You save $69.98
Stuck with your IT certification exam preparation? ExamLabs is the ultimate solution with Cisco DevNet Professional practice test questions, study guide, and a training course, providing a complete package to pass your exam. Saving tons of your precious time, the Cisco DevNet Professional exam dumps and practice test questions and answers will help you pass easily. Use the latest and updated Cisco DevNet Professional practice test questions with answers and pass quickly, easily and hassle free!
DevNet Professional is Cisco's former name for the professional automation certification. On February 3, 2026, Cisco replaced the DevNet naming with its Automation track and launched CCNP Automation. Unlike the associate-level rename, the professional program was substantially redesigned rather than simply relabeled.
The current core is 350-901 AUTOCOR v2.0, Designing, Deploying and Managing Network Automation Systems. To earn CCNP Automation, candidates pass AUTOCOR plus a current automation concentration such as 300-435 ENAUTO or 300-635 DCNAUTO.
Professional automation engineers are expected to create workflows other people can trust. A useful system has clear inputs, predictable behavior, scoped credentials, useful logs, tests, failure handling, and evidence that the network actually reached the desired state. Speed matters, but repeatability and safe change matter more. The certification therefore rewards engineering discipline across the complete automation lifecycle rather than familiarity with isolated APIs.
The 2026 transition changes the professional track more deeply than a simple label swap. CCNP Automation is built around the idea that automation is an operational system with architecture, software, data models, testing, security, observability, and lifecycle concerns. That is broader than writing scripts against one controller. Candidates using older DevNet Professional material should keep the enduring programmability concepts but rebuild their study map around AUTOCOR and the current concentration choices.
The older DevNet Professional model leaned heavily toward application developers learning Cisco platforms. Cisco's redesign shifts the center of gravity toward network engineers building end-to-end automation systems. That changes how candidates should think about the core.
AUTOCOR now emphasizes infrastructure as code, operational workflows, validation, AI in automation, telemetry, secure coding, and the systems needed to make automation reliable in production. Older DevNet Professional certification material remains useful historical context, but it does not describe the full 2026 blueprint.
AUTOCOR asks candidates to think in systems. An inventory source feeds data into an automation service, code or infrastructure-as-code definitions express intent, APIs carry requests to platforms, and telemetry or validation checks determine whether the result is acceptable. Each interface can fail independently. Professional engineers should be able to identify where data became stale, authentication failed, a schema changed, a request was rejected, or the target accepted the request but produced an unintended state.
Architecture choices also determine maintainability. A one-off script may be sufficient for a narrow task, while a shared service may need reusable modules, external configuration, secret management, concurrency control, and a stable API of its own. Candidates should be comfortable explaining why a workflow should run synchronously or asynchronously, where state should be stored, and how operators will know when a job partially succeeds. Those decisions separate production automation from a collection of personal tools.
Professional automation work requires more than generating configuration text. Engineers need source control, reusable modules, environment separation, validation, change review, and a way to compare intended and observed state.
Ansible and Terraform for infrastructure automation helps frame two common approaches. One is often used for orchestration and configuration tasks, while the other is oriented around declarative infrastructure state. Strong candidates understand the tradeoff rather than trying to make one tool solve every problem.
Declared state creates a reference point, but it is valuable only when teams understand drift. Changes made manually outside the automation system, software defects, device replacements, and environment-specific constraints can all cause live state to diverge from the repository. Professional workflows detect that divergence and decide whether to reconcile it automatically, flag it for review, or preserve it because the exception is intentional. Blind enforcement can be as risky as unmanaged configuration.
State files and inventories also become sensitive operational assets. They can reveal topology, addresses, object names, or credentials, and corruption can mislead future runs. Teams need access controls, backups, versioning, and safe concurrency. Infrastructure as code therefore joins software engineering with configuration governance: the goal is not merely to generate commands, but to make intended infrastructure transparent, reviewable, and recoverable.
A safe workflow asks what should be true before the change, what should be true afterward, and how the system proves the difference. That may involve tests, digital twins, staged rollouts, telemetry, logs, or controller state.
This is where automation and network assurance meet. The script is not finished when it returns a success code. It is finished when the engineer can show that the service still behaves as intended.
Pre-change checks reduce the chance that a workflow acts on bad assumptions. They can verify reachability, software version, current configuration, available capacity, maintenance-window status, or whether a previous change is still in progress. Post-change checks prove the intended service outcome rather than simply confirming that a configuration request was accepted. A route should be present, a neighbor should be established, a policy should match, or a user path should behave as expected.
Testing should occur at several levels. Unit tests can validate data transformation and decision logic without touching infrastructure. Integration tests can confirm that API clients and platform interfaces behave as expected. Lab or staging environments can expose workflow interactions before production. Professional candidates should be able to choose the smallest test that provides useful confidence and understand that a successful syntax check is not evidence that the network service is correct.
