You save $69.98
MD-102 Premium Bundle
- Premium File 463 Questions & Answers
- Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
- Training Course 84 Lectures
- Study Guide 512 Pages
You save $69.98
A field user loses access even though their device's platform policy is assigned. An endpoint administrator proposes: Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
A Hello PIN unlocks keys secured to that particular device; it is not an interchangeable account password. The relevant design depends on this fact: policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
A field user loses access even though their device's platform policy is assigned. The approved approach is: Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
The exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
The Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors. That observation does not verify the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected.
A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. That observation does not verify the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected.
A pilot user enrolls an approved PIN/biometric gesture and signs in successfully. That observation does not verify the exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected.
A field user loses access even though their device's platform policy is assigned. After implementing: Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. Policy assignment is not proof that every compliance condition passes on the endpoint.
Audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents.
Use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents.
Monitor password rotation and alert on recovery access anomalies. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents.
An Android corporate-owned work-profile device is not being evaluated against the correct platform compliance requirements because the team configured only a Windows policy. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode. The Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors.
The option ‘Create a Windows device compliance policy requiring encryption and assign it to the correct population’ does not by itself establish that the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
The option ‘Review enrollment and Windows Hello for Business policy scope to target the approved device set’ does not by itself establish that the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
The option ‘Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy’ does not by itself establish that the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
An Android corporate-owned work-profile device is not being evaluated against the correct platform compliance requirements because the team configured only a Windows policy. An endpoint administrator proposes: Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal. The relevant design depends on this fact: compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
An Android corporate-owned work-profile device is not being evaluated against the correct platform compliance requirements because the team configured only a Windows policy. The approved approach is: Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
The Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
An unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. That observation does not verify the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors.
A permitted test user can sign in remotely without obtaining local Administrator membership or unrestricted elevation. That observation does not verify the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors.
The exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. That observation does not verify the Android device evaluates the intended supported controls without unsupported-rule errors.
An Android corporate-owned work-profile device is not being evaluated against the correct platform compliance requirements because the team configured only a Windows policy. After implementing: Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout. Compliance setting support differs by device platform and management mode.
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout.
Audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout.
Audit password retrieval permissions and rotation frequency. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is use platform- and ownership-aware pilot checks for each compliance rollout.
Devices with no assigned compliance policy are incorrectly assumed compliant for a high-security tenant. Which administrative change BEST meets the requirement without relying on an unrelated control?
Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified. An unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy.
The option ‘Target the appropriate platform-specific Android compliance policy and device group’ does not by itself establish that an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
The option ‘Inspect the effective Intune compliance state and per-setting results before changing access policy’ does not by itself establish that an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
The option ‘Use the Intune Local user group membership policy to add approved identities to Remote Desktop Users, with Remote Desktop enabled separately’ does not by itself establish that an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Devices with no assigned compliance policy are incorrectly assumed compliant for a high-security tenant. An endpoint administrator proposes: Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies. Which technical reason BEST supports this choice?
The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified. Verify that an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy.
Compliance status must be enforced at the app access decision, not only viewed in the Intune portal. The relevant design depends on this fact: the no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Device compliance translates measured security posture into a policy status. The relevant design depends on this fact: the no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Devices with no assigned compliance policy are incorrectly assumed compliant for a high-security tenant. The approved approach is: Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies. Which direct test result BEST establishes that the objective was achieved?
An unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Authorized recovery shows a unique current local admin password for a selected endpoint. That observation does not verify an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy.
The exact failing compliance rule is identified and corrected. That observation does not verify an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy.
A nonencrypted test device is reported noncompliant and an encrypted peer compliant. That observation does not verify an unassessed endpoint is not treated as compliant under the chosen strict policy.
Devices with no assigned compliance policy are incorrectly assumed compliant for a high-security tenant. After implementing: Review the Intune tenant setting for devices with no compliance policy and the assigned policies. Which continuing operational safeguard MOST directly prevents recurrence of the stated issue?
Audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes. The no-compliance-policy setting changes how unassessed devices are classified.
Control policy ownership and run change reviews for sensitive local groups. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
Monitor grace periods and ensure risk-sensitive rules have the intended timing. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
Correlate device check-in time with compliance evaluation and user access incidents. The continuing safeguard in this deployment is audit the default behavior after tenant configuration changes.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.