sees visuals; an unapproved user still cannot access underlying model data. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The job executes without an individual user's session and its role assignments remain narrowly scoped.

That observation would verify a different goal: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The job executes without an individual user's session and its role assignments remain narrowly scoped.

That observation would verify a different goal: Confirm the user opens existing reports but cannot save edits or create a new lakehouse. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The job executes without an individual user's session and its role assignments remain narrowly scoped.

That observation would verify a different goal: A validated test-stage item reaches production only through the authorized deployment stage. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Only the reviewed changed items are selected and deployed to the intended destination stage.

That observation would verify a different goal: A clean project opens with the reviewed measures and visuals before publishing. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Only the reviewed changed items are selected and deployed to the intended destination stage.

That observation would verify a different goal: The merged branch syncs without conflict and retains reviewed changes from both branches. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Only the reviewed changed items are selected and deployed to the intended destination stage.

Apply the appropriate Microsoft Purview sensitivity label to the Fabric item. is an approach for a different requirement: Sensitivity labels communicate and can enforce information-protection policy; they are not row filters. In the present case, file and folder permissions belong to OneLake data security rather than visual-only filters.

Remove elevated workspace authoring access where users should be governed by data-plane restrictions. is an approach for a different requirement: High-trust workspace roles confer broad data capabilities; scoped data roles target users with lower control-plane access. In the present case, file and folder permissions belong to OneLake data security rather than visual-only filters.

Apply column-level permissions or data security at the warehouse or OneLake layer where supported. is an approach for a different requirement: Column security enforces permission on the data field, not merely hiding a report visual. In the present case, file and folder permissions belong to OneLake data security rather than visual-only filters.

That observation would verify a different goal: The restricted column is absent for a test viewer while approved measures still work. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: An authorized user opens the target file while an unrelated viewer receives access denied.

That observation would verify a different goal: An allowed group queries its permitted table and the other group receives a denied response. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: An authorized user opens the target file while an unrelated viewer receives access denied.

That observation would verify a different goal: Testing as each assigned user shows only their authorized geography's rows. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: An authorized user opens the target file while an unrelated viewer receives access denied.

Inspect direct item sharing and permissions, not only workspace-role assignments. is an approach for a different requirement: Direct item grants can authorize access to a specific item without a workspace-wide role. In the present case, access to a report artifact and permission to use its source semantic model are separate concerns.

Grant Build permission on the semantic model to the report author. is an approach for a different requirement: Build enables creating dependent content against a semantic model without requiring ownership of its definition. In the present case, access to a report artifact and permission to use its source semantic model are separate concerns.

Grant item-level sharing or permissions rather than a workspace role across all items. is an approach for a different requirement: Item permissions target a named resource while workspace roles generally apply to every item. In the present case, access to a report artifact and permission to use its source semantic model are separate concerns.

That observation would verify a different goal: A branch change produces the expected item set without losing an uncommitted required item. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The merged branch syncs without conflict and retains reviewed changes from both branches.

That observation would verify a different goal: A pull request displays reviewable report and model changes without replacing the entire binary PBIX. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The merged branch syncs without conflict and retains reviewed changes from both branches.

That observation would verify a different goal: A clean project opens with the reviewed measures and visuals before publishing. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: The merged branch syncs without conflict and retains reviewed changes from both branches.

Connect the new thin report to the governed shared semantic model using Build permission. is an approach for a different requirement: A thin report consumes centrally maintained model logic and avoids divergence from copied definitions. In the present case, impact analysis identifies downstream dependent analytics assets likely to be affected by a change.

Publish and authorize use of a shared semantic model instead of duplicating it. is an approach for a different requirement: Shared semantic models centralize business calculations and support reports that reuse one governed definition. In the present case, impact analysis identifies downstream dependent analytics assets likely to be affected by a change.

Use the semantic model's supported XMLA endpoint with appropriate permissions. is an approach for a different requirement: The XMLA endpoint exposes compatible tabular metadata and management operations to supported tools. In the present case, impact analysis identifies downstream dependent analytics assets likely to be affected by a change.

Create scoped OneLake security roles for the relevant tables and principals. is an approach for a different requirement: Data-plane roles define table, row, column or file rights at the item boundary. In the present case, rLS filters rows returned by the model according to assigned users or groups.

Review the semantic model's identity and security path independently from source SQL rules. is an approach for a different requirement: Source-layer security may not automatically apply identically through semantic-model storage and identities. In the present case, rLS filters rows returned by the model according to assigned users or groups.

Apply column-level permissions or data security at the warehouse or OneLake layer where supported. is an approach for a different requirement: Column security enforces permission on the data field, not merely hiding a report visual. In the present case, rLS filters rows returned by the model according to assigned users or groups.

Apply column-level permissions or data security at the warehouse or OneLake layer where supported. is an approach for a different requirement: Column security enforces permission on the data field, not merely hiding a report visual. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.

Mark the item Promoted rather than Certified. is an approach for a different requirement: Promotion signals usefulness but does not represent formal enterprise endorsement by authorized certifiers. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.

Apply the appropriate Microsoft Purview sensitivity label to the Fabric item. is an approach for a different requirement: Sensitivity labels communicate and can enforce information-protection policy; they are not row filters. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.