Pass Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional DOP-C02 Exam in First Attempt Easily
Real Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional DOP-C02 Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

Verified by experts
2 products

You save $34.99

AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional DOP-C02 Premium Bundle

  • Premium File 480 Questions & Answers
  • Last Update: Nov 4, 2026
  • Training Course 242 Lectures
$74.99 $109.98

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    480 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 4, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    242 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99

AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional DOP-C02 Practice Test 20

Question 190

A team documents a detailed disaster recovery plan but has never exercised data restoration or application dependency order.

What technical reasoning best supports the required control?

  1. A DR plan is an unproven hypothesis until tested with realistic failures, credentials, dependencies and measurement.
  2. Warm standby keeps a functional recovery stack running, shortening restore time relative to rebuilding from backups.
  3. PITR uses managed backups and transaction logs to recover to a chosen time in the retention window rather than only to fixed snapshot times.
  4. Object versioning preserves prior object generations that can be retrieved after accidental replacement, subject to retention controls.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A DR plan is an unproven hypothesis until tested with realistic failures, credentials, dependencies and measurement. This explains the implementation decision: Automate and regularly perform recovery game days that verify resource, data and application restoration against business targets. Verification should show the following: Recorded exercises demonstrate repeatable recovery steps, observed RTO/RPO and corrected shortcomings from failed tests.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Warm standby keeps a functional recovery stack running, shortening restore time relative to rebuilding from backups. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of warm standby recovery, for which the relevant intervention is: Maintain a reduced-capacity warm standby with replicated data and automation to scale it during failover. The scenario requires understanding recovery runbook validation, where a DR plan is an unproven hypothesis until tested with realistic failures, credentials, dependencies and measurement.

C:

PITR uses managed backups and transaction logs to recover to a chosen time in the retention window rather than only to fixed snapshot times. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of rds point in time recovery, for which the relevant intervention is: Use RDS automated backups and point-in-time recovery to create a new instance from an eligible timestamp, then plan controlled cutover. The scenario requires understanding recovery runbook validation, where a DR plan is an unproven hypothesis until tested with realistic failures, credentials, dependencies and measurement.

D:

Object versioning preserves prior object generations that can be retrieved after accidental replacement, subject to retention controls. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of s3 versioned recovery, for which the relevant intervention is: Enable suitable S3 versioning and tightly controlled deletion and recovery procedures on critical configuration objects. The scenario requires understanding recovery runbook validation, where a DR plan is an unproven hypothesis until tested with realistic failures, credentials, dependencies and measurement.

Question 191

A service pages operators separately for high latency, elevated 5xx errors and a failing synthetic check during one outage.

Which adverse outcome is the recommended change intended to prevent?

  1. A catch-all event rule floods responders with irrelevant alerts and hides actual production outages.
  2. Paging on every correlated signal causes alert fatigue and multiple competing incident records.
  3. Unrouted AWS service notifications leave dependent teams unaware of scheduled disruptions and remediation requirements.
  4. Unbounded remediation can change legitimate exception rules or repeatedly act on a misclassified resource.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Paging on every correlated signal causes alert fatigue and multiple competing incident records. This outcome arises from the mechanism in the situation: Composite alarms aggregate alarm logic so a related failure produces fewer independent pages and a clearer incident trigger. The corresponding mitigation is: Use CloudWatch composite alarms to combine related alarm states and page on actionable combined conditions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A catch-all event rule floods responders with irrelevant alerts and hides actual production outages. That is a credible concern for eventbridge event patterns, normally addressed by: Use an EventBridge rule with event-pattern filtering by source, event detail, account or tags and route matches to a controlled target. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Paging on every correlated signal causes alert fatigue and multiple competing incident records.

C:

Unrouted AWS service notifications leave dependent teams unaware of scheduled disruptions and remediation requirements. That is a credible concern for health event operations, normally addressed by: Send relevant AWS Health events through EventBridge to owner-specific notification and operations workflows. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Paging on every correlated signal causes alert fatigue and multiple competing incident records.

D:

Unbounded remediation can change legitimate exception rules or repeatedly act on a misclassified resource. That is a credible concern for config rule auto remediation, normally addressed by: Use a Config rule with scoped Systems Manager Automation remediation for the specific unauthorized ingress condition. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Paging on every correlated signal causes alert fatigue and multiple competing incident records.

Question 192

GuardDuty reports a likely compromised EC2 host, but the standard response manually edits the host's security group hours later.

Which consequence is most specific to the observed weakness?

