You save $69.98
Stuck with your IT certification exam preparation? ExamLabs is the ultimate solution with Test Prep LSAT practice test questions, study guide, and a training course, providing a complete package to pass your exam. Saving tons of your precious time, the Test Prep LSAT exam dumps and practice test questions and answers will help you pass easily. Use the latest and updated Test Prep LSAT practice test questions with answers and pass quickly, easily and hassle free!
The journey to law school is a challenging yet rewarding endeavor, and at the heart of this journey lies a formidable gatekeeper: the Law School Admission Test, or LSAT. Unlike many standardized tests you may have encountered in your academic career, the LSAT is not a test of memorized facts or subject-specific knowledge. Instead, it is a rigorous assessment of your skills in critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and reading comprehension. Law schools place significant weight on the LSAT score because it is one of the most reliable predictors of first-year law school performance. A high score can open doors to top-tier institutions and substantial scholarships, sometimes even compensating for a less-than-perfect grade point average. It is a test of how you think, not what you know.
This five-part series is designed to demystify the LSAT preparation process and provide you with a comprehensive roadmap to success. We will move beyond simple tips and delve into the core strategies and methodologies required to master this unique examination. In this first installment, we will lay the crucial groundwork for your studies. We will explore the importance of a diagnostic test, the art of crafting a personalized study plan, the necessity of cultivating the right mindset, the process of selecting the best preparation materials, and the fundamental principles of logic and time management that underpin the entire test. Building a strong foundation is not just the first step; it is the most critical one.
Embarking on your LSAT preparation without first taking a diagnostic test is akin to setting sail across the ocean without a map or a compass. You might be moving, but you have no idea where you are starting from or in which direction you need to go. A full-length, timed practice exam taken under realistic conditions is the essential first step in your journey. It provides an unfiltered, objective snapshot of your current abilities. This initial assessment is not about achieving a high score; its primary purpose is to gather data. It will reveal your natural strengths and, more importantly, expose the areas that require the most significant improvement. This baseline score serves as a benchmark against which all your future progress will be measured.
Analyzing the results of your diagnostic test is a critical exercise. You should go beyond merely calculating your raw score and delve into the specifics of your performance. Which section did you find most challenging: the intricate puzzles of Analytical Reasoning, the dense passages of Reading Comprehension, or the nuanced arguments of Logical Reasoning? Within each section, what types of questions consistently gave you trouble? For instance, in Logical Reasoning, did you struggle with identifying assumptions or with strengthening an argument? A thorough analysis will provide you with a detailed blueprint of your weaknesses. This information is invaluable because it allows you to move away from a one-size-fits-all study approach and begin crafting a plan that is tailored specifically to your needs.
With the insights gained from your diagnostic test, you can now transition from assessment to action by creating a personalized study plan. A well-structured schedule is the backbone of effective LSAT preparation. The sheer volume of material and skills to be mastered can feel overwhelming, but breaking it down into manageable daily and weekly tasks makes the process far less intimidating. Your study plan should be both ambitious and realistic, taking into account your other commitments, such as school, work, and personal life. Consistency is far more important than intensity. Studying for two hours every day is significantly more effective than cramming for ten hours once a week. Your brain needs time to absorb and internalize the complex logical frameworks tested on the LSAT.
Your study schedule should be dynamic, evolving as your skills develop. Initially, you might dedicate more time to understanding the fundamental concepts of a section where you performed poorly on the diagnostic. As you progress, your focus might shift to timed practice and refining your strategies for specific question types. Incorporating different study techniques can also enhance your learning. The Pomodoro Technique, for example, which involves studying in focused 25-minute intervals with short breaks in between, can help maintain concentration and prevent burnout. The key is to create a sustainable routine that you can adhere to over the long term. Remember, the LSAT is a marathon, not a sprint, and your study plan is your race strategy.
