Pass ISC CISSP Exam in First Attempt Easily
Real ISC CISSP Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

Verified by experts
3 products

You save $69.98

CISSP Premium Bundle

  • Premium File 484 Questions & Answers
  • Last Update: Oct 31, 2026
  • Training Course 62 Lectures
  • Study Guide 2003 Pages
$79.99 $149.97

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    484 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Oct 31, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    62 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    2003 Pages

    $43.99
    $39.99

Certified Information Systems Security Professional CISSP Practice Test 23

Question 220

A signing device uses strong algorithms but reveals secret-dependent timing differences across chosen inputs. As the accountable security practitioner, which response BEST addresses the specific weakness without introducing a different untested control?

  1. Apply constant-time operations and side-channel-resistant implementation review and testing.
  2. Increase the signing key length but keep secret-dependent timing branches unchanged.
  3. Encrypt the signer’s network connection while allowing attackers to measure timing variations over repeated chosen inputs.
  4. Add a warning banner to the signing API without modifying variable-time cryptographic operations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Side-channel attacks exploit implementation leakage rather than mathematical cipher breaks. Hardware power and cache leakage may persist despite constant-time source code.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Stronger math does not eliminate information leaked through implementation timing.

C:

Transport protection does not remove computation-time leakage observable at the endpoint.

D:

User messaging cannot mitigate a side channel in secret-dependent execution.

Question 221

The organization implemented the response to this scenario: A signing device uses strong algorithms but reveals secret-dependent timing differences across chosen inputs. The approved response was: Apply constant-time operations and side-channel-resistant implementation review and testing. Which statement MOST accurately identifies a remaining risk or constraint?

  1. Constant-time source code rules out every hardware power, cache and speculative execution leak.
  2. Hardware power and cache leakage may persist despite constant-time source code.
  3. Using a standardized secure cipher proves its implementation does not leak key-dependent timing.
  4. An encrypted response guarantees attackers cannot infer secrets from response-time distributions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Side-channel attacks exploit implementation leakage rather than mathematical cipher breaks. Statistical timing tests show no exploitable secret-dependent correlation for supported operations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Physical and microarchitectural behavior can expose information beyond source-level timing.

C:

Algorithm strength does not certify side-channel resistance of deployed code and hardware.

D:

Payload secrecy does not hide observable timing correlation.

Question 222

Management implemented a response after this event: A signing device uses strong algorithms but reveals secret-dependent timing differences across chosen inputs. The response was: Apply constant-time operations and side-channel-resistant implementation review and testing. Which observed outcome BEST verifies that the intended security protection operates, rather than merely appearing in a plan?

  1. Statistical timing tests show no exploitable secret-dependent correlation for supported operations.
  2. A signing API uses a current cryptographic algorithm but timing varies predictably with secret-derived branches.
  3. The device passes ordinary functional signature tests without any chosen-input timing analysis.
  4. Power-use monitoring is disabled during assurance, so no anomalous readings are visible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Statistical timing tests show no exploitable secret-dependent correlation for supported operations. Side-channel attacks exploit implementation leakage rather than mathematical cipher breaks.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Algorithm selection alone does not demonstrate side-channel resistance.

C:

Correct signatures cannot establish resistance to implementation leakage.

D:

Missing measurement data does not demonstrate absence of exploitable side channels.

Question 223

A decryption API returns detailed padding-error differences for attacker-crafted ciphertexts. As the accountable security practitioner, which response BEST addresses the specific weakness without introducing a different untested control?

  1. Return detailed padding-valid and padding-invalid errors for every adversary-supplied ciphertext.
  2. Hide the decryption error text but retain large timing differences between failure branches.
  3. Use authenticated encryption and uniform error handling to prevent a practical decryption oracle.
  4. Increase the RSA key length while preserving a vulnerable padding-oracle API.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Chosen-ciphertext attacks can turn decryption error behavior into information leakage. Even uniform errors may be insufficient if response timing exposes the failure branch.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Distinct decryption errors can form a practical chosen-ciphertext oracle.

B:

A timing side channel can disclose the same padding-validation information.

D:

Stronger keys do not fix adaptive decryption error leakage.

Question 224

The organization implemented the response to this scenario: A decryption API returns detailed padding-error differences for attacker-crafted ciphertexts. The approved response was: Use authenticated encryption and uniform error handling to prevent a practical decryption oracle. Which statement MOST accurately identifies a remaining risk or constraint?

  1. Uniform error messages are enough even if the timing difference exposes the rejected padding branch.
  2. Encryption confidentiality is guaranteed when unauthenticated ciphertext changes are accepted into processing.
  3. Even uniform errors may be insufficient if response timing exposes the failure branch.
  4. A decryption API is secure merely because the caller never sees the private key.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Chosen-ciphertext attacks can turn decryption error behavior into information leakage. Modified ciphertext fails authentication without revealing distinguishable decryption details.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Observed timing may still distinguish the failure and enable an oracle.

B:

Lack of authenticated encryption can permit adaptive manipulation or information leakage.

D:

Chosen-ciphertext attacks exploit behavior of a key-holding oracle, not key extraction.

Question 225

Management implemented a response after this event: A decryption API returns detailed padding-error differences for attacker-crafted ciphertexts. The response was: Use authenticated encryption and uniform error handling to prevent a practical decryption oracle. Which observed outcome BEST verifies that the intended security protection operates, rather than merely appearing in a plan?