  1. A lack of automatic correction allows easily reintroduced network exposure to persist between security reviews.
  2. Manual global configuration edits make it difficult to identify or reverse the exact setting that caused an outage.
  3. Manual daily scaling allows important queued work to exceed its processing deadline during sudden load changes.
  4. Overbroad or slow isolation either leaves malicious traffic active or disconnects innocent production systems.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Overbroad or slow isolation either leaves malicious traffic active or disconnects innocent production systems. This outcome arises from the mechanism in the situation: Event-driven isolation can reduce exposure quickly when it uses narrow selection logic and records the affected resource and decision. The corresponding mitigation is: Trigger a guarded event workflow that applies a preapproved quarantine security group after checking finding type and resource identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A lack of automatic correction allows easily reintroduced network exposure to persist between security reviews. That is a credible concern for config rule network remediation, normally addressed by: Attach a narrowly scoped Systems Manager Automation remediation to the relevant Config rule with controlled exception handling. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Overbroad or slow isolation either leaves malicious traffic active or disconnects innocent production systems.

B:

Manual global configuration edits make it difficult to identify or reverse the exact setting that caused an outage. That is a credible concern for parameter change rollback, normally addressed by: Associate the rollout with meaningful CloudWatch health alarms and automatic configuration rollback rather than restarting every service manually. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Overbroad or slow isolation either leaves malicious traffic active or disconnects innocent production systems.

C:

Manual daily scaling allows important queued work to exceed its processing deadline during sudden load changes. That is a credible concern for auto scale on sqs backlog, normally addressed by: Use suitable CloudWatch backlog metrics to drive an Auto Scaling policy for the processing fleet with bounded capacity. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Overbroad or slow isolation either leaves malicious traffic active or disconnects innocent production systems.

Question 193

A deployment role in the workload account can read a shared S3 object but fails to decrypt its KMS-encrypted release artifact.

Which action best meets the technical requirement?

  1. Allow the target deployment role appropriate KMS decrypt access in the key policy and IAM permissions while keeping object access scoped.
  2. Record source revision, build execution, artifact checksum and dependency inventory as immutable release metadata.
  3. Enable immutable image tags or promote by image digest so a release references a fixed container image version.
  4. Scan the final built container or machine image in addition to source dependencies before release approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Allow the target deployment role appropriate KMS decrypt access in the key policy and IAM permissions while keeping object access scoped. Reading an SSE-KMS object requires both permitted S3 access and effective permissions to use the encryption key. The relevant operational proof is specific: A scoped target role can decrypt only authorized release objects, while an unrelated workload role remains denied.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Record source revision, build execution, artifact checksum and dependency inventory as immutable release metadata. That would address build provenance tracking, because supply-chain provenance lets operations distinguish approved packages from unexpected binaries and supports incident reconstruction. However, the stated situation instead concerns cross-account kms artifacts. Reading an SSE-KMS object requires both permitted S3 access and effective permissions to use the encryption key.

C:

Enable immutable image tags or promote by image digest so a release references a fixed container image version. That would address immutable container tags, because an ECR image digest identifies content independently of a mutable human-readable label, removing ambiguity during promotion and rollback. However, the stated situation instead concerns cross-account kms artifacts. Reading an SSE-KMS object requires both permitted S3 access and effective permissions to use the encryption key.

D:

Scan the final built container or machine image in addition to source dependencies before release approval. That would address artifact scanning after build, because the deployed artifact may include runtime libraries not represented in source dependency checks, so assessment must cover the actual output. However, the stated situation instead concerns cross-account kms artifacts. Reading an SSE-KMS object requires both permitted S3 access and effective permissions to use the encryption key.

Question 194

A release team frequently recreates stacks and could inadvertently delete a production S3 data bucket during a resource rename.

Which AWS operational change most directly resolves the stated problem?

  1. Use appropriately versioned nested stacks or shared infrastructure components with independently maintained lifecycle boundaries.
  2. Provide versioned reusable CloudFormation modules or CDK constructs with validated network and security defaults.
  3. Set appropriate DeletionPolicy or UpdateReplacePolicy attributes on critical stateful resources and validate replacement behavior.
  4. Run CloudFormation drift detection on supported resources and reconcile unauthorized differences back into the declared template state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Set appropriate DeletionPolicy or UpdateReplacePolicy attributes on critical stateful resources and validate replacement behavior. CloudFormation resource policies can retain or snapshot supported resources when stack deletion or replacement occurs, reducing accidental loss. The relevant operational proof is specific: A rehearsal update retains the protected object storage resource when the template resource is removed or replaced.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use appropriately versioned nested stacks or shared infrastructure components with independently maintained lifecycle boundaries. That would address nested stacks lifecycle, because modular stack composition lets infrastructure teams maintain common structures without scattering unsynchronized copies. However, the stated situation instead concerns cloudformation deletion protections. CloudFormation resource policies can retain or snapshot supported resources when stack deletion or replacement occurs, reducing accidental loss.

