That observation would verify a different goal: Two test tenants create separate reports with their own approved data source parameters. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Two independently authored reports return the same metric from the shared model.

That observation would verify a different goal: The team lists affected models and reports before approving the upstream schema migration. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Two independently authored reports return the same metric from the shared model.

That observation would verify a different goal: Opening the file starts a connector flow pointing to the approved source. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Two independently authored reports return the same metric from the shared model.

That observation would verify a different goal: The merged branch syncs without conflict and retains reviewed changes from both branches. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: A pull request displays reviewable report and model changes without replacing the entire binary PBIX.

That observation would verify a different goal: A branch change produces the expected item set without losing an uncommitted required item. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: A pull request displays reviewable report and model changes without replacing the entire binary PBIX.

That observation would verify a different goal: A production report reaches the production warehouse and not the development database. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: A pull request displays reviewable report and model changes without replacing the entire binary PBIX.

Apply column-level permissions or data security at the warehouse or OneLake layer where supported. is an approach for a different requirement: Column security enforces permission on the data field, not merely hiding a report visual. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.

Mark the item Promoted rather than Certified. is an approach for a different requirement: Promotion signals usefulness but does not represent formal enterprise endorsement by authorized certifiers. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.

Apply the appropriate Microsoft Purview sensitivity label to the Fabric item. is an approach for a different requirement: Sensitivity labels communicate and can enforce information-protection policy; they are not row filters. In the present case, certification denotes a trusted, governed asset; it is distinct from simply creating a report.

Separate development, test and production stages with an approved deployment path. is an approach for a different requirement: Controlled stage boundaries reduce untested content releases and provide intentional environment transitions. In the present case, git repositories retain revisions, making hardcoded secrets a continuing credential-exposure risk.

Connect a supported workspace to Git integration and commit supported item definitions. is an approach for a different requirement: Git integration version-controls supported workspace items through a linked repository and branch. In the present case, git repositories retain revisions, making hardcoded secrets a continuing credential-exposure risk.

Save the Power BI content as a Power BI Desktop project (.pbip) with source-controlled definitions. is an approach for a different requirement: PBIP represents report/model project artifacts as folder-based files suitable for version control. In the present case, git repositories retain revisions, making hardcoded secrets a continuing credential-exposure risk.

That observation would verify a different goal: User creates a test pipeline but cannot add a new workspace member. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Administrator adds a member and updates workspace settings while permissions are audit logged.

That observation would verify a different goal: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Administrator adds a member and updates workspace settings while permissions are audit logged.

That observation would verify a different goal: Manager shares a report with an analyst but cannot delete the workspace itself. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Administrator adds a member and updates workspace settings while permissions are audit logged.

That observation would verify a different goal: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Authorized queries return permitted data while protected values stay inaccessible.

That observation would verify a different goal: The permitted user sees visuals; an unapproved user still cannot access underlying model data. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Authorized queries return permitted data while protected values stay inaccessible.

That observation would verify a different goal: Contractor changes the permitted artifact but fails when trying to edit another workspace item. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Authorized queries return permitted data while protected values stay inaccessible.

Assign the reviewer the workspace Viewer role instead of a content-editing role. is an approach for a different requirement: Viewer provides read access across workspace content without granting item creation or editing rights. In the present case, direct item grants can authorize access to a specific item without a workspace-wide role.

Review the report and dependent semantic model permissions instead of sharing only the report URL. is an approach for a different requirement: Access to a report artifact and permission to use its source semantic model are separate concerns. In the present case, direct item grants can authorize access to a specific item without a workspace-wide role.

Use an item-scoped permission grant and avoid assigning Contributor across the workspace. is an approach for a different requirement: Workspace Contributor would give unnecessarily broad modification rights compared with item access. In the present case, direct item grants can authorize access to a specific item without a workspace-wide role.

That observation would verify a different goal: The partner opens the authorized item but cannot list unrelated restricted workspace assets. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Contractor changes the permitted artifact but fails when trying to edit another workspace item.

That observation would verify a different goal: Revoking the item's share removes that access while workspace membership remains unchanged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Contractor changes the permitted artifact but fails when trying to edit another workspace item.

That observation would verify a different goal: Manager shares a report with an analyst but cannot delete the workspace itself. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Contractor changes the permitted artifact but fails when trying to edit another workspace item.

That observation would verify a different goal: The partner opens the authorized item but cannot list unrelated restricted workspace assets. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: User creates a test pipeline but cannot add a new workspace member.

That observation would verify a different goal: Administrator adds a member and updates workspace settings while permissions are audit logged. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: User creates a test pipeline but cannot add a new workspace member.

That observation would verify a different goal: The permitted user sees visuals; an unapproved user still cannot access underlying model data. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: User creates a test pipeline but cannot add a new workspace member.

That observation would verify a different goal: Users locate the certified model in catalog discovery and can identify its endorsement. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Catalog users see the Promoted status and do not mistake it for Certified approval.

That observation would verify a different goal: A Viewer with the limited OneLake role sees permitted data; editing users no longer retain unintended broad rights. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Catalog users see the Promoted status and do not mistake it for Certified approval.

That observation would verify a different goal: Permitted and denied employees retrieve different rows during role-based tests. It does not demonstrate the specific required result: Catalog users see the Promoted status and do not mistake it for Certified approval.

Use deployment-pipeline stage comparison before selecting what to promote. is an approach for a different requirement: The comparison highlights supported content differences so operators can avoid unreviewed promotions. In the present case, deployment pipelines promote supported content across environments with controlled comparisons and rules.

Separate development, test and production stages with an approved deployment path. is an approach for a different requirement: Controlled stage boundaries reduce untested content releases and provide intentional environment transitions. In the present case, deployment pipelines promote supported content across environments with controlled comparisons and rules.

Perform focused post-deployment dependency and report validation in the target environment. is an approach for a different requirement: A deployment task's success doesn't prove its dependent models and connections behave as intended. In the present case, deployment pipelines promote supported content across environments with controlled comparisons and rules.