The psychological dimension of LSAT preparation is often underestimated but is just as critical as mastering the content. The test is designed to be mentally taxing, and your mindset will play a pivotal role in your ability to persevere through the challenges. Adopting a growth mindset, the belief that your abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work, is essential. This contrasts with a fixed mindset, which assumes that intelligence and skill are static traits. Students with a growth mindset view challenges as opportunities to learn and grow, rather than as reflections of their inherent limitations. When you encounter a difficult logic game or a confusing reading passage, a growth mindset allows you to approach it with curiosity and determination.
Developing a growth mindset involves practical strategies that you can incorporate into your daily study routine. When you get a question wrong, avoid the impulse to feel discouraged. Instead, treat it as a valuable learning opportunity. Analyze the mistake, understand the underlying reasoning, and identify how you can avoid similar errors in the future. Positive self-talk is another powerful tool. Replace negative thoughts like "I'll never be good at logic games" with constructive ones like "This game is challenging, but I can improve with practice and the right strategy." Building this mental resilience from the outset will not only make your study process more effective and enjoyable but will also equip you to handle the pressure of test day with confidence and composure.
Once you have a study plan and the right mindset, you need to equip yourself with high-quality preparation materials. The market is saturated with LSAT prep resources, ranging from comprehensive books and online courses to individual tutoring and free online materials. The most important resources in your arsenal should be the official LSAT PrepTests released by the Law School Admission Council, the organization that creates the test. These are actual past exams, and they are the gold standard for practice. Working with official materials ensures that you are familiarizing yourself with the precise language, question structures, and difficulty level of the real test. No third-party material can perfectly replicate the nuances of an authentic LSAT.
Beyond the official tests, many excellent resources can help you learn the strategies needed to succeed. Comprehensive prep books from reputable companies provide in-depth explanations of different question types and offer structured approaches to each section. Online courses can offer a more interactive learning experience, with video lessons, drills, and analytics to track your progress. The best choice of supplementary materials depends on your individual learning style and budget. Some people thrive with the structure of a formal course, while others prefer the flexibility of self-study with a book. Regardless of the resources you choose, the key is to use them systematically and to focus on understanding the underlying methods rather than just memorizing tricks.
At its core, the LSAT is a test of applied logic. A fundamental understanding of logical principles is therefore essential for success across all sections of the exam. One of the most important concepts to master is conditional reasoning, which often appears in the form of "if-then" statements. Knowing how to correctly diagram these statements and, crucially, how to derive their contrapositive is a skill that pays dividends, particularly in the Logical Reasoning and Analytical Reasoning sections. The contrapositive is a logically equivalent restatement of the original conditional, and the ability to form it quickly and accurately allows you to make deductions that are not immediately obvious. Understanding the difference between necessary and sufficient conditions is another foundational logical skill.
The LSAT also tests your ability to distinguish between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive arguments aim to provide conclusions that are guaranteed to be true if the premises are true. Inductive arguments, on the other hand, provide conclusions that are likely, but not guaranteed, to be true based on the premises. Most of the arguments you will encounter in the Logical Reasoning section are inductive, and your task is often to identify their assumptions or flaws. Familiarizing yourself with common logical fallacies, such as errors in causation, circular reasoning, and ad hominem attacks, will provide you with a framework for deconstructing arguments and identifying their weaknesses. A solid grasp of these logical fundamentals will empower you to tackle the test with precision and confidence.
The LSAT is a race against the clock. Each of the scored multiple-choice sections gives you 35 minutes to answer between 23 and 27 questions. This pacing is intentionally demanding, and it is designed so that many test-takers will not have enough time to comfortably answer every question. Therefore, effective time management is not just a helpful skill; it is a critical component of a high score. From the very beginning of your preparation, you should practice under timed conditions. This will help you develop an internal clock and a sense of pacing for each section. You need to know how much time you can afford to spend on an average question and recognize when a particular question is taking too long and should be skipped.
