Visit here for our full Google Professional Cloud Developer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 211: 

Your application deployed on Cloud Run needs to call a private API hosted on GKE. Both services are in the same VPC. What is the recommended connectivity approach?

A) Use Cloud Load Balancing to expose the GKE service publicly

B) Configure Cloud Run to use VPC Connector for private network access

C) Use Cloud VPN between Cloud Run and GKE

D) Deploy Cloud NAT for outbound connectivity

Answer: B

Explanation:

Configuring Cloud Run to use VPC Connector enables private network access to services running on GKE within the same VPC network. The Serverless VPC Access connector creates a bridge between the serverless Cloud Run environment and the VPC network, allowing Cloud Run services to communicate with internal resources using private IP addresses.

VPC Connector deploys as a managed resource that handles the networking infrastructure between Cloud Run and the VPC. After creating a connector in the desired region and VPC network, Cloud Run services reference the connector in their configuration. Traffic from Cloud Run destined for private IP ranges automatically routes through the connector into the VPC.

The connectivity enables Cloud Run to call GKE services using internal Kubernetes service DNS names or cluster IP addresses. This private communication maintains security by avoiding exposure of internal APIs to the public internet. Network policies and firewall rules in the VPC can further restrict which Cloud Run services can access specific GKE endpoints.

Performance considerations include connector throughput limits based on machine type and instance count. Connectors scale automatically within configured limits to handle traffic volume. For high-throughput scenarios, organizations can configure connectors with higher machine types or multiple instances to provide additional capacity.

Public Load Balancing exposes services unnecessarily to the internet. Cloud VPN is designed for connecting different networks rather than integrating serverless services with VPC. Cloud NAT provides outbound internet access but not VPC connectivity. VPC Connector specifically enables Cloud Run to access private VPC resources including GKE services.

Question 212: 

You need to implement request authentication for your Cloud Run service using custom tokens. What is the best approach?

A) Use Cloud IAM for all authentication

B) Implement custom authentication middleware in the application

C) Use Cloud Endpoints with API Gateway for token validation

D) Configure Cloud Armor for authentication

Answer: B

Explanation:

Implementing custom authentication middleware in the application provides the flexibility required for custom token validation in Cloud Run services. While Cloud Run supports IAM-based authentication natively, custom token formats like JWT tokens with specific claims or proprietary authentication schemes require application-level implementation.

Authentication middleware intercepts incoming requests before they reach application business logic, validating tokens from request headers or cookies. The middleware can verify token signatures using public keys, check token expiration, validate claims against application requirements, and reject unauthorized requests with appropriate HTTP status codes.

For JWT tokens, libraries in most languages provide validation functionality that checks signatures against public keys, verifies standard claims like expiration and audience, and extracts custom claims for authorization decisions. The middleware can cache public keys and validation results to minimize performance impact on request processing.

The application can combine custom authentication with Cloud Run’s built-in IAM authentication for defense in depth. Services can require Cloud IAM authentication for machine-to-machine communication while accepting custom tokens for user-facing requests. This layered approach provides flexibility while maintaining security.

Cloud IAM authentication is excellent for service-to-service communication but does not support custom token formats. Cloud Endpoints and API Gateway provide API management features but require additional infrastructure. Cloud Armor focuses on DDoS protection and security policies. Custom middleware provides the necessary flexibility for application-specific authentication requirements in Cloud Run.

Question 213: 

Your application uses Cloud Firestore and needs to implement full-text search across document fields. What is the recommended solution?

A) Use Firestore’s built-in full-text search

B) Implement search using Firestore queries with multiple filters

C) Sync Firestore data to Algolia or Elasticsearch for search

D) Load data into BigQuery for search queries

Answer: C

Explanation:

Syncing Firestore data to specialized search services like Algolia or Elasticsearch is the recommended approach for implementing full-text search functionality. Cloud Firestore does not provide native full-text search capabilities, and its query model is designed for exact matches and range queries rather than text search.

