Pass Cisco DEVASC 200-901 Exam in First Attempt Easily
Real Cisco DEVASC 200-901 Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

Verified by experts
3 products

You save $69.98

200-901 Premium Bundle

  • Premium File 431 Questions & Answers
  • Last Update: Nov 9, 2026
  • Training Course 11 Lectures
  • Study Guide 1212 Pages
$79.99 $149.97

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    431 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 9, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    11 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    1212 Pages

    $43.99
    $39.99

DevNet Associate (DEVASC) 200-901 Practice Test 15

Question 140

The initial implementation fails or does not meet the expected behavior. A test integration left duplicate subscriptions sending the same incident twice; the API supports DELETE /subscriptions/{id}. Which investigation should be prioritized to diagnose the problem?

  1. Inspect status code, body length and the endpoint's documented success responses.
  2. Verify the identifier, endpoint authorization and returned deletion status before retrying.
  3. Inspect request If-None-Match, response status and stored ETag/body pairing.
  4. Inspect request headers, raw payload bytes and accepted media types in API docs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Verify the identifier, endpoint authorization and returned deletion status before retrying. These are the relevant initial evidence checks for DELETE an obsolete webhook subscription. Intended action: Issue DELETE for the verified unwanted subscription ID, using the documented authentication and method. Expected success condition: The unwanted subscription no longer appears on list requests and duplicate events cease.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect status code, body length and the endpoint's documented success responses. This investigation primarily applies to Interpret 204 No Content, not the current DELETE an obsolete webhook subscription problem. Prioritize: Verify the identifier, endpoint authorization and returned deletion status before retrying.

C:

Inspect request If-None-Match, response status and stored ETag/body pairing. This investigation primarily applies to Handle conditional GET with 304, not the current DELETE an obsolete webhook subscription problem. Prioritize: Verify the identifier, endpoint authorization and returned deletion status before retrying.

D:

Inspect request headers, raw payload bytes and accepted media types in API docs. This investigation primarily applies to 415 Unsupported Media Type on JSON endpoint, not the current DELETE an obsolete webhook subscription problem. Prioritize: Verify the identifier, endpoint authorization and returned deletion status before retrying.

Question 141

A Cisco network automation team has this requirement: An incident system should react within seconds when a device goes offline, but a client polls all devices every ten minutes. Which design or implementation action best addresses it?

  1. Fetch current state, reconcile intended changes and resubmit using documented concurrency controls.
  2. Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks.
  3. Catch appropriate requests exceptions, log a redacted structured failure and return an explicit unsuccessful result.
  4. Send the required Basic authorization credentials through the HTTP client's supported auth interface over verified HTTPS.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks. Technical reason: Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling. Verify by: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan. Deployment qualification: The receiver must remain available and tolerate delivery retries or duplicates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Fetch current state, reconcile intended changes and resubmit using documented concurrency controls. This instead targets the different case 409 Conflict on stale configuration revision. The described Webhook push instead of polling requirement specifically calls for Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks.

C:

Catch appropriate requests exceptions, log a redacted structured failure and return an explicit unsuccessful result. This instead targets the different case Catch RequestException without hiding failures. The described Webhook push instead of polling requirement specifically calls for Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks.

D:

Send the required Basic authorization credentials through the HTTP client's supported auth interface over verified HTTPS. This instead targets the different case Basic authentication for an approved legacy service. The described Webhook push instead of polling requirement specifically calls for Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks.

Question 142

After deployment, an engineer must prove the proposed solution works. An incident system should react within seconds when a device goes offline, but a client polls all devices every ten minutes. Which observed result is the most direct acceptance evidence?

  1. After a simulated limit response, the client waits and succeeds without a tight retry storm.
  2. A deliberately unresponsive fixture causes a handled timeout within the defined processing budget.
  3. Repeated calls reuse eligible connections while an untrusted certificate is still rejected.
  4. A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan. Recommended implementation: Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks. Why the observation matters: Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling.

Incorrect Answers

A:

After a simulated limit response, the client waits and succeeds without a tight retry storm. That observation could confirm Back off on API rate-limit response, not the current Webhook push instead of polling case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

B:

A deliberately unresponsive fixture causes a handled timeout within the defined processing budget. That observation could confirm Control timeouts and retry budget, not the current Webhook push instead of polling case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

C:

Repeated calls reuse eligible connections while an untrusted certificate is still rejected. That observation could confirm Reuse requests Session with certificate verification, not the current Webhook push instead of polling case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

Question 143

A developer is explaining the underlying technical behavior. An incident system should react within seconds when a device goes offline, but a client polls all devices every ten minutes. Which principle is most relevant to this case?

  1. Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling.
  2. Rate limiting constrains request frequency and 429 indicates throttling rather than a malformed endpoint.
  3. Sessions pool HTTP connections and certificate verification authenticates the remote endpoint.
  4. Header-based API authentication avoids exposing secrets in ordinary URL records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling. This mechanism explains Webhook push instead of polling. Action: Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks. Expected confirmation: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Rate limiting constrains request frequency and 429 indicates throttling rather than a malformed endpoint. This relates to Back off on API rate-limit response. In the current Webhook push instead of polling case the operative principle is: Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling.