A key aspect of time management is developing a strategy for the order in which you tackle questions within a section. In Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension, the questions generally increase in difficulty, so it often makes sense to work through them sequentially. In Analytical Reasoning, however, it can be strategic to quickly scan all four games and start with the one that appears to be the most straightforward. The goal is to maximize the number of points you score within the 35-minute window. This means being willing to guess on a difficult question and move on, rather than getting bogged down and sacrificing the opportunity to answer several easier questions that follow. Mastering time management is about working smarter, not just faster, ensuring that you give yourself the best possible chance to demonstrate your abilities on every question you have time to reach.
Welcome to the second installment of our comprehensive guide to preparing for the LSAT. In Part 1, we established the foundational strategies for success, including the importance of a diagnostic test, a personalized study plan, and a growth mindset. Now, we turn our attention to the heart of the examination: the Logical Reasoning section. This section, often referred to as "LR," accounts for two of the four scored sections on the test, meaning it comprises fully half of your total score. There is no path to a high LSAT score that does not go directly through mastering Logical Reasoning. These questions are designed to test your ability to analyze, evaluate, and construct arguments, a skill set that is fundamental to the practice of law.
Each Logical Reasoning question presents a short passage, known as the stimulus, followed by a question stem and five answer choices. The stimuli are drawn from a wide range of topics, from science and art to philosophy and law, but no outside knowledge is ever required. Everything you need to answer the question is contained within the stimulus itself. This section will provide a deep dive into the architecture of LR questions, teaching you how to deconstruct arguments, identify common question types and logical fallacies, and develop systematic strategies for finding the correct answer with speed and accuracy. Mastering this section requires precision, practice, and a methodical approach, and this guide will equip you with the tools you need to succeed.
The first step to conquering any Logical Reasoning question is to master the art of deconstructing the stimulus. Every stimulus can be broadly categorized as either an argument or a set of facts. A stimulus containing an argument will present a series of statements, or premises, that are intended to provide support for a specific conclusion. Your primary task when reading an argumentative stimulus is to identify this core structure. The conclusion is the main point the author is trying to prove, while the premises are the pieces of evidence or reasoning offered in its defense. Authors often use indicator words to signal these components. Words like "therefore," "thus," "hence," and "so" typically precede a conclusion, while words like "because," "since," and "for" often introduce a premise.
In contrast, some stimuli do not contain an argument at all. They simply present a set of related facts or statements without trying to persuade the reader of a particular point. In these cases, it is crucial to understand the relationships between the facts presented. Often, there might be an apparent discrepancy or paradox that needs to be resolved. Recognizing whether you are dealing with an argument or a set of facts is a critical first step because it dictates how you will approach the question. If it is an argument, you will be focused on its structure, its assumptions, and its validity. If it is a set of facts, you will be focused on understanding the information and making logical inferences based on it.
Logical Reasoning questions can be categorized into several distinct families based on the task they require you to perform. One of the most common question types is the "Must Be True" question, also known as an inference question. For these questions, you must accept the statements in the stimulus as true and identify the answer choice that is a logical consequence of those statements. The correct answer is not simply something that could be true; it must be true, with absolute certainty, based only on the information provided. Closely related are "Main Point" questions, which ask you to identify the primary conclusion of the author's argument. This requires you to distinguish the main conclusion from any subsidiary conclusions or premises.
Another important category includes "Method of Reasoning" and "Role of a Statement" questions. "Method of Reasoning" questions ask you to describe, in abstract terms, how the author constructed their argument. You are not evaluating the argument's validity, but rather its structure. For example, the author might make a generalization based on a sample, or draw an analogy. "Role of a Statement" questions are more specific, asking you to identify the function of a particular sentence or phrase within the argument. Is it a premise, a conclusion, an opposing viewpoint, or something else? Success with these question types depends on your ability to accurately dissect the argument's structure, as we discussed previously.