Integration patterns involve listening to Firestore document changes using Cloud Functions or Firestore triggers, then indexing document content in the search service. When documents are created or updated in Firestore, triggers invoke functions that extract searchable content and send it to the search service for indexing. Deletions also trigger index updates.

Search services like Algolia provide features including relevance ranking, typo tolerance, faceted search, and highlighting that are essential for good user experience. These services are optimized for search workloads with specialized indexing structures and query processing. Applications query the search service for matches, then retrieve full documents from Firestore using document IDs.

The dual-system architecture maintains Firestore as the source of truth for data persistence while leveraging search services for their specialized capabilities. This separation of concerns allows each system to excel at its purpose. Firestore provides strong consistency, transactions, and real-time updates while search services deliver fast, flexible text search.

Firestore does not have built-in full-text search. Multiple filters can handle some search scenarios but not true full-text search with ranking and relevance. BigQuery is designed for analytics rather than low-latency search queries. Specialized search services provide the capabilities required for full-text search integrated with Firestore.

Question 214: 

You are developing a mobile application backend on Cloud Run that needs to handle file uploads up to 100MB. What should you implement?

A) Configure Cloud Run to accept larger request bodies

B) Use signed URLs for direct upload to Cloud Storage

C) Increase Cloud Run memory allocation

D) Implement chunked upload in the application

Answer: B

Explanation:

Using signed URLs for direct upload to Cloud Storage is the recommended approach for handling large file uploads in mobile applications. This pattern bypasses the application backend for file transfer, reducing latency, improving reliability, and eliminating the need to stream large files through Cloud Run instances.

The workflow involves mobile clients requesting signed URLs from the Cloud Run backend. The backend generates signed URLs using Cloud Storage client libraries with appropriate expiration times and access restrictions. Mobile clients then upload files directly to Cloud Storage using the signed URLs without involving the application backend in the data transfer.

Signed URLs provide temporary, limited access to specific Cloud Storage objects without requiring clients to have Google Cloud credentials. The URL includes authentication information embedded in query parameters, and Cloud Storage validates requests against the signature. URLs can be scoped to specific operations like upload or download with controlled expiration.

After successful upload, mobile clients notify the backend which can then process the uploaded file by reading it from Cloud Storage. This pattern scales efficiently because file transfer bandwidth does not consume Cloud Run resources. The backend only handles lightweight coordination rather than streaming large payloads.

Cloud Run has request size limits that cannot be increased arbitrarily. Memory allocation affects processing capacity but not request size handling. Chunked uploads add complexity to both client and server. Direct upload to Cloud Storage using signed URLs provides the scalable, efficient solution for large file uploads in mobile backends.

Question 215: 

Your application needs to implement distributed locking for coordinating work across multiple instances. What is the most appropriate solution?

A) Use Cloud Memorystore (Redis) with SETNX commands

B) Use Cloud SQL with row-level locking

C) Implement locking with Cloud Storage object versioning

D) Use Cloud Pub/Sub for coordination

Answer: A

Explanation:

Cloud Memorystore for Redis with SETNX (SET if Not eXists) commands provides the most appropriate solution for implementing distributed locking across multiple application instances. Redis offers atomic operations and expiration capabilities essential for reliable distributed lock implementations.

The SETNX command atomically sets a key only if it does not already exist, returning success or failure. Applications attempting to acquire a lock use SETNX with a unique lock key. Only one instance succeeds, effectively acquiring the lock. The lock key includes an expiration time preventing locks from persisting if the holding instance fails before releasing.

Redis also provides the Redlock algorithm implementation offering stronger guarantees for distributed locks. This algorithm uses multiple Redis instances to avoid single points of failure. Applications acquire locks by obtaining majority consensus across Redis instances, providing fault tolerance even if some Redis nodes fail.

Lock implementations should include appropriate timeout and retry logic. Applications set reasonable expiration times on locks based on expected work duration. If work completes successfully, applications explicitly release locks using DELETE commands. If instances fail while holding locks, expiration ensures locks release automatically preventing permanent blocking.