B:

Provide versioned reusable CloudFormation modules or CDK constructs with validated network and security defaults. That would address reusable network modules, because reusable IaC components encode organizational patterns once and allow controlled adoption without copying divergent templates. However, the stated situation instead concerns cloudformation deletion protections. CloudFormation resource policies can retain or snapshot supported resources when stack deletion or replacement occurs, reducing accidental loss.

D:

Run CloudFormation drift detection on supported resources and reconcile unauthorized differences back into the declared template state. That would address cloudformation drift detection, because drift detection compares actual supported resource properties with expected stack values, exposing out-of-band configuration changes. However, the stated situation instead concerns cloudformation deletion protections. CloudFormation resource policies can retain or snapshot supported resources when stack deletion or replacement occurs, reducing accidental loss.

Question 195

A Git-based CI workflow outside AWS currently stores a highly privileged IAM access key for deployments in repository secrets.

What is the main operational consequence of the stated design gap?

  1. Exposed long-lived local credentials may be reused from outside the EC2 workload until explicitly revoked.
  2. A leaked long-lived build key remains broadly usable until discovered and rotated, possibly across many projects.
  3. Unbounded standing administrator privileges allow an incident account compromise to spread through unrelated production workloads.
  4. Delegated role creation without a ceiling permits privilege escalation by attaching an administrator policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A leaked long-lived build key remains broadly usable until discovered and rotated, possibly across many projects. This outcome arises from the mechanism in the situation: Federated short-lived credentials avoid permanent key distribution and can constrain role assumption to a repository and workflow identity. The corresponding mitigation is: Use a supported OIDC federation trust or other short-lived credential exchange to assume a scoped AWS deployment role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Exposed long-lived local credentials may be reused from outside the EC2 workload until explicitly revoked. That is a credible concern for iam roles for workloads, normally addressed by: Attach a least-privilege instance profile IAM role to EC2 and retrieve temporary credentials through the instance metadata service. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: A leaked long-lived build key remains broadly usable until discovered and rotated, possibly across many projects.

C:

Unbounded standing administrator privileges allow an incident account compromise to spread through unrelated production workloads. That is a credible concern for session scoped access, normally addressed by: Use tightly scoped STS role sessions with appropriate duration and session policies or tags for the incident-specific task. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: A leaked long-lived build key remains broadly usable until discovered and rotated, possibly across many projects.

D:

Delegated role creation without a ceiling permits privilege escalation by attaching an administrator policy. That is a credible concern for permissions boundary delegation, normally addressed by: Require an IAM permissions boundary on developer-created roles in addition to appropriately scoped identity policies. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: A leaked long-lived build key remains broadly usable until discovered and rotated, possibly across many projects.

Question 196

A replicated service is deployed into a backup Region but still reads one critical secret and one artifact bucket only from its failed primary Region.

Why would the preferred design resolve the described failure?

  1. Intra-Region cluster failover does not automatically protect against region-wide loss, whereas cross-Region replication supports a regional recovery path.
  2. Global tables replicate writes across participating Regions and support local read/write access, but cross-Region convergence is asynchronous.
  3. Application resilience depends on all critical dependencies, not simply copying compute and database resources.
  4. Asynchronous queue decoupling absorbs temporary consumer failures and retains messages until processing succeeds or retry policy is exhausted.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Application resilience depends on all critical dependencies, not simply copying compute and database resources. This explains the implementation decision: Replicate or independently provision required configuration, secrets, artifacts and key access for the recovery Region. Verification should show the following: During a primary-Region isolation test, the secondary service retrieves configuration and artifacts without calling the unavailable Region.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Intra-Region cluster failover does not automatically protect against region-wide loss, whereas cross-Region replication supports a regional recovery path. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of aurora regional disaster availability, for which the relevant intervention is: Design a separate regional recovery capability such as Aurora Global Database with tested secondary promotion and application reconnection. The scenario requires understanding regional dependency inventory, where application resilience depends on all critical dependencies, not simply copying compute and database resources.

B:

Global tables replicate writes across participating Regions and support local read/write access, but cross-Region convergence is asynchronous. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of dynamodb global tables, for which the relevant intervention is: Use DynamoDB global tables where suitable and design conflict handling and application routing for replicated multi-Region writes. The scenario requires understanding regional dependency inventory, where application resilience depends on all critical dependencies, not simply copying compute and database resources.