A significant portion of the Logical Reasoning section is dedicated to questions that ask you to interact with an argument by either strengthening or weakening it. "Strengthen" questions require you to select an answer choice that, if true, would provide additional support for the author's conclusion. The correct answer often works by reinforcing a key premise, affirming an underlying assumption, or providing a new piece of evidence that is consistent with the conclusion. It does not need to prove the conclusion beyond all doubt; it just needs to make the conclusion more likely to be true. Conversely, "Weaken" questions ask you to find an answer choice that, if true, would damage the author's argument.
The most effective way to weaken an argument is to attack its central assumption. Arguments on the LSAT are almost never airtight; they rely on unstated assumptions to bridge the gap between their premises and conclusion. A classic weakening answer choice will expose or challenge this assumption. Other ways to weaken an argument include introducing an alternative cause for an observed effect or providing a counterexample that contradicts the author's reasoning. For both strengthening and weakening questions, the key is to first identify the precise conclusion and the primary evidence offered for it. Only then can you effectively assess how each answer choice impacts the relationship between the two.
The authors of LSAT arguments are masters of flawed reasoning, and your job is to be a master of identifying those flaws. Familiarizing yourself with common logical fallacies will give you a significant advantage, particularly on "Flaw in the Reasoning" questions, but also on weakening and strengthening questions. One of the most frequently tested fallacies is the confusion of correlation with causation. Just because two things happen at the same time does not mean that one caused the other. An argument might observe that ice cream sales and crime rates both increase in the summer and conclude that eating ice cream causes crime, ignoring the obvious alternative cause: hot weather.
Other common fallacies include the ad hominem attack, where an author attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself, and the straw man fallacy, where an author misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack. You should also be on the lookout for flawed survey or sample-based arguments, where the group surveyed is unrepresentative of the group about which the conclusion is drawn. Creating a list of these fallacies and practicing identifying them in various contexts will train your brain to spot the weaknesses in LSAT arguments quickly and efficiently. This skill is not just about identifying flaws; it is about understanding the very nature of argumentation.
Assumption questions are a cornerstone of the LSAT and come in two main varieties: "Sufficient Assumption" and "Necessary Assumption." A "Sufficient Assumption" question asks you to find an answer choice that, if added to the existing premises, will guarantee the truth of the conclusion. It completely closes the logical gap in the argument. A "Necessary Assumption" question, which is more common, asks for something that the argument requires or depends on. In other words, if the necessary assumption were false, the argument would fall apart. A useful technique for testing necessary assumption answer choices is the "Negation Test." If you negate the answer choice and the resulting statement destroys the argument, then it is the correct necessary assumption.
"Flaw in the Reasoning" questions are closely related to assumption questions because the flaw in an argument is often its reliance on an unwarranted assumption. These questions ask you to describe the error in the author's reasoning. The correct answer will pinpoint the logical gap or fallacy committed by the author. As mentioned earlier, having a strong command of common logical fallacies is invaluable here. The answer choices are often abstract descriptions of the error, so you will need to match the specific argument in the stimulus to the general description of the flaw in the correct answer choice. Mastering these challenging question types is a sign that you have developed a sophisticated understanding of logical analysis.
Parallel Reasoning questions are among the most time-consuming in the section. They ask you to identify the answer choice that contains an argument with the same logical structure as the argument in the stimulus. This is not about the topic of the argument, but rather its abstract logical pattern. To solve these, you must first break down the stimulus argument into its component parts and abstract structure. For example, you might characterize it as "A leads to B, and B leads to C, therefore A leads to C." You then have to examine each answer choice to find the one that perfectly mirrors this pattern. "Parallel Flaw" questions are a variation where you must match the specific logical fallacy committed in the stimulus.
"Principle" questions involve the application of a general rule. Some questions will provide a principle in the stimulus and ask you to identify a specific situation in the answer choices that conforms to that principle. Other questions work in the opposite direction: they provide a specific argument in the stimulus and ask you to identify a general principle in the answer choices that would justify the reasoning in that argument. These questions test your ability to move between abstract rules and concrete examples. The key is to ensure a perfect match between the logic of the principle and the logic of the specific case.