Cloud SQL row-level locking works but introduces database load and potential performance bottlenecks. Cloud Storage versioning is not designed for locking coordination. Pub/Sub provides messaging but not locking primitives. Redis’s atomic operations and expiration make it ideal for distributed locking patterns.

Question 216: 

You need to implement a canary deployment strategy for your GKE application. What is the recommended approach?

A) Deploy to a separate GKE cluster and switch DNS

B) Use Kubernetes Deployments with multiple replicas at different versions

C) Use Istio or Anthos Service Mesh for traffic splitting

D) Implement application-level feature flags

Answer: C

Explanation:

Using Istio or Anthos Service Mesh for traffic splitting provides the most robust and flexible approach for implementing canary deployments in GKE. Service mesh technology offers fine-grained traffic management capabilities that enable precise control over request routing between application versions.

Service mesh implementations deploy sidecar proxies alongside application containers that intercept and route network traffic. Traffic routing rules define percentage splits between different versions of services. For canary deployments, administrators configure rules sending a small percentage like 5% of traffic to the new version while 95% goes to the stable version.

The mesh provides observability into both versions simultaneously through metrics, tracing, and logging. Operators monitor error rates, latency, and other indicators comparing canary and stable versions. If the canary performs well, traffic gradually shifts toward the new version. If problems arise, traffic immediately routes back to the stable version.

Advanced routing capabilities enable sophisticated canary strategies including routing specific user segments to the canary for targeted testing, header-based routing for internal testing, and weighted routing combining multiple factors. These capabilities provide more control than basic Kubernetes features alone.

Separate clusters add infrastructure complexity and management overhead. Multiple replicas at different versions within a Deployment do not provide controlled traffic splitting. Feature flags provide application-level control but lack infrastructure-level traffic management and observability. Service mesh technology delivers comprehensive canary deployment capabilities for GKE applications.

Question 217: 

Your Cloud Function needs to process events from Cloud Storage but occasionally fails. What is the best practice for handling failures?

A) Implement retry logic in the function code

B) Configure Cloud Functions to use Pub/Sub Dead Letter Topic

C) Use Cloud Tasks for reliable retry handling

D) Enable automatic retry in Cloud Functions event configuration

Answer: D

Explanation:

Enabling automatic retry in Cloud Functions event configuration is the best practice for handling transient failures in event-driven functions. Cloud Functions provides built-in retry mechanisms specifically designed for event triggers that automatically reattempt failed function executions with exponential backoff.

When automatic retry is enabled for event-driven functions, Cloud Functions tracks execution results. If a function fails by throwing an exception or returning an error status, the platform automatically schedules retry attempts. Retries use exponential backoff with jitter to avoid overwhelming downstream services and distribute retry load over time.

The retry mechanism continues attempting execution for up to 7 days by default, providing resilience against temporary failures like network issues, downstream service unavailability, or transient data inconsistencies. Functions should be implemented idempotently since retry attempts may cause multiple executions for the same event.

Functions can signal whether failures should trigger retries by throwing exceptions for retriable errors while handling non-retriable errors gracefully. For example, invalid data that will never process successfully should not trigger retries, while temporary network failures should. This distinction prevents wasting resources on events that cannot succeed.

Implementing retry logic in function code duplicates platform functionality and adds complexity. Dead Letter Topics are useful for handling events that exhaust retries but do not replace retry mechanisms. Cloud Tasks provides scheduling but event-driven Cloud Functions have native retry support. Enabling automatic retry uses the platform’s built-in, optimized retry handling.

Question 218: 

You need to implement circuit breaker pattern for calls from your GKE application to external APIs. What is the recommended approach?

A) Implement circuit breaker logic in application code

B) Use Istio service mesh with outlier detection

C) Configure Cloud Load Balancing health checks

D) Use Cloud Armor security policies

Answer: B

Explanation:

Using Istio service mesh with outlier detection provides the recommended approach for implementing circuit breaker patterns in GKE applications. Istio’s traffic management capabilities include sophisticated failure detection and recovery mechanisms that automatically isolate failing services.

