You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
Devices with no assigned compliance policy are incorrectly assumed compliant for a high-security tenant. After implementing: Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Control policy ownership and run change reviews for sensitive local groups. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
Monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
A cloud app must deny access to corporate resources from devices Intune marks noncompliant. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Configure Microsoft Entra Conditional Access grant control requiring a compliant device. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal. A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds.
The option ‘Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance’ does not by itself establish that A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
The option ‘Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and Conditional Access evaluation for that request’ does not by itself establish that A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
The option ‘Rotate the managed local administrator password according to the LAPS policy’ does not by itself establish that A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
A cloud app must deny access to corporate resources from devices Intune marks noncompliant. An endpoint administrator proposes: Configure Microsoft Entra Conditional Access grant control requiring a compliant device. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
A cloud app must deny access to corporate resources from devices Intune marks noncompliant. The approved approach is: Configure Microsoft Entra Conditional Access grant control requiring a compliant device. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
Sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users. That observation does not verify A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds.
An unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. That observation does not verify A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds.
The sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result. That observation does not verify A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds.
A cloud app must deny access to corporate resources from devices Intune marks noncompliant. After implementing: Configure Microsoft Entra Conditional Access grant control requiring a compliant device. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Deploy CA rules in report-only mode first and maintain emergency access exclusions. Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal.
Pilot high-impact CA rules and retain break-glass recovery paths. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is deploy CA rules in report-only mode first and maintain emergency access exclusions.
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is deploy CA rules in report-only mode first and maintain emergency access exclusions.
Record representative sign-in diagnostics for every protected app. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is deploy CA rules in report-only mode first and maintain emergency access exclusions.
A security team enables a Conditional Access compliant-device grant control but many users lose access unexpectedly. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance. An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations. Sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users.
An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations. Verify that sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users.
The option ‘Rotate the managed local administrator password according to the LAPS policy’ does not by itself establish that sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users. An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
The option ‘Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and Conditional Access evaluation for that request’ does not by itself establish that sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users. An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
A security team enables a Conditional Access compliant-device grant control but many users lose access unexpectedly. An endpoint administrator proposes: Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal. The relevant design depends on this fact: an overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match. The relevant design depends on this fact: an overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode. The relevant design depends on this fact: an overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
A security team enables a Conditional Access compliant-device grant control but many users lose access unexpectedly. The approved approach is: Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
Sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users. An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
The sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result. That observation does not verify sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users.
A noncompliant test endpoint is denied and a compliant authorized endpoint succeeds. That observation does not verify sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users.
The device shows the intended group member set and no policy conflict. That observation does not verify sign-in logs show which policy caused denial and the corrected scope permits intended users.
A security team enables a Conditional Access compliant-device grant control but many users lose access unexpectedly. After implementing: Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Pilot high-impact CA rules and retain break-glass recovery paths. An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations.
Deploy CA rules in report-only mode first and maintain emergency access exclusions. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is pilot high-impact CA rules and retain break-glass recovery paths.
Test role-scoped LAPS recovery with both allowed and denied identities. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is pilot high-impact CA rules and retain break-glass recovery paths.
Record representative sign-in diagnostics for every protected app. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is pilot high-impact CA rules and retain break-glass recovery paths.
An access rule looks correct in the admin portal, but the team cannot prove it affected a particular sign-in. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and Conditional Access evaluation for that request. An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match. The sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result.
The option ‘Configure Microsoft Entra Conditional Access grant control requiring a compliant device’ does not by itself establish that the sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result. An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
The option ‘Configure Windows LAPS password management and backup to an approved directory’ does not by itself establish that the sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result. An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
The option ‘Review CA policy scope, supported platforms, exclusions, and effective device compliance’ does not by itself establish that the sign-in details identify the applied compliant-device control and result. An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
An access rule looks correct in the admin portal, but the team cannot prove it affected a particular sign-in. An endpoint administrator proposes: Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs and Conditional Access evaluation for that request. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
An assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. The relevant design depends on this fact: an assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal. The relevant design depends on this fact: an assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
An overly broad grant requirement can block unexpected user/device combinations. The relevant design depends on this fact: an assigned CA policy may not apply when its conditions and exclusions do not match.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.