You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
An Intune administrator's protected policy edit is pending, yet they expect it to deploy immediately. After implementing: Check multi-admin approval status and route the request to an authorized approver. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Monitor pending approvals and set escalation ownership. Protected actions do not take effect merely because the requester saved a request.
Maintain preapproved emergency contacts and verify approval audit trails. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor pending approvals and set escalation ownership.
Monitor password rotation and alert on recovery access anomalies. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor pending approvals and set escalation ownership.
Review approver membership and rejection logs regularly. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor pending approvals and set escalation ownership.
A manager wants to bypass multi-admin approval for an emergency change. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Use the documented emergency change and authorized approval procedure rather than silently disabling the approval protection. Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy. The emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied.
Multi Admin Approval requires a distinct authorized approver; self-approval bypasses the required separation of duties.
The option ‘Enable multi-admin approval with policies that cover the designated change types’ does not by itself establish that the emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied. Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
The option ‘Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and Conditional Access evaluation for that request’ does not by itself establish that the emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied. Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
A manager wants to bypass multi-admin approval for an emergency change. An endpoint administrator proposes: Use the documented emergency change and authorized approval procedure rather than silently disabling the approval protection. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
Protected actions do not take effect merely because the requester saved a request. The relevant design depends on this fact: disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
Incorrect assignment can trigger unwanted provisioning for users/devices not in the intended rollout. The relevant design depends on this fact: disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
An independent approval gate prevents a single requester from immediately applying protected changes. The relevant design depends on this fact: disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
A manager wants to bypass multi-admin approval for an emergency change. The approved approach is: Use the documented emergency change and authorized approval procedure rather than silently disabling the approval protection. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
The emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied. Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
A pilot user enrolls an approved PIN/biometric gesture and signs in successfully. That observation does not verify the emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied.
A policy change remains pending until an authorized separate approver approves it. That observation does not verify the emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied.
The approved request moves through the documented application process. That observation does not verify the emergency request has an approved trace and the necessary change is applied.
A manager wants to bypass multi-admin approval for an emergency change. After implementing: Use the documented emergency change and authorized approval procedure rather than silently disabling the approval protection. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Maintain preapproved emergency contacts and verify approval audit trails. Disabling review removes the intended separation of duties and may violate change policy.
Test role-scoped LAPS recovery with both allowed and denied identities. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is maintain preapproved emergency contacts and verify approval audit trails.
Review approver membership and rejection logs regularly. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is maintain preapproved emergency contacts and verify approval audit trails.
Monitor pending approvals and set escalation ownership. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is maintain preapproved emergency contacts and verify approval audit trails.
A Windows fleet needs noncompliant status whenever BitLocker is disabled. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant.
The option ‘Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group’ does not by itself establish that A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
The option ‘Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies’ does not by itself establish that A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
The option ‘Deploy Windows Hello for Business with supported Intune configuration and identity prerequisites’ does not by itself establish that A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
A Windows fleet needs noncompliant status whenever BitLocker is disabled. An endpoint administrator proposes: Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
Per-device rotating local admin secrets reduce the lateral movement risks of a shared password. The relevant design depends on this fact: device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint. The relevant design depends on this fact: device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode. The relevant design depends on this fact: device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
A Windows fleet needs noncompliant status whenever BitLocker is disabled. The approved approach is: Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
The device shows the intended group member set and no policy conflict. That observation does not verify A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant.
The exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. That observation does not verify A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant.
An unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. That observation does not verify A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant.
A Windows fleet needs noncompliant status whenever BitLocker is disabled. After implementing: Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing. Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status.
Use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing.
Audit password retrieval permissions and rotation frequency. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing.
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing.
A field user loses access even though their device's platform policy is assigned. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint. The exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected.
The option ‘Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group’ does not by itself establish that the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
The option ‘Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population’ does not by itself establish that the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
The option ‘Assign a suitable Intune RBAC role with minimal read and support privileges’ does not by itself establish that the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
A field user loses access even though their device's platform policy is assigned. An endpoint administrator proposes: Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
A Hello PIN unlocks keys secured to that particular device; it is not an interchangeable account password. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.