Outlier detection in Istio monitors request success rates and latency for service endpoints. When an endpoint exceeds configured failure thresholds, Istio automatically ejects it from the load balancing pool for a specified time period. This ejection prevents additional requests from being sent to failing instances, giving them time to recover.

Configuration defines thresholds for consecutive failures, time windows for evaluation, and ejection periods. For external API calls, applications can configure destination rules specifying that services with high error rates should be temporarily removed from use. The mesh automatically manages the circuit state based on observed behavior.

Istio also provides retry policies, timeout configurations, and fault injection capabilities that combine with outlier detection to create resilient communication patterns. These features work together to prevent cascading failures where problems in one service propagate through the system affecting overall stability.

Implementing circuit breakers in application code is possible but requires careful design and testing. Istio provides production-tested implementations reducing development effort. Load Balancing health checks verify backend health but do not provide circuit breaker patterns. Cloud Armor focuses on security rather than resilience patterns. Istio delivers comprehensive circuit breaker functionality for GKE applications.

Question 219: 

Your application uses Secret Manager to store API keys. How should you access these secrets from Cloud Run?

A) Download secrets at build time and include in container image

B) Mount secrets as volumes using Secret Manager integration

C) Use environment variables with secret references

D) Fetch secrets in application code using Secret Manager API

Answer: D

Explanation:

Fetching secrets in application code using Secret Manager API is the recommended approach for accessing secrets from Cloud Run. This pattern provides runtime access to secrets with proper access control through IAM, enables secret rotation without redeployment, and keeps secrets out of container images and environment variables.

Applications use Secret Manager client libraries to retrieve secret values during initialization or when needed. The Cloud Run service account requires Secret Manager Secret Accessor role on the specific secrets or project. API calls specify secret names and optionally version numbers, receiving secret values that can be used for API authentication or other purposes.

This approach supports secret rotation by allowing applications to periodically refresh secret values. For long-running connections, applications can implement periodic secret refresh to pick up rotated values without restart. Short-lived Cloud Run instances naturally fetch current secrets on each cold start.

Secret Manager maintains audit logs of all access attempts providing visibility into which services access secrets and when. This auditability helps security teams monitor secret usage and investigate potential compromises. IAM policies provide fine-grained control over secret access.

Including secrets in container images exposes them in image layers creating security risks. Mounting as volumes is not supported in Cloud Run. Environment variables with references expose secrets to container inspection tools. Direct API access provides the secure, flexible approach for secret access from Cloud Run applications.

Question 220: 

You need to implement a webhook receiver that processes GitHub events. The receiver should handle high traffic spikes. What is the best architecture?

A) Deploy receiver on Compute Engine with autoscaling

B) Use Cloud Run with Pub/Sub push subscriptions

C) Use Cloud Functions triggered by HTTP

D) Implement receiver on GKE with Horizontal Pod Autoscaler

Answer: B

Explanation:

Using Cloud Run with Pub/Sub push subscriptions provides the best architecture for handling webhook receivers with traffic spikes. This pattern decouples webhook reception from processing, enabling reliable event handling even during extreme traffic bursts that might overwhelm direct HTTP receivers.

The architecture involves a lightweight Cloud Run service receiving webhooks from GitHub and publishing them to a Pub/Sub topic. This receiver acknowledges webhooks immediately, ensuring GitHub sees successful delivery. Pub/Sub then delivers events to processing services through push subscriptions, managing retry and backoff automatically.

Processing services can also run on Cloud Run, scaling independently based on incoming event rate from Pub/Sub. This separation allows receiver and processor to scale differently. The receiver handles brief traffic spikes efficiently while processors scale based on sustained processing needs. Pub/Sub buffering absorbs traffic spikes preventing system overload.

Pub/Sub provides durability guarantees ensuring no events are lost even if processing services are temporarily unavailable. Events persist in the topic until successfully processed. This durability is crucial for webhooks where GitHub does not indefinitely retry failed deliveries.