D:

Asynchronous queue decoupling absorbs temporary consumer failures and retains messages until processing succeeds or retry policy is exhausted. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of decouple requests with sqs, for which the relevant intervention is: Place durable SQS buffering between intake and workers with appropriate visibility timeout, retries and a dead-letter queue. The scenario requires understanding regional dependency inventory, where application resilience depends on all critical dependencies, not simply copying compute and database resources.

Question 197

A busy Lambda application emits unstructured multiline logs that cannot be correlated reliably to requests after scaling.

What is the most appropriate next step for this team?

  1. Configure CloudWatch Logs subscription filters to a supported streaming destination with suitable IAM and backpressure handling.
  2. Emit consistent structured log records with request identifiers, relevant severity and bounded sensitive fields into CloudWatch Logs.
  3. Aggregate required audit logs into an access-restricted central S3 archive with suitable SSE-KMS encryption and lifecycle controls.
  4. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability with a central monitoring account and approved source-account links where applicable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Emit consistent structured log records with request identifiers, relevant severity and bounded sensitive fields into CloudWatch Logs. Structured records and correlation IDs improve distributed event reconstruction and allow effective field-based queries. The relevant operational proof is specific: Logs for one request can be retrieved by its correlation identifier across related functions without exposing credentials.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure CloudWatch Logs subscription filters to a supported streaming destination with suitable IAM and backpressure handling. That would address kinesis subscription processing, because subscriptions forward matching log events to a processor such as Kinesis Data Streams or Lambda shortly after ingestion. However, the stated situation instead concerns log ingestion throughput. Structured records and correlation IDs improve distributed event reconstruction and allow effective field-based queries.

C:

Aggregate required audit logs into an access-restricted central S3 archive with suitable SSE-KMS encryption and lifecycle controls. That would address central encrypted log archive, because a dedicated log archive separates custody from workload operators while encryption and scoped permissions protect retained evidence. However, the stated situation instead concerns log ingestion throughput. Structured records and correlation IDs improve distributed event reconstruction and allow effective field-based queries.

D:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability with a central monitoring account and approved source-account links where applicable. That would address cross account observability, because cross-account observability shares selected telemetry with a monitoring account without handing out permanent workload account secrets. However, the stated situation instead concerns log ingestion throughput. Structured records and correlation IDs improve distributed event reconstruction and allow effective field-based queries.

Question 198

A CloudFormation stack update is blocked in UPDATE_ROLLBACK_FAILED because a required external resource was removed outside the stack.

Which statement correctly explains the implementation tradeoff?

  1. CloudFormation stack events expose failing resource operations; recovery must restore a valid stack lifecycle before further updates.
  2. Function timeouts can reflect external service latency, insufficient timeout configuration or resource pressure, requiring evidence rather than guesswork.
  3. Image pull failures occur before application readiness and are often unrelated to available compute capacity.
  4. The ECS task execution role and network path are needed to fetch container images before the application task can start.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

CloudFormation stack events expose failing resource operations; recovery must restore a valid stack lifecycle before further updates. This explains the implementation decision: Inspect stack events and resource dependencies, repair the root cause, then use supported rollback continuation before a new change set. Verification should show the following: The stack reaches a stable allowed status with intended resources reconciled and an approved change set can proceed.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Function timeouts can reflect external service latency, insufficient timeout configuration or resource pressure, requiring evidence rather than guesswork. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of lambda timeout dependencies, for which the relevant intervention is: Correlate Lambda duration, timeout and downstream trace segments to identify whether the new code or dependency is responsible. The scenario requires understanding cloudformation update rollback, where cloudFormation stack events expose failing resource operations; recovery must restore a valid stack lifecycle before further updates.

C:

Image pull failures occur before application readiness and are often unrelated to available compute capacity. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of eks image pull errors, for which the relevant intervention is: Inspect pod events, image reference, registry access and pull credentials before changing cluster scaling. The scenario requires understanding cloudformation update rollback, where cloudFormation stack events expose failing resource operations; recovery must restore a valid stack lifecycle before further updates.

D:

The ECS task execution role and network path are needed to fetch container images before the application task can start. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of ecs task startup failure, for which the relevant intervention is: Inspect stopped-task reasons, ECR connectivity and the ECS task execution role's image-pull permissions. The scenario requires understanding cloudformation update rollback, where cloudFormation stack events expose failing resource operations; recovery must restore a valid stack lifecycle before further updates.