Cisco's current automation curriculum explicitly brings AI into the track. Engineers may use large language models, agents, or model-context tooling to help generate, interpret, or operate automation workflows. Those tools still need boundaries, trusted data, verification, and clear privilege models.
The safest way to think about AI-assisted automation is as another powerful interface into infrastructure. It can accelerate reasoning and repetitive work, but it does not remove the need for deterministic validation and rollback.
AI-assisted tooling can summarize telemetry, generate candidate code, classify incidents, or help operators query complex systems in natural language. Those capabilities are useful when they reduce repetitive analysis, but generated output still needs validation. A model can produce syntactically convincing code that makes a dangerous change, or interpret incomplete telemetry with unwarranted confidence. Professional automation therefore treats AI output as an input to an engineering control process rather than as an autonomous authority.
Good guardrails are familiar automation controls: least-privilege access, explicit change scope, deterministic validation, approval for high-impact actions, audit logs, and rollback. Engineers should also know what data is sent to an AI service and whether that data contains credentials, configuration, customer information, or sensitive topology. The modern skill is not simply using AI; it is integrating AI without weakening the security and reliability standards applied to every other automation component.
300-435 ENAUTO is the enterprise-focused concentration, covering device-level and controller-based automation, operations, and AI in automation. It suits engineers working around enterprise routing, switching, SD-WAN, controllers, and campus infrastructure.
300-635 DCNAUTO takes the same automation mindset into data center networking, where APIs, fabric controllers, infrastructure as code, and operational automation are applied to Cisco data center platforms.
ENAUTO is useful when automation work centers on enterprise controllers, campus and WAN platforms, and device-level workflows. DCNAUTO is aimed at data-center networking, where fabrics, controllers, APIs, policy models, and high-density change create a different operating context. Both concentrations assume the candidate can move between platform-specific objects and the general automation principles established by AUTOCOR.
Concentration study should therefore avoid becoming a vendor-API memorization exercise. Learn the object model and workflows, but keep asking the same professional questions: how is authentication handled, what makes an operation idempotent, what state must be validated before and after a change, what errors can occur, and how will the workflow behave if only half the targets respond? Those questions transfer across platforms and remain useful as APIs evolve.
The former DevNet Associate credential is now CCNA Automation, using the 200-901 exam. That associate path is a sensible starting point for candidates who still need to develop comfort with APIs, scripting, application security, and basic infrastructure automation.
It is not a mandatory prerequisite for CCNP Automation. Experienced automation engineers can begin at the professional level if their background already covers the associate skills.
The associate path is especially useful for engineers who can configure networks manually but have not yet built software habits. It provides practice with Python, REST APIs, structured data, source control, security, and basic infrastructure-as-code ideas before the professional track adds architecture and operational scale. Software developers moving in the opposite direction may need to strengthen networking concepts so that their automation has accurate technical intent.
Experienced practitioners can enter CCNP Automation directly because Cisco does not require the associate credential. Even so, a quick self-assessment is worthwhile. If JSON structures, HTTP authentication, Git workflows, exception handling, or basic network state are unfamiliar, closing those gaps first will make AUTOCOR study more productive. Professional certification assumes those fundamentals are tools, not the primary learning objective.
In 2026, “DevNet Professional” describes the lineage while “CCNP Automation” describes the live certification. Study plans should be based on AUTOCOR and the current concentration structure rather than older DEVCOR-centered material.
Automation now forms its own track among Cisco certifications, and CI/CD pipelines help connect software delivery practices with the repeatable validation and deployment patterns used in infrastructure automation.
Older DevNet Professional content should be classified rather than discarded. API design, Python, source control, application security, testing, and automation principles remain useful. Material centered on the old DEVCOR exam structure, retired concentrations, or outdated product interfaces needs to be mapped carefully to current objectives. This prevents a large library of valid technical knowledge from becoming a misleading exam blueprint.
A strong capstone project is an end-to-end change workflow: read inventory, collect current state, calculate a desired change, generate a reviewable diff, apply the change to a limited target, verify network behavior, record the result, and support rollback. Add tests and clear failure messages. That single project forces the candidate to integrate software development, APIs, infrastructure as code, security, operations, and observability—the same integration that defines the current professional track.
Cisco DevNet Professional certification exam dumps from ExamLabs make it easier to pass your exam. Verified by IT Experts, the Cisco DevNet Professional exam dumps, practice test questions and answers, study guide and video course is the complete solution to provide you with knowledge and experience required to pass this exam. With 98.4% Pass Rate, you will have nothing to worry about especially when you use Cisco DevNet Professional practice test questions & exam dumps to pass.
Please keep in mind before downloading file you need to install Avanset Exam Simulator Software to open VCE files. Click here to download software.
Please fill out your email address below in order to Download VCE files or view Training Courses.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examlabs.com and follow the directions.