Compute Engine requires more management and slower scaling than serverless options. Cloud Functions work but Pub/Sub integration provides better buffering and retry. GKE with HPA scales well but adds Kubernetes management complexity. Cloud Run with Pub/Sub delivers serverless scaling with reliable event processing for webhook handling.

Question 221: 

Your application needs to query data from BigQuery and cache results for 1 hour. What is the most cost-effective caching strategy?

A) Use BigQuery’s built-in cache with query results

B) Store results in Cloud Memorystore

C) Cache results in Cloud Storage

D) Use Cloud CDN for query result caching

Answer: A

Explanation:

Using BigQuery’s built-in cache with query results is the most cost-effective caching strategy for repeated queries. BigQuery automatically caches query results for 24 hours at no additional cost, eliminating the need for external caching infrastructure when queries are repeated within the cache duration.

When BigQuery executes a query, it stores results in a temporary cached table. Subsequent identical queries served from cache do not consume query processing slots and are not charged. The cache is invalidated if underlying tables change, ensuring results remain current. This automatic caching provides significant cost savings for dashboards and reports running repeated queries.

Applications can explicitly control cache behavior using query parameters. The useQueryCache parameter enables or disables cache usage. For use cases requiring data freshness over cost savings, applications can bypass cache. For dashboard scenarios where hourly data is acceptable, cache provides optimal cost efficiency.

BigQuery cache is scoped per user and per project. Multiple users running identical queries each generate their own cache entries. Organizations can optimize costs by consolidating queries through shared service accounts or by building additional caching layers for multi-user scenarios.

Cloud Memorystore adds infrastructure costs and management overhead. Cloud Storage introduces access latency and data management complexity. Cloud CDN is designed for HTTP content caching rather than query results. BigQuery’s native caching provides zero-cost, automatic caching for repeated queries making it the most cost-effective option.

Question 222: 

You need to implement graceful shutdown for your Cloud Run application to complete in-flight requests. What should you implement?

A) Handle SIGTERM signal and stop accepting new requests

B) Use Cloud Run minimum instances to prevent shutdowns

C) Implement health check endpoints that delay shutdown

D) Configure longer Cloud Run request timeout

Answer: A

Explanation:

Handling SIGTERM signal and stopping acceptance of new requests enables graceful shutdown in Cloud Run applications. When Cloud Run decides to shut down a container instance, it sends SIGTERM signal giving the application up to 10 seconds to complete in-flight requests before forcefully terminating the process.

Graceful shutdown implementation involves registering signal handlers that respond to SIGTERM by stopping acceptance of new requests while allowing existing requests to complete. The application should stop listening on the HTTP port, finish processing active requests, close database connections, flush buffers, and perform cleanup before exiting.

During the shutdown window, Cloud Run does not route new requests to the terminating instance but allows time for completing existing work. Applications should aim to complete shutdown within the 10-second window. If the process does not exit within this period, Cloud Run sends SIGKILL forcefully terminating the container.

Best practices include implementing shutdown logic that tracks active requests, waits for their completion with a timeout, and logs shutdown progress. For long-running operations, applications should design request handling to be interruptible or resumable since shutdown may occur at any time.

Minimum instances prevent cold starts but do not prevent instance shutdown during scaling down. Health check endpoints do not delay actual shutdown. Request timeout controls maximum request duration but not shutdown behavior. SIGTERM handling provides the proper mechanism for graceful shutdown in Cloud Run.

Question 223: 

Your application needs to implement role-based access control with custom roles beyond default IAM roles. What is the best approach?

A) Create custom IAM roles at the organization level

B) Implement authorization logic in application code

C) Use Cloud Identity Groups for role management

D) Configure Firestore security rules for access control

Answer: B

Explanation:

Implementing authorization logic in application code is the best approach when applications require custom roles beyond what IAM provides. IAM manages infrastructure-level access control, but application-level authorization requires business logic specific to the application’s data model and user roles.