  1. Malformed ciphertext returns distinct padding-error messages for different invalid inputs.
  2. Uniform error text is shown, but input-dependent response times still reveal the validation stage.
  3. Normal encrypted messages decrypt, but the service has no malicious ciphertext or timing regression tests.
  4. Modified ciphertext fails authentication without revealing distinguishable decryption details.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Modified ciphertext fails authentication without revealing distinguishable decryption details. Chosen-ciphertext attacks can turn decryption error behavior into information leakage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Distinguishable failures are exactly the leakage that adaptive oracle attacks exploit.

B:

Equal messages alone do not demonstrate indistinguishable failure behavior.

C:

Positive functionality cannot prove resistance to adaptive chosen-ciphertext queries.

Question 226

A primary data room is built beneath plumbing in a flood-prone basement despite nearby higher-floor space. As the accountable security practitioner, which response BEST addresses the specific weakness without introducing a different untested control?

  1. Keep critical racks in the basement and install only a better password policy.
  2. Select facility location using environmental hazards and critical-system availability requirements.
  3. Add a second storage unit beside the primary rack under the same overhead plumbing.
  4. Rely on insurance reimbursement instead of evaluating safer equipment placement and recovery access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Physical siting choices can create correlated disasters that cannot be patched in software. Higher floors also require evaluating fire, structural, access and utility dependencies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Credential controls cannot prevent correlated physical flood damage to systems.

C:

Co-located redundancy shares the same environmental hazard.

D:

Financial coverage does not preserve essential service during physical infrastructure loss.

Question 227

The organization implemented the response to this scenario: A primary data room is built beneath plumbing in a flood-prone basement despite nearby higher-floor space. The approved response was: Select facility location using environmental hazards and critical-system availability requirements. Which statement MOST accurately identifies a remaining risk or constraint?

  1. Moving equipment to a higher floor eliminates all site-level environmental and utility hazards.
  2. Duplicating servers in one flood zone guarantees independent disaster recovery.
  3. A server room’s lock controls its primary flood and plumbing hazards.
  4. Higher floors also require evaluating fire, structural, access and utility dependencies.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Physical siting choices can create correlated disasters that cannot be patched in software. Site survey and flooding scenario demonstrate safe equipment placement and evacuation access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Flood risk may decrease, but fire, structure, power and access still require assessment.

B:

Shared physical exposure can destroy both supposedly redundant devices.

C:

Access protection does not mitigate water intrusion or environmental placement risk.

Question 228

Management implemented a response after this event: A primary data room is built beneath plumbing in a flood-prone basement despite nearby higher-floor space. The response was: Select facility location using environmental hazards and critical-system availability requirements. Which observed outcome BEST verifies that the intended security protection operates, rather than merely appearing in a plan?

  1. A physical-access audit passes while flood simulations still put water above the equipment floor.
  2. A blueprint identifies two racks under the same pipe without evaluating simultaneous water damage.
  3. Site survey and flooding scenario demonstrate safe equipment placement and evacuation access.
  4. Insurance coverage is adequate, but a flood scenario would disable all essential business functions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Site survey and flooding scenario demonstrate safe equipment placement and evacuation access. Physical siting choices can create correlated disasters that cannot be patched in software.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Door security is not evidence of safe environmental siting.

B:

Equipment counts do not demonstrate hazard independence.

D:

Financial transfer does not establish safe placement and continuity.

Question 229

A server room uses a fire suppression system that protects equipment but has no occupancy safety or power shutdown procedures. As the accountable security practitioner, which response BEST addresses the specific weakness without introducing a different untested control?

  1. Deploy an equipment-safe suppressant without occupancy notification or evacuation procedures.
  2. Install smoke detectors but omit the building’s required suppression and safe power isolation interfaces.
  3. Disable emergency exits to protect server-room secrecy during a fire alarm.
  4. Design fire detection and suppression with life safety, building code and protected equipment considerations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

People safety takes priority while suitable suppression limits facility damage. Suppressant compatibility with energized equipment and room integrity must be validated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Protecting hardware cannot override occupant life safety during discharge.

B:

Detection alone does not control hazardous conditions or approved response sequence.

C:

Physical security cannot prevent lawful safe evacuation of personnel.

Question 230

The organization implemented the response to this scenario: A server room uses a fire suppression system that protects equipment but has no occupancy safety or power shutdown procedures. The approved response was: Design fire detection and suppression with life safety, building code and protected equipment considerations. Which statement MOST accurately identifies a remaining risk or constraint?

  1. Suppressant compatibility with energized equipment and room integrity must be validated.
  2. A fire suppressant approved for electronics is necessarily harmless to occupants in every concentration.
  3. Fire suppression installation automatically proves safe electrical shutdown and evacuation sequencing.
  4. Protecting racks from water is sufficient even when the chosen chemical suppressant creates an unacceptable personnel hazard.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

People safety takes priority while suitable suppression limits facility damage. A supervised exercise verifies alarm, occupant evacuation, power isolation and suppression sequence.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Human exposure and local building code must be evaluated separately.

C:

Systems need integrated procedures, inspection and drills.

D:

Equipment preservation must remain subordinate to life safety.

Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    484 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Oct 31, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    62 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    2003 Pages

    $43.99
    $39.99

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%

Use Discount Code:

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.

Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your email address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

  • Realistic exam simulation and exam editor with preview functions
  • Whole exam in a single file with several different question types
  • Customizable exam-taking mode & detailed score reports