One of the most powerful techniques for improving both your accuracy and your speed in the Logical Reasoning section is to anticipate the answer before you look at the answer choices. This process is often called "pre-phrasing." After you have read the stimulus and the question stem, take a moment to formulate your own answer to the question in your head. For example, if it is a "Weaken" question, you might think, "The author is assuming that there is no other cause for this phenomenon. The correct answer will likely point out an alternative cause." This proactive approach has several benefits.
First, it forces you to engage with the stimulus on a deeper level and ensure you have a firm grasp of the argument and the task at hand. Second, it helps you avoid the cleverly designed trap answer choices. The test-makers are experts at writing tempting but incorrect options that are designed to distract you. If you go into the answer choices with a clear idea of what you are looking for, you are far less likely to fall for these traps. You can scan the options for the one that best matches your pre-phrased answer. While you will not always be able to predict the exact wording of the correct answer, the process of anticipating it will sharpen your focus and make you a more efficient and accurate test-taker.
Mastering Logical Reasoning is not just about understanding the concepts; it is about building a skill through deliberate practice. The most effective way to practice is not by simply doing thousands of questions, but by engaging in a process of deep review. One of the best review methods is called "blind review." After you complete a practice section, put it away without checking the answers. Later, go back and re-work every question you were not 100% certain about. This forces you to re-engage with the problem without being biased by knowing the correct answer. Only after you have settled on a final answer for your "blind review" set should you check the key.
For every question you get wrong, and for every question you got right but were unsure of, you need to conduct a thorough analysis. Why was the correct answer right, and why were the four incorrect answers wrong? What was it about the incorrect answer you chose that made it seem appealing? What was the logical flaw in your own thinking? It is highly recommended that you keep a "wrong answer journal" where you log these mistakes and analyze the patterns. Do you consistently miss assumption questions? Do you fall for a particular type of trap answer? This process of targeted drilling and meticulous review is what separates good LSAT students from great ones. It is through this rigorous process that you will forge the skills and confidence to conquer the Logical Reasoning section.
Welcome to the third part of our series on mastering the LSAT. Having covered foundational strategies and the intricacies of the Logical Reasoning section, we now venture into what is, for many, the most intimidating section of the test: Analytical Reasoning, more commonly known as Logic Games. This section is unlike anything most students have encountered in their prior academic experiences. It presents a series of puzzles that require you to organize and manipulate a set of variables according to a specific set of rules. For the uninitiated, these games can seem baffling and impossibly complex. However, there is a crucial secret to this section: it is the most learnable part of the LSAT.
While your performance in Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension is partly tied to long-developed habits of reading and thinking, Logic Games performance is almost entirely dependent on a specific, teachable methodology. With the right techniques and dedicated practice, anyone can learn to master this section. Improvement is not just possible; it is practically guaranteed. This installment will guide you through that methodology. We will cover the fundamental importance of diagramming, the process of making powerful deductions, the strategies for tackling the most common game types, and the systematic approach required to answer the questions with both speed and absolute certainty. Prepare to transform your greatest source of anxiety into your greatest strength.
The single most important skill for success in the Logic Games section is the ability to create a clear, consistent, and effective diagram. A diagram is your visual representation of the game's setup and rules. Attempting to solve a game purely in your head is a recipe for disaster; the number of variables and constraints is simply too much to keep track of mentally. Your diagram is your workspace, your map, and your primary tool for solving the puzzle. Before you even begin practicing games, you should develop a standardized system of notation. This means having a consistent way to represent different types of rules, such as blocks (two variables that must always be together), anti-blocks (two variables that can never be together), and conditional "if-then" statements.