Application-level authorization evaluates user permissions against application-specific resources and actions. For example, an application might define roles like Editor, Viewer, and Admin with permissions determining which documents users can access or modify. These permissions depend on document ownership, sharing settings, and team membership rather than Google Cloud resources.

Implementation typically involves storing role assignments in the application database, evaluating permissions during request processing, and enforcing access decisions before returning data or performing actions. Authorization middleware can intercept requests, check user roles and permissions, and reject unauthorized access attempts.

Combining IAM for infrastructure access with application-level authorization provides defense in depth. IAM controls which users can invoke Cloud Run services or access Cloud Storage buckets, while application authorization determines what data and operations each user can access within the application.

Custom IAM roles at organization level control Google Cloud resource access but not application data. Identity Groups organize users but do not define application permissions. Firestore security rules work for Firestore but do not cover authorization across other resources. Application code provides the flexibility needed for custom role-based access control.

Question 224: 

You need to implement a data processing pipeline that transforms data from Cloud Storage to BigQuery with validation. What is the recommended approach?

A) Use Cloud Functions to process files and load BigQuery

B) Implement processing in Cloud Dataflow

C) Use BigQuery Data Transfer Service

D) Write a Cloud Run service to process files

Answer: B

Explanation:

Implementing processing in Cloud Dataflow provides the recommended approach for data transformation pipelines requiring validation, complex transformations, and scalable processing. Dataflow offers a managed Apache Beam service designed specifically for batch and streaming data processing workloads.

Dataflow pipelines define transformation steps including reading from Cloud Storage, parsing data formats, validating records against business rules, transforming data structures, handling errors, and writing results to BigQuery. The service automatically scales compute resources based on data volume, optimizing cost and performance.

Built-in connectors for Cloud Storage and BigQuery simplify pipeline development. Beam provides I/O transforms for reading various file formats and writing to BigQuery tables. The pipeline can handle schema evolution, data quality checks, and error handling with separate outputs for valid and invalid records.

Dataflow provides monitoring through Cloud Monitoring with metrics for pipeline progress, worker utilization, and data throughput. This observability enables identifying bottlenecks and optimizing performance. Error handling capabilities include dead letter queues for failed records and retry mechanisms for transient failures.

Cloud Functions work for simple transformations but lack Dataflow’s scalability and built-in data processing features. Data Transfer Service handles specific source systems but not custom transformations. Cloud Run can implement processing but requires more custom code than Dataflow. Dataflow provides the purpose-built solution for data transformation pipelines.

Question 225: 

Your application deployed across multiple regions needs a global load balancer with automatic SSL certificate management. What should you use?

A) Cloud Load Balancing with Google-managed SSL certificates

B) Cloud CDN with custom SSL certificates

C) Cloud Armor with SSL policies

D) Third-party load balancer on Compute Engine

Answer: A

Explanation:

Cloud Load Balancing with Google-managed SSL certificates provides the comprehensive solution for global load balancing with automatic certificate management. Google Cloud provisions, renews, and manages SSL certificates automatically for configured domains, eliminating operational overhead while ensuring secure connections.

Global HTTP(S) Load Balancing distributes traffic across regions using Google’s global network infrastructure. The load balancer selects backend regions based on user proximity, backend health, and capacity, providing optimal performance for globally distributed users. Automatic failover reroutes traffic if regional backends become unavailable.

Google-managed certificates require only domain verification through DNS records. After verification, Google automatically provisions certificates from a trusted certificate authority, manages renewals before expiration, and handles all certificate lifecycle operations. Applications never handle certificate files or private keys.

The load balancer integrates with Cloud CDN for caching static content at edge locations, Cloud Armor for DDoS protection and security policies, and Cloud Monitoring for observability. This integrated approach provides comprehensive global application delivery infrastructure through a single service.

Cloud CDN requires a load balancer and does not handle load balancing itself. Cloud Armor provides security policies but not load balancing. Third-party load balancers require management of infrastructure and certificates. Cloud Load Balancing with managed certificates delivers automated global load balancing with certificate management.