You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
A lost organization-owned Android phone contains sensitive offline company data. The documented loss response requires factory reset once the device next connects, and identity access must be revoked separately. An endpoint administrator proposes: Issue the Intune Wipe action for the confirmed corporate-owned phone and separately revoke its user sessions as authorized. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone. The device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently.
The proposition ‘Retire and Wipe always remove the same scope of user and organization data from every enrolled platform’ is not the reason the selected control works. Retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone.
Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs. The controlling technical behavior here is retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone.
A remote sync requests new MDM communication but does not itself fix the underlying policy value. The controlling technical behavior here is retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone.
A lost organization-owned Android phone contains sensitive offline company data. The documented loss response requires factory reset once the device next connects, and identity access must be revoked separately. The approved approach is: Issue the Intune Wipe action for the confirmed corporate-owned phone and separately revoke its user sessions as authorized. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently. Retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone.
The proposed observation ‘Intune accepted a remote-action request, but no on-device action result or resulting management state is known’ does not establish the target state. The device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently.
A new device check-in completes the requested LAPS rotation and directory backup. The required observation is the device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently.
After check-in the device reports receipt of the new configuration or a specific error. The required observation is the device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently.
A lost organization-owned Android phone contains sensitive offline company data. The documented loss response requires factory reset once the device next connects, and identity access must be revoked separately. After implementing: Issue the Intune Wipe action for the confirmed corporate-owned phone and separately revoke its user sessions as authorized. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Check device ownership, last contact and any legal hold before destructive remote wiping, and track completion rather than treating server acceptance as client execution. Retire selectively removes managed business data where supported, but Wipe initiates factory reset and is the specified response for the lost high-risk corporate phone. The device action progresses to a client-confirmed wipe outcome when it reconnects; access revocation is verified independently.
The alternative ‘Use sync sparingly and check last contact before escalating failures’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Check device ownership, last contact and any legal hold before destructive remote wiping, and track completion rather than treating server acceptance as client execution’.
The suggested safeguard ‘Run destructive device actions on any selected inventory record without rechecking ownership or legal hold’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Check device ownership, last contact and any legal hold before destructive remote wiping, and track completion rather than treating server acceptance as client execution.
The alternative ‘Set stale-check-in alerts and avoid repeatedly exposing current passwords’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Check device ownership, last contact and any legal hold before destructive remote wiping, and track completion rather than treating server acceptance as client execution’.
A fleet has 250 retired company-owned kiosks requiring the same approved supported remote action; the operator must respect the Intune bulk-action selection limit. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen. Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
The alternative ‘Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action’ does not implement the required action ‘Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation’. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
The proposed ‘Submit one Intune bulk-device action covering all 250 selected devices in a single operation’ does not implement the required change. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
The alternative ‘Trigger the Intune Sync remote action on the selected device’ does not implement the required action ‘Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation’. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
A fleet has 250 retired company-owned kiosks requiring the same approved supported remote action; the operator must respect the Intune bulk-action selection limit. An endpoint administrator proposes: Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen. Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
The proposition ‘Intune bulk-device actions accept an unlimited number of devices in one request’ is not the reason the selected control works. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs. The controlling technical behavior here is intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
Remote password rotation requires the managed endpoint to process the instruction. The controlling technical behavior here is intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
A fleet has 250 retired company-owned kiosks requiring the same approved supported remote action; the operator must respect the Intune bulk-action selection limit. The approved approach is: Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen.
The proposed observation ‘The bulk request was created, without reconciling per-device completion or the final target membership’ does not establish the target state. Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
The pane identifies the affected user's enrolled devices and their specific failure statuses. The required observation is each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices. The required observation is each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
A fleet has 250 retired company-owned kiosks requiring the same approved supported remote action; the operator must respect the Intune bulk-action selection limit. After implementing: Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Require selection snapshots, approval, and per-batch result checks, especially before Wipe, Retire, or Delete. Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen. Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome.
The suggested safeguard ‘Reuse an old destructive-action device selection without checking new assignments or service limits’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Require selection snapshots, approval, and per-batch result checks, especially before Wipe, Retire, or Delete.
The alternative ‘Use pre-action inventory snapshots and peer review for fleet-wide actions’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Require selection snapshots, approval, and per-batch result checks, especially before Wipe, Retire, or Delete’.
The alternative ‘Audit recovery-key viewing and rotate promptly after exposure’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Require selection snapshots, approval, and per-batch result checks, especially before Wipe, Retire, or Delete’.
A bulk restart request included a group of critical devices that should stay online. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs. The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
The alternative ‘Run the verified Intune bulk remote action in separately approved groups of no more than 100 eligible devices per operation’ does not implement the required action ‘Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action’. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
The proposed ‘Submit one Intune bulk-device action covering all 250 selected devices in a single operation’ does not implement the required change. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
The alternative ‘Collect Intune device diagnostics and inspect the relevant management extension logs’ does not implement the required action ‘Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action’. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
A bulk restart request included a group of critical devices that should stay online. An endpoint administrator proposes: Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs. The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
The proposition ‘Intune bulk-device actions accept an unlimited number of devices in one request’ is not the reason the selected control works. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
A remote sync requests new MDM communication but does not itself fix the underlying policy value. The controlling technical behavior here is group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
Intune bulk actions support up to 100 devices in one operation and can amplify errors when the wrong IDs or destructive action are chosen. The controlling technical behavior here is group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
A bulk restart request included a group of critical devices that should stay online. The approved approach is: Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs.
Each batch has a validated target list, and per-device action status confirms the intended result or a pending outcome. The required observation is the previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
The proposed observation ‘The bulk request was created, without reconciling per-device completion or the final target membership’ does not establish the target state. The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
After correcting the source path, the intelligence version advances on test devices. The required observation is the previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
A bulk restart request included a group of critical devices that should stay online. After implementing: Narrow the target device list and exclude critical devices before running the bulk action. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Use pre-action inventory snapshots and peer review for fleet-wide actions. Group targeting is not a substitute for a checked list of affected device IDs. The previewed bulk selection excludes the protected devices.
The suggested safeguard ‘Reuse an old destructive-action device selection without checking new assignments or service limits’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Use pre-action inventory snapshots and peer review for fleet-wide actions.
The alternative ‘Limit sensitive inventory query access and validate KQL syntax’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Use pre-action inventory snapshots and peer review for fleet-wide actions’.
The alternative ‘Require selection snapshots, approval, and per-batch result checks, especially before Wipe, Retire, or Delete’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Use pre-action inventory snapshots and peer review for fleet-wide actions’.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.