Your diagram should be large, neat, and organized. When you begin a game, you should list out the variables, often called the "players," and then create the main framework of your diagram, which might be a series of numbered slots for a sequencing game or a set of columns for a grouping game. As you read each rule, you should translate it into your symbolic notation and add it to your diagram. A well-constructed diagram not only helps you keep track of the rules but also facilitates the process of making deductions. It allows you to see the relationships between the rules and how they interact to constrain the possibilities. Consistency in your diagramming is key, as it builds automaticity and frees up your mental energy to focus on solving the puzzle.
Once you have accurately diagrammed all the rules of a game, the next and most critical step is to look for deductions. Deductions are new pieces of information that are not explicitly stated in the rules but are logical consequences of the rules interacting with each other. This is the step that separates novices from experts. Novices simply list the rules and then jump straight to the questions, trying to brute-force each one. Experts, on the other hand, spend significant time upfront, before looking at a single question, to synthesize the rules and uncover hidden constraints. Making these upfront deductions can dramatically simplify the game and, in some cases, solve most of the questions before you even read them.
The most powerful source of deductions often comes from combining rules. For example, if one rule states that A must be before B, and another rule states that B must be before C, you can deduce that A must be before C. Conditional rules are another fertile ground for deductions. A conditional rule, such as "If X is selected, then Y must also be selected," should always be accompanied by its contrapositive: "If Y is not selected, then X cannot be selected." Linking these conditional chains together can reveal surprising and powerful insights. The goal of this upfront work is to create a "master diagram" that is as complete as possible, incorporating all the given rules and any deductions you can make from them. This initial investment of time will pay off handsomely in speed and accuracy when you get to the questions.
Linear games, also known as sequencing or ordering games, are the most common type of logic game on the LSAT. These games require you to place a set of variables into a specific order in a single line. For example, you might be asked to determine the order in which six runners finish a race or the schedule of seven presentations in a day. The fundamental diagram for a linear game is a series of numbered slots representing the available positions (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The rules will then provide constraints on where the variables can be placed within these slots.
There are several variations of linear games. Some are "strictly balanced," where the number of variables is equal to the number of slots. Others may be unbalanced, with more variables than slots or vice versa. Some games might involve placing more than one set of variables into the same set of ordered slots. The key to mastering linear games is to become proficient at representing different types of ordering rules. A "block" (A is immediately before B) can be represented as "AB" circled. A more general rule (C is sometime before D) can be represented as "C ... D". By combining these rules on your main diagram, you can start to see which variables are highly constrained and which are more flexible, which is key to answering the questions.
The second major category of logic games is grouping games. In these games, your task is to assign variables to one or more groups. Unlike linear games, the order of variables within a group usually does not matter. For example, you might be asked to select a committee of four lawyers from a pool of nine candidates, or to assign ten students to three different project teams. The diagram for a grouping game typically involves creating columns or buckets to represent each group and then filling them with the variables according to the rules.
Grouping games come in several flavors. A common type is the "In-and-Out" game, where you have a single pool of variables and you must determine which ones are selected for a single group (the "in" group) and which are not (the "out" group). Diagramming these often involves a simple roster with "in" and "out" columns. Other grouping games involve assigning all variables to one of several distinct groups. Conditional rules are very common and powerful in grouping games. For instance, a rule might state, "If Alice is on the team, then Bob cannot be on the team." Making deductions by linking these conditional statements is often the key to unlocking the entire game.
As you become more comfortable with linear and grouping games, you will encounter hybrid games, which, as the name suggests, combine elements of both types. These are often considered the most challenging games on the test because they require more complex diagrams and a more flexible approach. A hybrid game might ask you to first select a group of people to attend a dinner and then to arrange those selected people in seating order around a table. Another example could be assigning cars of different colors to three different floors of a parking garage, where the order of cars on each floor matters.