C:

Sessions pool HTTP connections and certificate verification authenticates the remote endpoint. This relates to Reuse requests Session with certificate verification. In the current Webhook push instead of polling case the operative principle is: Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling.

D:

Header-based API authentication avoids exposing secrets in ordinary URL records. This relates to Bearer token separation from query string. In the current Webhook push instead of polling case the operative principle is: Webhooks push event notifications to a subscriber endpoint rather than requiring repeated polling.

Question 144

A team does not apply the necessary control or correction. An incident system should react within seconds when a device goes offline, but a client polls all devices every ten minutes. Which resulting failure or risk is most directly relevant?

  1. Aggressive retries amplify throttling and may lead to temporary API blocks.
  2. Putting Basic credentials in a URL leaks them through browser and proxy histories.
  3. Slow polling creates event-detection delay and unnecessary API load.
  4. Changing device routes will not resolve an expired access token.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Slow polling creates event-detection delay and unnecessary API load. This is the direct exposure for Webhook push instead of polling. Mitigate with: Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks. Check success by: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Aggressive retries amplify throttling and may lead to temporary API blocks. This risk occurs in the different Back off on API rate-limit response situation. For the given Webhook push instead of polling requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Slow polling creates event-detection delay and unnecessary API load.

B:

Putting Basic credentials in a URL leaks them through browser and proxy histories. This risk occurs in the different Basic authentication for an approved legacy service situation. For the given Webhook push instead of polling requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Slow polling creates event-detection delay and unnecessary API load.

D:

Changing device routes will not resolve an expired access token. This risk occurs in the different 401 Unauthorized on expired bearer token situation. For the given Webhook push instead of polling requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Slow polling creates event-detection delay and unnecessary API load.

Question 145

The initial implementation fails or does not meet the expected behavior. An incident system should react within seconds when a device goes offline, but a client polls all devices every ten minutes. Which investigation should be prioritized to diagnose the problem?

  1. Inspect subscription offsets, event ordering and periodic snapshot reconciliation.
  2. Inspect identity, role assignments, method-specific permissions and server authorization logs.
  3. Inspect subscription state, delivery logs, target URL and received event timestamp.
  4. Compare HTTP verb, required JSON schema and response status with the API reference.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect subscription state, delivery logs, target URL and received event timestamp. These are the relevant initial evidence checks for Webhook push instead of polling. Intended action: Register a documented event webhook and expose a secured reachable receiver for state-change callbacks. Expected success condition: A simulated device-down event arrives at the receiver promptly without a scheduled inventory scan.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect subscription offsets, event ordering and periodic snapshot reconciliation. This investigation primarily applies to Event stream versus request-response polling, not the current Webhook push instead of polling problem. Prioritize: Inspect subscription state, delivery logs, target URL and received event timestamp.

B:

Inspect identity, role assignments, method-specific permissions and server authorization logs. This investigation primarily applies to 403 Forbidden despite valid authentication, not the current Webhook push instead of polling problem. Prioritize: Inspect subscription state, delivery logs, target URL and received event timestamp.

D:

Compare HTTP verb, required JSON schema and response status with the API reference. This investigation primarily applies to POST creates an alarm subscription, not the current Webhook push instead of polling problem. Prioritize: Inspect subscription state, delivery logs, target URL and received event timestamp.

Question 146

A Cisco network automation team has this requirement: A collaboration bot accepts arbitrary HTTPS posts as trusted Webex event notices without verifying their origin. Which design or implementation action best addresses it?

  1. Refresh or replace the expired credential through the approved authentication flow before retrying the same permitted request.
  2. Issue DELETE for the verified unwanted subscription ID, using the documented authentication and method.
  3. Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event.
  4. Call requests.get(url, params={"site":site}, headers=auth_headers, timeout=(3,10)) and check status.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event. Technical reason: Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest. Verify by: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected. Deployment qualification: TLS alone encrypts transit but does not prove the sender is the subscribed application.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Refresh or replace the expired credential through the approved authentication flow before retrying the same permitted request. This instead targets the different case 401 Unauthorized on expired bearer token. The described Verify webhook signature on callback requirement specifically calls for Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event.

B:

Issue DELETE for the verified unwanted subscription ID, using the documented authentication and method. This instead targets the different case DELETE an obsolete webhook subscription. The described Verify webhook signature on callback requirement specifically calls for Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event.

D:

Call requests.get(url, params={"site":site}, headers=auth_headers, timeout=(3,10)) and check status. This instead targets the different case Use requests.get with params and timeout. The described Verify webhook signature on callback requirement specifically calls for Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event.

Question 147

After deployment, an engineer must prove the proposed solution works. A collaboration bot accepts arbitrary HTTPS posts as trusted Webex event notices without verifying their origin. Which observed result is the most direct acceptance evidence?

