You save $69.98
An Intune Endpoint Detection and Response policy is assigned but a device sends no EDR telemetry. After implementing: Check Defender sensor onboarding and service-health prerequisites rather than assuming policy assignment equals protection. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Alert on unmanaged or inactive EDR sensors and recheck policy targeting. An assigned EDR policy is insufficient if sensor onboarding or connectivity is broken. The device appears healthy and sends a test signal to the Defender portal.
The suggested safeguard ‘Ignore connector health and EDR sensor status after linking Intune and Defender services’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Alert on unmanaged or inactive EDR sensors and recheck policy targeting.
The alternative ‘Record baseline version approvals and rollback criteria’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Alert on unmanaged or inactive EDR sensors and recheck policy targeting’.
The alternative ‘Monitor connector health, licensing and risk evaluation timing’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Alert on unmanaged or inactive EDR sensors and recheck policy targeting’.
New corporate Windows devices should become visible to the Defender for Endpoint service for EDR alerts. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment. A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
The alternative ‘Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant’ does not implement the required action ‘Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices’. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
The proposed ‘Install Defender Antivirus and assume Defender for Endpoint EDR onboarding happens without the onboarding configuration’ does not implement the required change. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
The alternative ‘Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity’ does not implement the required action ‘Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices’. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
New corporate Windows devices should become visible to the Defender for Endpoint service for EDR alerts. An endpoint administrator proposes: Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment. A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
The proposition ‘Antivirus installation and active EDR sensor onboarding are exactly the same service-state transition’ is not the reason the selected control works. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed. The controlling technical behavior here is onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints. The controlling technical behavior here is onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
New corporate Windows devices should become visible to the Defender for Endpoint service for EDR alerts. The approved approach is: Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment.
The proposed observation ‘The device exists in Intune, but the Defender for Endpoint device inventory contains no active onboarded sensor’ does not establish the target state. A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
The device reports only to the intended new tenant after safe re-onboarding. The required observation is A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
The proposed observation ‘Check only that the endpoint is enrolled with Intune MDM and assume it is present in the Defender for Endpoint device inventory’ does not establish the target state. A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
New corporate Windows devices should become visible to the Defender for Endpoint service for EDR alerts. After implementing: Deploy the supported Defender for Endpoint onboarding policy to eligible Intune devices. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Validate onboarding package/platform compatibility and tenant service configuration. Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment. A pilot appears in the Defender device inventory with an active sensor and test telemetry.
The alternative ‘Document tenant migration and avoid overlapping EDR onboarding policies’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Validate onboarding package/platform compatibility and tenant service configuration’.
The alternative ‘Monitor mismatches between Intune managed inventory and Defender enrolled devices’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Validate onboarding package/platform compatibility and tenant service configuration’.
The suggested safeguard ‘Monitor only local antivirus engine health rather than tenant EDR onboarding and telemetry loss’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Validate onboarding package/platform compatibility and tenant service configuration.
An endpoint appears in Intune but not in Defender for Endpoint after deployment. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints. The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
The proposed ‘Install Defender Antivirus and assume Defender for Endpoint EDR onboarding happens without the onboarding configuration’ does not implement the required change. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
The alternative ‘Assign an Intune endpoint security antivirus policy with the required settings’ does not implement the required action ‘Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity’. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
The alternative ‘Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant’ does not implement the required action ‘Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity’. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
An endpoint appears in Intune but not in Defender for Endpoint after deployment. An endpoint administrator proposes: Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints. The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
The proposition ‘Antivirus installation and active EDR sensor onboarding are exactly the same service-state transition’ is not the reason the selected control works. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment. The controlling technical behavior here is intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
Intune configuration status alone does not provide full threat alert evidence or incident triage context. The controlling technical behavior here is intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
An endpoint appears in Intune but not in Defender for Endpoint after deployment. The approved approach is: Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity. Which observable test result best confirms the proposed outcome?
The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints.
The device reports only to the intended new tenant after safe re-onboarding. The required observation is the repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
The proposed observation ‘The device exists in Intune, but the Defender for Endpoint device inventory contains no active onboarded sensor’ does not establish the target state. The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
The proposed observation ‘Look only for a healthy Microsoft Defender Antivirus engine while ignoring EDR onboarding and sensor connectivity’ does not establish the target state. The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
An endpoint appears in Intune but not in Defender for Endpoint after deployment. After implementing: Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity. Which continuing safeguard best prevents this problem from recurring?
Monitor mismatches between Intune managed inventory and Defender enrolled devices. Intune MDM enrollment and Defender EDR onboarding are separate operational checkpoints. The repaired device appears in Defender inventory and reports healthy sensor status.
The suggested safeguard ‘Monitor only local antivirus engine health rather than tenant EDR onboarding and telemetry loss’ would leave the demonstrated risk unresolved. Monitor mismatches between Intune managed inventory and Defender enrolled devices.
The alternative ‘Document tenant migration and avoid overlapping EDR onboarding policies’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Monitor mismatches between Intune managed inventory and Defender enrolled devices’.
The alternative ‘Version the selected baseline and review updated recommendations’ is not the continuing control for this configuration. The relevant safeguard is ‘Monitor mismatches between Intune managed inventory and Defender enrolled devices’.
A device was moved to a new tenant but Defender telemetry still targets the old security tenant. Which administrative action most directly meets the stated requirement?
Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant. A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed. The device reports only to the intended new tenant after safe re-onboarding.
The proposed ‘Install Defender Antivirus and assume Defender for Endpoint EDR onboarding happens without the onboarding configuration’ does not implement the required change. A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
The alternative ‘Inspect EDR onboarding status, endpoint sensor service and network connectivity’ does not implement the required action ‘Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant’. A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
The alternative ‘Revise authorized signer rules after verifying the new publisher identity’ does not implement the required action ‘Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant’. A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
A device was moved to a new tenant but Defender telemetry still targets the old security tenant. An endpoint administrator proposes: Offboard it using the supported process, then onboard to the approved Defender tenant. Which technical explanation most directly supports the proposed action?
A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed. The device reports only to the intended new tenant after safe re-onboarding.
The proposition ‘Antivirus installation and active EDR sensor onboarding are exactly the same service-state transition’ is not the reason the selected control works. A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
Onboarding establishes the device's sensor/service relationship; antivirus installation alone is not proof of EDR enrollment. The controlling technical behavior here is A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
BitLocker policy can fail when the device cannot satisfy encryption prerequisites or has conflicting settings. The controlling technical behavior here is A sensor association can remain linked to its original Defender service until correctly changed.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.