The key to tackling a hybrid game is to avoid being intimidated and to break the problem down into its constituent parts. You need to create a diagram that can accommodate both the grouping and the linear elements of the game. This might mean having a main diagram for the grouping aspect with smaller linear diagrams attached to each group. Because these games have more moving parts, the upfront deduction phase is even more critical. Look for "linchpin" variables—those that are involved in both grouping and linear rules—as they often hold the key to understanding the game's structure. Success with hybrid games is a true test of your diagramming skills and your ability to think flexibly under pressure.
Once you have set up your master diagram and made all possible upfront deductions, you are ready to approach the questions. It is crucial to have a systematic approach. The first question for a game is often an "Acceptability" question, which provides a complete potential arrangement and asks if it is valid. You should use this question to double-check your understanding of the rules. Simply go through each rule one by one and test the proposed arrangement against it. If it violates any rule, it is incorrect. The correct answer will be the one arrangement that satisfies every single rule.
The remaining questions can be divided into two main categories: "If" questions and "General" questions. "If" questions, also called local questions, introduce a new piece of information that applies only to that specific question (e.g., "If Sarah is in the third position..."). For these questions, you should draw a new, mini-diagram that incorporates this new information along with the original rules. This will often lead to a cascade of new deductions that will solve the question. "General" questions ask what "must be true" or "could be true" based on the original rules alone. Your upfront deductions will often answer these directly. It is also a great strategy to use the work you did for the "If" questions to help eliminate answer choices for general questions.
Speed is essential in the Logic Games section. The goal is to complete all four games within the 35-minute time limit, which requires an average of 8 minutes and 45 seconds per game. One of the best time-saving strategies is to invest more time upfront in making deductions. This may feel counterintuitive, but a minute or two spent finding a key deduction can save you several minutes of work when answering the questions. Another powerful technique is to create hypothetical scenarios. If you have a rule that creates two distinct possibilities for the game (e.g., "Either A is in position 1 or B is in position 1"), it can be highly effective to create two separate master diagrams, one for each possibility, and solve them both.
Recognizing the most constrained variables, often called "power players," can also save time. These are the variables that are involved in multiple rules. Focusing on their possible placements can often unlock the entire game. Finally, do not be afraid to skip a game and come back to it. If you read the setup for a game and it seems particularly strange or difficult, it might be wise to tackle the other three games first and return to the challenging one with your remaining time. This ensures you do not get bogged down and miss out on points from easier games.
There is no substitute for practice when it comes to Logic Games. This is the section where repetition pays the highest dividends. Your goal is not just to be able to solve a game, but to internalize the patterns and deductive processes so that they become second nature. When you practice, focus on quality over quantity. After completing a game, review it thoroughly. Did you make all the possible deductions upfront? Was your diagram efficient? Could you have solved it faster? It is highly effective to re-do games that you have already completed. The second or third time you do a game, you should be able to see the deductions and the structure of the puzzle much more clearly.
Drilling games by type is also a valuable strategy. Spend a week focusing only on basic linear games, then move to grouping games, and so on. This will allow you to see the common patterns and rule structures that the test-makers use for each game type. As you get closer to your test date, your practice should consist of doing full, timed sections of four games to build your stamina and pacing. Through this process of deliberate practice, repetition, and review, you will transform Logic Games from a source of fear into a predictable and even enjoyable section where you can reliably score a perfect or near-perfect score.
Test Prep LSAT certification exam dumps from ExamLabs make it easier to pass your exam. Verified by IT Experts, the Test Prep LSAT exam dumps, practice test questions and answers, study guide and video course is the complete solution to provide you with knowledge and experience required to pass this exam. With 98.4% Pass Rate, you will have nothing to worry about especially when you use Test Prep LSAT practice test questions & exam dumps to pass.
File name |
Size |
Downloads |
|
|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MB |
1475 |
||
2.4 MB |
1579 |
Please keep in mind before downloading file you need to install Avanset Exam Simulator Software to open VCE files. Click here to download software.
Please fill out your email address below in order to Download VCE files or view Training Courses.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.