Question 199

A deployment drains old tasks and directs users to new instances before their application readiness endpoint is returning success.

What technical reasoning best supports the required control?

  1. Load balancer health checks determine whether an instance or task should receive requests; instance launch does not mean application readiness.
  2. A separate target fleet keeps the last-known-good servers available until the replacement version meets cutover criteria.
  3. Schema changes must support both application revisions while blue/green or canary traffic overlaps; destructive changes belong after consumers migrate.
  4. Weighted Lambda aliases provide version-specific traffic control without requiring callers to change function names or endpoints.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Load balancer health checks determine whether an instance or task should receive requests; instance launch does not mean application readiness. This explains the implementation decision: Require healthy load-balancer target status and suitable readiness checks before shifting client traffic to replacement capacity. Verification should show the following: Traffic moves only after all intended green targets pass the health threshold and recoverable targets are removed when unhealthy.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A separate target fleet keeps the last-known-good servers available until the replacement version meets cutover criteria. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of ec2 blue green deployment, for which the relevant intervention is: Deploy the revision to a separate green EC2 fleet and switch traffic after health checks using a blue/green deployment strategy. The scenario requires understanding alb target group health, where load balancer health checks determine whether an instance or task should receive requests; instance launch does not mean application readiness.

C:

Schema changes must support both application revisions while blue/green or canary traffic overlaps; destructive changes belong after consumers migrate. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of database expand contract migration, for which the relevant intervention is: Use an expand-and-contract schema migration that preserves backward compatibility throughout mixed-version deployment. The scenario requires understanding alb target group health, where load balancer health checks determine whether an instance or task should receive requests; instance launch does not mean application readiness.

D:

Weighted Lambda aliases provide version-specific traffic control without requiring callers to change function names or endpoints. This reasoning supports the alternative topic of lambda canary aliases, for which the relevant intervention is: Publish a Lambda version and use a CodeDeploy canary deployment to shift alias traffic gradually with CloudWatch rollback alarms. The scenario requires understanding alb target group health, where load balancer health checks determine whether an instance or task should receive requests; instance launch does not mean application readiness.

Question 200

A team configures dev by code but fixes production stack failures through undocumented console changes with no reconciliation.

What is the main operational consequence of the stated design gap?

  1. Uncontrolled manual fixes cause the next stack update to overwrite corrections or recreate the original outage.
  2. Skipping template policy checks allows broad network exposure or unencrypted data storage to appear across accounts.
  3. Ad hoc copy-and-paste infrastructure may omit event permissions and cause environment-specific function failures.
  4. Without explicit retention controls, a template cleanup can delete resources containing durable business information.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Uncontrolled manual fixes cause the next stack update to overwrite corrections or recreate the original outage. This outcome arises from the mechanism in the situation: Declarative source control provides a reviewable desired state; production console drift undermines repeatability and auditability. The corresponding mitigation is: Require infrastructure modifications through version-controlled approved IaC pipelines and reconcile emergency changes into source promptly.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Skipping template policy checks allows broad network exposure or unencrypted data storage to appear across accounts. That is a credible concern for template lint and policy checks, normally addressed by: Run CloudFormation validation and policy-as-code checks such as cfn-guard in CI before executing change sets. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Uncontrolled manual fixes cause the next stack update to overwrite corrections or recreate the original outage.

C:

Ad hoc copy-and-paste infrastructure may omit event permissions and cause environment-specific function failures. That is a credible concern for sam serverless templates, normally addressed by: Use an AWS SAM template and supported transforms to define reusable serverless resources and events through CloudFormation. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Uncontrolled manual fixes cause the next stack update to overwrite corrections or recreate the original outage.

D:

Without explicit retention controls, a template cleanup can delete resources containing durable business information. That is a credible concern for cloudformation deletion protections, normally addressed by: Set appropriate DeletionPolicy or UpdateReplacePolicy attributes on critical stateful resources and validate replacement behavior. It is not the primary failure mechanism described here. The relevant exposure is: Uncontrolled manual fixes cause the next stack update to overwrite corrections or recreate the original outage.

AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional DOP-C02 Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

  • Premium File

    480 Questions & Answers
    Last Update: Nov 4, 2026

    $76.99
    $69.99
  • Training Course

    242 Lectures

    $43.99
    $39.99

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
This is ONE TIME OFFER

You save
10%

Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

You save
10%

Use Discount Code:

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.

Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your email address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

  • Realistic exam simulation and exam editor with preview functions
  • Whole exam in a single file with several different question types
  • Customizable exam-taking mode & detailed score reports