  1. A site named West Campus is encoded correctly and failures produce bounded exceptions.
  2. A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.
  3. The service returns a newly created subscription identifier and a matching stored event filter.
  4. The revised request applies without overwriting another team's already committed settings.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected. Recommended implementation: Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event. Why the observation matters: Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A site named West Campus is encoded correctly and failures produce bounded exceptions. That observation could confirm Use requests.get with params and timeout, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

C:

The service returns a newly created subscription identifier and a matching stored event filter. That observation could confirm POST creates an alarm subscription, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

D:

The revised request applies without overwriting another team's already committed settings. That observation could confirm 409 Conflict on stale configuration revision, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback case. For this case, the decisive observation is: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

Question 148

A developer is explaining the underlying technical behavior. A collaboration bot accepts arbitrary HTTPS posts as trusted Webex event notices without verifying their origin. Which principle is most relevant to this case?

  1. The json parameter serializes a Python object and sets the normal JSON content type.
  2. Revocation invalidates leaked bearer-equivalent credentials while secret storage reduces future exposure.
  3. HTTP Link headers can advertise pagination relations independently of the response body.
  4. Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest. This mechanism explains Verify webhook signature on callback. Action: Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event. Expected confirmation: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The json parameter serializes a Python object and sets the normal JSON content type. This relates to Use requests.post json parameter. In the current Verify webhook signature on callback case the operative principle is: Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest.

B:

Revocation invalidates leaked bearer-equivalent credentials while secret storage reduces future exposure. This relates to Rotate a compromised API key. In the current Verify webhook signature on callback case the operative principle is: Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest.

C:

HTTP Link headers can advertise pagination relations independently of the response body. This relates to Parse Link header for next page. In the current Verify webhook signature on callback case the operative principle is: Webhook signatures provide message integrity and origin evidence using a secret-derived digest.

Question 149

A team does not apply the necessary control or correction. A collaboration bot accepts arbitrary HTTPS posts as trusted Webex event notices without verifying their origin. Which resulting failure or risk is most directly relevant?

  1. Disabling TLS verification permits interception or spoofed-controller responses.
  2. Unauthenticated callbacks permit forged incidents or unauthorized bot operations.
  3. Silently treating missing fields as healthy can suppress outage reporting.
  4. Granting administrator rights for a single denied method violates least privilege.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Unauthenticated callbacks permit forged incidents or unauthorized bot operations. This is the direct exposure for Verify webhook signature on callback. Mitigate with: Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event. Check success by: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Disabling TLS verification permits interception or spoofed-controller responses. This risk occurs in the different Reuse requests Session with certificate verification situation. For the given Verify webhook signature on callback requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Unauthenticated callbacks permit forged incidents or unauthorized bot operations.

C:

Silently treating missing fields as healthy can suppress outage reporting. This risk occurs in the different Respect versioned API fields situation. For the given Verify webhook signature on callback requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Unauthenticated callbacks permit forged incidents or unauthorized bot operations.

D:

Granting administrator rights for a single denied method violates least privilege. This risk occurs in the different 403 Forbidden despite valid authentication situation. For the given Verify webhook signature on callback requirement, the directly relevant risk is: Unauthenticated callbacks permit forged incidents or unauthorized bot operations.

Question 150

The initial implementation fails or does not meet the expected behavior. A collaboration bot accepts arbitrary HTTPS posts as trusted Webex event notices without verifying their origin. Which investigation should be prioritized to diagnose the problem?

  1. Inspect raw payload bytes, signature header and constant-time digest comparison outcome.
  2. Inspect request headers, raw payload bytes and accepted media types in API docs.
  3. Inspect connect/read timeout configuration, exception handling and total retry elapsed time.
  4. Compare HTTP verb, required JSON schema and response status with the API reference.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect raw payload bytes, signature header and constant-time digest comparison outcome. These are the relevant initial evidence checks for Verify webhook signature on callback. Intended action: Validate the provider's documented shared-secret signature over the received request body before processing the event. Expected success condition: A correctly signed fixture is accepted and a tampered body or invalid signature is rejected.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect request headers, raw payload bytes and accepted media types in API docs. This investigation primarily applies to 415 Unsupported Media Type on JSON endpoint, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback problem. Prioritize: Inspect raw payload bytes, signature header and constant-time digest comparison outcome.

C:

Inspect connect/read timeout configuration, exception handling and total retry elapsed time. This investigation primarily applies to Control timeouts and retry budget, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback problem. Prioritize: Inspect raw payload bytes, signature header and constant-time digest comparison outcome.

D:

Compare HTTP verb, required JSON schema and response status with the API reference. This investigation primarily applies to POST creates an alarm subscription, not the current Verify webhook signature on callback problem. Prioritize: Inspect raw payload bytes, signature header and constant-time digest comparison outcome.

DevNet Associate (DEVASC) (200-901) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    431 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 9, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    11 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    1212 Pages

    $43.99
    $39.99

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%

Use Discount Code:

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.

Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your email address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

  • Realistic exam simulation and exam editor with preview functions
  • Whole exam in a single file with several different question types
  • Customizable exam-taking mode & detailed score reports